BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
- 2,180
That rule needs to be approved because the dates are specified in TX state law. A judge cannot change state election law, period.Rule changes are illegal unless that state legislature votes on it, moron.There were some management and rule changes to accommodate COVID conditions...that Secretary of States put in.... Booth separation, sanitizing, fewer voting places and consolidation in to mega huge voting places, and many things for safety....but Secretary of States are given in their State constitutions and in election law by legislatures to put out rules and guidance for voters and on how to execute the election, so they run smoothly, or to ensure accuracy, or to accommodate that one man one vote is equal and fair kind of things that circumstances in their state required at the time.The states election laws were changed without the state legislature. Start telling the truth.It is the Democrats ignoring the Constitution. Those audits are a Constitutional right. They are well in the purview of the state legislatures that control and make the laws about elections. Calling those people traitors shows the disrespect Democrats have for the Constitution, not the people behind the audits.Congress are the people who fucked up Jan 6th. They knew 40% of voters wanted fraud investigated and they did nothing. It is in the hands of the people in the swing states now and they are going to prove fraud.Like they did on Jan 6?Trying to get the courts to acknowledge the election was stolen is not attacking the country.
Trump and his supporters are attacking this country. You are trying to establish a dictatorship and assaulting free speech rights in this country.
The Faithless Party will never be able to overturn the 2020 election. Their only hope is to overthrow the Constitution that they've obviously lost faith in.
The States election laws were all followed in 2020 and the results were certified. There is no official audit being conducted that can change the results of the election. Having lost faith in our Constitution, the Neo-GOP are becoming more radical.
I don't believe a single law was changed. All 50 States certified their election results in 2020.
Many times the republican legislature with the Trump campaign sued the Secretary of States, to stop some of the guidance they gave.... These are cases that are said to be the 60 or so that Trump lost, even on appeal, that are mentioned a lot... Only one that I know of, made it to the Supreme court after the election, that I mentioned in my previous post....which disagree with a lower court ruling.
Not all rule changes need to be approved. It depends on the States. For example the Republican Gov. of Texas expanded the dates for early voting in Texas. The Republican's sued him of course, but the Texas Supreme Court agreed with the Gov,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GREG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, do hereby suspend Section 85.001(a) of the Texas Election Code to the extent necessary to require that, for any election ordered or authorized to occur on November 3, 2020, early voting by personal appearance shall begin on Tuesday, October 13, 2020, and shall continue through the fourth day before election day. I further suspend Section 86.006(a-1) of the Texas Election Code, for any election ordered or authorized to occur on November 3, 2020, to the extent necessary to allow a voter to deliver a marked mail ballot in person to the early voting clerk’s office prior to and including on election day.
In Texas, the Governor can modify the early voting dates in an emergency.
Abbot was sued over it. He won.