SCOTUS: states cannot ban same sex marriage

[paddymurphy]

That's kind of a dodge, a cop out, don't you think? I believe it's quite easy to understand how God must have felt about slavery just as it's equally easy to understand the purpose of the Civil War. Your selective outrage only highlights the need to keep our legal system completely secular.

No. I think I speak Truth. I don't have any outrage but I do have issues I clearly am more concerned about that others.... God spoke clearly about his 2 greatest commands:

1st and foremost, above all else: #1 - LOVE GOD
2nd, #2 - Love you Neighbor as Yourself

This means - not enslaving people, not willfully setting out to hurt people, whether it be by flag, by words (the insulting of persons - be they Liberal or Conservative) etc. A conscientious effort to LOVE, and, part of the LOVING of OTHERS in a Christian's heart is SHARING GOD! Imploring others to live for GOD, because that I #1 (see above).

And comparing adults in a loving committed relationship to someone of the same gender to pedophiles not willfully setting out to hurt those... not insulting them.. loving them? What a hypocrite.

what I am saying is set the ball rolling on moral decay.. .it will continue to roll.....

You are an example of that moral decay.

 

[mdk]

They can proclaim anything they want. Nothing is changed for me. I do not, and will not, accept any 2 gay people as being married. Not ever. I don't care what papers they have, what ceremony they went through, or anything else. Millions of Americans no doubt, think exactly the same.

Who gives a shit if you believe they are married or not! Do you care if I don't believe your marriage is valid? Of course not. Quit crying and take your defeat like a man.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Now that s gotta hurt Fox Viewers...........

 

[Vandalshandle]

I'm more concerned about tooth decay, myself....

that's unfortunate.... but I understand the desire to mock others, it's mean-spirited and results in no good, and that is par for the course....

Par for the course is 72...at least the one I play on.

 

[rightwinger]

Five years from now, people will wonder what the fuss was all about

Yes, winger, now you can pack fudge legally, you and jake can marry and jerk each other off while you take turns posting on this message board.

You seem to be taking the court's ruling well.

the court has allowed 3% of the population to dictate to 97%.

I remember you gassing on endlessly about how you would accept this ruling if it didn't go you way. As I suspected, you're not taking this ruling so well. Oh, by the way, gay people may only 3% of the population but they have the majority of population supporting their right to marry. You'll get over it.

the majority of americans do not support this ruling. But it is the ruling so they will have to accept it and move on. There are more important battles yet to come.

Wrong again...over 60% support the ruling

 

[Bonzi]

Par for the course is 72...at least the one I play on.

deflecting with humor, that's an old and overused trick.. nice try

 

[Hossfly]

Now that s gotta hurt Fox Viewers...........

I can hear it now, "I pledge allegiance to the flag of The Cocksuckers Of America........" I ain't gonna do it.

 

[paddymurphy]

Par for the course is 72...at least the one I play on.

deflecting with humor, that's an old and overused trick.. nice try

But you are so laughable.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The marriage issue is a Trojan Horse.

What this ruling really means is that the Government has expanded the roles of people who will be eligible for entitlements.

All the Debt Serfs and Tax Donkeys must support the Democrat Identity Politics Coalition.

And I say this as someone who doesn't care who marries whom. Marriage shouldn't be the government's business. Entitlements connected with Marriage drag the government into the bedroom. Why the Left wants this intrusion is quite laughable.

I've posted in another thread:
snip:

15 Reasons ‘Marriage Equality’ Is About Neither Marriage Nor Equality
Don't fall for the 'marriage equality' sales pitch. It's a deception.
By Stella Morabito


By Stella Morabito
June 26, 2015








Same-sex marriage is a notion that contains within itself the seeds of its own destruction. I doubt many have thought this through, with the ironic exception of the elites who have been pushing the agenda the hardest.

Most people are weary of it all and going along to get along, especially since dissent has become such a socially expensive proposition, almost overnight. That in itself should deeply concern anyone who values freedom of expression.


Sure, true believers scattered across the land really do think the entire project ends with allowing same-sex couples to marry. Most persist in the blind faith that a federal ban on the standard definition of marriage will have no negative effect on family autonomy and privacy. That’s a pipe dream.

The same-sex marriage agenda is more like a magic bullet with a trajectory that will abolish civil marriage for everyone, and in doing so, will embed central planning into American life. And that, my friends, is the whole point of it. Along with Obamacare, net neutrality, and Common Core, genderless marriage is a blueprint for regulating life, particularly family life.

The Rainbow’s Arc
Unintended consequences usually come about when we are ignorant or maybe lazy about a course of action. But we usually crash land after following an arc of logic, which in this case has gone largely undiscerned and unaddressed in the public square.

Americans are in a fog about how marriage equality will lead to more central planning and thought policing. This is partly because the media and Hollywood only provide slogans to regurgitate while academics and judges push politically correct speech codes to obey.

Let’s explore the fallout of that arc of faulty logic. Included below are some 15 of the gaping holes in the “marriage equality” reasoning that Americans have not thought through.

1. The Kids Are Not All Right

all of it here:
15 Reasons Marriage Equality Is About Neither

That might work for you, but I don't take advice from perverts and I don't play with my rectum either, as hard as that might be fore you to imagine, dear.

 

[paddymurphy]

The marriage issue is a Trojan Horse.

What this ruling really means is that the Government has expanded the roles of people who will be eligible for entitlements.

All the Debt Serfs and Tax Donkeys must support the Democrat Identity Politics Coalition.

And I say this as someone who doesn't care who marries whom. Marriage shouldn't be the government's business. Entitlements connected with Marriage drag the government into the bedroom. Why the Left wants this intrusion is quite laughable.

I've posted in another thread:
snip:

15 Reasons ‘Marriage Equality’ Is About Neither Marriage Nor Equality
Don't fall for the 'marriage equality' sales pitch. It's a deception.
By Stella Morabito


By Stella Morabito
June 26, 2015








Same-sex marriage is a notion that contains within itself the seeds of its own destruction. I doubt many have thought this through, with the ironic exception of the elites who have been pushing the agenda the hardest.

Most people are weary of it all and going along to get along, especially since dissent has become such a socially expensive proposition, almost overnight. That in itself should deeply concern anyone who values freedom of expression.


Sure, true believers scattered across the land really do think the entire project ends with allowing same-sex couples to marry. Most persist in the blind faith that a federal ban on the standard definition of marriage will have no negative effect on family autonomy and privacy. That’s a pipe dream.

The same-sex marriage agenda is more like a magic bullet with a trajectory that will abolish civil marriage for everyone, and in doing so, will embed central planning into American life. And that, my friends, is the whole point of it. Along with Obamacare, net neutrality, and Common Core, genderless marriage is a blueprint for regulating life, particularly family life.

The Rainbow’s Arc
Unintended consequences usually come about when we are ignorant or maybe lazy about a course of action. But we usually crash land after following an arc of logic, which in this case has gone largely undiscerned and unaddressed in the public square.

Americans are in a fog about how marriage equality will lead to more central planning and thought policing. This is partly because the media and Hollywood only provide slogans to regurgitate while academics and judges push politically correct speech codes to obey.

Let’s explore the fallout of that arc of faulty logic. Included below are some 15 of the gaping holes in the “marriage equality” reasoning that Americans have not thought through.

1. The Kids Are Not All Right

all of it here:
15 Reasons Marriage Equality Is About Neither

That might work for you, but I don't take advice from perverts and I don't play with my rectum either, as hard as that might be fore you to imagine, dear.

Then how do you get your head of there?

 

[JimBowie1958]

If you can't discriminate against same sex marriages, then you can't discriminate based on species. Liberals wave Equality flags in jubilant celebration.

How will you get your goat to say I do?

I would have to guess that it would be the same way you do.

 

[candycorn]

Breaking news.

Links later, am traveling.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Nutter heads are exploding all over the country.

Quite possibly.

Pacific Trade Pact
Obamacare
Gay Marriage
Confederate battle flag under heavy scrutiny.

All in one week.

BOOM!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Don't forget the catastrophic natural disasters coming soon to a neighborhood near you. The writing on the wall has been visible the past 6 1/2 years and will now be etched in flaming letters. God help this sick, sorry, depraved country. I pray that Sodom and Gomorrah be visited upon this nation with the harhest punishment. I'm ready to go.

Best Post Ever!!!!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Then how do you get your head of there?

Well most of the rest of us just avoid putting our heads in our rectums, so we don't have that problem. You might try it next time and you wont have to ask such stupid questions.

 

[paddymurphy]

Then how do you get your head of there?

Well most of the rest of us just avoid putting our heads in our rectums, so we don't have that problem. You might try it next time and you wont have to ask such stupid questions.

Your seem so firmly planted up there given the shit you spew here.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Add thinking goats can consent to legal contracts to Stephanie 's long list of retardation symptoms.

Steph, you know if we polled every person on the entire board right now as to.who is the dumbest poster, you win it in a landslide right?

You are being deliberately ignorant or just stupid, take your pick. Libtards have been advancing animal rights and equality for decades now, even giving human rights to animals.

Who are you to say that an animal that is taught to give signals can never give consent? Bahbah can stamp her hooves once for yes, twice for no. By libtard reasoning it can in fact be done.

Oh wow....

Another unhinged conservatard meltsdown!! Lol


Today is awesome.....an easier day than most to weed out the morons you should never attempt to take seriously, for the future

 

[JimBowie1958]

Then how do you get your head of there?

Well most of the rest of us just avoid putting our heads in our rectums, so we don't have that problem. You might try it next time and you wont have to ask such stupid questions.

Your seem so firmly planted up there given the shit you spew here.

Again, that would be called 'projection' on your part.

You shouldn't presume other people have the same perverted practices that you and your butt buddies do.

 

[G.T.]

Add thinking goats can consent to legal contracts to Stephanie 's long list of retardation symptoms.

Steph, you know if we polled every person on the entire board right now as to.who is the dumbest poster, you win it in a landslide right?

You are being deliberately ignorant or just stupid, take your pick. Libtards have been advancing animal rights and equality for decades now, even giving human rights to animals.

Who are you to say that an animal that is taught to give signals can never give consent? Bahbah can stamp her hooves once for yes, twice for no. By libtard reasoning it can in fact be done.

Oh wow....

Another unhinged conservatard meltsdown!! Lol


Today is awesome.....an easier day than most to weed out the morons you should never attempt to take seriously, for the future

Lolol you thought fit to respond to that twice, huh?

Meeeeeelting doooownnnn boohooo

 

[thanatos144]

Yes, and did you know that Dixie-crats of those days are now the Tea Party of today?

Also it was racist Democrats that have attempted to fix the errors of the past ( LBJ, Byrd and their group ) while those like you cling to the past wanting America to stay WASP controlled and denying the minorities any right to be happy in this nation.

really Just Strom Thurman did all of that? Hey idiot he is the only one who switched parties.... Bull Connor Democrat Al Gore Senior democrat LBJ Wallace Democrat Robert Byrd Democrat that was minority and majority leader in the senate for years. You are ignorant as hell it seems.

Awww, being called ignorant by someone like you is a wonderful compliment when you are the dumbest poster on here so far.

Now why is it Dixiecrats like you fear allowing others to have equal rights?

Also as I wrote the racist Democrats like Byrd and LBJ attempted to fix their wrongs from their past, and that flew right over your ignorant ass as usual...

You are living proof what is wrong with the Christian Right and why they ruined the GOP. Those like you condoned laws that prevented interracial marriages. You are the type that would refuse a person to be employed because of his skin color. You are the type that would demand a woman should be barefooted and pregnant in the kitchen and be allowed to beat her daily because she is property to you.

I bet you believe that flying a Dixie Flag is cool and if someone that find it revolting is a Liberal Queer to you, am I correct?

The great thing about today ruling is it end the argument but it will not end those like you from wanting to revert back to the WASP America where you enjoyed denying others the same rights you enjoy.

Son you seem to ignore ACTUAL history for your fairy tales.... There was no
magical party switch. They all but one STAYED IN YOUR PARTY!

Are you really that stupid?

Dixiecrat voters like you left the Democrat party after LBJ signed laws that those like you objected to.

Also dumb ass I am not either DEMOCRAT nor REPUBLICAN and voted for McCain and Romney in the last two elections because I do not support Obama nor his agenda but I am not a close minded buffoon like you longing for the gone days of a WASP America!

Actually, the Dixicrat movement was started by Strom Thurmond in 1948. He and his fellow bigots walked out of the Democratic Convention in response to Harry Truman's efforts to integrate the Armed Forces. Southern Conservative Democrats started to leave the Democrat Party then and even more so after the Civil Rights and Voter's Rights bills were signed in the early 1960s..

Their loyalty ran toward their segregationist ideology more than party identity and Conservatives from the old solid Democratic South have followed suit ever since.

Conservatives have a distinctly difficult time with history and even a harder time understanding the difference between party identity and political ideology.

What a nice myth to bad facts speak otherwise since Thurman left the party the rest of the bigots stayed

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[JimBowie1958]

Add thinking goats can consent to legal contracts to Stephanie 's long list of retardation symptoms.

Steph, you know if we polled every person on the entire board right now as to.who is the dumbest poster, you win it in a landslide right?

You are being deliberately ignorant or just stupid, take your pick. Libtards have been advancing animal rights and equality for decades now, even giving human rights to animals.

Who are you to say that an animal that is taught to give signals can never give consent? Bahbah can stamp her hooves once for yes, twice for no. By libtard reasoning it can in fact be done.

Oh wow....

Another unhinged conservatard meltsdown!! Lol


Today is awesome.....an easier day than most to weed out the morons you should never attempt to take seriously, for the future

Lolol you thought fit to respond to that twice, huh?

Meeeeeelting doooownnnn boohooo

Lol, enjoy your win, perv. It isn't going to last. Nature abhors homosexuality and removes that perversion from itself

 

[G.T.]

Add thinking goats can consent to legal contracts to Stephanie 's long list of retardation symptoms.

Steph, you know if we polled every person on the entire board right now as to.who is the dumbest poster, you win it in a landslide right?

You are being deliberately ignorant or just stupid, take your pick. Libtards have been advancing animal rights and equality for decades now, even giving human rights to animals.

Who are you to say that an animal that is taught to give signals can never give consent? Bahbah can stamp her hooves once for yes, twice for no. By libtard reasoning it can in fact be done.

Oh wow....

Another unhinged conservatard meltsdown!! Lol


Today is awesome.....an easier day than most to weed out the morons you should never attempt to take seriously, for the future

Lolol you thought fit to respond to that twice, huh?

Meeeeeelting doooownnnn boohooo

Add thinking goats can consent to legal contracts to Stephanie 's long list of retardation symptoms.

Steph, you know if we polled every person on the entire board right now as to.who is the dumbest poster, you win it in a landslide right?

You are being deliberately ignorant or just stupid, take your pick. Libtards have been advancing animal rights and equality for decades now, even giving human rights to animals.

Who are you to say that an animal that is taught to give signals can never give consent? Bahbah can stamp her hooves once for yes, twice for no. By libtard reasoning it can in fact be done.

Oh wow....

Another unhinged conservatard meltsdown!! Lol


Today is awesome.....an easier day than most to weed out the morons you should never attempt to take seriously, for the future

Lolol you thought fit to respond to that twice, huh?

Meeeeeelting doooownnnn boohooo

Lol, enjoy your win, perv. It isn't going to last. Nature abhors homosexuality and removes that perversion from itself

Nature? Is that a guy you know?