Senate confirms DOJ nominee Kristen Clarke with just one Republican vote

About damn time she got confirmed, with just one Republican vote no doubt.

Now we'll have an actual functional Civil Rights Department.


Thank you Sleepy Joe!


She sounds like she will do a good job.

I'm glad she was confirmed.
 
The Rs attacked poor little O. Too bad. He couldn’t get anything done because of the Rs. That’s absurd.
No doubt you give the same excuse for Don’s failures, since no potus was more attack then him. Right?
You’re no different than a Trumper. You love your guy no matter what.
Trump had a lemming party in full lockstep with him.

Obama got us back on track after Bush II damn near destroyed the country.

BTW, are you suggesting that Trumpers are bad?
He didn’t get us back on track after W, but that is the establishment’s propaganda and you accepted it. He spent massively, blowing up the national debt, yet offered no progressive policies. He enriched the rich while taking the homes of the poor. He took two wars and made it seven.

AWFUL!

Trumpers and Obamabots are bad and they are very much alike, just like the two criminal parties.
 
Last edited:
why is that marc?....was it because you didnt agree with her?....
Well, let's see how truly stupid you are.

Was the Bush II Administration a success, or a failure?
once again not answering a question you dont like....we were talking about condoleeza rice not the bush admin marc....when you get around to answering what i asked you i will give you an answer to your question...until then keep on dancing....
 
I agree. Now for the moment of truth, is Obama a colossal failure?
Nope. He could have and should have done more, but the Republicans attacked him non-stop from before he stepped one foot in Office.

Just hold your L like a man dude.
now you know how the trump people felt.....the Democrats attacked him non-stop from before he stepped one foot in Office.
 
now you know how the trump people felt.....the Democrats attacked him non-stop from before he stepped one foot in Office.
Why didn't you say "Marc, I now understand how Obama people felt", considering that it happened before Trump's time?
 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
Just once again demonstrating that he is unwilling to even attempt to defend his own arguments, his mode goes like this:

TROLLISH PROVACATIVE ASSERTIONS

--- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

WEAK ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT

-- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

HASTY RETREAT

This thread was just a continuation of an ongoing experiment to see how consistently the rat will press the button when subjected to the same stimuli, so far he's batting 1000%.
 
About damn time she got confirmed, with just one Republican vote no doubt.

Now we'll have an actual functional Civil Rights Department.


Thank you Sleepy Joe!
How is the Civil Rights Department “functional” given the constant barrage of civil rights complaints assaulting the air waves? Are they all going to go away now that we’ve confirmed this bureaucrat ? What new and wonderful things can we expect? I mean other than an ever higher price tag.

.. and how many Democrat votes did each of Donny’s nominees receive, I must of missed that torrent of Bi-Partisan cooperation when he was trying to get the positions in his administration filled, enlighten me.
Well, there will be a slightly different focus. LOL
 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
Just once again demonstrating that he is unwilling to even attempt to defend his own arguments, his mode goes like this:

TROLLISH PROVACATIVE ASSERTIONS

--- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

WEAK ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT

-- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

HASTY RETREAT

This thread was just a continuation of an ongoing experiment to see how consistently the rat will press the button when subjected to the same stimuli, so far he's batting 1000%.
why should he bother, fox. Your post was barely above a trolling effort.
 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
Just once again demonstrating that he is unwilling to even attempt to defend his own arguments, his mode goes like this:

TROLLISH PROVACATIVE ASSERTIONS

--- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

WEAK ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT

-- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

HASTY RETREAT

This thread was just a continuation of an ongoing experiment to see how consistently the rat will press the button when subjected to the same stimuli, so far he's batting 1000%.
why should he bother, fox. Your post was barely above a trolling effort.
LOL, since when did challenging someone to defend their assertions become a "trolling effort"?

It's no wonder so many left wingers around here can't formulate an argument based on reason and evidence to save their lives and can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag, they get offended when anyone deigns to challenge them to defend their assertions, all they want is an ECHO CHAMBER.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." -- William F. Buckley
 
About damn time she got confirmed, with just one Republican vote no doubt.

Now we'll have an actual functional Civil Rights Department.


Thank you Sleepy Joe!

I advocate for defunding policing operations that have made African Americans more vulnerable to police violence and contributed to mass incarceration, while investing more in programs and policies that address critical community needs.”

Kristen Clarke is another misguided radical who supported the Socialist Democrat failed 'Defund The Police' policy that has resulted in skyrocketing violence and murder rates in Democrat-run cities. This alone disqualifies her for the job.




First, she said that she “did not have a speaking or other substantive role” at a controversial conference at which black radicals lauded several notorious cop-killers, such as Philadelphia’s Mumia Abu-Jamal. Ross, however, found the official conference itinerary, which listed Clarke as a moderator (a direct participant in the presentation, or, in short, a “speaker”) for a panel that included a top advocate for Abu-Jamal.

Second, Clarke told the Senate that she did not serve alongside Marxist, anti-Semitic poet Amiri Baraka on the staff of a journal on black studies. The truth is that she and Baraka together were, respectively, an “assistant editor” and a “contributing editor” for eight full issues.

Enough discrepancy was found in her testimony under oath to give legitimate pause in voting for her.



"...for the Department of Justice, the only thing worse than an anti-police radical is an anti-police radical who lies repeatedly under oath about both aspects of that radicalism."


As violence explodes across the country n the wake of the Democrats' 'Defund The police' crusade against lsw enforcement officers, the last thing the DOJ needs is someone who villainizes the police and seeks to tie their hands even more....IMHO.
 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
Just once again demonstrating that he is unwilling to even attempt to defend his own arguments, his mode goes like this:

TROLLISH PROVACATIVE ASSERTIONS

--- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

WEAK ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT

-- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

HASTY RETREAT

This thread was just a continuation of an ongoing experiment to see how consistently the rat will press the button when subjected to the same stimuli, so far he's batting 1000%.
why should he bother, fox. Your post was barely above a trolling effort.
LOL, since when did challenging someone to defend their assertions become a "trolling effort"?

It's no wonder so many left wingers around here can't formulate an argument based on reason and evidence to save their lives and can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag, they get offended when anyone deigns to challenge them to defend their assertions, all they want is an ECHO CHAMBER.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." -- William F. Buckley
Since when did failing to be even marginally informed give a poster reason to question.

 
You answer my questions first and THEN I'll answer yours, after all you have yet to make even a tiny effort to defend your own OP.

Sucks when someone challenges you to support your own assertions, huh? :cool:
To investigate and prosecute (if necessary) instances of civil rights violations nationwide.

It hasn't been functional under the last corrupt Administration on purpose.

Trump had no interest in keeping the law, nor being fair or partial.

What was your "challenge" exactly?
Do you not understand the questions I asked? or do you have some sort of reading disfunction, like perhaps selective reading that prevents you from comprehending questions that force you to deviate from the script you've generated in your head?

You still haven't answered them, color me shocked.

BTW just so you know, it's a DIVISON (of the DEPARTMENT of Justice) not a DEPARTMENT, apparently when you had to Google what it's functions are you missed that detail.

Thanks in advance for your attention to detail going forward.

:popcorn:
Enough NightFox you have humiliated and emasculated MarcATL

The fight is over, no need to keep pounding on him.
Just once again demonstrating that he is unwilling to even attempt to defend his own arguments, his mode goes like this:

TROLLISH PROVACATIVE ASSERTIONS

--- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

WEAK ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT

-- CHALLENGED TO DEFEND ASSERTIONS

HASTY RETREAT

This thread was just a continuation of an ongoing experiment to see how consistently the rat will press the button when subjected to the same stimuli, so far he's batting 1000%.
why should he bother, fox. Your post was barely above a trolling effort.
LOL, since when did challenging someone to defend their assertions become a "trolling effort"?

It's no wonder so many left wingers around here can't formulate an argument based on reason and evidence to save their lives and can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag, they get offended when anyone deigns to challenge them to defend their assertions, all they want is an ECHO CHAMBER.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." -- William F. Buckley
Since when did failing to be even marginally informed give a poster reason to question.

ROFLMAO! Are you for real? Or is defending assertions incumbent on someone OTHER than the person making them where you come from?

I think it's very gallant of you rush to his defense, perhaps he should hire you as his spokesperson.

:popcorn:
 
It will be open season on whites. But then again as a piece of ghetto trash far Left scumbag you support that.
Can you describe what you mean by "open season on whites" and how you came to that conclusion?
 

Forum List

Back
Top