james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,802
Creation science presented BOTH sides of the argument and I'll stay on God's side, thank you.That is why it is so obvious that creation "science" is not science.
OTOH, you and your science only presented your side and disregarded the other. Now, you're believing everything because of radiometric decay? It's really stupid. No wonder you tried to bring in the age of the Earth. I mean if the Bible had the age of the Earth, then you could present something to contradict it. But just your presentation has nothing to contradict. I won't argue further as I said my piece and only say that it could be wrong.
I enjoyed what AIG presented. We can ignore radiometric dating.
Last edited: