Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are better more effective ways to prevent children from being killed at school than saying millions of law abiding people can't own this one particular rifle because if we ban this one rifle people will magically stop wanting to commit mass shootingsWhat am I trying to hide?Every time you morons use all murders in the assault rifle debate, we know you are dishonest & trying to dupe people.,People who think a 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a gun means that they are not safe enough are the scared and paranoid onesI Agree with the Senator.If there is a black out, or Hurricane, or some other natural or unnatural disaster, an AR-15 will be a good deterrent to looters and the criminal minded in the society.There are terrorists armed with fully automatic AK-47 assault rifles waiting attack Americans. We need assault rifles in America.
Paranoid ^^^; must be a pity to feel so scared all the time.
So Let me know when you want an honest debate or STFU
11000 murdered annually by a person with a gun 330000000 people in the country
.003% pf the population murdered by a person using a gun
99.997% of the population not murdered annually by a person with a gun
That number includes mass shootings
This is 5th grade math
Try some 5th grade logic.
The ban on assault rifles has to do with taking away access for mass shooters with high body counts.
Not all murders.
Not all guns
not all people.
The only question is what is the percentage in these types of mass shootings involved assault type rifles.
According to you, we should just do nothing because not enough children are slaughtered.
What am I trying to hide?Every time you morons use all murders in the assault rifle debate, we know you are dishonest & trying to dupe people.,People who think a 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a gun means that they are not safe enough are the scared and paranoid onesI Agree with the Senator.If there is a black out, or Hurricane, or some other natural or unnatural disaster, an AR-15 will be a good deterrent to looters and the criminal minded in the society.There are terrorists armed with fully automatic AK-47 assault rifles waiting attack Americans. We need assault rifles in America.
Paranoid ^^^; must be a pity to feel so scared all the time.
So Let me know when you want an honest debate or STFU
11000 murdered annually by a person with a gun 330000000 people in the country
.003% pf the population murdered by a person using a gun
99.997% of the population not murdered annually by a person with a gun
That number includes mass shootings
This is 5th grade math
There are liars, damn liars and statistics. The parent or spouse who loses a child or spouse by gun fire doesn't give a damn about your math.
I watched video of a motorcycle backfire in Times Square and people ran as if they were being shot at. I know Republicans found that to be hysterically funny.
Then a sign fell at a mall in Utah and shoppers freaked out and took off running. I'm sure Republicans found that to be even more funny than in Times Square.
Ah yes, Republicans and there far out sense of humor. These guys are still filled with chuckles.
Nothing funnier to the GOP than people running for their lives from absolutely nothing.
Hilarious!
Like Trump says, "Smile with a BIG thumbs up!"
Without us all of Europe would be speaking German dip shitWithout the intervention of France we might still be ruled by Britain.Do you think there was a musket hanging above every hearth in everynhome? How many guns were there in private hands in 1789?The government wasn't armed. Mcheck your constitution. The Army could only be reaped every two years. If 2% of the population serves in active duty armed services today, in 1789 it was .02%."Needs" is not a good argument. The founders understood the people may need an equalizing force because the government was armed. The founders had just successfully pulled this off.
Now you can argue that is outdated. I will argue it is not and irrelevant as long as the 2nd remains a part of the COnstitution.
And you're not going to stand the 82nd Airborne down with your AK.
There was no government. People brought their own weapons with them to throw out the British.
Remember, NO GUN WAS MASS PRODUCED THEN! Every girl n was handmade.
Without the private ownership of guns we would have still been ruled by England.
Does your pussy hurt?I watched video of a motorcycle backfire in Times Square and people ran as if they were being shot at. I know Republicans found that to be hysterically funny.
Then a sign fell at a mall in Utah and shoppers freaked out and took off running. I'm sure Republicans found that to be even more funny than in Times Square.
Ah yes, Republicans and there far out sense of humor. These guys are still filled with chuckles.
Nothing funnier to the GOP than people running for their lives from absolutely nothing.
Hilarious!
Like Trump says, "Smile with a BIG thumbs up!"
LolThe lethality of the round fired is a consideration, until one realizes that given the circumstances, a .22 caliber bullet is also lethal. The rate of fire, the rate of sustainable fire is the issue.They have the privilege, not the right. Removing assault weapons does not infringe the citizen's right to bear arms.Maybe a hand game n? Does is absolutely have to be a weapon equipped with a 100 round magazine and a semi-automatic firing system? Couldn't he be better served by a grenade launcher or a mortar?SO what?
MAybe he can't fire a shotgun for some reason and he prefers a lighter weapon
The gun! What is the one singular commonality among all mass shootings? A video game? No! It's the fucking gun!
No one, absolutely no one NEEDS an AR-15 or similar weapon. Unless you're actually a soldier, such weapons are unnecessary.
They have the right, need doesn't have to be demonstrated.
And, as has been repeatedly pointed out, that is a false argument until such time as all agree on the definition of "assault weapons". Those who own and shoot AR-15's will tell you that they are just another rifle with a distinctive shape, not any deadlier than a deer rifle. And yes, they have the right until the SC weighs in on any proposed ban.
Deer rifles are occasionally bolt action rifles requiring the shooter to load another round mechanically. Not a practical weapon if you just watched a bunch of propaganda and decided to take out a few dozen people on your own.
A 100 round clip? Really? There's an absolute need for such a thing?
You are the cowardly POS who thinks she needs quick change 100 round mags that have never been needed for defense and rarely during full blown offense.war. Cowards like you use them for maximum kill in defenseless crowds.of children.LolNever in history did a homeowner need quick changing 100 round mags after a natural disaster, but that never stops Repubtards from inventing strawmen!!!
Fixed 15 round mags reloading 1 at a time is all anyone ever needed!
Someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your fucking business you fucking cowardly piece of shit
The lethality of the round fired is a consideration, until one realizes that given the circumstances, a .22 caliber bullet is also lethal. The rate of fire, the rate of sustainable fire is the issue.They have the privilege, not the right. Removing assault weapons does not infringe the citizen's right to bear arms.Maybe a hand game n? Does is absolutely have to be a weapon equipped with a 100 round magazine and a semi-automatic firing system? Couldn't he be better served by a grenade launcher or a mortar?SO what?
MAybe he can't fire a shotgun for some reason and he prefers a lighter weapon
The gun! What is the one singular commonality among all mass shootings? A video game? No! It's the fucking gun!
No one, absolutely no one NEEDS an AR-15 or similar weapon. Unless you're actually a soldier, such weapons are unnecessary.
They have the right, need doesn't have to be demonstrated.
And, as has been repeatedly pointed out, that is a false argument until such time as all agree on the definition of "assault weapons". Those who own and shoot AR-15's will tell you that they are just another rifle with a distinctive shape, not any deadlier than a deer rifle. And yes, they have the right until the SC weighs in on any proposed ban.
Deer rifles are occasionally bolt action rifles requiring the shooter to load another round mechanically. Not a practical weapon if you just watched a bunch of propaganda and decided to take out a few dozen people on your own.
A 100 round clip? Really? There's an absolute need for such a thing?
LolYou are the cowardly POS who thinks she needs quick change 100 round mags that have never been needed for defense and rarely during full blown offense.war. Cowards like you use them for maximum kill in defenseless crowds.of children.LolNever in history did a homeowner need quick changing 100 round mags after a natural disaster, but that never stops Repubtards from inventing strawmen!!!
Fixed 15 round mags reloading 1 at a time is all anyone ever needed!
Someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your fucking business you fucking cowardly piece of shit
I watched video of a motorcycle backfire in Times Square and people ran as if they were being shot at. I know Republicans found that to be hysterically funny.
Then a sign fell at a mall in Utah and shoppers freaked out and took off running. I'm sure Republicans found that to be even more funny than in Times Square.
Ah yes, Republicans and there far out sense of humor. These guys are still filled with chuckles.
Nothing funnier to the GOP than people running for their lives from absolutely nothing.
Hilarious!
Like Trump says, "Smile with a BIG thumbs up!"
They ran because they don't know anything about guns
A motorcycle backfire doesn't sound like a rifle shot
It don't matter what name, style or action the gun has, it should not have quick change mags or hold more than 15 rounds. Mass murder weapon is a WMD.LolYou are the cowardly POS who thinks she needs quick change 100 round mags that have never been needed for defense and rarely during full blown offense.war. Cowards like you use them for maximum kill in defenseless crowds.of children.LolNever in history did a homeowner need quick changing 100 round mags after a natural disaster, but that never stops Repubtards from inventing strawmen!!!
Fixed 15 round mags reloading 1 at a time is all anyone ever needed!
Someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your fucking business you fucking cowardly piece of shit
Na, not really
ARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing less
LolIt don't matter what name, style or action the gun has, it should not have quick change mags or hold more than 15 rounds. Mass murder weapon is a WMD.LolYou are the cowardly POS who thinks she needs quick change 100 round mags that have never been needed for defense and rarely during full blown offense.war. Cowards like you use them for maximum kill in defenseless crowds.of children.LolNever in history did a homeowner need quick changing 100 round mags after a natural disaster, but that never stops Repubtards from inventing strawmen!!!
Fixed 15 round mags reloading 1 at a time is all anyone ever needed!
Someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your fucking business you fucking cowardly piece of shit
Na, not really
ARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing less
If we were to make a genuine decision on banning assault weapons I think the old method of drawing a vertical line downmthrough the center of a page and listing 'pros' on the left and 'cons' on the right.The lethality of the round fired is a consideration, until one realizes that given the circumstances, a .22 caliber bullet is also lethal. The rate of fire, the rate of sustainable fire is the issue.They have the privilege, not the right. Removing assault weapons does not infringe the citizen's right to bear arms.Maybe a hand game n? Does is absolutely have to be a weapon equipped with a 100 round magazine and a semi-automatic firing system? Couldn't he be better served by a grenade launcher or a mortar?
The gun! What is the one singular commonality among all mass shootings? A video game? No! It's the fucking gun!
No one, absolutely no one NEEDS an AR-15 or similar weapon. Unless you're actually a soldier, such weapons are unnecessary.
They have the right, need doesn't have to be demonstrated.
And, as has been repeatedly pointed out, that is a false argument until such time as all agree on the definition of "assault weapons". Those who own and shoot AR-15's will tell you that they are just another rifle with a distinctive shape, not any deadlier than a deer rifle. And yes, they have the right until the SC weighs in on any proposed ban.
Deer rifles are occasionally bolt action rifles requiring the shooter to load another round mechanically. Not a practical weapon if you just watched a bunch of propaganda and decided to take out a few dozen people on your own.
A 100 round clip? Really? There's an absolute need for such a thing?
Again, need has nothing to do with it. There are reasons presented why people desire certain types of firearms, but they do NOT have to demonstrate need.
You need to live in a civilized country to see what safe really isNothing to brag aboutWhat am I trying to hide?Every time you morons use all murders in the assault rifle debate, we know you are dishonest & trying to dupe people.,People who think a 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a gun means that they are not safe enough are the scared and paranoid onesParanoid ^^^; must be a pity to feel so scared all the time.
So Let me know when you want an honest debate or STFU
11000 murdered annually by a person with a gun 330000000 people in the country
.003% pf the population murdered by a person using a gun
99.997% of the population not murdered annually by a person with a gun
That number includes mass shootings
This is 5th grade math
Most nations would be appalled at such carnage
IDGAF about other countries of what they think.
A 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a person with a gun is pretty fucking safe
When was the last time you were in a Wal Mart? Who fired shots at you?You need to live in a civilized country to see what safe really is
Can’t even shop in a Walmart
Good ideaI watched video of a motorcycle backfire in Times Square and people ran as if they were being shot at. I know Republicans found that to be hysterically funny.
Then a sign fell at a mall in Utah and shoppers freaked out and took off running. I'm sure Republicans found that to be even more funny than in Times Square.
Ah yes, Republicans and there far out sense of humor. These guys are still filled with chuckles.
Nothing funnier to the GOP than people running for their lives from absolutely nothing.
Hilarious!
Like Trump says, "Smile with a BIG thumbs up!"
They ran because they don't know anything about guns
A motorcycle backfire doesn't sound like a rifle shot
So let's train every man, women and child on the sound difference of a backfire, a firecracker, and a gun. BTW, different guns have different sounds.
You need to live in a civilized country to see what safe really isNothing to brag aboutWhat am I trying to hide?Every time you morons use all murders in the assault rifle debate, we know you are dishonest & trying to dupe people.,People who think a 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a gun means that they are not safe enough are the scared and paranoid ones
So Let me know when you want an honest debate or STFU
11000 murdered annually by a person with a gun 330000000 people in the country
.003% pf the population murdered by a person using a gun
99.997% of the population not murdered annually by a person with a gun
That number includes mass shootings
This is 5th grade math
Most nations would be appalled at such carnage
IDGAF about other countries of what they think.
A 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a person with a gun is pretty fucking safe
Can’t even shop in a Walmart
A semiautomatic rifle is a semiautomatic rifle is a semiautomatic rifleIf we were to make a genuine decision on banning assault weapons I think the old method of drawing a vertical line downmthrough the center of a page and listing 'pros' on the left and 'cons' on the right.The lethality of the round fired is a consideration, until one realizes that given the circumstances, a .22 caliber bullet is also lethal. The rate of fire, the rate of sustainable fire is the issue.They have the privilege, not the right. Removing assault weapons does not infringe the citizen's right to bear arms.They have the right, need doesn't have to be demonstrated.
And, as has been repeatedly pointed out, that is a false argument until such time as all agree on the definition of "assault weapons". Those who own and shoot AR-15's will tell you that they are just another rifle with a distinctive shape, not any deadlier than a deer rifle. And yes, they have the right until the SC weighs in on any proposed ban.
Deer rifles are occasionally bolt action rifles requiring the shooter to load another round mechanically. Not a practical weapon if you just watched a bunch of propaganda and decided to take out a few dozen people on your own.
A 100 round clip? Really? There's an absolute need for such a thing?
Again, need has nothing to do with it. There are reasons presented why people desire certain types of firearms, but they do NOT have to demonstrate need.
The first question I have is: what is the virtue of an assault weapon? What makes it good? What makes it bad?
You need to live in a civilized country to see what safe really isNothing to brag aboutWhat am I trying to hide?Every time you morons use all murders in the assault rifle debate, we know you are dishonest & trying to dupe people.,
So Let me know when you want an honest debate or STFU
11000 murdered annually by a person with a gun 330000000 people in the country
.003% pf the population murdered by a person using a gun
99.997% of the population not murdered annually by a person with a gun
That number includes mass shootings
This is 5th grade math
Most nations would be appalled at such carnage
IDGAF about other countries of what they think.
A 99.997% chance of not being murdered by a person with a gun is pretty fucking safe
Can’t even shop in a Walmart
99.997% chance of not getting killed by a person with a gun.
If you think that is not safe then it is you who is afraid and paranoid
