Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Facts or not, you know you can only push your agenda ny preying upon the emotions of the ignorant.You call it emotions, I call it facts.
Facts or not, you know you can only push your agenda ny preying upon the emotions of the ignorant.
Rational, reasoned people will not be swayed by your fallacions appeals to emotions -- and you know it.
Hey....dipshit....since when has a 19 year old been called a child? Or a 17 year old, or a 15 year old, hardened gang member?
Leading causes of child and adolescent death
In 2016, there were 20,360 deaths of people under the age of 19 in the U.S. Firearms were the second most common cause of death.
-----
Rates of death from firearms among ages 14 to 17 are now 22.5% higher than motor vehicle-related death rates. In the U.S., middle and high school age children are now more likely to die as the result of a firearm injury than from any other single cause of death.
For Americans between the ages of 1 and 19, a little over half of 2017 firearm-related deaths are homicides.
There's nothing indefensible about the right to keep ans bear arms, because there's no rational, reasoned argument against it.That aside, I am still right and you are defending the indefensible.
... and they only serve to negate your attempts to prey upon the emotions of the ignorant.The stats are there.,..
Facts or not, you know you can only push your agenda ny preying upon the emotions of the ignorant.
Rational, reasoned people will not be swayed by your fallacions appeals to emotions -- and you know it.
There's nothing indefensible about the right to keep ans bear arms, because there's no rational, reasoned argument against it.
Every gun has a purpose under the 2nd, and is in common use for same.I have never denied there is a right. My point is there are too many guns out there which are not used for their purpose.
Your requirement that a firearm fill some subjective "need" is laughable.Take ak47 etc. Not one person needs a weapon like that.
We get them becaue they are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, and thus, "bearable arms"You get them because the NRA are playing on your fears and emotions.
I'm sporry you don't likethe fact that the right to keep and bear arms includes gun youdon't like, but your opinion on the matter doesn't matter.Don't make me vomit with your pathetic excuses.
Every gun has a purpose under the 2nd, and is in common use for same.
Your requirement that a firearm fill some subjective "need" is laughable.
We get them becaue they are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, and thus, "bearable arms"
I'm sporry you don't likethe fact that the right to keep and bear arms includes gun youdon't like, but your opinion on the matter doesn't matter.
I have never denied there is a right. My point is there are too many gu s out there which are not used for their purpose. Take ak47 etc. Not one person needs a weapon like that. You get them because the NRA are playing on your fears and emotions. You're frightened of a tyrannical government. You need it to protect yourselves from yourselves.
Heard them all before.
Don't make me vomit with your pathetic excuses.
In fact there is no mention of any types in the 2nd.
It's not laughable because most gun owners are testosterone driven. I'm talking about how often assault weapon would be purposefully used in an normal environment. They are pure egotistical toys.
Don't feel sorry for me with your mealy mouthed words. Feel sorry for the parents of those kids at Sandy hook who are suffering because you want assault weapons. you consider the mass slaughter of innocent is the price you pay for your freedom. What a fucking joke. You're brain dead.
You can rattle on forever with your pathetic justifications but nothing will change the fact too many guns are in the hands of idiots and that's why the us is being laughed at.
In fact there is no mention of any types in the 2nd.
It's not laughable because most gun owners are testosterone driven. I'm talking about how often assault weapon would be purposefully used in an normal environment. They are pure egotistical toys.
Don't feel sorry for me with your mealy mouthed words. Feel sorry for the parents of those kids at Sandy hook who are suffering because you want assault weapons. you consider the mass slaughter of innocent is the price you pay for your freedom. What a fucking joke. You're brain dead.
You can rattle on forever with your pathetic justifications but nothing will change the fact too many guns are in the hands of idiots and that's why the us is being laughed at.
You're projecting.You're paranoid, like nearly all RepubliQans today.
By your logic if we impose a speed limit of 55, it's just a step toward lowering it to 5. Slippery slope, right? Nonsense.
Background checks have too many loopholes. There are not provisions for stopping people who are obviously unhinged (cf. Adam Lanza). And really why do you need huge magazines, automatic weapons, and such? For hunting? Yeah right, for hunting Democrats, elected officials, blacks, immigrants, Muslims, gays... right?
Don't think we don't know what you're up to. And don't think you won't run into a brick wall.
Are you on LSD?Mad Jack: "You can have my dildo when you pry it out of my old dead hands."
Put down the baseball bat, your straw man is dead.And yet, you're clueless about the idea that those who don't care about the law don't care about being law abiding gun owners are completely willing to be law-not-abiding gun owners. Gun control laws never stop the criminal; they only stop the law abiding.
When more and more people are on the lists to not buy guns, including vets and anyone who the government doesn't like, you're OK with that, right?
For example, consider that 257,000 military veterans had their gun rights denied when their names were added into NICS because someone else handles their finances. Other decent citizens—such as medical marijuana users, and even those who have unpaid speeding tickets—are also at risk of having their rights denied under H.R. 4434 and S. 2135.
Jordan Stein: Don't 'Fix NICS,' Trash It
Jordan Stein: Anything short of repealing the National Instant Check System (NICS) is the wrong move, both practically and in principle.www.breitbart.com
Veterans unfairly being banned from owning guns
Military veterans make up a large amount of the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), despite the fact they may not be a danger to society.popularmilitary.com
As soon as people like you tell the government it's OK for them to infringe on some people, then it is up to the government to determine upon which people they will infringe.
You show your ignorance and shallow-mindedness when you jump on the anti-gun bandwagon without considering the bigger picture costs to liberty.
As our president might put it...The NRA and pro-gun people have been saying for years that the government should enforce current laws before creating new ones.
Glad the Democrats finally caught on.
Are you on some sort of mind altering chemicals?You don't have much understanding of the Constitution. No right can be stripped, even with due process of the law. Google Supremacy Clause.
Are you suggesting that the government can convict without a trial or jury? Or that, as long as there's a law passed, a person can be charged twice for the same crime?
That's a lieNo; he's generally a gun controller with some mild interest in keeping the guns he approves in the hands of those he approves.
Like I said to Missourian, there's no "except" clause at the end of the Second Amendment. Since he agrees that the government can infringe, the only thing that separates him from David Chipman is the negotiation on which guns to ban and from whom.
You're good at meaningless buzzwords. How about some ideas for ACTUAL LAWS that might help?Again, they are pathetic justifications for the slaughter of kids.
The fact remains, there are too many guns out there because you won't allow restrictions on lunatics. But, that's your right and that's all you've got.
"Arms" unquestionably includes any and all firerams in common use for traditionally lawful purposes; it is impossible for you to soundly argue otherwise.In fact there is no mention of any types in the 2nd
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.It's not laughable because most gun owners are testosterone driven
As they are among the most popular firearms with a vast multituse of legal uses - at least as often as a handgun is used for self-defense.I'm talking about how often assault weapon would be purposefully used in an normal environment.
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.They are pure egotistical toys.
Translation:Don't feel sorry for me with your mealy mouthed words.
There you go again, preying upon the emotions of the ignorant, knowing it is theoinly way you can push your agenda.Feel sorry for the parents of those kids at Sandy hook...
Your statement, above, demonstrates you hae no idea whatseoever how many people are killed with 'assault weapons' in mass shootings.you consider the mass slaughter of innocent is the price you pay for your freedom.
Oh,the irony.What a fucking joke.
See above, in spades.You're brain dead.
Why do you hate the truth?You can rattle on forever with your pathetic justifications
"Arms" unquestionably includes any and all firerams in common use for traditionally lawful purposes; it is impossible for you to soundly argue otherwise.
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.
Thus, your position is not only laughable, but based on a lie.
As they are among the most popular firearms with a vast multituse of legal uses - at least as often as a handgun is used for self-defense.
Thus, "in common use".
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.
Translation:
You got nuthin', and you know it.
There you go again, preying upon the emotions of the ignorant, knowing it is theoinly way you can push your agenda.
What's it like waking up every morning, hoping to hear of a mass shooting, so you'll have an opportunity to push something you know no rational, reasoned person will agree with?
Your statement, above, demonstrates you hae no idea whatseoever how many people are killed with 'assault weapons' in mass shootings.
Oh,the irony.
See above, in spades.
Why do you hate the truth?
