Shocked!!!! Prankster Puts Bacon On Muslim's Sandwich

Why are people comparing bacon being mistakenly put on a sandwich with this where a sliver of bacon or a small piece , which is obviously deliberate in hopes the people wouldn't realize it until they have already eaten it...

'Cause some of us do not believe the bacon was mistakenly put on the sandwiches. Many of us question just who put it there and why. Amazing that the intended "victims" managed to detect and avoid said "bacon bombs" before consuming them.

First off, I know you haven't looked at the pictures of the sandwiches, because you thought they were hamburgers. Secondly, you don't think MacDonalds is going to take the bacon and test it to make sure it is THEIR bacon?

bacon-allege-art1.jpg


I hate to tell you this, but some people actually look at their food before they eat it. This is especially true of people that have to watch items in their diet. I learned my lesson one day from MacDonalds. I ALWAYS order a McChicken add pickle. One day I didn't look at it and they screwed it up and it was a McChicken with just ketchup. Now I look at my food every time before I leave the restaurant.

Edit to add: They are regulars at that MacDonalds and order the same thing all the time... and there was bacon on ALL FOURTEEN sandwiches...
The one on the right is clearly underdone, based on McD's standards. Why is it so difficult for you to even entertain the concept that these women were capable of adding the pork product?
Why in hell do you even eat at McD's?! You seem quite concerned about healthy eating, so why chow down on that swill?

Why are you trying to change the subject? If this is going to litigation MacDonalds WILL test the bacon to make sure it is their's. The family are regulars there and place the same order all the time... why do you think all of a sudden they would pull this prank? They will find out who put it on their sandwiches.

I'm not going to continue to argue this with you. You can take all this time to argue your bigotry but couldn't take 5 minutes to read an article about the subject of the thread...
Well, finally something we can agree upon. Arguing with you is unfair since arguing with an unarmed man (woman?) is counterproductive. When you overcome your bigotry, call me back and let me know.


My bigotry? You know you've lost an argument when you start trying to use projection as a defense mechanism. :lmao:
 
But the family noticed a smoky taste

Mmmmmmm

I LOVE bacon... but I'm not going to look down on other people if their religion tells them they shouldn't eat it. I LOVE lobster, shrimp, and crab, but Catholics aren't supposed to eat that... but I don't tell them they are bad people because of it.

You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10
'Cause they eat dead things from the bottom of the sea. Pork is prohibited because they are omnivorous and will eat flesh and flora. Eating flesh, either dead on the sea bottom or otherwise implies that such creatures may have consumed human flesh and eating them becomes cannibalistic somehow.
 

I LOVE bacon... but I'm not going to look down on other people if their religion tells them they shouldn't eat it. I LOVE lobster, shrimp, and crab, but Catholics aren't supposed to eat that... but I don't tell them they are bad people because of it.

You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.
 
Just another attempt to screw whitey....what happened to that clock boy who tried to sue? I think the case was thrown out. Hand them deportation papers and see what happens
 
I LOVE bacon... but I'm not going to look down on other people if their religion tells them they shouldn't eat it. I LOVE lobster, shrimp, and crab, but Catholics aren't supposed to eat that... but I don't tell them they are bad people because of it.

You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.


I just showed you the passage from the Bible. If you choose not to follow your own rules that is on you. But as far as this thread is concerned, pork is a definite no-no for Muslims.
 
I LOVE bacon... but I'm not going to look down on other people if their religion tells them they shouldn't eat it. I LOVE lobster, shrimp, and crab, but Catholics aren't supposed to eat that... but I don't tell them they are bad people because of it.

You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.
Wait! He's not religious! I guess that means he knows what it means to be religious. He's telling us what's best for mooslims, Catholics, and christians. Makes him (her?) an expert on the subject of religion, doesn't it?
 
You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.


I just showed you the passage from the Bible. If you choose not to follow your own rules that is on you. But as far as this thread is concerned, pork is a definite no-no for Muslims.

And I explained why you're full of shit, dumbass.

You are wrong, go lick your wounds and next time don't come unprepared

You now look foolish
 
You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.
Wait! He's not religious! I guess that means he knows what it means to be religious. He's telling us what's best for mooslims, Catholics, and christians. Makes him (her?) an expert on the subject of religion, doesn't it?

I simply posted a Bible passage. As I said, I could care less how closely someone else follows THEIR rules.
 
You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.

Devil's advocate here ... if a 'new covenant' gives you the power to ignore all biblical injunctions in Torah, why do you choose to only ignore some (dietary laws and sabbath restrictions) and embrace others (such as the injunction on male homosexuality)?

Doesn't it get confusing for you?
 
I always wanted a nice sucking pig stuffed with sauerkraut and bread stuffing.

DSC_0878-1.jpg
 
“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.


I just showed you the passage from the Bible. If you choose not to follow your own rules that is on you. But as far as this thread is concerned, pork is a definite no-no for Muslims.

And I explained why you're full of shit, dumbass.

You are wrong, go lick your wounds and next time don't come unprepared

You now look foolish

How do I look foolish? Is the passage in the Bible or not?
 
You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10

Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.
Wait! He's not religious! I guess that means he knows what it means to be religious. He's telling us what's best for mooslims, Catholics, and christians. Makes him (her?) an expert on the subject of religion, doesn't it?

He's full of it. I've made more people look foolish on that topic than I can count
 
Old Covenant, done away with by the New Covenant and it was Mosaic dietary law, directed at Jews, not Gentiles

You have been schooled and are dismissed

Shellfish are considered bottom feeders that feed off of dead material and are the "Insects of the sea."

You were wrong. It's not sinful for Christians to eat shellfish...and never was.


I just showed you the passage from the Bible. If you choose not to follow your own rules that is on you. But as far as this thread is concerned, pork is a definite no-no for Muslims.

And I explained why you're full of shit, dumbass.

You are wrong, go lick your wounds and next time don't come unprepared

You now look foolish

How do I look foolish? Is the passage in the Bible or not?

It is, it's OLD COVENANT, done away with by the NEW COVENANT, Christ himself said it was no longer a sin. Mark chapter seven
 
But the family noticed a smoky taste

Mmmmmmm

I LOVE bacon... but I'm not going to look down on other people if their religion tells them they shouldn't eat it. I LOVE lobster, shrimp, and crab, but Catholics aren't supposed to eat that... but I don't tell them they are bad people because of it.

You continue to expose how little you know of Catholics and the Bible

There is no Biblical law stating Catholics cannot eat shellfish...and never has there been one

“Do not eat the creatures of the sea that have no fins or scales, for they are unclean” Lev 11:10, I Cor 8:8 – 13, Deu 14:10
'Cause they eat dead things from the bottom of the sea. Pork is prohibited because they are omnivorous and will eat flesh and flora. Eating flesh, either dead on the sea bottom or otherwise implies that such creatures may have consumed human flesh and eating them becomes cannibalistic somehow.

The reasons for these dietary restrictions was not the food, but the way it was prepared. Food could not be cooked at a sufficiently high temperature to kill off dangerous parasites and bacteria that would cause illness and death in anyone consuming it.
 
I read something interesting on that...pork for instance. It's forbidden in two of the main ME religions - Judaism and Islam. What I read was that pigs were a direct competitor for resources with humans in that environment - they aren't native to desert terrain, and compete for the same resources as people, as opposed to cows or goats.
 
The reasons for these dietary restrictions was not the food, but the way it was prepared. Food could not be cooked at a sufficiently high temperature to kill off dangerous parasites and bacteria that would cause illness and death in anyone consuming it.

The dietary restrictions are very, VERY complicated and go way beyond specific foods and combinations of foods. While the reasons for dietary restrictions are never stated in scripture, they go way beyond health. My personal belief is that any Jew who follows them is unable to associate in any meaningful way with non-Jews. It keeps Jews socially isolated from non-Jews. The long-term effect of which is to keep Jewish observance more or less intact for the past 2,000 years.
 
And if they screw up, you give it back and ask for the right thing. It has happened many times over the years to my family.
And to my understanding, isn't it true they also don't want cross contamination, which in a restaurant that serves pork products could very easily happen, even if not on the item they order.
Jews who observe dietary restriction do so by only eating at a restaurant that is inspected and certified Kosher. You can't expect others to respect or take responsibility for your religious practices.
I think you, as a customer can expect to be served a burger without bacon if that is requested...yes?
 
And to my understanding, isn't it true they also don't want cross contamination, which in a restaurant that serves pork products could very easily happen, even if not on the item they order.

Under the rules for Kashrut, meat and dairy cannot be served at the same meal. They can't be cooked in the same cookware, served on the same plates, eaten with the same utensils or stored in the same refrigerator. A restaurant that serves dairy products cannot server meat products and vice versa.

Of course, the rules of Halal are much less strict than the rules of Kashrut. But, it would be very difficult to prevent cross-contamination in a restaurant where pork items are prepared alongside other items.
 

Forum List

Back
Top