BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,610
He is in a suicide smock.
He must have been threatening to kill himself in the jail.
Good for him. I'll send him a rope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is in a suicide smock.
He must have been threatening to kill himself in the jail.
To come up with the applicable law ?
let's see if that's applicable.
it is definitely NOT a stand your ground situation.
even if you are being attacked by popcorn at 71 that is NOT going to fly as the reason for stand your ground.
This will go as a manslaughter conviction.
I know it wouldn't be worth hearing--but what sort of explanation might this individual have for using deadly force because of tweeting?
To come up with the applicable law ?
let's see if that's applicable.
it is definitely NOT a stand your ground situation.
even if you are being attacked by popcorn at 71 that is NOT going to fly as the reason for stand your ground.
This will go as a manslaughter conviction.
The focus is not the popcorn itself.
The focus is the deceased battered an elderly patron and did that elderly person believe he was facing great bodily injury.
If someone is going to start throwing things and verbally haranguing the elderly for such trivialness there may be a reasonable demonstrated fear of great bodily injury.
If you ask 100 seniors in the situation I would bet you get an overwhelming fear of great bodily injury. And it would be reasonable.
let's see if that's applicable.
it is definitely NOT a stand your ground situation.
even if you are being attacked by popcorn at 71 that is NOT going to fly as the reason for stand your ground.
This will go as a manslaughter conviction.
The focus is not the popcorn itself.
The focus is the deceased battered an elderly patron and did that elderly person believe he was facing great bodily injury.
If someone is going to start throwing things and verbally haranguing the elderly for such trivialness there may be a reasonable demonstrated fear of great bodily injury.
If you ask 100 seniors in the situation I would bet you get an overwhelming fear of great bodily injury. And it would be reasonable.
Everyone knows that legal guns can't be used in crimes.
If someone was shot with a legal gun, they must have deserved it, right?
let's see if that's applicable.
it is definitely NOT a stand your ground situation.
even if you are being attacked by popcorn at 71 that is NOT going to fly as the reason for stand your ground.
This will go as a manslaughter conviction.
I know it wouldn't be worth hearing--but what sort of explanation might this individual have for using deadly force because of tweeting?
I asked him to stop. He didn't.
I went to movie management. He didn't stop.
When I came back he started aggressively berating and intimidating me.
Then he came at me throwing something aggressively. It was dark I didn't know what he had.
In the dark and as 73 year old man, with health issues alone in the theatre I felt I was in danger of being injured by this irate individual who projected force at me. As a former law enforcement officer I have witnessed the effects of aggression toward the elderly and physical assaults.
I did what I needed to cease his aggression.
I know it wouldn't be worth hearing--but what sort of explanation might this individual have for using deadly force because of tweeting?
I asked him to stop. He didn't.
I went to movie management. He didn't stop.
When I came back he started aggressively berating and intimidating me.
Then he came at me throwing something aggressively. It was dark I didn't know what he had.
In the dark and as 73 year old man, with health issues alone in the theatre I felt I was in danger of being injured by this irate individual who projected force at me. As a former law enforcement officer I have witnessed the effects of aggression toward the elderly and physical assaults.
I did what I needed to cease his aggression.
as a juror--that would not cut it for me.
Assault by popcorn is no reason to draw and shoot.
I asked him to stop. He didn't.
I went to movie management. He didn't stop.
When I came back he started aggressively berating and intimidating me.
Then he came at me throwing something aggressively. It was dark I didn't know what he had.
In the dark and as 73 year old man, with health issues alone in the theatre I felt I was in danger of being injured by this irate individual who projected force at me. As a former law enforcement officer I have witnessed the effects of aggression toward the elderly and physical assaults.
I did what I needed to cease his aggression.
as a juror--that would not cut it for me.
Voir Dire, Dear.
as a juror--that would not cut it for me.
Voir Dire, Dear.
lol--cannot imagine what sort of jurors they will find. very cynical today. lol --a 'jury of his peers'--idiots?
Voir Dire, Dear.
lol--cannot imagine what sort of jurors they will find. very cynical today. lol --a 'jury of his peers'--idiots?
As a potential juror ma'am to what level do you think it acceptable to assault an elderly person ?
lol--cannot imagine what sort of jurors they will find. very cynical today. lol --a 'jury of his peers'--idiots?
As a potential juror ma'am to what level do you think it acceptable to assault an elderly person ?
not gonna try to think about that today.
Sorry folks, but OODA is correct.
As distasteful as it is, as much as we disagree with it, a good lawyer who argues and applies the law as it is written, if the jury follows their instructions, there's a good chance this guy walks...
The take away from this and Zimmerman is.
Don't put your hands on people unless you are defending yourself.
You may get ventilated.
Right or wrong. Free or imprisoned.
You are still dead.
The take away from this and Zimmerman is.
Don't put your hands on people unless you are defending yourself.
You may get ventilated.
Right or wrong. Free or imprisoned.
You are still dead.
Actually, what I take from this is that gun nuts are willing to go so far into left field to defend guns at all costs that you guys are actually able to convince yourselves that a man truly deserved to be killed because he threw popcorn at another man.
The take away from this and Zimmerman is.
Don't put your hands on people unless you are defending yourself.
You may get ventilated.
Right or wrong. Free or imprisoned.
You are still dead.
Actually, what I take from this is that gun nuts are willing to go so far into left field to defend guns at all costs that you guys are actually able to convince yourselves that a man truly deserved to be killed because he threw popcorn at another man.
What I take from this is you can put your emotional reckoning aside to deal with facts and law.