Shades Of Nazi Germany: Biden Wants Americans To Report / Turn In 'Radicalized' Friends And Family To His Govt


BIG BROTHER: Biden Administration Wants

Americans To Report ‘Radicalized’ Friends

And Family To Government




For four years, the left insisted that Trump was a fascist dictator. Even people in politics and media echoed this falsehood.
Now we have the Joe Biden administration urging Americans to snitch on their family and friends to the government.


(This could be considered a little 'over-kill' since the FISA Court proved the FBI has been illegally, Un-Constitutionally committing FISA Court Fraud and spying on Americans, reporters, the media, Congress, USSC Justices, political party Candidates and their trams...and are still doing it under Wray.)

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.


Biden doesn't need to ask anyone to rat on their friends or family - he just needs to turn on his TV and watch foreign/Democrat-funded and protected domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM constantly looting, destroying, burning , attempting to burn federal agents alive, injuring 14 Secret Service members, permanently closing minority-owned small businesses and racking a combined total of BILLIONS of dollars in damage to communities all over the US.
- Perhaps someone should report VP Harris for heping bail these domestic terrorists out of jail to return to committing act of terrorism...and for calling on these domestic terrorists to continue committing violence after the election, which they have done?!




Dementia Joe can kiss my Lilly white conservative ass..........
 

BIG BROTHER: Biden Administration Wants

Americans To Report ‘Radicalized’ Friends

And Family To Government




For four years, the left insisted that Trump was a fascist dictator. Even people in politics and media echoed this falsehood.
Now we have the Joe Biden administration urging Americans to snitch on their family and friends to the government.


(This could be considered a little 'over-kill' since the FISA Court proved the FBI has been illegally, Un-Constitutionally committing FISA Court Fraud and spying on Americans, reporters, the media, Congress, USSC Justices, political party Candidates and their trams...and are still doing it under Wray.)

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.


Biden doesn't need to ask anyone to rat on their friends or family - he just needs to turn on his TV and watch foreign/Democrat-funded and protected domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM constantly looting, destroying, burning , attempting to burn federal agents alive, injuring 14 Secret Service members, permanently closing minority-owned small businesses and racking a combined total of BILLIONS of dollars in damage to communities all over the US.
- Perhaps someone should report VP Harris for heping bail these domestic terrorists out of jail to return to committing act of terrorism...and for calling on these domestic terrorists to continue committing violence after the election, which they have done?!


Yes, but we don't see the violence committed by the Trump-supporting right-wing domestic terrorist organizations like the white supremacists, Po boys, etc. You know, yes? The type of people who attacked our Capitol on Jan 6. Nobody had a handle on them before so the time is now before they do any more damage to our democracy, kill or injure lawmakers and other Americans tasked with governing our country or simply living their lives.
What violence exactly?

January 6th kerfuffle planned and acted out by the FBI and their lapdogs:

- A few windows smashed (a new video surfaced of an FBI provocateur not only smashing windows but actively encouraging others to join him)
- Only one woman murdered by a Capitol police officer. Her own husband doesn't even know the name of the man who murdered his wife because Congress is protecting the cop. There were no other deaths.
- There are numerous videos showing Capitol police waiving people onto the Capitol grounds and into the Capitol building and of them standing idly by as an "insurrection" occurs.
- Over 14,000 hours of video is being withheld by the federal government
- The Capitol police, Nancy Pelosi, and the DC police (along with the DC mayor) were all informed prior to the kerfuffle that something was going to happen. And yet, they did NOTHING
- The Capitol police claim they didn't fully react to the kerfuffle because of how harshly they were attacked by the left (from Congress to the media) for attempting to quell blm/antifa riots in DC. They didn't want to be attacked by the left again for doing their jobs.

The past year of blm/antifa riots (you know, the groups that the Democrats proudly supporting including Knee-Pads Harris?):

- BILLIONS in property damage
- Thousands injured including several hundred police officers and many innocent bystanders
- Dozens killed including a retired police officer must trying to help and a woman who dared say "all lives matter."
- Numerous federal and state government buildings (including police precincts) have been set on fire, breached, smashed, and vandalized by leftists - which by your own definition of an insurrection means they committed insurrection numerous times
- Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, mostly minority neighborhoods - the very people blm pretends they care about - turning them into wastelands that no businesses will rebuild (look no further than LA to see what happens after a riot)
- A horse was burned to death by rioters simply because the horse's owner was driving his horse trailer on a public road the rioters wanted control over
- Democrats to this day claim it was "mostly peaceful protests"

So either you're a complete moron or incapable of seeing reality for what it truly is which makes you mentally ill. So which is it?
Just look at the fucking videos for reality.

BIG BROTHER: Biden Administration Wants

Americans To Report ‘Radicalized’ Friends

And Family To Government




For four years, the left insisted that Trump was a fascist dictator. Even people in politics and media echoed this falsehood.
Now we have the Joe Biden administration urging Americans to snitch on their family and friends to the government.


(This could be considered a little 'over-kill' since the FISA Court proved the FBI has been illegally, Un-Constitutionally committing FISA Court Fraud and spying on Americans, reporters, the media, Congress, USSC Justices, political party Candidates and their trams...and are still doing it under Wray.)

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.


Biden doesn't need to ask anyone to rat on their friends or family - he just needs to turn on his TV and watch foreign/Democrat-funded and protected domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM constantly looting, destroying, burning , attempting to burn federal agents alive, injuring 14 Secret Service members, permanently closing minority-owned small businesses and racking a combined total of BILLIONS of dollars in damage to communities all over the US.
- Perhaps someone should report VP Harris for heping bail these domestic terrorists out of jail to return to committing act of terrorism...and for calling on these domestic terrorists to continue committing violence after the election, which they have done?!


Yes, but we don't see the violence committed by the Trump-supporting right-wing domestic terrorist organizations like the white supremacists, Po boys, etc. You know, yes? The type of people who attacked our Capitol on Jan 6. Nobody had a handle on them before so the time is now before they do any more damage to our democracy, kill or injure lawmakers and other Americans tasked with governing our country or simply living their lives.
What violence exactly?

January 6th kerfuffle planned and acted out by the FBI and their lapdogs:

- A few windows smashed (a new video surfaced of an FBI provocateur not only smashing windows but actively encouraging others to join him)
- Only one woman murdered by a Capitol police officer. Her own husband doesn't even know the name of the man who murdered his wife because Congress is protecting the cop. There were no other deaths.
- There are numerous videos showing Capitol police waiving people onto the Capitol grounds and into the Capitol building and of them standing idly by as an "insurrection" occurs.
- Over 14,000 hours of video is being withheld by the federal government
- The Capitol police, Nancy Pelosi, and the DC police (along with the DC mayor) were all informed prior to the kerfuffle that something was going to happen. And yet, they did NOTHING
- The Capitol police claim they didn't fully react to the kerfuffle because of how harshly they were attacked by the left (from Congress to the media) for attempting to quell blm/antifa riots in DC. They didn't want to be attacked by the left again for doing their jobs.

The past year of blm/antifa riots (you know, the groups that the Democrats proudly supporting including Knee-Pads Harris?):

- BILLIONS in property damage
- Thousands injured including several hundred police officers and many innocent bystanders
- Dozens killed including a retired police officer must trying to help and a woman who dared say "all lives matter."
- Numerous federal and state government buildings (including police precincts) have been set on fire, breached, smashed, and vandalized by leftists - which by your own definition of an insurrection means they committed insurrection numerous times
- Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, mostly minority neighborhoods - the very people blm pretends they care about - turning them into wastelands that no businesses will rebuild (look no further than LA to see what happens after a riot)
- A horse was burned to death by rioters simply because the horse's owner was driving his horse trailer on a public road the rioters wanted control over
- Democrats to this day claim it was "mostly peaceful protests"

So either you're a complete moron or incapable of seeing reality for what it truly is which makes you mentally ill. So which is it?
Watch the fucking video, asshole. The woman tried to break into an area that was being protected by
police and got what she deserved. 6 people were killed and 130 police officers were injured because of the violence that she was a part of as she and others attempted to prevent lawmakers from doing their job.
The other damage that you are referring to was not caused by "leftists". It was done by criminals whose politics are not an issue. Read a book.
'EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE'

An officer blindly, indiscriminately fired his weapon through a doorway without having a clear view of what / who he was shooting at, shooting / killing an unarmed, petite, white, female, US military veteran and American citizen.

Had this policeman been white and the victim been an unarmed, female black vet / American citizen Antifa / BLM would have burned half of DC down.


Some snowflakes have argued that the police officer did NOT 'blindly, indiscriminately' fire through the doorway, that he did see his target and did see Babbitt clearly and made the choice to take the shot.

My comments were based on part of the investigation, videos, ad what experts stated happened, but I appreciate the snowflakes' version. Their version proved the officer was guilty of ;'Excessive Use of Force' and made the conscious choice to shoot and kill an unarmed citizen.

Either way, it was a 'Bad Shoot'.
 

BIG BROTHER: Biden Administration Wants

Americans To Report ‘Radicalized’ Friends

And Family To Government




For four years, the left insisted that Trump was a fascist dictator. Even people in politics and media echoed this falsehood.
Now we have the Joe Biden administration urging Americans to snitch on their family and friends to the government.


(This could be considered a little 'over-kill' since the FISA Court proved the FBI has been illegally, Un-Constitutionally committing FISA Court Fraud and spying on Americans, reporters, the media, Congress, USSC Justices, political party Candidates and their trams...and are still doing it under Wray.)

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.


Biden doesn't need to ask anyone to rat on their friends or family - he just needs to turn on his TV and watch foreign/Democrat-funded and protected domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM constantly looting, destroying, burning , attempting to burn federal agents alive, injuring 14 Secret Service members, permanently closing minority-owned small businesses and racking a combined total of BILLIONS of dollars in damage to communities all over the US.
- Perhaps someone should report VP Harris for heping bail these domestic terrorists out of jail to return to committing act of terrorism...and for calling on these domestic terrorists to continue committing violence after the election, which they have done?!


Yes, but we don't see the violence committed by the Trump-supporting right-wing domestic terrorist organizations like the white supremacists, Po boys, etc. You know, yes? The type of people who attacked our Capitol on Jan 6. Nobody had a handle on them before so the time is now before they do any more damage to our democracy, kill or injure lawmakers and other Americans tasked with governing our country or simply living their lives.
What violence exactly?

January 6th kerfuffle planned and acted out by the FBI and their lapdogs:

- A few windows smashed (a new video surfaced of an FBI provocateur not only smashing windows but actively encouraging others to join him)
- Only one woman murdered by a Capitol police officer. Her own husband doesn't even know the name of the man who murdered his wife because Congress is protecting the cop. There were no other deaths.
- There are numerous videos showing Capitol police waiving people onto the Capitol grounds and into the Capitol building and of them standing idly by as an "insurrection" occurs.
- Over 14,000 hours of video is being withheld by the federal government
- The Capitol police, Nancy Pelosi, and the DC police (along with the DC mayor) were all informed prior to the kerfuffle that something was going to happen. And yet, they did NOTHING
- The Capitol police claim they didn't fully react to the kerfuffle because of how harshly they were attacked by the left (from Congress to the media) for attempting to quell blm/antifa riots in DC. They didn't want to be attacked by the left again for doing their jobs.

The past year of blm/antifa riots (you know, the groups that the Democrats proudly supporting including Knee-Pads Harris?):

- BILLIONS in property damage
- Thousands injured including several hundred police officers and many innocent bystanders
- Dozens killed including a retired police officer must trying to help and a woman who dared say "all lives matter."
- Numerous federal and state government buildings (including police precincts) have been set on fire, breached, smashed, and vandalized by leftists - which by your own definition of an insurrection means they committed insurrection numerous times
- Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, mostly minority neighborhoods - the very people blm pretends they care about - turning them into wastelands that no businesses will rebuild (look no further than LA to see what happens after a riot)
- A horse was burned to death by rioters simply because the horse's owner was driving his horse trailer on a public road the rioters wanted control over
- Democrats to this day claim it was "mostly peaceful protests"

So either you're a complete moron or incapable of seeing reality for what it truly is which makes you mentally ill. So which is it?
Just look at the fucking videos for reality.

BIG BROTHER: Biden Administration Wants

Americans To Report ‘Radicalized’ Friends

And Family To Government




For four years, the left insisted that Trump was a fascist dictator. Even people in politics and media echoed this falsehood.
Now we have the Joe Biden administration urging Americans to snitch on their family and friends to the government.


(This could be considered a little 'over-kill' since the FISA Court proved the FBI has been illegally, Un-Constitutionally committing FISA Court Fraud and spying on Americans, reporters, the media, Congress, USSC Justices, political party Candidates and their trams...and are still doing it under Wray.)

President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.


Biden doesn't need to ask anyone to rat on their friends or family - he just needs to turn on his TV and watch foreign/Democrat-funded and protected domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM constantly looting, destroying, burning , attempting to burn federal agents alive, injuring 14 Secret Service members, permanently closing minority-owned small businesses and racking a combined total of BILLIONS of dollars in damage to communities all over the US.
- Perhaps someone should report VP Harris for heping bail these domestic terrorists out of jail to return to committing act of terrorism...and for calling on these domestic terrorists to continue committing violence after the election, which they have done?!


Yes, but we don't see the violence committed by the Trump-supporting right-wing domestic terrorist organizations like the white supremacists, Po boys, etc. You know, yes? The type of people who attacked our Capitol on Jan 6. Nobody had a handle on them before so the time is now before they do any more damage to our democracy, kill or injure lawmakers and other Americans tasked with governing our country or simply living their lives.
What violence exactly?

January 6th kerfuffle planned and acted out by the FBI and their lapdogs:

- A few windows smashed (a new video surfaced of an FBI provocateur not only smashing windows but actively encouraging others to join him)
- Only one woman murdered by a Capitol police officer. Her own husband doesn't even know the name of the man who murdered his wife because Congress is protecting the cop. There were no other deaths.
- There are numerous videos showing Capitol police waiving people onto the Capitol grounds and into the Capitol building and of them standing idly by as an "insurrection" occurs.
- Over 14,000 hours of video is being withheld by the federal government
- The Capitol police, Nancy Pelosi, and the DC police (along with the DC mayor) were all informed prior to the kerfuffle that something was going to happen. And yet, they did NOTHING
- The Capitol police claim they didn't fully react to the kerfuffle because of how harshly they were attacked by the left (from Congress to the media) for attempting to quell blm/antifa riots in DC. They didn't want to be attacked by the left again for doing their jobs.

The past year of blm/antifa riots (you know, the groups that the Democrats proudly supporting including Knee-Pads Harris?):

- BILLIONS in property damage
- Thousands injured including several hundred police officers and many innocent bystanders
- Dozens killed including a retired police officer must trying to help and a woman who dared say "all lives matter."
- Numerous federal and state government buildings (including police precincts) have been set on fire, breached, smashed, and vandalized by leftists - which by your own definition of an insurrection means they committed insurrection numerous times
- Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, mostly minority neighborhoods - the very people blm pretends they care about - turning them into wastelands that no businesses will rebuild (look no further than LA to see what happens after a riot)
- A horse was burned to death by rioters simply because the horse's owner was driving his horse trailer on a public road the rioters wanted control over
- Democrats to this day claim it was "mostly peaceful protests"

So either you're a complete moron or incapable of seeing reality for what it truly is which makes you mentally ill. So which is it?
Watch the fucking video, asshole. The woman tried to break into an area that was being protected by
police and got what she deserved. 6 people were killed and 130 police officers were injured because of the violence that she was a part of as she and others attempted to prevent lawmakers from doing their job.
The other damage that you are referring to was not caused by "leftists". It was done by criminals whose politics are not an issue. Read a book.
So if you believe shooting an unarmed woman is "justice", then why do you support blm?

6 people were NOT killed. If you took just a few minutes to research things for yourself you'd see that was yet another lie fed to you by a media who thinks you're as stupid as I do. Since you're obviously too lazy to educate yourself with facts, I'll spoon feed you. Only 5 people were attributed to dying from "violence" on the 6th by the leftist media, you can't even get your talking points right :D

  • Ashli Babbitt, 35 years old. Cause of death – Gunshot, Homicide.
  • Kevin Greeson, 55 years old. Cause of death – Heart attack, natural.
  • Benjamin Phillips, 50 years old. Cause of death – Heart attack, natural.
  • Roseanne Boyland, 34 years old. Cause of death Amphetamine intoxication, accidental.
  • Officer Brian Sicknick, 42 years old. Cause of death – A series of strokes his own family stated were caused naturally, NOT by anything to do with the kerfuffle
All of them are Trump supporters, the ones you're claiming are "insurrectionists". You're using their deaths to further your political agenda while simultaneously attacking those very people for their political ideology. Ahh, there's no bigger hypocrite than a leftist twit.

Speaking of political agendas, blm and antifa BOTH have openly stated numerous times that their agendas are political.

The founders of blm are open Marxists (while getting filthy rich from capitalism) whose own website espoused communist ideology until they came under too much heat. Several leaders of blm are on camera talking about both literally and figuratively burning the system down.

Antifa has been pushing for anarchy. While that means no government, it's still a political desire. Then, when they get their way (through weak-spined Democrat leaders) by creating "autonomous zones" they create their own defacto government and police! The hypocrisy is so delicious!

I especially adore how you tell me to read a book after pecking out such an ignorant and angry response to facts. It was quite comical! Keep up the good work!
 
Last edited:
it defines me as what I am, not who I am. It says I'm an oppressor no matter what.
It doesn’t. That’s just your fragility.

If we can’t teach a theory of how people have behaved because it makes you feel like the group you identify with is bad, then you just need to accept you’re a propagandist.

You didn't actually contradict what I said, you just deflected like a typical SJW twat.
I did contradict you in the first two words.
It doesn’t.
See? Marty, you have to read what I write. Or you can just lie about it.

You pee wee herman contradicted, you didn't actually back it up.
 
No, I thought it overreached on no constitutional basis.
Right. Because you’re concern is with the impairment of the “freedom” for states to oppress a minority.

Kind of like the freedom of States to oppress bakers and photographers?
Kinda, yeah. Anyone want to go back to the days of segregated businesses? Nope? Me neither.

That was systemic segregation, enabled by a Supreme Court decision. It also involved race, and often point of sale services, i.e. actual public accommodations.

Actually the calls for segregation are coming from your side now

Yes, Black NYU Students Demanded Segregated Housing. No, the University Didn't Agree to It..

Smith College Introduces Segregated Residence Halls
The SCOTUS did not demand segregation, it only allowed it.

That’s the kind of freedom you’re after, right?

I said enabled, not demanded, nice attempted dodge.
The dodge is you about the “enabling” in the first place.

That's what plessy did, it gave federal blessing to local jim crow laws.
And it is irrelevant. Doesn't matter who enabled what. This isn't even about Jim Crow laws. It's about segregation in businesses which you want to allow.

It's not about segregation, it's about not wanting to do a single service for a single event because of religious reasons.

And SJW's like you can't even compromise on that.
 
it defines me as what I am, not who I am. It says I'm an oppressor no matter what.
It doesn’t. That’s just your fragility.

If we can’t teach a theory of how people have behaved because it makes you feel like the group you identify with is bad, then you just need to accept you’re a propagandist.

You didn't actually contradict what I said, you just deflected like a typical SJW twat.
I did contradict you in the first two words.
It doesn’t.
See? Marty, you have to read what I write. Or you can just lie about it.

You pee wee herman contradicted, you didn't actually back it up.
Your allegation wasn’t backed up either.

What’s your game? Say whatever the hell you want and demand people disprove you?

Go to hell.
 
it defines me as what I am, not who I am. It says I'm an oppressor no matter what.
It doesn’t. That’s just your fragility.

If we can’t teach a theory of how people have behaved because it makes you feel like the group you identify with is bad, then you just need to accept you’re a propagandist.

You didn't actually contradict what I said, you just deflected like a typical SJW twat.
I did contradict you in the first two words.
It doesn’t.
See? Marty, you have to read what I write. Or you can just lie about it.

You pee wee herman contradicted, you didn't actually back it up.
Your allegation wasn’t backed up either.

What’s your game? Say whatever the hell you want and demand people disprove you?

Go to hell.

Om nom nom nom.

I've actually described parts of CRT and their impact, all you have done is said nuh uh or lied about the actual purpose of it
 
No, I thought it overreached on no constitutional basis.
Right. Because you’re concern is with the impairment of the “freedom” for states to oppress a minority.

Kind of like the freedom of States to oppress bakers and photographers?
Kinda, yeah. Anyone want to go back to the days of segregated businesses? Nope? Me neither.

That was systemic segregation, enabled by a Supreme Court decision. It also involved race, and often point of sale services, i.e. actual public accommodations.

Actually the calls for segregation are coming from your side now

Yes, Black NYU Students Demanded Segregated Housing. No, the University Didn't Agree to It..

Smith College Introduces Segregated Residence Halls
The SCOTUS did not demand segregation, it only allowed it.

That’s the kind of freedom you’re after, right?

I said enabled, not demanded, nice attempted dodge.
The dodge is you about the “enabling” in the first place.

That's what plessy did, it gave federal blessing to local jim crow laws.
And it is irrelevant. Doesn't matter who enabled what. This isn't even about Jim Crow laws. It's about segregation in businesses which you want to allow.

It's not about segregation, it's about not wanting to do a single service for a single event because of religious reasons.

And SJW's like you can't even compromise on that.
The fundamental issue is the same as segregation. No difference. Refusal to serve people based on their sexual orientation isn’t any different than refusal to serve black peoples at Woolworth’s.
 
No, I thought it overreached on no constitutional basis.
Right. Because you’re concern is with the impairment of the “freedom” for states to oppress a minority.

Kind of like the freedom of States to oppress bakers and photographers?
Kinda, yeah. Anyone want to go back to the days of segregated businesses? Nope? Me neither.

That was systemic segregation, enabled by a Supreme Court decision. It also involved race, and often point of sale services, i.e. actual public accommodations.

Actually the calls for segregation are coming from your side now

Yes, Black NYU Students Demanded Segregated Housing. No, the University Didn't Agree to It..

Smith College Introduces Segregated Residence Halls
The SCOTUS did not demand segregation, it only allowed it.

That’s the kind of freedom you’re after, right?

I said enabled, not demanded, nice attempted dodge.
The dodge is you about the “enabling” in the first place.

That's what plessy did, it gave federal blessing to local jim crow laws.
And it is irrelevant. Doesn't matter who enabled what. This isn't even about Jim Crow laws. It's about segregation in businesses which you want to allow.

It's not about segregation, it's about not wanting to do a single service for a single event because of religious reasons.

And SJW's like you can't even compromise on that.
The fundamental issue is the same as segregation. No difference. Refusal to serve people based on their sexual orientation isn’t any different than refusal to serve black peoples at Woolworth’s.

No, it isn't. In these businesses they can still get point of sale service, they are just asked to go somewhere else for this specific event, which is religiously sinful for the baker or photographer in question.

And the Woolworth thing was a symptom of a systemic issue, overall denial of economic equality.
 
I've actually described parts of CRT and their impact, all you have done is said nuh uh or lied about the actual purpose of it
Your description was an unsubstantiated claim. You lied about the actual purpose of it.
 
I've actually described parts of CRT and their impact, all you have done is said nuh uh or lied about the actual purpose of it
Your description was an unsubstantiated claim. You lied about the actual purpose of it.

Nope. It's the crux of the theory, more appropriately, it's the reason for the theory. It's simple academic bullying dressed up in victimology.
 
No, I thought it overreached on no constitutional basis.
Right. Because you’re concern is with the impairment of the “freedom” for states to oppress a minority.

Kind of like the freedom of States to oppress bakers and photographers?
Kinda, yeah. Anyone want to go back to the days of segregated businesses? Nope? Me neither.

That was systemic segregation, enabled by a Supreme Court decision. It also involved race, and often point of sale services, i.e. actual public accommodations.

Actually the calls for segregation are coming from your side now

Yes, Black NYU Students Demanded Segregated Housing. No, the University Didn't Agree to It..

Smith College Introduces Segregated Residence Halls
The SCOTUS did not demand segregation, it only allowed it.

That’s the kind of freedom you’re after, right?

I said enabled, not demanded, nice attempted dodge.
The dodge is you about the “enabling” in the first place.

That's what plessy did, it gave federal blessing to local jim crow laws.
And it is irrelevant. Doesn't matter who enabled what. This isn't even about Jim Crow laws. It's about segregation in businesses which you want to allow.

It's not about segregation, it's about not wanting to do a single service for a single event because of religious reasons.

And SJW's like you can't even compromise on that.
The fundamental issue is the same as segregation. No difference. Refusal to serve people based on their sexual orientation isn’t any different than refusal to serve black peoples at Woolworth’s.

No, it isn't. In these businesses they can still get point of sale service, they are just asked to go somewhere else for this specific event, which is religiously sinful for the baker or photographer in question.

And the Woolworth thing was a symptom of a systemic issue, overall denial of economic equality.
100% it is. The same laws that desegregated Woolworth's counter is what makes it so the baker needs to serve the gay couple.

Public accommodation laws are at the center of this.
 
Nope. It's the crux of the theory, more appropriately, it's the reason for the theory. It's simple academic bullying dressed up in victimology.
It's not. It's a description of the motivations of those who created the power structures in this country and a way of accounting for much of our current economic disparities.

You find it offensive only because you can't accept that a group you identified with may have had motives you don't want to acknowledge.
 
No, I thought it overreached on no constitutional basis.
Right. Because you’re concern is with the impairment of the “freedom” for states to oppress a minority.

Kind of like the freedom of States to oppress bakers and photographers?
Kinda, yeah. Anyone want to go back to the days of segregated businesses? Nope? Me neither.

That was systemic segregation, enabled by a Supreme Court decision. It also involved race, and often point of sale services, i.e. actual public accommodations.

Actually the calls for segregation are coming from your side now

Yes, Black NYU Students Demanded Segregated Housing. No, the University Didn't Agree to It..

Smith College Introduces Segregated Residence Halls
The SCOTUS did not demand segregation, it only allowed it.

That’s the kind of freedom you’re after, right?

I said enabled, not demanded, nice attempted dodge.
The dodge is you about the “enabling” in the first place.

That's what plessy did, it gave federal blessing to local jim crow laws.
And it is irrelevant. Doesn't matter who enabled what. This isn't even about Jim Crow laws. It's about segregation in businesses which you want to allow.

It's not about segregation, it's about not wanting to do a single service for a single event because of religious reasons.

And SJW's like you can't even compromise on that.
The fundamental issue is the same as segregation. No difference. Refusal to serve people based on their sexual orientation isn’t any different than refusal to serve black peoples at Woolworth’s.

No, it isn't. In these businesses they can still get point of sale service, they are just asked to go somewhere else for this specific event, which is religiously sinful for the baker or photographer in question.

And the Woolworth thing was a symptom of a systemic issue, overall denial of economic equality.
100% it is. The same laws that desegregated Woolworth's counter is what makes it so the baker needs to serve the gay couple.

Public accommodation laws are at the center of this.


Not even close. And a contracted service is not a Public Accommodation. They baker doesn't turn away point of sale customers for any reason.
 
Nope. It's the crux of the theory, more appropriately, it's the reason for the theory. It's simple academic bullying dressed up in victimology.
It's not. It's a description of the motivations of those who created the power structures in this country and a way of accounting for much of our current economic disparities.

You find it offensive only because you can't accept that a group you identified with may have had motives you don't want to acknowledge.

Wow, talk about academic blather.

Sorry, but I don't want to be the whipping boy for things I never did and be called an oppressor by people with more power and stuff than me simply because I am white, male, want to remain male and like boobs.

It's simply another way to balkanize our nation.
 
And a contracted service is not a Public Accommodation.
Of course it is.

A PA is something you walk into, a store, a movie theater, a hotel, etc. It isn't a contracted service.

And even PA's don't override free exercise without a compelling government reason. A SSM couple having to find another baker doesn't justify telling a baker to either compromise their religious beliefs or go out of business.

It's amazing how people like you can't see the other side without trying to destroy them.
 
Sorry, but I don't want to be the whipping boy for things I never did and be called an oppressor by people with more power and stuff than me simply because I am white, male, want to remain male and like boobs.
Huh. Like you treat me as a “whipping boy” for riots I never did?

Jesus. Grow up. It’s just fragility talking.
 
Sorry, but I don't want to be the whipping boy for things I never did and be called an oppressor by people with more power and stuff than me simply because I am white, male, want to remain male and like boobs.
Huh. Like you treat me as a “whipping boy” for riots I never did?

Jesus. Grow up. It’s just fragility talking.

No, the whole point of CRT is that somehow by just being me I'm getting advantages over people like LeBron James and Oprah, and that will never change until somehow the system is setup to screw me over as revenge.
 
And a contracted service is not a Public Accommodation.
Of course it is.

A PA is something you walk into, a store, a movie theater, a hotel, etc. It isn't a contracted service.

And even PA's don't override free exercise without a compelling government reason. A SSM couple having to find another baker doesn't justify telling a baker to either compromise their religious beliefs or go out of business.

It's amazing how people like you can't see the other side without trying to destroy them.
PAs cover contracted service too. The definition is extremely broad.
 

Forum List

Back
Top