Short Answers Against Gun Control

[Nuthin' Fancy]

He was the one who was attacked, you dope...by 3 democrat party brown shirts....2 of them felons...one of them a serial child rapist..but you keep defending the child rapist.......

Never fucking mentioned them, you moron.

 

[2aguy]

Never fucking mentioned them, you moron.

Yeah...because the facts show you are an idiot....so you lie about Rittenhouse

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Dipshit.......

They tried to register 15 million long guns.........as opposed to the just 20 million AR-15 rifles all by themselves here in the U.S.....on top of the total 600 million guns in private hands in the U.S....

and they couldn't do it.........

Canada Tried Registering Long Guns -- And Gave Up

The law passed and starting in 1998 Canadians were required to have a license to own firearms and register their weapons with the government. According to Canadian researcher (and gun enthusiast) Gary Mauser, the Canada Firearms Center quickly rose to 600 employees and the cost of the effort climbed past $600 million. In 2002 Canada’s auditor general released a report saying initial cost estimates of $2 million (Canadian) had increased to $1 billion as the government tried to register the estimated 15 million guns owned by Canada’s 34 million residents.

The registry was plagued with complications like duplicate serial numbers and millions of incomplete records, Mauser reports. One person managed to register a soldering gun, demonstrating the lack of precise standards. And overshadowing the effort was the suspicion of misplaced effort: Pistols were used in 66% of gun homicides in 2011, yet they represent about 6% of the guns in Canada. Legal long guns were used in 11% of killings that year, according to Statistics Canada, while illegal weapons like sawed-off shotguns and machine guns, which by definition cannot be registered, were used in another 12%.

So the government was spending the bulk of its money — about $17 million of the Firearms Center’s $82 million annual budget — trying to register long guns when the statistics showed they weren’t the problem.

There was also the question of how registering guns was supposed to reduce crime and suicide in the first place. From 1997 to 2005, only 13% of the guns used in homicides were registered. Police studies in Canada estimated that 2-16% of guns used in crimes were stolen from legal owners and thus potentially in the registry. The bulk of the guns, Canadian officials concluded, were unregistered weapons imported illegally from the U.S. by criminal gangs.

Finally in 2011, conservatives led by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper voted to abolish the long-gun registry and destroy all its records. Liberals argued the law had contributed to the decline in gun homicides since it was passed.

But Mauser notes that gun homicides have actually been rising in recent years, from 151 in 1999 to 173 in 2009, as violent criminal gangs use guns in their drug turf wars and other disputes.


As in the U.S., most gun homicides in Canada are committed by young males, many of them with criminal records. In the majority of homicides involving young males, the victim and the killer are know each other.

CONTINUING with the "LONG GUNS"?
No one in Canada or the U.S. gives a fuck about, hunting rifles.
They AREN'T the gun nuts.
Teabaggers and Trumptards are.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yeah...because the facts show you are an idiot....so you lie about Rittenhouse?

Facts prove you're an idiot.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Sure, Q-NUT, Rittenhouse, a RWNJ, checked his weapon, to make sure it had shells in it, kills two people and wounds, a third person, should be able to have all the weapons, he wants.

Not guilty x5.
Your opinion doesn't matter.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Rittenhouse is a gun nut who went to Kenosha to start trouble.
Just like these wannabe "Rambo's".

Your opinion doesn't matter.

 

[M14 Shooter]

An example.

Specifically:
How is the Rittenhouse matter "an example: of Republican prosecutors who plea bargain away gun charges, Republican judges release on no cash bail, and Republican politicians keep lowering the sentencing laws for gun felonies?

 

[Next Time]

Here in Australia, we have to undergo psych evaluation tests and character referencing and join a gun club to obtain a firearms licence and it has to be justified for what you're using it for other than the club.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Here in Australia, we have to undergo psych evaluation tests and character referencing and join a gun club to obtain a firearms licence and it has to be justified for what you're using it for other than the club.

Wow. Sucks to be you.

 

[Next Time]

Wow. Sucks to be you.

It does.
Thanks for the false flag operation that occurred at Port Arthur, Tasmania 1996. It turned the shooting world upside down after that. I was serving in the army during that time so it didn't phase me, but it does now.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It does.
Thanks for the false flag operation that occurred at Port Arthur, Tasmania 1996. It turned the shooting world upside down after that. I was serving in the army during that time so it didn't phase me, but it does now.

Yeah, you people need to do something about that.

 

[Next Time]

Yeah, you people need to do something about that.

Which part? All parts of the machine are broken, that's the only way it works.

 

[Blues Man]

You're FOS.
Police can't take your license and revoke your privilege to drive for running a stop sign, for the first time, not resulting in an accident, injury or death.

People have "due process", that's why there are court systems.


No, they aren't.
A man that shoots a gun towards his wife during a domestic dispute, should be able to retain the weapon.


No, it won't.

The police can take your license from you anytime they arrest you.

And it is the State government and the registry of motor vehicles that will suspend your license or a judge can do it too.

You don;t know much about red flag laws if you thin the only time a person will lose their rights to own guns is when they shoot at someone.

FYI there is nothing that grants anyone the right to fire a weapon in fact when and where you can fire a weapon are strictly defined by every town city and state.

 

[2aguy]

Here in Australia, we have to undergo psych evaluation tests and character referencing and join a gun club to obtain a firearms licence and it has to be justified for what you're using it for other than the club.

Unless you are a criminal in Australia.....in that case you simply ignore the law and buy an illegal gun.....

 

[Next Time]

Unless you are a criminal in Australia.....in that case you simply ignore the law and buy an illegal gun.....

As a biker (as in Hell's Angles), perhaps. As you have a family of outlaws to protect you. As an individual with no backup, a lot tougher and the risk is not worth it, unless you have large acreage far from civilisation...

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The police can take your license from you anytime they arrest you.

Yes, they can.
The license, may be in the policeman's custody but it isn't suspended or revoked until court.
It's still a valid license, until then.

And it is the State government and the registry of motor vehicles that will suspend your license or a judge can do it too.

See above.

You don;t know much about red flag laws if you thin the only time a person will lose their rights to own guns is when they shoot at someone.

Evidently you don't, a Baker act charge will give the authorities the right to take a weapon.

FYI there is nothing that grants anyone the right to fire a weapon in fact when and where you can fire a weapon are strictly defined by every town city and state.

No, shit.
Look at the 4th of July, all those guns firing in the air, ALL illegal.

 

[Blues Man]

Yes, they can.
The license, may be in the policeman's custody but it isn't suspended or revoked until court.
It's still a valid license, until then.

See above.

Evidently you don't, a Baker act charge will give the authorities the right to take a weapon.

No, shit.
Look at the 4th of July, all those guns firing in the air, ALL illegal.

You do not have to go to court to have your license revoked.

Tell you what stop paying your insurance and wait until you get a letter in the mail saying your license has been suspended.
Get a Dui or refuse a breathalyzer and your license is revoked on the spot before you go to court

How Does a Driver's License Get Revoked? - FindLaw

The types of conduct that can lead to a driver's license revocation are similar to offenses that can result in suspension.

www.findlaw.com

The types of conduct that can cause a driver to have his or her driver's license revoked are similar to offenses that can result in suspension, only more serious (and in many cases, after repeated violations following a suspension). And since driving on public streets and highways is considered a privilege and not a right, states generally have a lot of leeway with regard to the revocation of drivers' licenses for both driving- and non-driving-related offenses.

In the majority of states, if you're arrested for driving under the influence, you probably won't be getting behind the wheel for a while. That's because of Administrative License Suspension (ALS) laws. While ALS laws vary state by state, they typically require that a license be confiscated and automatically suspended without a hearing in a couple of situations.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You do not have to go to court to have your license revoked.

Tell you what stop paying your insurance and wait until you get a letter in the mail saying your license has been suspended.
Get a Dui or refuse a breathalyzer and your license is revoked on the spot before you go to court

How Does a Driver's License Get Revoked? - FindLaw

The types of conduct that can lead to a driver's license revocation are similar to offenses that can result in suspension.

www.findlaw.com

The types of conduct that can cause a driver to have his or her driver's license revoked are similar to offenses that can result in suspension, only more serious (and in many cases, after repeated violations following a suspension). And since driving on public streets and highways is considered a privilege and not a right, states generally have a lot of leeway with regard to the revocation of drivers' licenses for both driving- and non-driving-related offenses.

In the majority of states, if you're arrested for driving under the influence, you probably won't be getting behind the wheel for a while. That's because of Administrative License Suspension (ALS) laws. While ALS laws vary state by state, they typically require that a license be confiscated and automatically suspended without a hearing in a couple of situations.

WTF?
That has NOTHING to do with what you stated.

"The police can take your license from you anytime they arrest you".

You then, move the goal post.

"Tell you what stop paying your insurance and wait until you get a letter in the mail saying your license has been suspended".
"Get a Dui or refuse a breathalyzer and your license is revoked on the spot before you go to court".

Because when you get your license, that's the agreement that YOU sign your name to, with YOUR signature of your DL.

 

[Blues Man]

WTF?
That has NOTHING to do with what you stated.

"The police can take your license from you anytime they arrest you".

You then, move the goal post.

"Tell you what stop paying your insurance and wait until you get a letter in the mail saying your license has been suspended".
"Get a Dui or refuse a breathalyzer and your license is revoked on the spot before you go to court".

Because when you get your license, that's the agreement that YOU sign your name to, with YOUR signature of your DL.

The point is that driving is not a right it is a privilege IF it was a right then there is no way the State could revoke your license without a hearing.

Why don't you find the statutes that say driving is a right to prove your point? Maybe it's because you can't find those statute because they do not exist

 

[miketx]

No, I want to ban dumbasses like your governor.
Gov. Greg Abbott (R) signed a bill last year allowing people to carry concealed handguns without passing a background check and proficiency test that is required for a license.

How long have you been a lying Nazi gun grabber?