IsaacNewton
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2015
- 17,308
- 3,697
Dog stays and the coon leaves.
Off to ignore for you David Duke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dog stays and the coon leaves.
Given her behavior it my guess it was the dog who was truly offended.She should have just left and not gave them her money if so offended. If it was some derp that just wandered in with their pet then a reaction is warranted, but not like this for a service dog.
I also have a question about 'service dog'. It isn't a seeing eye dog is it? Aren't these just friends for people? Do these animals have the same right of way as a seeing eye dog?
I'm more than a little unfamiliar with this whole area.
The way the article read it sounds as if it was more an emotional support dog due to the owner having PTSD. It says Delaware law doesn't cover emotional support pets, but it seems the restaurant owners had no issue with it being in there.
By law I'd assume an animal in a restaurant is a health no no in general if not mandated by law. A restaurant can't change health code at it's whim. I don't know but I'd guess that. Likely legally he didn't have the right to take the dog into the restaurant (again I didn't read the article) and the woman, though she could have handled it differently, was not at fault for not wanting an animal in a food establishment. She over-reacted, likely she has a great aversion to animals being present when eating, another guess. But also likely the dog should not have been in there.
If she was so concerned about the dog disrupting her meal how does she feel about someone screaming at the top of their lungs while she's trying to eat. The whole thing should have been avoided.
Here's a vid of how one woman reacted .....
Here's a link to the restaurants FB response...
Kathy's Crab House & Family Restaurant
Here's a link to a news story about the incident....
Woman calls veteran's PTSD service dog 'nasty' in viral video
Thoughts?
![]()
She should have just left and not gave them her money if so offended. If it was some derp that just wandered in with their pet then a reaction is warranted, but not like this for a service dog.
I also have a question about 'service dog'. It isn't a seeing eye dog is it? Aren't these just friends for people? Do these animals have the same right of way as a seeing eye dog?
I'm more than a little unfamiliar with this whole area.
The way the article read it sounds as if it was more an emotional support dog due to the owner having PTSD. It says Delaware law doesn't cover emotional support pets, but it seems the restaurant owners had no issue with it being in there.
By law I'd assume an animal in a restaurant is a health no no in general if not mandated by law. A restaurant can't change health code at it's whim. I don't know but I'd guess that. Likely legally he didn't have the right to take the dog into the restaurant (again I didn't read the article) and the woman, though she could have handled it differently, was not at fault for not wanting an animal in a food establishment. She over-reacted, likely she has a great aversion to animals being present when eating, another guess. But also likely the dog should not have been in there.
If she was so concerned about the dog disrupting her meal how does she feel about someone screaming at the top of their lungs while she's trying to eat. The whole thing should have been avoided.
Here's a vid of how one woman reacted .....
Here's a link to the restaurants FB response...
Kathy's Crab House & Family Restaurant
Here's a link to a news story about the incident....
Woman calls veteran's PTSD service dog 'nasty' in viral video
Thoughts?
![]()
TNB...
Here's a vid of how one woman reacted .....
Here's a link to the restaurants FB response...
Kathy's Crab House & Family Restaurant
Here's a link to a news story about the incident....
Woman calls veteran's PTSD service dog 'nasty' in viral video
Thoughts?
![]()
Here's a vid of how one woman reacted .....
Here's a link to the restaurants FB response...
Kathy's Crab House & Family Restaurant
Here's a link to a news story about the incident....
Woman calls veteran's PTSD service dog 'nasty' in viral video
Thoughts?
![]()
I second this. To me, it is sad when an animal is more well behaved compared to a human.The restaurant used the resulting publicity to have a large fundraiser for service dogs. Good for them.
If a dog is well behaved it should be allowed anywhere. Service dog or not. If people are not well behaved they should be ejected, forcefully. This creature should be ejected and put on a "do not serve' list.
There is a woman I see at the grocery store all the time with her Golden Retriever service dog. He has a vest that says "Don't bother me. I'm working."
I have been in restaurants a million times in my life, and never one where there was a service dog present. So let's say this happens one day and for some reason I don't like it. So one meal of my life is made mildly unpleasant because some guy has THE NERVE to risk his life for our country. This fucking c*nt...
Restaurants should also accommodate people who do not wish to sit next to people with children. I know lots of people whose dogs are far better behaved than many other people's children.It seems to me that restaurants SHOULD accommodate people who do not want to sit next to dogs.
While I agree, to an extent, that confrontation in the presence of a child might be best avoided, how do you feel about the language and manner the mother demonstrated...in front of her child?A couple of reasons. First of all the law wasnt the issue. You cant force someone to think your dog is clean. Second of all you dont confront someone in front of their child.Yes. The law wasnt the issue. She thought a dog being in the restaurant was nasty. They were trying to convince her it wasnt nasty. No one asked the dog owner to explain the law to the woman and from what the woman said the dog owner did it in a confrontational manner in front of her child. The woman was leaving. The dog owner should have let it go and never said anything to her.Probably went something like this...I can't understand a word she is saying due to her screeching. And it wouldn't matter anyway. First time she opened her mouth to SCREAM would be enough for me.
woman..."i dont want to eat here next to this dog. lets go"
dog owner...I approached you in a nice manner to explain federal law. ( she literally said this)
yes----something wrong with that?
Your comment does not make sense-----the lady with the service dog ""should not have mentioned the issue of
the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES LAW in front of 'a child' ??? Why? -----it is OBSCENE. Seems
to me that children should learn about laws
Actually, we didn't witness the alleged original "confrontation" between the people with the dog and the woman, either. Where was the child when the dog-people were "educating" the mother?From the woman that admitted she took it upon herself to explain the law when that wasnt the issue. Obviously your sight is bad too. The child doesnt appear to be there while all the screaming is going on. If you see the child please point her out.A couple of reasons. First of all the law wasnt the issue. You cant force someone to think your dog is clean. Second of all you dont confront someone in front of their child.Yes. The law wasnt the issue. She thought a dog being in the restaurant was nasty. They were trying to convince her it wasnt nasty. No one asked the dog owner to explain the law to the woman and from what the woman said the dog owner did it in a confrontational manner in front of her child. The woman was leaving. The dog owner should have let it go and never said anything to her.yes----something wrong with that?
Your comment does not make sense-----the lady with the service dog ""should not have mentioned the issue of
the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES LAW in front of 'a child' ??? Why? -----it is OBSCENE. Seems
to me that children should learn about laws
where do you get WHO was confronting? -------the crazy bitch who was SCREAMING-----clearly, had no thought for
a child