Senate Impeachment Trial Thread.

I feel like I'm watching a washed up professor at college drone on and on about nothing of importance just so he can hear himself talk. I can't imagine this is going over very well with a faction of voters who can only absorb short soundbites.

It ought to require a prescription. Or at least a warning against listening and operating machinery.
 
thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/gop-senator-john-barrasso-says-he-saw-blood-drain-from-schiffs-face-when-trumps-defense-team-played-video-of-fake-call-and-transcript/

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) says he saw blood drain from Adam Schiff’s face when Trump’s lawyers confronted him about his fake call and transcript.

Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura opened the White House defense of President Donald Trump with video of Adam Schiff’s fake call and transcript he read during the House impeachment proceedings.

Mike Purpura played the video immediately after taking the podium on Saturday.

And there Schiff was lying his face off for the whole world to see.

Schiff completely fabricated transcript of Trump’s phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his opening statement in the House hearings.

On Saturday, Trump’s lawyers confronted the serial liar in person, making the blood drain from his face.
Starr is now pointing out that every Subpoena issued before HR 660 passed was illegal, and not only that, Pelosi had an obligation to respond to court challenges to those Subpoenas and knew that, but neglected to, and then turned a legal court challenge against illegal subpoenas in to a fake crime called "Obstruction of Congress" which appears no where in US Code.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
1998 has zero to do with your Dimwingers not having a case.
 
Starr is now pointing out that every Subpoena issued before HR 660 passed was illegal, and not only that, Pelosi had an obligation to respond to court challenges to those Subpoenas and knew that, but neglected to, and then turned a legal court challenge against illegal subpoenas in to a fake crime called "Obstruction of Congress" which appears no where in US Code.

Dem's have been ignoring the law and U.S. Constitution for years so I'm not surprised. Dems do whatever the hell they feel like the law be damned. The Dem position is take us to court and force us to obey the law and Constitution.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.

It's not going to backfire. It's going to hurt Trump and the Repubs. Bigly.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.

It's not going to backfire. It's going to hurt Trump and the Repubs. Bigly.
It already has backfired. You are just too big of a hack to realize it.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
1998 has zero to do with your Dimwingers not having a case.

The Democrats have a good case. The Trump defense is to say, "Unh-uh" and block witnesses. The Unh-uh Defense - a staple of two-year cookie thieves for as long as there have been cookies.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
We know that. We pointed this out long ago. And there they had actual statutory crimes and The President still was not removed. Here they don't even have statutory crimes. They deserve what is coming and they deserve it good and hard.

SHAMPEACHMENT: Dem wavering on impeachment? Manchin signals he’s open to Trump defense argument.

Bipartisan exoneration roaring down the pike!

Manchin told Fake News CNN's Manu Raju he thought the lawyers did a "good job."

"One thing that stuck in my mind is they said there isn't a witness they have had so far that had direct contact with the president,"​
 
Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
1998 has zero to do with your Dimwingers not having a case.

The Democrats have a good case. The Trump defense is to say, "Unh-uh" and block witnesses. The Unh-uh Defense - a staple of two-year cookie thieves for as long as there have been cookies.
The fact you are too stupid to understand why the subpoenas issued by the House were invalid is hilarious.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.

It's not going to backfire. It's going to hurt Trump and the Repubs. Bigly.

You keep thinking that. Right up until the tsunami of the 2020 Trump relection completely wipes your dumb asses out and your party becomes nothing but a footnote in the history books.
 
I would guess it's because only 17 transcripts were included in the House Report. OE says it was a 'briefing'(intel), rather than witness testimony. I don't know that technically, but OE is reliable. At any rate, unless it's classified, Ratcliffe is free to show it to us. If it is classified, we won't know if Ratcliffe is lying about it or not.

Thanks.

Schiff reportedly designated Atkinson’s testimony as a “briefing,” which allowed him to make what Atkinson said classified and makes it so Republicans in the Senate cannot use what he said in their defense of the president.​
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.

It's not going to backfire. It's going to hurt Trump and the Repubs. Bigly.
Wish-casting. We'll see.
 
You gotta admire Starr's chutzpah - he rushed his Porn Report out 60 days before an election, and now, in somnolescent lament, he frets over politicized impeachment.

Starr had been investigating for 4 years, so how the hell to you get that he "rushed"? And 1998 was a mid term election, not a Presidential election year.

Oops......and Oops.............

Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
They deserve to have it backfire on them.

We've had enough: Hold the FBI accountable for spying on Trump’s campaign.

It's not going to backfire. It's going to hurt Trump and the Repubs. Bigly.

You keep thinking that. Right up until the tsunami of the 2020 Trump relection completely wipes your dumb asses out and your party becomes nothing but a footnote in the history books.
He's probably take the House to, with Liz Cheney taking the Speaker's Gavel.
 
thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/gop-senator-john-barrasso-says-he-saw-blood-drain-from-schiffs-face-when-trumps-defense-team-played-video-of-fake-call-and-transcript/

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) says he saw blood drain from Adam Schiff’s face when Trump’s lawyers confronted him about his fake call and transcript.

Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura opened the White House defense of President Donald Trump with video of Adam Schiff’s fake call and transcript he read during the House impeachment proceedings.

Mike Purpura played the video immediately after taking the podium on Saturday.

And there Schiff was lying his face off for the whole world to see.

Schiff completely fabricated transcript of Trump’s phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his opening statement in the House hearings.

On Saturday, Trump’s lawyers confronted the serial liar in person, making the blood drain from his face.
Starr is now pointing out that every Subpoena issued before HR 660 passed was illegal, and not only that, Pelosi had an obligation to respond to court challenges to those Subpoenas and knew that, but neglected to, and then turned a legal court challenge against illegal subpoenas in to a fake crime called "Obstruction of Congress" which appears no where in US Code.
Just took a look at their faces after Seklow showed The Pen Celebration, and Schiff and Company looked very concerned and like they wanted to hide.
 
Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
1998 has zero to do with your Dimwingers not having a case.

The Democrats have a good case. The Trump defense is to say, "Unh-uh" and block witnesses. The Unh-uh Defense - a staple of two-year cookie thieves for as long as there have been cookies.
The fact you are too stupid to understand why the subpoenas issued by the House were invalid is hilarious.
I know this one. Because Pelosi, Bug-eyed Schiff and Fat Jerry don't PERSONALLY hold impeachment power, the House as a body does. We covered this at the time, and we were right.
 
Do you know why everyone worried, claimed, or predicted impeachment would backfire on the Democrats?
Absolutely. Dimwingers have no case.

Next?

It's because it backfired on the Repubs in 1998. They expected to pick up a lot of seats, and wound up losing a few. It led to Gingrich's resignation. You could look it up.
1998 has zero to do with your Dimwingers not having a case.

The Democrats have a good case. The Trump defense is to say, "Unh-uh" and block witnesses. The Unh-uh Defense - a staple of two-year cookie thieves for as long as there have been cookies.
The fact you are too stupid to understand why the subpoenas issued by the House were invalid is hilarious.

Maybe it's simply because they weren't issued by the house at all. And that's the whole point in a nutshell. The speaker isn't the house nor are individual committees. They are merely of the house. It takes the entire house voting and approving before sopenas are legitimate and even then they'd have to go to court if executive privilege comes into play.
 
How in the world can anyone have a serious discussion about serious issues with all the name calling and personal attacks. Ridiculous.
 

Forum List

Back
Top