Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.
Taxpayers win, sort of...!
The amount of revenue this tax will bring in barely scratches the surface of covering the cost of gun violence in Seattle.
Judge upholds Seattle 'gun violence tax,' dismisses NRA suit
By Associated Press
22 December 2015
<snip>
Between 2006 and 2010, there were on average 131 firearms deaths a year in King County, according to Public Health-Seattle and King County. An additional 536 people required hospitalization for shooting injuries during that time.
Officials say the direct medical costs of treating 253 gunshot victims at Harborview Medical Center in 2014 totaled more than $17 million. Taxpayers paid more than $12 million of that. City officials estimate the new tax would bring in $300,000 to $500,000 a year, but gun shop owners told council members those numbers were inflated. They said the law would cost them customers and sales and could force them to move out of the city.
<snip.
.
It's amazing so many spineless, cowardly progressives think that more laws pertaining to gun violence will help, more laws only help criminals/terrorists.
Facts are stubborn things
It is true that liberal schemes usually produce the opposite outcome from which they say they want, especially when it comes to taxes.It wouldn't, because revenue isn't the point, social engineering is. Gun dealers moving out of the city is precisely what they want.And watch gun dealers move out f Seattle to the suburbs, depriving the city of tax revenue.
AMazingly every attempt to "stilck it" to gun owners falls flat.
Perhaps, but when businesses walk, so does their tax money and jobs. As the article noted, VA is the home of the NRA who may be considering the same thing.
Nobody belives that. Strawman fallacy.It's amazing how many people believe "If the gun shops close, the whole city's gonna die!"
It wouldn't, because revenue isn't the point, social engineering is. Gun dealers moving out of the city is precisely what they want.And watch gun dealers move out f Seattle to the suburbs, depriving the city of tax revenue.
AMazingly every attempt to "stilck it" to gun owners falls flat.
Perhaps, but when businesses walk, so does their tax money and jobs. As the article noted, VA is the home of the NRA who may be considering the same thing.
.
Taxpayers win, sort of...!
The amount of revenue this tax will bring in barely scratches the surface of covering the cost of gun violence in Seattle.
Judge upholds Seattle 'gun violence tax,' dismisses NRA suit
By Associated Press
22 December 2015
<snip>
Between 2006 and 2010, there were on average 131 firearms deaths a year in King County, according to Public Health-Seattle and King County. An additional 536 people required hospitalization for shooting injuries during that time.
Officials say the direct medical costs of treating 253 gunshot victims at Harborview Medical Center in 2014 totaled more than $17 million. Taxpayers paid more than $12 million of that. City officials estimate the new tax would bring in $300,000 to $500,000 a year, but gun shop owners told council members those numbers were inflated. They said the law would cost them customers and sales and could force them to move out of the city.
<snip.
.
.
Taxpayers win, sort of...!
The amount of revenue this tax will bring in barely scratches the surface of covering the cost of gun violence in Seattle.
Judge upholds Seattle 'gun violence tax,' dismisses NRA suit
By Associated Press
22 December 2015
<snip>
Between 2006 and 2010, there were on average 131 firearms deaths a year in King County, according to Public Health-Seattle and King County. An additional 536 people required hospitalization for shooting injuries during that time.
Officials say the direct medical costs of treating 253 gunshot victims at Harborview Medical Center in 2014 totaled more than $17 million. Taxpayers paid more than $12 million of that. City officials estimate the new tax would bring in $300,000 to $500,000 a year, but gun shop owners told council members those numbers were inflated. They said the law would cost them customers and sales and could force them to move out of the city.
<snip.
.
.
Taxpayers win, sort of...!
The amount of revenue this tax will bring in barely scratches the surface of covering the cost of gun violence in Seattle.
Judge upholds Seattle 'gun violence tax,' dismisses NRA suit
By Associated Press
22 December 2015
<snip>
Between 2006 and 2010, there were on average 131 firearms deaths a year in King County, according to Public Health-Seattle and King County. An additional 536 people required hospitalization for shooting injuries during that time.
Officials say the direct medical costs of treating 253 gunshot victims at Harborview Medical Center in 2014 totaled more than $17 million. Taxpayers paid more than $12 million of that. City officials estimate the new tax would bring in $300,000 to $500,000 a year, but gun shop owners told council members those numbers were inflated. They said the law would cost them customers and sales and could force them to move out of the city.
<snip.
.
Allegedly they want fewer guns in the city. But that of course is a pipe dream. What they'll get are fewer guns in the hands of law abiding people and more in the hands of criminals.It wouldn't, because revenue isn't the point, social engineering is. Gun dealers moving out of the city is precisely what they want.And watch gun dealers move out f Seattle to the suburbs, depriving the city of tax revenue.
AMazingly every attempt to "stilck it" to gun owners falls flat.
Because libs are too stupid to recognize the difference.
...gun shop owners told council members those numbers were inflated. They said the law would cost them customers and sales and could force them to move out of the city.