SHAME! Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones SLAM Joy Behar for calling them tramps

To laugh about it?

"On the tapes, Clinton, who speaks in a Southern drawl, appears to acknowledge that she was aware of her client’s guilt, brags about successfully getting the only piece of physical evidence thrown out of court, and laughs about it all whimsically."

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
Did you ever actually listen to the entire tape? I did:



She's laughing because she said the guy took a polygraph test and passed and so she would never again believe anything that came from one of those tests.

She's laughing because the crime lab, something she has nothing to do with, cut the evidence out of the underwear and lost the pieces it cut out and gave the underwear back with holes in it to be used as evidence. You have to laugh at that. It's so inept it's funny. Underwear to be used as evidence with holes cut out?

And the guy wasn't from some famous family. Just some nobody. So where would he get the influence to somehow "fix" the trial.

Republicans and their conspiracies. It's pathetic. You guys are truly awful.


So she knows her client did it and brags to a reporter about how she got the rapist off. Hillary also blames the twelve year old.

And this is a bitch from hell who says she's an advocate for women and children?

:lol:



She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men.

You really want to keep trying to protect this vile piece of shit that claims a twelve year old is basically asking for it?

And her laughing while bragging is disgusting.

Just stop lying. She didn't want the case and laughed about them losing the evidence and the guy beating the polygraph. She had a job to do and did it.
 
To laugh about it?

"On the tapes, Clinton, who speaks in a Southern drawl, appears to acknowledge that she was aware of her client’s guilt, brags about successfully getting the only piece of physical evidence thrown out of court, and laughs about it all whimsically."

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
Did you ever actually listen to the entire tape? I did:



She's laughing because she said the guy took a polygraph test and passed and so she would never again believe anything that came from one of those tests.

She's laughing because the crime lab, something she has nothing to do with, cut the evidence out of the underwear and lost the pieces it cut out and gave the underwear back with holes in it to be used as evidence. You have to laugh at that. It's so inept it's funny. Underwear to be used as evidence with holes cut out?

And the guy wasn't from some famous family. Just some nobody. So where would he get the influence to somehow "fix" the trial.

Republicans and their conspiracies. It's pathetic. You guys are truly awful.


She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men.

You really want to keep trying to protect this vile piece of shit that claims a twelve year old is basically asking for it?

And her laughing while bragging is disgusting.


It's also nonexistent.

As are the previous two lines.
"She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men. "​

(Rump voice): Wrong.
>> Documents from the 1975 case include an affidavit (p. 34) sworn by Clinton, from which the "in court, Hillary told the judge that I made up the rape story" portion of the claims was derived. That affidavit doesn't show, as claimed, that Hillary Clinton asserted the defendant "made up the rape story because [she] enjoyed fantasizing about men"; rather, it shows that other people, including an expert in child psychology, had said that the complainant was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing about persons, claiming they had attacked her body," and that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Clinton therefore asked the court to have the complainant undergo a psychiatric exam (at the defense's expense) to determine the validity of that information << (Snopes)
Want more?

>> According to Gibson, Maupin Cummings, the judge in the case, kept a list of attorneys who would represent poor clients. Clinton was on that list and helped run a legal aid clinic at the time. Taylor was assigned a public defender in the case but Gibson said he quickly “started screaming for a woman attorney” to represent him.

Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don't want to represent this guy. I just can't stand this. I don't want to get involved. Can you get me off?”

“I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don't jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn't remove her and she stayed on the case.” <<​

Still more?

>> As for the claim that Hillary Clinton "knew the defendant was guilty," she couldn't possibly have known that unless she were present when the incident in question occurred. It's also largely irrelevant given that under Hillary Clinton's handling of the case, the defendant pled guilty rather than going to trial and asserting his innocence. <<

Happy to help. See, I have a special subscription to this thing called the "Internet" where I can look all this stuff up. It's only open to a very select few of the Inner Circle and it's very expensive and requires an intensive exclusive training course.

Oh wait --- no it's not and no it doesn't.

Stop peddling this fucking bullshit TD. You look as sleazy as that trenchcoat-wielding porno-theater flasher who starts these bullshit threads.
 
To laugh about it?

"On the tapes, Clinton, who speaks in a Southern drawl, appears to acknowledge that she was aware of her client’s guilt, brags about successfully getting the only piece of physical evidence thrown out of court, and laughs about it all whimsically."

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
Did you ever actually listen to the entire tape? I did:



She's laughing because she said the guy took a polygraph test and passed and so she would never again believe anything that came from one of those tests.

She's laughing because the crime lab, something she has nothing to do with, cut the evidence out of the underwear and lost the pieces it cut out and gave the underwear back with holes in it to be used as evidence. You have to laugh at that. It's so inept it's funny. Underwear to be used as evidence with holes cut out?

And the guy wasn't from some famous family. Just some nobody. So where would he get the influence to somehow "fix" the trial.

Republicans and their conspiracies. It's pathetic. You guys are truly awful.


She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men.

You really want to keep trying to protect this vile piece of shit that claims a twelve year old is basically asking for it?

And her laughing while bragging is disgusting.

You don't think Americans deserve lawyers trying to defend them, do you?
 
To laugh about it?

"On the tapes, Clinton, who speaks in a Southern drawl, appears to acknowledge that she was aware of her client’s guilt, brags about successfully getting the only piece of physical evidence thrown out of court, and laughs about it all whimsically."

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
Did you ever actually listen to the entire tape? I did:



She's laughing because she said the guy took a polygraph test and passed and so she would never again believe anything that came from one of those tests.

She's laughing because the crime lab, something she has nothing to do with, cut the evidence out of the underwear and lost the pieces it cut out and gave the underwear back with holes in it to be used as evidence. You have to laugh at that. It's so inept it's funny. Underwear to be used as evidence with holes cut out?

And the guy wasn't from some famous family. Just some nobody. So where would he get the influence to somehow "fix" the trial.

Republicans and their conspiracies. It's pathetic. You guys are truly awful.


She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men.

You really want to keep trying to protect this vile piece of shit that claims a twelve year old is basically asking for it?

And her laughing while bragging is disgusting.


It's also nonexistent.

As are the previous two lines.
"She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men. "​

(Rump voice): Wrong.
>> Documents from the 1975 case include an affidavit (p. 34) sworn by Clinton, from which the "in court, Hillary told the judge that I made up the rape story" portion of the claims was derived. That affidavit doesn't show, as claimed, that Hillary Clinton asserted the defendant "made up the rape story because [she] enjoyed fantasizing about men"; rather, it shows that other people, including an expert in child psychology, had said that the complainant was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing about persons, claiming they had attacked her body," and that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Clinton therefore asked the court to have the complainant undergo a psychiatric exam (at the defense's expense) to determine the validity of that information << (Snopes)
Want more?

>> According to Gibson, Maupin Cummings, the judge in the case, kept a list of attorneys who would represent poor clients. Clinton was on that list and helped run a legal aid clinic at the time. Taylor was assigned a public defender in the case but Gibson said he quickly “started screaming for a woman attorney” to represent him.

Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don't want to represent this guy. I just can't stand this. I don't want to get involved. Can you get me off?”

“I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don't jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn't remove her and she stayed on the case.” <<​

Still more?

>> As for the claim that Hillary Clinton "knew the defendant was guilty," she couldn't possibly have known that unless she were present when the incident in question occurred. It's also largely irrelevant given that under Hillary Clinton's handling of the case, the defendant pled guilty rather than going to trial and asserting his innocence. <<

Happy to help. See, I have a special subscription to this thing called the "Internet" where I can look all this stuff up. It's only open to a very select few of the Inner Circle and it's very expensive and requires an intensive exclusive training course.

Oh wait --- no it's not and no it doesn't.

Stop peddling this fucking bullshit TD. You look as sleazy as that trenchcoat-wielding porno-theater flasher who starts these bullshit threads.


You know who wrote that at Snopes? Drum roll........

A woman who was writing for a blog that got busted by............

Snopes!

:lol:

Even the headline of that article is garbage. Of course Hillary couldn't "free" the rapist.

In the affidavit she never even brings up a name to come to the conclusions she wrote in that affidavit.
No explanations given at all. Who are these imaginary advisers? Who are these imaginary experts that "told her"?

Pffffft. She blamed the victim. Deal with it.
 
Looks like rape accusers only deserved to be heard and believed if it's politically advantageous.
.

Mac,
Come on, I have no given credibility to claims of rape by Trump from the lawsuit and his ex-wife even thought the level of proof is far higher. There is no sworn testimony against Bill Clinton.

But I also don't expect a level of proof used against Bill Clinton to accepted as well... Bill Clinton is innocent until proven guilty and good like finding a judge that wouldn't throw this out on its ear after 2 mins...
Clinton already proved he would lie about sexual allegations. In fact he will lie on national television about it. Even under oath, so that gives the women accusing him credit.

That doesn't make him guilty of rape... He lied about having sex with a woman, this is not rape or sexual assault...

Do you have a lawyer that would bring this to a court and a judge who will listen to it for more than 2 min?
 
To laugh about it?

"On the tapes, Clinton, who speaks in a Southern drawl, appears to acknowledge that she was aware of her client’s guilt, brags about successfully getting the only piece of physical evidence thrown out of court, and laughs about it all whimsically."

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
Did you ever actually listen to the entire tape? I did:



She's laughing because she said the guy took a polygraph test and passed and so she would never again believe anything that came from one of those tests.

She's laughing because the crime lab, something she has nothing to do with, cut the evidence out of the underwear and lost the pieces it cut out and gave the underwear back with holes in it to be used as evidence. You have to laugh at that. It's so inept it's funny. Underwear to be used as evidence with holes cut out?

And the guy wasn't from some famous family. Just some nobody. So where would he get the influence to somehow "fix" the trial.

Republicans and their conspiracies. It's pathetic. You guys are truly awful.


She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men.

You really want to keep trying to protect this vile piece of shit that claims a twelve year old is basically asking for it?

And her laughing while bragging is disgusting.


It's also nonexistent.

As are the previous two lines.
"She blamed the victim for her own rape. In her affidavit she lied and said the girl fantasized about older men. "​

(Rump voice): Wrong.
>> Documents from the 1975 case include an affidavit (p. 34) sworn by Clinton, from which the "in court, Hillary told the judge that I made up the rape story" portion of the claims was derived. That affidavit doesn't show, as claimed, that Hillary Clinton asserted the defendant "made up the rape story because [she] enjoyed fantasizing about men"; rather, it shows that other people, including an expert in child psychology, had said that the complainant was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing about persons, claiming they had attacked her body," and that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Clinton therefore asked the court to have the complainant undergo a psychiatric exam (at the defense's expense) to determine the validity of that information << (Snopes)
Want more?

>> According to Gibson, Maupin Cummings, the judge in the case, kept a list of attorneys who would represent poor clients. Clinton was on that list and helped run a legal aid clinic at the time. Taylor was assigned a public defender in the case but Gibson said he quickly “started screaming for a woman attorney” to represent him.

Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don't want to represent this guy. I just can't stand this. I don't want to get involved. Can you get me off?”

“I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don't jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn't remove her and she stayed on the case.” <<​

Still more?

>> As for the claim that Hillary Clinton "knew the defendant was guilty," she couldn't possibly have known that unless she were present when the incident in question occurred. It's also largely irrelevant given that under Hillary Clinton's handling of the case, the defendant pled guilty rather than going to trial and asserting his innocence. <<

Happy to help. See, I have a special subscription to this thing called the "Internet" where I can look all this stuff up. It's only open to a very select few of the Inner Circle and it's very expensive and requires an intensive exclusive training course.

Oh wait --- no it's not and no it doesn't.

Stop peddling this fucking bullshit TD. You look as sleazy as that trenchcoat-wielding porno-theater flasher who starts these bullshit threads.


You know who wrote that at Snopes? Drum roll........

A woman who was writing for a blog that got busted by............

Snopes!

:lol:

Even the headline of that article is garbage. Of course Hillary couldn't "free" the rapist.

In the affidavit she never even brings up a name to come to the conclusions she wrote in that affidavit.
No explanations given at all. Who are these imaginary advisers? Who are these imaginary experts that "told her"?

Pffffft. She blamed the victim. Deal with it.


It's linked to the documents actually. With TEN sources.

You lose.


Pffffft. She blamed the victim. Deal with it.
Link?
Quote?



Nah, didn't think so.
 
Looks like rape accusers only deserved to be heard and believed if it's politically advantageous.
.

Mac,
Come on, I have no given credibility to claims of rape by Trump from the lawsuit and his ex-wife even thought the level of proof is far higher. There is no sworn testimony against Bill Clinton.

But I also don't expect a level of proof used against Bill Clinton to accepted as well... Bill Clinton is innocent until proven guilty and good like finding a judge that wouldn't throw this out on its ear after 2 mins...
Clinton already proved he would lie about sexual allegations. In fact he will lie on national television about it. Even under oath, so that gives the women accusing him credit.

That doesn't make him guilty of rape... He lied about having sex with a woman, this is not rape or sexual assault...

Do you have a lawyer that would bring this to a court and a judge who will listen to it for more than 2 min?
He lied about a blow job, you really don't think he would lie about rape?
 
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit.

“I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

Clinton also wrote that a child psychologist told her that children in early adolescence “tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” especially when they come from “disorganized families, such as the complainant.”

So where is the proof of anything that she wrote in the affidavit?

And if you don't think the line "has a tendency to seek out older men....." isn't code for "she was asking for it" you're nuts.

Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
 
I've got my facts straight. Clinton blamed the victim asshole. Clinton in an affidavit had the balls to claim that the 12 year old girl fantasized about making it with an older man.

The piece of evidence which had the virgin's blood stain on it went missing but there was no reason that the officers who collected the evidence could not have been called.

And yes her mother just wanted all this over with so her daughter didn't have to testify BUT that does not take away from the fact that Hillary blamed the victim.

Like she always does. It's never Bill's fault either.

And I'm thrilled to death that this poor woman's story is now finally news.
Are you talking about when Hillary was ordered to defend a man in a case she didn't want to defend?

She became so invested i the case that she maligned the little girl's reputation.
In other words, as a public defender, she did an outstanding job. Exactly what was required of her under the law.

Maligning an innocent child's reputation in order to set free a child rapist is morally reprehensible, not an outstanding job.

Sorry, Lets introduce you to the justice system, the defense lawyer has to do everything within the law to defend her client...

Did Clinton break the law because for her not to do so is actually breaking the law...

This was a case where Clinton was far better lawyer than her opposite number...

But do they laugh at clearing a rapist, that she confirms she knows he is....pathetic liberal scum!
 
Yes, the fucking liberals are pathetic pieces of shit

http://twitchy.com ^

Remember when Hillary Clinton said something about how all women who are sexually assaulted should be heard? Or something along those lines, it’s hard to keep it all straight considering how much nonsense she spews but it was something like that. Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise they’re just tramps

Well, yeah. They made a big deal about Clarence Thomas, and trying to destroy him over a woman, guess there is some double standard
And the RW made him their Supreme Court nominee...
 
Are you talking about when Hillary was ordered to defend a man in a case she didn't want to defend?

She became so invested i the case that she maligned the little girl's reputation.
In other words, as a public defender, she did an outstanding job. Exactly what was required of her under the law.

Maligning an innocent child's reputation in order to set free a child rapist is morally reprehensible, not an outstanding job.

Sorry, Lets introduce you to the justice system, the defense lawyer has to do everything within the law to defend her client...

Did Clinton break the law because for her not to do so is actually breaking the law...

This was a case where Clinton was far better lawyer than her opposite number...

But do they laugh at clearing a rapist, that she confirms she knows he is....pathetic liberal scum!
Except both of those are lies.....but then again, we know you lie.....a lot.
 
Yes, the fucking liberals are pathetic pieces of shit

http://twitchy.com ^

Remember when Hillary Clinton said something about how all women who are sexually assaulted should be heard? Or something along those lines, it’s hard to keep it all straight considering how much nonsense she spews but it was something like that. Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise they’re just tramps

Well, yeah. They made a big deal about Clarence Thomas, and trying to destroy him over a woman, guess there is some double standard
And the RW made him their Supreme Court nominee...

But celebrate a serial sexual abuser, proved by an out of court settlement...if you are innocent you don't settle...asshole,
 
They lost the evidence and her mother didn't want her to go to trial. Get you facts straight.

And she sat on stage with old pussy grabber? Fuck her.

I've got my facts straight. Clinton blamed the victim asshole. Clinton in an affidavit had the balls to claim that the 12 year old girl fantasized about making it with an older man.

The piece of evidence which had the virgin's blood stain on it went missing but there was no reason that the officers who collected the evidence could not have been called.

And yes her mother just wanted all this over with so her daughter didn't have to testify BUT that does not take away from the fact that Hillary blamed the victim.

Like she always does. It's never Bill's fault either.

And I'm thrilled to death that this poor woman's story is now finally news.
Are you talking about when Hillary was ordered to defend a man in a case she didn't want to defend?

The one where she was laughing about getting the rapist off. THAT one.
She was probably laughing at right wingers for wanting her to ignore the law.

No the audio was discovered in the Clinton Library. She was bragging on how she got him off and laughing in an interview with an Arkansas reporter.
Link?
 
I'm waiting for a Joy Behar suspension for calling innocent women, who Hillary claims must be heard, tramps.
I mean, Billy Bush is losing his job for a conversation 11 years ago.
Someone, please tell me why this bitch still has a job???
Anyone???
Joy Behar is not a very classy person. Fact. I also would not vote for her for political office. Another fact.
 
She became so invested i the case that she maligned the little girl's reputation.
In other words, as a public defender, she did an outstanding job. Exactly what was required of her under the law.

Maligning an innocent child's reputation in order to set free a child rapist is morally reprehensible, not an outstanding job.

Sorry, Lets introduce you to the justice system, the defense lawyer has to do everything within the law to defend her client...

Did Clinton break the law because for her not to do so is actually breaking the law...

This was a case where Clinton was far better lawyer than her opposite number...

But do they laugh at clearing a rapist, that she confirms she knows he is....pathetic liberal scum!
Except both of those are lies.....but then again, we know you lie.....a lot.

Nice try BoDYKEa....perverts protecting perverts...lolololol!
 
I've got my facts straight. Clinton blamed the victim asshole. Clinton in an affidavit had the balls to claim that the 12 year old girl fantasized about making it with an older man.

The piece of evidence which had the virgin's blood stain on it went missing but there was no reason that the officers who collected the evidence could not have been called.

And yes her mother just wanted all this over with so her daughter didn't have to testify BUT that does not take away from the fact that Hillary blamed the victim.

Like she always does. It's never Bill's fault either.

And I'm thrilled to death that this poor woman's story is now finally news.
Are you talking about when Hillary was ordered to defend a man in a case she didn't want to defend?

She became so invested i the case that she maligned the little girl's reputation.
In other words, as a public defender, she did an outstanding job. Exactly what was required of her under the law.

Maligning an innocent child's reputation in order to set free a child rapist is morally reprehensible, not an outstanding job.

Sorry, Lets introduce you to the justice system, the defense lawyer has to do everything within the law to defend her client...

Did Clinton break the law because for her not to do so is actually breaking the law...

This was a case where Clinton was far better lawyer than her opposite number...
Did the evidence go missing before or after Clinton became Attorney General?
Please pay attention....Bill Clinton was a law professor at that time AND they were not married yet. You've been told this several times. Time to question your sanity and/or your honesty.
 
In other words, as a public defender, she did an outstanding job. Exactly what was required of her under the law.

Maligning an innocent child's reputation in order to set free a child rapist is morally reprehensible, not an outstanding job.

Sorry, Lets introduce you to the justice system, the defense lawyer has to do everything within the law to defend her client...

Did Clinton break the law because for her not to do so is actually breaking the law...

This was a case where Clinton was far better lawyer than her opposite number...

But do they laugh at clearing a rapist, that she confirms she knows he is....pathetic liberal scum!
Except both of those are lies.....but then again, we know you lie.....a lot.

Nice try BoDYKEa....perverts protecting perverts...lolololol!
Ad hominem......See you here on Nov 9th?
 
Looks like rape accusers only deserved to be heard and believed if it's politically advantageous.
.

Mac,
Come on, I have no given credibility to claims of rape by Trump from the lawsuit and his ex-wife even thought the level of proof is far higher. There is no sworn testimony against Bill Clinton.

But I also don't expect a level of proof used against Bill Clinton to accepted as well... Bill Clinton is innocent until proven guilty and good like finding a judge that wouldn't throw this out on its ear after 2 mins...
Clinton already proved he would lie about sexual allegations. In fact he will lie on national television about it. Even under oath, so that gives the women accusing him credit.

That doesn't make him guilty of rape... He lied about having sex with a woman, this is not rape or sexual assault...

Do you have a lawyer that would bring this to a court and a judge who will listen to it for more than 2 min?
He lied about a blow job, you really don't think he would lie about rape?
We have many RWrs here who lie all the time....you really don't think they would lie about rape?
 
Yes, the fucking liberals are pathetic pieces of shit

http://twitchy.com ^

Remember when Hillary Clinton said something about how all women who are sexually assaulted should be heard? Or something along those lines, it’s hard to keep it all straight considering how much nonsense she spews but it was something like that. Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise they’re just tramps

Well, yeah. They made a big deal about Clarence Thomas, and trying to destroy him over a woman, guess there is some double standard
And the RW made him their Supreme Court nominee...

But celebrate a serial sexual abuser, proved by an out of court settlement...if you are innocent you don't settle...asshole,
:lol: People and businesses do it all the time. :lol:
 
Yes, the fucking liberals are pathetic pieces of shit

http://twitchy.com ^

Remember when Hillary Clinton said something about how all women who are sexually assaulted should be heard? Or something along those lines, it’s hard to keep it all straight considering how much nonsense she spews but it was something like that. Apparently the Left only agrees with her when women who are Democrats want to talk about being sexually assaulted, otherwise they’re just tramps

Well, yeah. They made a big deal about Clarence Thomas, and trying to destroy him over a woman, guess there is some double standard
And the RW made him their Supreme Court nominee...

But celebrate a serial sexual abuser, proved by an out of court settlement...if you are innocent you don't settle...asshole,
"Celebrate"? Define "celebrate" in this case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top