iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
that's not new evidence, just stupid.Attempts to legalize Post-Birth Abortions?!what new evidence can there possibly be for the abortion issue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that's not new evidence, just stupid.Attempts to legalize Post-Birth Abortions?!what new evidence can there possibly be for the abortion issue?
Trump has been TRASHED, NON STOP, 24/7 since the DAY HE WAS ELECTED.
You're right. I poofed the post. I thought for sure I remembered--maybe reprimands?--had something to do with what she said about Israel/Palestine? But I'm not able to find anything.She has? Are you sure?Haven't they censured AOC twice? Doesn't seem to be THAT hard.If they censured the knucklehead it would only need a simple majoritySounded like he crossed a line to me. We need to hold these violent leftists to the same standard they hold us, but I'm not sure how you go about removing someone like this.Schumer always gets close to but doesn't cross that threshold. It's time to censure Schumer at the least or impeach him at most.
It requires a 2/3rds vote of the senate and that will never happen.
.
it goes back to there are some that can't simply say "that was wrong" and let it be from there. they'll take a little of the responsibility to show they're being "fair" then go blame everyone else for the rest.You're the one who tried to spin Schumer's irresponsible remarks so you must think bullshit is fun.You say bullshit he says bullshit then we all go home... wasn’t that funBullshit, Schumer is complaining the Court is not biased in favor of the Democrats. The most political and biased members of the Court are Ginsburg and Sotomayor, and he has no problem with that. No one has heard an honest word out of Chuck in many years.He sees them as political and bias appointees that he doesn't think should have been approved by congress. Unfortunately for chuck, that’s how the pendulum of power swings in our system. He needs to do better and not make outbursts like that. To his credit, he did apologize and correct the recordSchumer is publicly flighting for a policy he believes in, that’s what politicians do. I don’t like that he went Trump style with his rhetoric.... we need to be better than that and not stoop to that level
The question is why did schmukey pick on only these two justices, it takes 5 to get a ruling either way.
.
go play with your toys.Go play your Whut Aboutism game with someone elseBut your orange whore has already violated the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. Your orange whore has already demanded recusal of members of the judicial branch of government.
schumer is the issue here, not trump
Bullshit. The accusation of violating the separation of powers was already made when I responded to it. Schumer's statement actually does not violate the separation of powers. Your whore has done it constantly. You right-wingers are perfectly content to throw female Americans under the bus to appease your cult friends. You think that it is okay to force female Americans to live under the yoke of right-wing "religious" fascism so that you can get what you want.
Hey snowflake. Don't try that denial shit with me.
Tell it to the Senators who are already moving to censure him.
Censuring him for what? You right-wingers have already laid down the rule that anything goes. We Americans can say anything we like, disobey any laws and rules that we don't like, claim anything to be a "sincerely held belief" that excuses us. We are now living by right-wing rules. BTW: Your orange whore already has demanded the recusal of Supreme Court justices.
Easy drama queen. If you’re gonna be that hardline on speech and decorum then your gonna have to apply it to all sides and I don’t think you’re ready for that given the verbal turd slinger we have in the White HouseHe needs to resign from congressAgreed, I never said what chuck did was appropriate discourse. It’s looking now like a PR stunt to get attention to the issue. Either way, he needs to do betterThe SC is not supposed to be a legislative bodySchumer is publicly flighting for a policy he believes in, that’s what politicians do. I don’t like that he went Trump style with his rhetoric.... we need to be better than that and not stoop to that levelFor as long as I can remember liberals were getting their way in the courts and demanded that supreme court rulings were infallible and must never be questionedWhat Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the same
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
according to lefties if the demigods in black robes say abortion, or gay marriage are constitutionally protected then no one can disagree
but now schumer is saying he knows more about the Constitution than the black robes
and making threats against them if they dont follow his orders
its been one in the past when the unelected lib judges discovered constitutional rights that congress didnt know about
but schumer has no business lobbying for any particular ruling by the judicial branch
not to mention make threats if they dont comply
and if he doesent step down he should be expelled
Jokes just show you have nothing to add that's worth shit.Trump has been TRASHED, NON STOP, 24/7 since the DAY HE WAS ELECTED.
Well.. that explains A LOT.
.... and all this time I thought the sumbitch didn't drink or do drugs.![]()
He needs to resign from congressAgreed, I never said what chuck did was appropriate discourse. It’s looking now like a PR stunt to get attention to the issue. Either way, he needs to do betterThe SC is not supposed to be a legislative bodySchumer is publicly flighting for a policy he believes in, that’s what politicians do. I don’t like that he went Trump style with his rhetoric.... we need to be better than that and not stoop to that levelFor as long as I can remember liberals were getting their way in the courts and demanded that supreme court rulings were infallible and must never be questionedWhat Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the same
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
according to lefties if the demigods in black robes say abortion, or gay marriage are constitutionally protected then no one can disagree
but now schumer is saying he knows more about the Constitution than the black robes
and making threats against them if they dont follow his orders
its been one in the past when the unelected lib judges discovered constitutional rights that congress didnt know about
but schumer has no business lobbying for any particular ruling by the judicial branch
not to mention make threats if they dont comply
and if he doesent step down he should be expelled
First off, I’m not a democrat. Second, Trump gets called out on his lies and for the things he says and does just as Chuck deserved to get called out for acting inappropriately with the SCOTUS situation.Trump has been TRASHED, NON STOP, 24/7 since the DAY HE WAS ELECTED. TRASHING people is WHAT YOU DEMOCRATS DO, and you think you can just get away with it NON STOP and NO one is EVER supposed to RESPOND in the SAME MANNER. Yeah, so Trump FIRES BACK and you radical little bubble heads think it's WRONG. He GIVES WHAT HE GETS, and you ass wipes CAN'T STAND IT.Excuses?! What excuses. I said what Schumer said was unacceptable, I called Waters a douche and yes Trump has been the ring leader is disgusting rhetoric for most his life and has brought new lows into our politics. You need to get real man. I’m not breaking news hereBull shit. Trump has NEVER come CLOSE to doing ANYTHING even REMOTELY resembling what Schumer did towards the SC.trump screams at the the judges when he doesn't like the ruling. very true. but i've not heard him make what could be considered a threat to their personal well being.And of course... YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.Not a single threat.
Nothing wrong with disagreeing with court rulings.
Remember Trent Lot? He made a JOKE when Strom Thurman retired and he was GONE, for FAR, FAR LESS... HE WAS GONE.
Schumer should be REMOVED, NOW, PERIOD, END OF STORY. He stood on the STEPS OF THE SUPREME COURT, and POINTED to the court, and CALLED OUT SC JUSTICES BY NAME, and THREATENED THEM.
You ATTEMPTING to downplay this is just another GLARING example of you DEMOCRATS HYPOCRISY and DOUBLE STANDARD. Had a REPUBLICAN just did what Chuckie Cheese did aimed at LEFTIST JUSTICES, THE ENTIRE DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING would be in TOTAL SCORCHED EARTH MELT DOWN MODE, and you know DAMN WELL that's the TRUTH.
but what happens is that goes unchecked and sooner or later someone does the "hold my beer" schtick and takes it up a notch. schumer did in fact do just that and needs to be called out for it by all sides. anyone saying he was right in doing this is wrong.
trump isn't right in what he does either but again - i've not seen him directly threaten the health of a SCOTUS as of yet.
Get freakin' real. You democrats excuses are absolutely PATHETIC as you try and SPIN this.
But the difference is, Trump is RESPONDING to all the DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING TRASHING he gets NON STOP. He has NEVER pulled a STUNT like Schumer just did and EVERYONE knows it, even you LYING sons a bitches.
Ya, GET REAL, and spare me your pathetic SPIN and EXCUSES.
what new evidence can there possibly be for the abortion issue?yep, what's the point? let it happen. it's called a fight. legislation in congress gets changed all the time. why is this any different? New evidence is collected and presented. just like any guilty person in jail. I don't get why people oppose such things. too funny.this is where i think sooner or later we need to come to a consensus and let it go. so i agree that once we've decided it, why take it up again only when you feel you can reverse it? all that means is later when the SCOTUS tilts again, we bring it back and change it. again.Why is the SC hearing a case so similar to one that was decided in Texas a couple years ago? In that one, the SC said no, they couldn't require that, but by the time the decision was made, most of the clinics offering abortion services had closed because the legislation was in limbo.Kavenaugh Thomas and Alito all form their opinions on Roe by virtue of their religion. I mean why would they find a religious exemption to people getting FREE HC via an employer as a basis to challenge covering IUDs. Or employers complaining that the govt mandates all HC plans cover them? If THAT's a right, how come abortion is a right that State's can pass laws making them unattainable unless docs have admitting privileges to hospitals that will NEVER grant the privilege to a doc who openly performs abortions?SC justices don't "vote," as I'm sure you know. I think ALL of them, including Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, call 'em as they see 'em and do their best to keep their opinions out of it. That's their job.
I just think the reaction here is the typical "let's punish the lefties" attitude that comes at every opportunity. No sensible person would consider what he said as a viable threat. No one.
Isn't precedent worth anything any more? Are those opposed to legal abortion challenging the Court with laws that clearly refute its recent decisions? Doesn't the federal law superceed state law if the two contradict? States doing this should be fined, don't you think? It's not like they don't know what the law is. They are simply ignoring it. Man, they fight dirty. Or am I understanding this wrong?
Haha, you gonna apply the same standards to POTUS?I think Roberts public condemnation was appropriate and Chuck handled it the right way by apologizing on the floor of congress and correcting the record.How unacceptable?Excuses?! What excuses. I said what Schumer said was unacceptable, I called Waters a douche and yes Trump has been the ring leader is disgusting rhetoric for most his life and has brought new lows into our politics. You need to get real man. I’m not breaking news hereBull shit. Trump has NEVER come CLOSE to doing ANYTHING even REMOTELY resembling what Schumer did towards the SC.trump screams at the the judges when he doesn't like the ruling. very true. but i've not heard him make what could be considered a threat to their personal well being.
but what happens is that goes unchecked and sooner or later someone does the "hold my beer" schtick and takes it up a notch. schumer did in fact do just that and needs to be called out for it by all sides. anyone saying he was right in doing this is wrong.
trump isn't right in what he does either but again - i've not seen him directly threaten the health of a SCOTUS as of yet.
Get freakin' real. You democrats excuses are absolutely PATHETIC as you try and SPIN this.
censure and demotion from minority leader?
or expulsion?
Not enough and too fucking late. These assholes need an example so maybe they'll learn to control their lying tongues for a change.
the left are insecure in their own selves.Trump has been TRASHED, NON STOP, 24/7 since the DAY HE WAS ELECTED. TRASHING people is WHAT YOU DEMOCRATS DO, and you think you can just get away with it NON STOP and NO one is EVER supposed to RESPOND in the SAME MANNER. Yeah, so Trump FIRES BACK and you radical little bubble heads think it's WRONG. He GIVES WHAT HE GETS, and you ass wipes CAN'T STAND IT.Excuses?! What excuses. I said what Schumer said was unacceptable, I called Waters a douche and yes Trump has been the ring leader is disgusting rhetoric for most his life and has brought new lows into our politics. You need to get real man. I’m not breaking news hereBull shit. Trump has NEVER come CLOSE to doing ANYTHING even REMOTELY resembling what Schumer did towards the SC.trump screams at the the judges when he doesn't like the ruling. very true. but i've not heard him make what could be considered a threat to their personal well being.And of course... YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.Not a single threat.
Nothing wrong with disagreeing with court rulings.
Remember Trent Lot? He made a JOKE when Strom Thurman retired and he was GONE, for FAR, FAR LESS... HE WAS GONE.
Schumer should be REMOVED, NOW, PERIOD, END OF STORY. He stood on the STEPS OF THE SUPREME COURT, and POINTED to the court, and CALLED OUT SC JUSTICES BY NAME, and THREATENED THEM.
You ATTEMPTING to downplay this is just another GLARING example of you DEMOCRATS HYPOCRISY and DOUBLE STANDARD. Had a REPUBLICAN just did what Chuckie Cheese did aimed at LEFTIST JUSTICES, THE ENTIRE DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING would be in TOTAL SCORCHED EARTH MELT DOWN MODE, and you know DAMN WELL that's the TRUTH.
but what happens is that goes unchecked and sooner or later someone does the "hold my beer" schtick and takes it up a notch. schumer did in fact do just that and needs to be called out for it by all sides. anyone saying he was right in doing this is wrong.
trump isn't right in what he does either but again - i've not seen him directly threaten the health of a SCOTUS as of yet.
Get freakin' real. You democrats excuses are absolutely PATHETIC as you try and SPIN this.
But the difference is, Trump is RESPONDING to all the DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING TRASHING he gets NON STOP. He has NEVER pulled a STUNT like Schumer just did and EVERYONE knows it, even you LYING sons a bitches.
Ya, GET REAL, and spare me your pathetic SPIN and EXCUSES.
I did? What did I try and spin them to?You're the one who tried to spin Schumer's irresponsible remarks so you must think bullshit is fun.You say bullshit he says bullshit then we all go home... wasn’t that funBullshit, Schumer is complaining the Court is not biased in favor of the Democrats. The most political and biased members of the Court are Ginsburg and Sotomayor, and he has no problem with that. No one has heard an honest word out of Chuck in many years.He sees them as political and bias appointees that he doesn't think should have been approved by congress. Unfortunately for chuck, that’s how the pendulum of power swings in our system. He needs to do better and not make outbursts like that. To his credit, he did apologize and correct the recordSchumer is publicly flighting for a policy he believes in, that’s what politicians do. I don’t like that he went Trump style with his rhetoric.... we need to be better than that and not stoop to that level
The question is why did schmukey pick on only these two justices, it takes 5 to get a ruling either way.
.
yea, right after you apply your standards evenly to people you don't like.Haha, you gonna apply the same standards to POTUS?I think Roberts public condemnation was appropriate and Chuck handled it the right way by apologizing on the floor of congress and correcting the record.How unacceptable?Excuses?! What excuses. I said what Schumer said was unacceptable, I called Waters a douche and yes Trump has been the ring leader is disgusting rhetoric for most his life and has brought new lows into our politics. You need to get real man. I’m not breaking news hereBull shit. Trump has NEVER come CLOSE to doing ANYTHING even REMOTELY resembling what Schumer did towards the SC.
Get freakin' real. You democrats excuses are absolutely PATHETIC as you try and SPIN this.
censure and demotion from minority leader?
or expulsion?
Not enough and too fucking late. These assholes need an example so maybe they'll learn to control their lying tongues for a change.
So....you are blaming the most successful President in the last 50 years for 'everybody' going 'f*ing stupid'...and you think Trump leaving will solve the problem of 'everybody going f*ing stupid'?The guys a jerk, as a matter of fact, since Trump has taken office, everybody has gone fuckin stupid...can't wait to send Trump packing
![]()
BULLSHIT! Somebody get a rope.I think Roberts public condemnation was appropriate and Chuck handled it the right way by apologizing on the floor of congress and correcting the record.How unacceptable?Excuses?! What excuses. I said what Schumer said was unacceptable, I called Waters a douche and yes Trump has been the ring leader is disgusting rhetoric for most his life and has brought new lows into our politics. You need to get real man. I’m not breaking news hereBull shit. Trump has NEVER come CLOSE to doing ANYTHING even REMOTELY resembling what Schumer did towards the SC.trump screams at the the judges when he doesn't like the ruling. very true. but i've not heard him make what could be considered a threat to their personal well being.And of course... YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.
Remember Trent Lot? He made a JOKE when Strom Thurman retired and he was GONE, for FAR, FAR LESS... HE WAS GONE.
Schumer should be REMOVED, NOW, PERIOD, END OF STORY. He stood on the STEPS OF THE SUPREME COURT, and POINTED to the court, and CALLED OUT SC JUSTICES BY NAME, and THREATENED THEM.
You ATTEMPTING to downplay this is just another GLARING example of you DEMOCRATS HYPOCRISY and DOUBLE STANDARD. Had a REPUBLICAN just did what Chuckie Cheese did aimed at LEFTIST JUSTICES, THE ENTIRE DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING would be in TOTAL SCORCHED EARTH MELT DOWN MODE, and you know DAMN WELL that's the TRUTH.
but what happens is that goes unchecked and sooner or later someone does the "hold my beer" schtick and takes it up a notch. schumer did in fact do just that and needs to be called out for it by all sides. anyone saying he was right in doing this is wrong.
trump isn't right in what he does either but again - i've not seen him directly threaten the health of a SCOTUS as of yet.
Get freakin' real. You democrats excuses are absolutely PATHETIC as you try and SPIN this.
censure and demotion from minority leader?
or expulsion?
It's new evidence of the Left's true overall / final objective but has little to do with the specific case of Roe-V-Wade and the basic Constitutionality of a woman's right to have an abortion.that's not new evidence, just stupid.
esp when their side get offended at anything they think gives them leverage.you mean this?Who knows? Everybody who listened to his apology and explanationI would think he would only have to threaten roberts who along with the 4 liberals would be enoughSchumer is publicly flighting for a policy he believes in, that’s what politicians do. I don’t like that he went Trump style with his rhetoric.... we need to be better than that and not stoop to that levelFor as long as I can remember liberals were getting their way in the courts and demanded that supreme court rulings were infallible and must never be questioned
according to lefties if the demigods in black robes say abortion, or gay marriage are constitutionally protected then no one can disagree
but now schumer is saying he knows more about the Constitution than the black robes
and making threats against them if they dont follow his orders
The question is why did schmukey pick on only these two justices, it takes 5 to get a ruling either way.
.
but who knows what is going on in schumers retarded brain?
"The minority leader admitted that he should not have used the words he did, but then contended that he was “in no way making a threat,” and flipped the situation onto Senate Republicans, accusing the majority of “manufacturing outrage.”"
he should just apologize and shut the fuck up. period. esp when their side get offended at anything they think gives them leverage. hell, you got bent cause you didn't like how trump carries himself and that was a point of debate.
it's all stupid and people need to own it and stop blaming others for their own actions.
period.