🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Senator Lindsey Graham wants FBI to explain use of force in Stone arrest

Senator Graham says the FBI's over-the-top use of force
was unnecessary and is demanding answers.


Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday, questioning the bureau's tactics when arresting Roger Stone, a longtime adviser and confidant of President Trump, last week at his Florida home.

Collins joins Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., in questioning the amount of force used in arresting the 66-year-old Stone at his home, given that he was not deemed a flight risk and had already publicly stated that he expected to be indicted.






Graham is doing some bootlicking. Who gives a fuck.
 
Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
Well, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?


What proof do you have stone did that? Bet you have none other then what you heard on NPR or CNN.
 
The FBI is no longer a law enforcement agency; it is now a politicized arm of a criminal syndicate operating under the guise of a political Party, the DNC; it has helped destroy evidence, engaged in illegal domestic spying on behalf of that Party, assisted in treasonous acts committed by the same Party, and other crimes against our country. It's job now is to aid in extorting perjured testimony from designated enemies of the Democratic Party, a job it seems to enjoy doing now. It's ironic how they're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages in while pretending to be 'investigating Russian collusion n stuff', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.
 
And of course the fn sick POS couldn't have had a gun? Already threatened someone
For that Herr Mueller needed 29 federal agents, a fleet of special SUV's, a helicopter in the sky and of course his special
news agency, CNN, to record his glorious victory?

More people were at Stone's home than were sent to rescue our people under fire in Benghazi, as has been pointed out.
No one can claim this wasn't mindless, wasteful overkill.

It keeps the Democratss' degenerate scumbag base happy and secure in the knowledge that the 'deep state' and Wall street are on their side and the coup is still operative; they aren't going to have to worry about such rubbish as elections and votes in 2020.
 
You would think that after 7 attempts to recount, over and over, all that hanging chad, would of been finished.
Well you thought wrong, because disputed votes and uncounted ballots kept turning up. But I don't expect a guy like you to do things like, "read newspapers". They don't seem to go well with trumpkin fantasy.
Uncounted ballots like they did in the last election in Broward County again? Seems that you dumbasses elect the most worthless people to tally votes, maybe you should go automated...
 
Tempest in a teapot and there goes graham again.There was a great potential that stone would destroy evidence, and serving arrest warrants has been shown to be a very dangerous business. One doesn't call up a drug dealer and tell him that he will be arrested the following day so that he has time to flush everything illegal down the toilet.

Why do people insist that right-wingers be treated like royalty, anyway? They are just like everyone else.
 
people forget he was one of the repub pos that disrupted the vote counting when gwb stole the 2000 election
No one should still have to address this tiresome leftist myth but Bush stole nothing in the 2000 presidential election.
How long will you bed wetting losers whine about this? Say What?: Bush Did NOT Steal The 2000 Election
Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election

Grow up, you fucking cry babies.
indy candidate stole it for bush


here we have the usual criminal syndicate spin about 'how Ralph Nader Cost Us the Election!!!" bullshit. Never mind Nader was the only genuine liberal running, and an honest one to boot, nothing at all like the scum crooks the DNC keeps nominating despite their own base's sniveling and rooting for even more corrupt murdering scum.
 
here we have the usual criminal syndicate spin about 'how Ralph Nader Cost Us the Election!!!" bullshit. Never mind Nader was the only genuine liberal running, and an honest one to boot, nothing at all like the scum crooks the DNC keeps nominating despite their own base's sniveling and rooting for even more corrupt murdering scum.
If we'd elected Nader in 1996, we would be in the good alternate reality like in Back to the Future 2.
 
Tempest in a teapot and there goes graham again.There was a great potential that stone would destroy evidence, and serving arrest warrants has been shown to be a very dangerous business. One doesn't call up a drug dealer and tell him that he will be arrested the following day so that he has time to flush everything illegal down the toilet.

Why do people insist that right-wingers be treated like royalty, anyway? They are just like everyone else.
A well to do 72 year old political advisor is not a drug dealer. And it doesn't take 29 FBI agents, with their specially equipped fleet of SUVs and helicopter, to prevent an old man just rousted out of bed, from destroying evidence or putting up a fight (which is an absurd thought) or any other
unlikely scenario you can dream up.

Good God...Stone knew he was going to jail. If he had any evidence that needed to be destroyed, as you theorize, it wouldn't be just sitting around for no good reason. It would have been long gone starting when he was originally indicted.
Don't be such an idiot which is what someone has to be to defend Herr Mueller's ridiculous wasteful unnecessary show of force. He, Mueller, is clearly off his rocker.
 
The FBI is no longer a law enforcement agency; it is now a politicized arm of a criminal syndicate operating under the guise of a political Party, the DNC; it has helped destroy evidence, engaged in illegal domestic spying on behalf of that Party, assisted in treasonous acts committed by the same Party, and other crimes against our country. It's job now is to aid in extorting perjured testimony from designated enemies of the Democratic Party, a job it seems to enjoy doing now. It's ironic how they're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages in while pretending to be 'investigating Russian collusion n stuff', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.
And the evidence is?
 
Tempest in a teapot and there goes graham again.There was a great potential that stone would destroy evidence, and serving arrest warrants has been shown to be a very dangerous business. One doesn't call up a drug dealer and tell him that he will be arrested the following day so that he has time to flush everything illegal down the toilet.

Why do people insist that right-wingers be treated like royalty, anyway? They are just like everyone else.
A well to do 72 year old political advisor is not a drug dealer. And it doesn't take 29 FBI agents, with their specially equipped fleet of SUVs and helicopter, to prevent an old man just rousted out of bed, from destroying evidence or putting up a fight (which is an absurd thought) or any other
unlikely scenario you can dream up.

Good God...Stone knew he was going to jail. If he had any evidence that needed to be destroyed, as you theorize, it wouldn't be just sitting around for no good reason. It would have been long gone starting when he was originally indicted.
Don't be such an idiot which is what someone has to be to defend Herr Mueller's ridiculous wasteful unnecessary show of force. He, Mueller, is clearly off his rocker.
But the evidence is not; Mueller’s team seizes “voluminous and complex” evidence in Roger Stone probe
 
Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
Well, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?
Hillary actually destroyed evidence
Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?
 
Except,that article is flawed, as the final recount was not allowed to finish.
Except it wasn't because the recount by Gore quislings was cherry picking and inventing votes for Al where none were objectively to be found. Take it up with PBS and the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, etc. and all the other
members of a news conglomerate that carefully went over the election vote by vote and determined despite all the illegal
shenanigans by the Gore Crime Syndicate, Bush actually won the election.
And you are still crying about your spilled milk?....incredible!
 
Last edited:
The FBI is no longer a law enforcement agency; it is now a politicized arm of a criminal syndicate operating under the guise of a political Party, the DNC; it has helped destroy evidence, engaged in illegal domestic spying on behalf of that Party, assisted in treasonous acts committed by the same Party, and other crimes against our country. It's job now is to aid in extorting perjured testimony from designated enemies of the Democratic Party, a job it seems to enjoy doing now. It's ironic how they're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages in while pretending to be 'investigating Russian collusion n stuff', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.
hey're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages ', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.}}}}}}}}
are you fn bonkers You just gave a description of your master Trump
 

Forum List

Back
Top