See it with your own eyes.

[gipper]

In essence, we have two right wing parties working in tandem to protect enrich and empower the 1%.

 

[OldFlame]

In essence, we have two right wing parties working in tandem to protect enrich and empower the 1%.

Right, that's why we've moved more and more left with each decade that's gone by.

 

[gipper]

Right, that's why we've moved more and more left with each decade that's gone by.

Absurd. Name all these left wing policies passed in the last 20 years.

 

[otto105]

If you live in a woke city you need to take a long, hard look at your local media. Can these information sources be trusted? Are the local media in the city too closely aligned with World Economic Forum and its plans to undermine the United States with ICLEI and Agenda 21 policies to change the voting demographics of the country?

Did your city broadsheet join a coalition of other newspapers to block the free speech of a former US president saying that his criticism of the press was a threat to democracy. Why would any newspaper join other newspapers to stem free speech? The answer of course is that actual free speech is dangerous to a status quo that has a decidedly socialist agenda and something to hide.

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI: Is "sustainable development" something the American people want?

At 77 years old I have memories of what I was taught in school. One of the key points I recall is that I was told the main difference between democracy and totalitarianism is that in a democracy the press is there to inform the people and regularly investigate the existing power structure to keep it honest. In totalitarian countries the press functions as public relations for the established status quo. The press in authoritarian countries is essentially a propaganda arm of the government.

The instructors I had as a young citizen were survivors of the Great Depression and a world war, and I felt confident that they were telling me the truth. I still believe they gave me useful information. In closed, centrally planned societies like the former Soviet Union and East Germany critics of the government were routinely arrested and charged with crimes against the state. People in those societies would watch as dissidents were jailed along with their supporters, and many would assume state offenders were guilty of serious crimes. After all, the people in power and the subservient press were clearly saying that the troublemakers were trying to overthrow the state. We were told that could never happen here because we have democracy with a vigilant press that would expose it.

Did you see what they did to a former US president who was not part of a cabal to fundamentally change America? These people just substituted the word state for the word democracy and then accused the president of being an existential threat to the state which was now what democracy is all about. In other words, the state, not the people, decides what democracy is. New woke socialism in your city has redefined democracy as something owned exclusively by the state so socialism in now democracy. Do you see how clever that is? This is the same dark verbal virtuosity that was used by the communists in the Cold War.

All you have to do is look around and see what is happening. You need to see it with your own eyes not the distorted lens the state is providing for you.

At 77-years-old can you explain Project 2025 and why trump had so many people involved in its creation.

 

[Billiejeens]

At 77-years-old can you explain Project 2025 and why trump had so many people involved in its creation.

So many equals no one.

No one.

 

[Billiejeens]

Right, that's why we've moved more and more left with each decade that's gone by.

You really can't have a right-left discussion with Gip using US definitions, norms, or scales.

Gip has a fantastical worldview - childlike, I guess, is a good description.

 

[gipper]

You really can't have a right-left discussion with Gip using US definitions, norms, or scales.

Gip has a fantastical worldview - childlike, I guess, is a good description.

You vote for WWIII, but don’t know it.

America spends actually half of the entire planet’s military spending, and I have explained how and why this is done. But the bottom line is that Kamala Harris is one of the persons responsible for it being the case, just as President Biden is, and just as Donald Trump is, and just as Barack Obama is, and just as George W. Bush is, and just as Bill Clinton is. They all are part of the same corruption, which drains money from ALL NON-‘DEFENSE’ SPENDING, even at the same time it causes our nation’s federal debt now to be $35 trillion, which our children and grandchildren will be needing to pay off. Far more than half of all “discretionary” or congressionally budgeted spending by the U.S. Government goes to the military, which is sucking out all of the spending for the things and services that the public needs for their health care, education, social welfare, environment, and infrastructure. Our country is being bled dry by these people — for the benefit of our billionaires, who, basically, fund them.

Obviously, anyone who votes for one of the two Parties’ Presidential candidates is voting for WW3. - Eric Zuesse

 

[Foxfyre]

If you live in a woke city you need to take a long, hard look at your local media. Can these information sources be trusted? Are the local media in the city too closely aligned with World Economic Forum and its plans to undermine the United States with ICLEI and Agenda 21 policies to change the voting demographics of the country?

Did your city broadsheet join a coalition of other newspapers to block the free speech of a former US president saying that his criticism of the press was a threat to democracy. Why would any newspaper join other newspapers to stem free speech? The answer of course is that actual free speech is dangerous to a status quo that has a decidedly socialist agenda and something to hide.

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI: Is "sustainable development" something the American people want?

At 77 years old I have memories of what I was taught in school. One of the key points I recall is that I was told the main difference between democracy and totalitarianism is that in a democracy the press is there to inform the people and regularly investigate the existing power structure to keep it honest. In totalitarian countries the press functions as public relations for the established status quo. The press in authoritarian countries is essentially a propaganda arm of the government.

The instructors I had as a young citizen were survivors of the Great Depression and a world war, and I felt confident that they were telling me the truth. I still believe they gave me useful information. In closed, centrally planned societies like the former Soviet Union and East Germany critics of the government were routinely arrested and charged with crimes against the state. People in those societies would watch as dissidents were jailed along with their supporters, and many would assume state offenders were guilty of serious crimes. After all, the people in power and the subservient press were clearly saying that the troublemakers were trying to overthrow the state. We were told that could never happen here because we have democracy with a vigilant press that would expose it.

Did you see what they did to a former US president who was not part of a cabal to fundamentally change America? These people just substituted the word state for the word democracy and then accused the president of being an existential threat to the state which was now what democracy is all about. In other words, the state, not the people, decides what democracy is. New woke socialism in your city has redefined democracy as something owned exclusively by the state so socialism in now democracy. Do you see how clever that is? This is the same dark verbal virtuosity that was used by the communists in the Cold War.

All you have to do is look around and see what is happening. You need to see it with your own eyes not the distorted lens the state is providing for you.

Those who control the message control everything. The situation began to get noticeably serious in the 1980's when Rush Limbaugh came on the scene and pretty much single handedly created a conservative talk radio industry that was bypassing the talking heads on television and putting out important information that they would not. And Rush immediately vaulted into the No. 1 spot on No. 1 stations all over the country.

Some leftists tried to duplicate the phenomenon but were largely unsuccessful. AIR AMERICA was unable to gain any traction with their uninteresting leftist babble and could not be financially sustained. Probably the most successful leftist on the radio was Alan Colmes, a Fox News affiliate, but he couldn't come close to pulling Rush's huge audience plus that of numerous other lesser but popular radio personalities.

But for the first time the left actively organized to vilify, demonize, discredit, attack Rush in any way they could think up to do that. And that was the first time I began to realize that something sinister and evil was happening. For the first time I witnessed an organized effort to shut down political opposition. Little did I know then how serious and truly oppressive and dangerous that effort would become.

 

[leftwinger]

It could get this bad.....in fact for poor J6 folks and Trump + his co-workers it already IS as bad as over in England below following the slaughter of three little girls (and two adults?) by a knife weilding African *******************

A 61-year-old Sutton man was sentenced to 18 months in prison for attending an anti-immigrant protest and screaming, “Who the f*** is Allah?” at police.

David Spring, a retiree who takes care of his ailing wife apologized to the court after he was sentenced this week.

Spring and several hundred protesters took to the streets after three little girls were murdered by a man with African roots whose parents moved to the UK years ago.

Protests broke out across England following the the mass murder of the little girls.

************the days of telling the truth, using common sense.....may be coming to an end. I only hope the punishments are not retroactive or I am a dead man.

 

[gipper]

Those who control the message control everything. The situation began to get noticeably serious in the 1980's when Rush Limbaugh came on the scene and pretty much single handedly created a conservative talk radio industry that was bypassing the talking head on television. Some leftists tried to duplicate the phenomenon but were largely unsuccessful with AIR AMERICA unable to gain any traction with their uninteresting leftist babble and could not be financially sustained. Probably the most successful leftist on the radio was Alan Colmes but he couldn't come close to pulling Rush's huge audience plus that of numerous other lesser but popular radio personalities.

But for the first time the left actively organized to vilify, demonize, discredit, attack Rush in any way they could think up to do that. And that was the first time I began to realize that something sinister and evil was happening. For the first time I witnessed an organized effort to shut down political opposition. Little did I know then how serious and truly oppressive and dangerous that effort would become.

You do know Israel controls our government and hence the corporate media, yet you still believe them.

 

[jc456]

No they promoted corporatism, oligarchs, and the State just as they do today.

he agreed with you, he explained he didn't get back then. experience helped him.

 

[Theowl32]

If you live in a woke city you need to take a long, hard look at your local media. Can these information sources be trusted? Are the local media in the city too closely aligned with World Economic Forum and its plans to undermine the United States with ICLEI and Agenda 21 policies to change the voting demographics of the country?

Did your city broadsheet join a coalition of other newspapers to block the free speech of a former US president saying that his criticism of the press was a threat to democracy. Why would any newspaper join other newspapers to stem free speech? The answer of course is that actual free speech is dangerous to a status quo that has a decidedly socialist agenda and something to hide.

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI: Is "sustainable development" something the American people want?

At 77 years old I have memories of what I was taught in school. One of the key points I recall is that I was told the main difference between democracy and totalitarianism is that in a democracy the press is there to inform the people and regularly investigate the existing power structure to keep it honest. In totalitarian countries the press functions as public relations for the established status quo. The press in authoritarian countries is essentially a propaganda arm of the government.

The instructors I had as a young citizen were survivors of the Great Depression and a world war, and I felt confident that they were telling me the truth. I still believe they gave me useful information. In closed, centrally planned societies like the former Soviet Union and East Germany critics of the government were routinely arrested and charged with crimes against the state. People in those societies would watch as dissidents were jailed along with their supporters, and many would assume state offenders were guilty of serious crimes. After all, the people in power and the subservient press were clearly saying that the troublemakers were trying to overthrow the state. We were told that could never happen here because we have democracy with a vigilant press that would expose it.

Did you see what they did to a former US president who was not part of a cabal to fundamentally change America? These people just substituted the word state for the word democracy and then accused the president of being an existential threat to the state which was now what democracy is all about. In other words, the state, not the people, decides what democracy is. New woke socialism in your city has redefined democracy as something owned exclusively by the state so socialism in now democracy. Do you see how clever that is? This is the same dark verbal virtuosity that was used by the communists in the Cold War.

All you have to do is look around and see what is happening. You need to see it with your own eyes not the distorted lens the state is providing for you.

I started another thread based on this scene. Just watch this clip please and see how things are and have been run.

First want to point out this has indeed been going since before any of us have been born, including you.

The country was never supposed to be a democracy. The word democracy doesn't appear in the Constitution nor Declaration of Independence.

This was pushed on us by world globalists with the expressed intention of turning the country into a demogoguery.


Here is the scene, please watch.

 

[buttercup]

We have a ruling class who is comprised of elites and very wealthy individuals. They support the crony capitalist unfair system that has given them power and wealth. They fear anyone who demands the system be changed.
We see Rs and cons claiming Kamala is a progressive or communist. This is absurd on its face. She supports the status quo and is almost entirely funded by the extreme wealthy. She’s certainly not on the left. She fits in more so on the right. She will spout off on cultural issues or criticizing billionaires to make it appear she’s on the left. She’ll do nothing that could be consider left, just like O and Genocide Joe.

It's like you didn't read anything I said, lol.

Yes, of course we have a ruling class comprised of very wealthy individuals. And yes, of course they support crony capitalism.

But cronyism / corporatism is actually collectivist. It's obviously not the same as free market capitalism. In fact, although I'm not an expert, I would say it goes in the exact opposite direction.

Again, you keep using the words "left" and "right"... As I just said, because people have different definitions in mind when it comes to those words, it's very misleading to use them.

Instead of using the words left or right, I would say Kamala is a statist and globalist. And the type of system the globalists want is collectivist, in other words, they don't care about the rights of the individual. And those at the top decide what they think is best for everyone. (The "greater good" is a load of BS, we can see that by looking at totalitarian systems that are rooted in collectivism....those in control of it at the very top always live like kings while everyone else is miserable.)

I hope I'm being clear here. And if you didn't, I hope you watch that first video I posted. He goes into all of this and if you watch the other parts of the same talk, he goes into it all in depth.

 

[jc456]

It could get this bad.....in fact for poor J6 folks and Trump + his co-workers it already IS as bad as over in England below following the slaughter of three little girls (and two adults?) by a knife weilding African *******************

A 61-year-old Sutton man was sentenced to 18 months in prison for attending an anti-immigrant protest and screaming, “Who the f*** is Allah?” at police.

David Spring, a retiree who takes care of his ailing wife apologized to the court after he was sentenced this week.

Spring and several hundred protesters took to the streets after three little girls were murdered by a man with African roots whose parents moved to the UK years ago.

Protests broke out across England following the the mass murder of the little girls.

************the days of telling the truth, using common sense.....may be coming to an end. I only hope the punishments are not retroactive or I am a dead man.

 

[leftwinger]

At 77-years-old can you explain Project 2025 and why trump had so many people involved in its creation.

Trump had nothing to do with Heratige foundation PJCT 2025. I took a look at it and it is a vauge monster list of this and that in language I am not smart enough to understand. I got not time to figure out even one page of one chapter. It was complicated and no specifics.


So nice try with your CNN MSLSD pablum you big dumb Baby. Get off the boards posting nonsese you have no idea about.//

 

[jc456]

Trump had nothing to do with Heratige foundation PJCT 2025. I took a look at it and it is a vauge monster list of this and that in language I am not smart enough to understand. I got not time to figure out even one page of one chapter. It was complicated and no specifics.


So nice try with your CNN MSLSD pablum you big dumb Baby. Get off the boards posting nonsese you have no idea about.//

it's 900 pages, so demofks in here think they read all of it!!!hahahaahahahahahahahaha

 

[Foxfyre]

You do know Israel controls our government and hence the corporate media, yet you still believe them.

Do you really have no clue how ignorant your post looks?

 

[Billiejeens]

You vote for WWIII, but don’t know it.

America spends actually half of the entire planet’s military spending, and I have explained how and why this is done. But the bottom line is that Kamala Harris is one of the persons responsible for it being the case, just as President Biden is, and just as Donald Trump is, and just as Barack Obama is, and just as George W. Bush is, and just as Bill Clinton is. They all are part of the same corruption, which drains money from ALL NON-‘DEFENSE’ SPENDING, even at the same time it causes our nation’s federal debt now to be $35 trillion, which our children and grandchildren will be needing to pay off. Far more than half of all “discretionary” or congressionally budgeted spending by the U.S. Government goes to the military, which is sucking out all of the spending for the things and services that the public needs for their health care, education, social welfare, environment, and infrastructure. Our country is being bled dry by these people — for the benefit of our billionaires, who, basically, fund them.

Obviously, anyone who votes for one of the two Parties’ Presidential candidates is voting for WW3. - Eric Zuesse

I've clearly explained that this is not the right country for you.

 

[gipper]

I've clearly explained that this is not the right country for you.

It’s not right for anyone including you, but you haven’t figured that out yet.

 

[Billiejeens]

It’s not right for anyone including you, but you haven’t figured that out yet.

It is fine for me
I'm not a lunatic like you.