SCOTUS rejects Trump's Texas lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Either way Joe has been stained, tarred and feathered, a dark cloud will loom forever, never be a legitimate politician.
I guess what Im saying is, good luck :auiqs.jpg:
Joe will have to hang his head in shame. He won by ONLY 7 million votes, and 306 to 232 in the electoral college.
 
Either way Joe has been stained, tarred and feathered, a dark cloud will loom forever, never be a legitimate politician.
I guess what Im saying is, good luck :auiqs.jpg:
Joe will have to hang his head in shame. He won by ONLY 7 million votes, and 306 to 232 in the electoral college.
Hence the fake news about voter fraud that made it to the SCOTUS, with how many people and states behind it, yeah right.
 
Why was Trump only claiming fraud in states he lost?

View attachment 427898
They all flipped after midnight.
So, you’re either a moron or a liar. No other choice.

The mail in votes were counted. You were warned of red and blue mirages on election night. Republican legislatures in these states passed laws that said the mail in ballots could not be counted until the polls closed and the election day ballots were counted.
How many times you gotta hear the same explanation?
The mail in process WS in violation of the US constitution. Never mind that there was no legit verification.
But it’s no longer the US were talking about. My country just lost to the communist states of America.

I suggest you study the constitution.
 
In 2016 the stupid uneducated Moon Bats were butt hurt because their anointed Socialist queen lost in a legitimate election. They put on their pink pussy hats and howled at the sky and made jackasses of themselves.

In 2020 Americans are pissed that the Democrat Dirty Tricks Department stole the election with fraudulent mail in ballots not requiring any ID. A thievery of the American Democracy.

There is a difference. Big damn difference.
 
They’re for you dopes who may feel a little frisky. I Bet they even have special ops folks placed around the country to quickly quell any potential 2A cuntery.

Conservative 2nd amendment types are looking through the washington phone book to find the address for the guy on the supreme court who dismissed the Texas lawsuit.

They can't find him, because Mr. Per Curium, doesn't have a listed phone number.
 
Why was Trump only claiming fraud in states he lost?

View attachment 427898
They all flipped after midnight.
So, you’re either a moron or a liar. No other choice.

The mail in votes were counted. You were warned of red and blue mirages on election night. Republican legislatures in these states passed laws that said the mail in ballots could not be counted until the polls closed and the election day ballots were counted.
How many times you gotta hear the same explanation?
The mail in process WS in violation of the US constitution. Never mind that there was no legit verification.
But it’s no longer the US were talking about. My country just lost to the communist states of America.

I suggest you study the constitution.
I suggest you study the constitution...

“non-legislative changes to state election laws facilitating the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law violates the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution”
 
Why was Trump only claiming fraud in states he lost?

View attachment 427898
They all flipped after midnight.
So, you’re either a moron or a liar. No other choice.

The mail in votes were counted. You were warned of red and blue mirages on election night. Republican legislatures in these states passed laws that said the mail in ballots could not be counted until the polls closed and the election day ballots were counted.
How many times you gotta hear the same explanation?
The mail in process WS in violation of the US constitution. Never mind that there was no legit verification.
But it’s no longer the US were talking about. My country just lost to the communist states of America.

I suggest you study the constitution.
I suggest you study the constitution...

“non-legislative changes to state election laws facilitating the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law violates the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution”
you should take it to court. no one had ever had these colossal insights you demonstrate here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top