miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,537
- 2,645
- Banned
- #1
If this is what it appears to be then it's a major win for civil rights. No doubt this was always supported by corrupt politicians and high ranking libercrat cops. Maybe Ginsburg is trying to avoid hell. Or maybe she took up Pascal on his wager.
The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against Policing for Profit
The Supreme Court struck an extraordinary blow for criminal justice reform on Wednesday, placing real limitations on policing for profit across the country. Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime. Rarely does the court hand down a ruling of such constitutional magnitude—and seldom do all nine justices agree to restrict the power that police and prosecutors exert over individuals. The landmark decision represents a broad agreement on the Supreme Court that law enforcement’s legalized theft has gone too far.
The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against Policing for Profit
The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against Policing for Profit
The Supreme Court struck an extraordinary blow for criminal justice reform on Wednesday, placing real limitations on policing for profit across the country. Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime. Rarely does the court hand down a ruling of such constitutional magnitude—and seldom do all nine justices agree to restrict the power that police and prosecutors exert over individuals. The landmark decision represents a broad agreement on the Supreme Court that law enforcement’s legalized theft has gone too far.
The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against Policing for Profit
