"Sexual Assault"

[MACAULAY]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The problem with age is that you've experienced the better times (the golden times in my generation) and better ways but as far too many parents experience, the youngers insist on learning the hard way. Alas, when they finally figure it out, too many are trapped in unfulfilling lives with little hope or faith to pull them through.

I figured out pretty early on that honesty was the best policy with young ladies then women. ... and it saves a lot of time, effort and money with the added bonus of zero regrets.

 

[Windparadox]

`
There's no fool like an old fool.

 

[PK1]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

 

[Meathead]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

It's over. Plan B didn't work either. It was all transparently too sleazy.

 

[PK1]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

It's over. Plan B didn't work either. It was all transparently too sleazy.

It’s over because the majority senators are willing to accept a half-ass FBI investigation and care more about politics/power than integrity & reason on the SCOTUS.
BTW, i was responding to the OP’s concerns.
.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I was out running errands one day and as I was walking down the street minding my own business, a guy walking the opposite direction, grabbed my breast as he passed me and then scurried off. I did not chase him down because I didnt' know what to do with him if I had caught him, this was before cell phones so I couldn't snap his photo for the police, I couldn't call them but even if I could what would I say to them? Some guy walking down the street grabbed my breast, I dont' know who he is or where he went and then what are the cops supposed to do? I'm pretty sure I was not even aware that a crime had been comitted (it had), only that something repulsive had been done to me by a stranger.

Just because no one witnessed what happened, I didn't bother to file a police report, I wasn't interacting with anyone or dressed provocatively doesn't mean it didn't happen. But the way our criminal justice system is structured, and even the civil system with the enforcement of non-disclosure agreements in the case of sexual harassment, all of this favors the perpetrators.

I don't give a shit who doesn't believe what sexual assault victims have to say. This was not the only time in my life that I was violated yet none of the incidents got reported because NOTHING EVER HAPPENS TO THE PERPETRATORS so why even bother? Unless....

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The problem with age is that you've experienced the better times (the golden times in my generation) and better ways but as far too many parents experience, the youngers insist on learning the hard way. Alas, when they finally figure it out, too many are trapped in unfulfilling lives with little hope or faith to pull them through.

I figured out pretty early on that honesty was the best policy with young ladies then women. ... and it saves a lot of time, effort and money with the added bonus of zero regrets.

Honesty is the best policy if for no other reason than anything less is nothing more than manipulation.

 

[Meathead]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

It's over. Plan B didn't work either. It was all transparently too sleazy.

It’s over because the majority senators are willing to accept a half-ass FBI investigation and care more about politics/power than integrity & reason on the SCOTUS.
BTW, i was responding to the OP’s concerns.
.

It's over because it was unbelievably sleazy to begin with. And Hillary called Trump supporters "deplorable", didn't she? This is Michelle O's "going high"?

 

[PK1]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

It's over. Plan B didn't work either. It was all transparently too sleazy.

It’s over because the majority senators are willing to accept a half-ass FBI investigation and care more about politics/power than integrity & reason on the SCOTUS.
BTW, i was responding to the OP’s concerns.
.

It's over because it was unbelievably sleazy to begin with. And Hillary called Trump supporters "deplorable", didn't she? This is Michelle O's "going high"?

“Sleazy” describes the Republican senators ignoring Obama’s SCOTUS nomination (Garland) for over 9 months.
.

 

[Snouter]

I was in New Haven yesterday evening, there are blue lights all over the Yale campus. That is for White females to run to when attacked by local Black and Brown and Muslim males. If they make it to the blue light security is notified (probably a lazy person). Very sad. Sexual assaults are real, and statistically very predictable based on race, not make believe like that democrat stooge Ballsy Ford tried to present.

 

[MACAULAY]

QUOTE FROM ONE of the ABOVE POSTS:

"I was out running errands one day and as I was walking down the street minding my own business, a guy walking the opposite direction, grabbed my breast as he passed me and then scurried off. I did not chase him down because I didnt' know what to do with him if I had caught him....Some guy walking down the street grabbed my breast, I dont' know who he is or where he went and then what are the cops supposed to do? I'm pretty sure I was not even aware that a crime had been comitted (it had), only that something repulsive had been done to me by a stranger.

Just because no one witnessed what happened, I didn't bother to file a police report, I wasn't interacting with anyone or dressed provocatively doesn't mean it didn't happen. But the way our criminal justice system is structured, and even the civil system with the enforcement of non-disclosure agreements in the case of sexual harassment, all of this favors the perpetrators.

I don't give a shit who doesn't believe what sexual assault victims have to say. This was not the only time in my life that I was violated yet none of the incidents got reported because NOTHING EVER HAPPENS TO THE PERPETRATORS so why even bother?
________________________

RESPONSE:

When I was a teen, I got the shit beat out of me by another teen about twice my size. He did it because he could. I didn't report him because the mores then were such that it would have made me a Crybaby and a Tattletale. I hope things have changed today...I suspect they have...but I am not going to go back and file a complaint today---4 decades later.

A few years later, I got burglarized in a rotting city (run by Democrats). The cops came and told me the chances were all but nil that the perpetrator would ever be caught---that they were overwhelmed. I got the impression no attempt to find the perpetrator would ever be made and I never heard from them again.

I'll stop there, but I have more sad stories, everybody does---yet if you cry to someone at random about the bad things that happen in your life, you are apt to just get that person crying back at you with his/her own sad stories.

Everybody has them----but none of them are Justice Kavanaugh's Fault--and nobody gets to project their unhappy experiences on him because they don't want him to be on the Supreme Court.

 

[Lumpy 1]

`
There's no fool like an old fool.

..it's good to be underestimated and thanks for proving my point...
.

 

[Correll]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I agree that drunken fun & groping by immature frat boys that occurred 36 years ago should not keep a qualified judge from being promoted to the SCOTUS.
However, lying about one’s past immature behavior and resorting to political conspiracy claims w/out relevant evidence is NOT reflective of a SCOTUS member’s honesty & impartial judgements.
.

It's over. Plan B didn't work either. It was all transparently too sleazy.

It’s over because the majority senators are willing to accept a half-ass FBI investigation and care more about politics/power than integrity & reason on the SCOTUS.
BTW, i was responding to the OP’s concerns.
.

If the dems wanted a better investigation, they should have given the letter to the committee MONTHS AGO.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I was out running errands one day and as I was walking down the street minding my own business, a guy walking the opposite direction, grabbed my breast as he passed me and then scurried off. I did not chase him down because I didnt' know what to do with him if I had caught him, this was before cell phones so I couldn't snap his photo for the police, I couldn't call them but even if I could what would I say to them? Some guy walking down the street grabbed my breast, I dont' know who he is or where he went and then what are the cops supposed to do? I'm pretty sure I was not even aware that a crime had been comitted (it had), only that something repulsive had been done to me by a stranger.

Just because no one witnessed what happened, I didn't bother to file a police report, I wasn't interacting with anyone or dressed provocatively doesn't mean it didn't happen. But the way our criminal justice system is structured, and even the civil system with the enforcement of non-disclosure agreements in the case of sexual harassment, all of this favors the perpetrators.

I don't give a shit who doesn't believe what sexual assault victims have to say. This was not the only time in my life that I was violated yet none of the incidents got reported because NOTHING EVER HAPPENS TO THE PERPETRATORS so why even bother? Unless....

Did you know that if you kick a guy in the balls hard enough they roll around screaming, crying, puking and finally they pass out from the pain.. trust me, not all perpetrators get a free pass.and will never forget....

.

 

[iceberg]

`
There's no fool like an old fool.

youth is wasted on the young.

 

[Correll]

QUOTE FROM ONE of the ABOVE POSTS:

"I was out running errands one day and as I was walking down the street minding my own business, a guy walking the opposite direction, grabbed my breast as he passed me and then scurried off. I did not chase him down because I didnt' know what to do with him if I had caught him....Some guy walking down the street grabbed my breast, I dont' know who he is or where he went and then what are the cops supposed to do? I'm pretty sure I was not even aware that a crime had been comitted (it had), only that something repulsive had been done to me by a stranger.

Just because no one witnessed what happened, I didn't bother to file a police report, I wasn't interacting with anyone or dressed provocatively doesn't mean it didn't happen. But the way our criminal justice system is structured, and even the civil system with the enforcement of non-disclosure agreements in the case of sexual harassment, all of this favors the perpetrators.

I don't give a shit who doesn't believe what sexual assault victims have to say. This was not the only time in my life that I was violated yet none of the incidents got reported because NOTHING EVER HAPPENS TO THE PERPETRATORS so why even bother?
________________________

RESPONSE:

When I was a teen, I got the shit beat out of me by another teen about twice my size. He did it because he could. I didn't report him because the mores then were such that it would have made me a Crybaby and a Tattletale. I hope things have changed today...I suspect they have...but I am not going to go back and file a complaint today---4 decades later.

A few years later, I got burglarized in a rotting city (run by Democrats). The cops came and told me the chances were all but nil that the perpetrator would ever be caught---that they were overwhelmed. I got the impression no attempt to find the perpetrator would ever be made and I never heard from them again.

I'll stop there, but I have more sad stories, everybody does---yet if you cry to someone at random about the bad things that happen in your life, you are apt to just get that person crying back at you with his/her own sad stories.

Everybody has them----but none of them are Justice Kavanaugh's Fault--and nobody gets to project their unhappy experiences on him because they don't want him to be on the Supreme Court.

I do have similar sad stories to. And I don't project them onto the various groups involved and try to punish unconnected individuals, as per the left with Kavanaugh.

 

[Darkwind]

I am kind of old, meaning I grew up under some different mores than the ones which seem to apply now. Which is fine...times change...and the world belongs to the young; not the old.

BUT.

When I first started hearing the term "sexual assault", about 15 or 20 years ago, I just assumed it was a way of describing RAPE that didn't rattle very young children. A mere refinement of discourse for the sake of the Snowflake Generation.

But, now I know that "Sexual Assault", while it can still include the awful crime of RAPE, also applies just as liberally to mere "Groping". And, I now know that "Groping" means almost anything---today...and it means different things to different lasses...sane and otherwise.

In the 60's, 70's and early 80's---if a girl did not want to risk getting "groped"--and most DID want to risk it---she and the boy sat in the swing on front porch and snuck a kiss when mama or papa weren't looking out the window.

And if she wanted to risk getting groped, which most did, even if they protested when it happened....then they sought out surreptitiously a private place...like a bedroom....and allowed the boy to kiss them passionately....which led...with metronometric regularity and with arithmetic certainty.....to "groping".

A butt got rubbed; a button got unbuttoned; a breast got felt; perhaps a bra got unsnapped----and then: then the lass had an opportunity to let the boy know if it had to stop there....which often happened....and the boy hoped for more progress NEXT time---and his patience was often rewarded.

If it is different today, so be it.

But, a wise man once noted that while the Present should never be judged by the Past; neither should the Past be judged by the Present...which means in part...that you cannot today make a crime that which was considered normal 4 decades ago...the lawyers call it NO EX POST FACTO....and this is why you Liberal Socialist Cocksuckers look so foolish troting out this Raving Loon Liberal to complain that she got groped by Kavanaugh......or ANY 17 year old boy 36 years ago. I don't believe it is true---her own witnesses refused to verify----is a calculated planned political hit job----but I don't give a shit if it is true!

This Hard Left Goofy Liberal BITCH ought to have said something 36 years ago, at least to her Best Friend....not now when it suited her to try to stop a CONSERVATIVE'S appointment to the Supreme Court.

And may she rot in Hell for such craven behavior today....even if it was at the handling of even more dedicated Marxists Slaves of Satan---like Diane Feinstein. Fuck them all.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

I would say this would be more of the 50's to the early 70's era. I became a teen in the mid 1970 's and the truth is, I was sexually assaulted more than any of the woman in My sphere of influence.

I was a good looking guy with a decent build and athletic -- QB on the HS football team, team captain on the volleyball team, all-star third basemen and I sat a mean bench in basketball!

Why didn't I report it?

Cause I liked it! muahahahahahaha......*coughcough*

Seriously, young people take liberties with each other that they would never dream of doing as adults, even young adults. Were there some guys who never grew up? You betcha. The same for the sluts who liked a little sheet time. Don't even bother to deny it. We all have seen it and lived it.

We cannot and should not judge that time by today's standards.

However...and Let Me be brutally frank here.

Dr. Ford's statements regarding what happened is a work of fiction. She was never assaulted and I doubt very much she was ever gropped.

Her story is just that. A story.

 

[Windparadox]

..it's good to be underestimated and thanks for proving my point... .

`
What point? You never had a point. You gave your opinion.. If your point was you have an opinion, Yeah, I'll agree. Age no longer means wisdom. Respect and deference must be EARNED, regardless of age.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The problem with age is that you've experienced the better times (the golden times in my generation) and better ways but as far too many parents experience, the youngers insist on learning the hard way. Alas, when they finally figure it out, too many are trapped in unfulfilling lives with little hope or faith to pull them through.

I figured out pretty early on that honesty was the best policy with young ladies then women. ... and it saves a lot of time, effort and money with the added bonus of zero regrets.

Honesty is the best policy if for no other reason than anything less is nothing more than manipulation.

It's just so much easier.. although, too many women disregard the obvious truth and the reality, swallow their ego with fantasies and end up bitter.