Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She’s right – you people elect morons; this proposed ‘legislation’ is proof of that.No, Americans have the right to hide in their homes if they are afraid of getting a cold.
Americans have a right to spread a deadly infection if they want to
Cruz is really stupid..Texas was really hard hit by polio and encephalitis from 1947 to 1954.
San Angelo was center of polio epidemic in summer of 1949
In the summer of 1949, San Angelo was a city caught in the grip of fear over the worst polio epidemic in the town’s history.www.gosanangelo.com
Why do you elect such morons?
Says a Biden person? Seriously?
Not the natural result of having the government intrude even more into our private lives.Americans have a right to spread a deadly infection if they want to
HR 227 and HR 1808. Aren't you paying attention?What bill is in the works that would confiscate all your guns?A few years ago there weren't any gun confiscation laws in the works, either. Yet, here we are.We just want to live. To breathe. To walk and drive without someone telling us that we can not do that. To survive. To take care of our children without someone taking the from us for the great state. To sit down with the family no matter how messed up at a dinner without the arbiters of government in control is so good to imagine. To split a bottle of wine with the wife without a prog rule and law invasive to it is so much of freedom. I go to the airport and experience the prog loved tsa and airline flight attendants extremist authoritarian ways and you love it. Until you live it. So just what I typed. Make it better. Repubs want it better to.Looks like yet another solution in search of a problem. The Republicans are getting good at this.Three U.S. Senators introduced legislation on Friday to ban the federal government from establishing coronavirus passports related to individual’s immunization status.
U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Braun (R-IN), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced the bill, which also prohibits the federal government from being able to work with third parties to establish immunization passports.
Cruz said that “Americans shouldn’t be discriminated against because of” their immunization status, “whether that is at work or in everyday life.”
“Americans have a well-established right to privacy that any mandated” immunization passport “would destroy,” Cruz said, adding that it “would be discriminatory against people who, for whatever reason, do not get” it.
Sanity.
Again. A solution in search of a problem.
And for all that - you have no problem with the government interfering in a women's liberty, or a mother's ability to get treatment for her child, or two men who want to marry. It's kind of ala carte isn't it?
There is no "vaccine passport" in the legislative works. So why is this law needed? I know why - it's political virtue signalling. Looks good to the electorate.
In this case, the Republicans are being proactive to Leftist stupidity.
None.
Sick Leftist Fvcks are incapable of thinking ...I’m thinking Social Outcasts
Barred from employment, unable to attend public events, excluded from social events
Yep....All for a virus that has a 99+% survival rate? You are a fucking idiot.
I realize that, but the government doesn't have unlimited authority to "keep us safe".What you ignore is that the harm from personal recklessness goes beyond the individual. It impacts the persons family, as well as himself who may because of it become public charges.Yes, I am opposed to seatbelt laws. If someone chooses not to wear a seatbelt, that's their decision.
Conservatives truly are lying scum.Again, nobody gives a shit about what you would or wouldn't do. That's EXACTLY how you should feel about us. Go fuck yourself and leave us alone.
But they do have a limited authority to act in the name of public health. It's no different than mandating sanitation standards for restaurants to prevent the spread of disease for example. It's not a new role, it just happens it became hyper politicized.I realize that, but the government doesn't have unlimited authority to "keep us safe".What you ignore is that the harm from personal recklessness goes beyond the individual. It impacts the persons family, as well as himself who may because of it become public charges.Yes, I am opposed to seatbelt laws. If someone chooses not to wear a seatbelt, that's their decision.
It's just fodder for the base - scare them into believing there is some sort of vaccine passport plan going on (probably involving Illuminatti right?) and the provide a solution.Conservatives truly are lying scum.Again, nobody gives a shit about what you would or wouldn't do. That's EXACTLY how you should feel about us. Go fuck yourself and leave us alone.
Rightists are being ‘left alone’ – no measures are being proposed to authorize a ‘vaccination passport,’ that’s just a rightwing lie; and Cruz’s idiotic ‘legislation’ is just as dishonest and unnecessary.
This is a lie.A few years ago there weren't any gun confiscation laws in the works, either. Yet, here we are.
In this case, the Republicans are being proactive to Leftist stupidity.
Correct.It's just fodder for the base - scare them into believing there is some sort of vaccine passport plan going on (probably involving Illuminatti right?) and the provide a solution.
What bill is in the works that would confiscate all your guns?
None.
HR 227 and HR 1808. Aren't you paying attention?
www.c-span.org
You couldn't be more wrong:This is a lie.A few years ago there weren't any gun confiscation laws in the works, either. Yet, here we are.
In this case, the Republicans are being proactive to Leftist stupidity.
There have never been gun ‘confiscation’ laws – proposed or otherwise.
Clearly stupidity is the sole purview of the right, as is dishonesty.
Limited authority. Where do YOU draw the line?But they do have a limited authority to act in the name of public health. It's no different than mandating sanitation standards for restaurants to prevent the spread of disease for example. It's not a new role, it just happens it became hyper politicized.I realize that, but the government doesn't have unlimited authority to "keep us safe".What you ignore is that the harm from personal recklessness goes beyond the individual. It impacts the persons family, as well as himself who may because of it become public charges.Yes, I am opposed to seatbelt laws. If someone chooses not to wear a seatbelt, that's their decision.
Another lie.HR 227 and HR 1808. Aren't you paying attention?
That's what bigots always say about the people they are bigoted against.No discriminationYou truly are this stupid. Your side fully discriminates against anybody who refuses to follow their dictates. States (blue ones) are already trying to discriminate against people who for whatever reason are not vaccinated. Trying to deny them the freedom to enter buildings or go anywhere.Who is being discrimminated against? Be specific.it’s sad that in the 21st century republicans still have to create law preventing dems from discriminating against people
People choose to stay away from those who are potentially dangerous
You are free to stay in your home...
That isn't all your guns. It's a particular type, like the machine gun ban.You couldn't be more wrong:This is a lie.A few years ago there weren't any gun confiscation laws in the works, either. Yet, here we are.
In this case, the Republicans are being proactive to Leftist stupidity.
There have never been gun ‘confiscation’ laws – proposed or otherwise.
Clearly stupidity is the sole purview of the right, as is dishonesty.
S.66 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Assault Weapons Ban of 2019
Summary of S.66 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Assault Weapons Ban of 2019www.congress.gov
You couldn’t be more of a liar.You couldn't be more wrong:This is a lie.A few years ago there weren't any gun confiscation laws in the works, either. Yet, here we are.
In this case, the Republicans are being proactive to Leftist stupidity.
There have never been gun ‘confiscation’ laws – proposed or otherwise.
Clearly stupidity is the sole purview of the right, as is dishonesty.
S.66 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Assault Weapons Ban of 2019
Summary of S.66 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Assault Weapons Ban of 2019www.congress.gov
Yes, I am opposed to seatbelt laws. If someone chooses not to wear a seatbelt, that's their decision.
Drawing the line? Draconian measures such as China took.Limited authority. Where do YOU draw the line?But they do have a limited authority to act in the name of public health. It's no different than mandating sanitation standards for restaurants to prevent the spread of disease for example. It's not a new role, it just happens it became hyper politicized.I realize that, but the government doesn't have unlimited authority to "keep us safe".What you ignore is that the harm from personal recklessness goes beyond the individual. It impacts the persons family, as well as himself who may because of it become public charges.
Yet we were told by the alleged experts this would be a disaster if these states did this yet that has not been the case so maybe just maybe people should take a sceond look at the mask mandates and social distancing rules.The states that are no longer enforcing are no longer enforcing because they are seeing a reduction in cases.What areas are seeing increased cases? It seems the states no longer enforcing that are showing decreases in covid.Ok, so until Covid is dealt with, you have no problem with mask mandates, social distancing etc. in areas that are seeing increased cases?No I would consider it cowardly to continue the practice after the problem has been dealt with.So I guess you consider it cowardly to shut down public pools during polio outbreaks?When did we become a nation of such fucking cowards?
