Should Burka be banned?

[Tommy Tainant]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What about female genital mutilation?
Just a cute little custom and we should mind our own business?
9 year old girls marrying? Is that a vestige we should allow?
Stoning adulterers? Throwing gays off buildings? Raping infidels?

No dipshit.!! All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone. It's the fucking white Christian rednecks who want to marry 9 year olds

All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone.

So you're all for forcing them to give up their culture.
Thanks for your honesty.

It's the fucking white Christian rednecks who want to marry 9 year olds

And it's the Muslims who actually do it. Quirky!

What you are essentially doing here is calling me a hypocrite. Doing so in a feeble attempt to discredit me is a logical fallacy:

tu quoque (To kwok we )(Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view based on criticism of the person's inconsistency and not the position presented whereas a person's inconsistency should not discredit the position. Thus, it is a form of the ad hominem argument. To clarify, although the person being attacked might indeed be acting inconsistently or hypocritically, this does not invalidate their argument."

In addition, it is a false equivalency Fallacy. But I understand, That is all you have

It is also just plain stupid because I stated that the criteria for what people can and cannot do is determined by the law but you can't seem to grasp that.

What you are essentially doing here is calling me a hypocrite.

Well, if the 7th Century customs fit...…….

But I understand, That is all you have

After you got your panties all in a bunch over the very thought that we could infringe on some "harmless"
cultural differences, you've decided that it's okay to disallow things that their culture does all the time.

All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone.

I agree, we should outlaw burkas for Muslim and non-Muslim, alike.

Now we're equal, eh?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

Absolutely!
Just look how much freer Iranian women are compared to a generation ago.
Look how much freer Turkish women are compared to two generations ago.

Wait....what? LOL!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

What about female genital mutilation?
Just a cute little custom and we should mind our own business?
9 year old girls marrying? Is that a vestige we should allow?
Stoning adulterers? Throwing gays off buildings? Raping infidels?

No dipshit.!! All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone. It's the fucking white Christian rednecks who want to marry 9 year olds

All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone.

So you're all for forcing them to give up their culture.
Thanks for your honesty.

It's the fucking white Christian rednecks who want to marry 9 year olds

And it's the Muslims who actually do it. Quirky!

What you are essentially doing here is calling me a hypocrite. Doing so in a feeble attempt to discredit me is a logical fallacy:

tu quoque (To kwok we )(Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view based on criticism of the person's inconsistency and not the position presented whereas a person's inconsistency should not discredit the position. Thus, it is a form of the ad hominem argument. To clarify, although the person being attacked might indeed be acting inconsistently or hypocritically, this does not invalidate their argument."

In addition, it is a false equivalency Fallacy. But I understand, That is all you have

It is also just plain stupid because I stated that the criteria for what people can and cannot do is determined by the law but you can't seem to grasp that.

What you are essentially doing here is calling me a hypocrite.

Well, if the 7th Century customs fit...…….

But I understand, That is all you have

After you got your panties all in a bunch over the very thought that we could infringe on some "harmless"
cultural differences, you've decided that it's okay to disallow things that their culture does all the time.

All of that is against the law in this country and applies equally to everyone.

I agree, we should outlaw burkas for Muslim and non-Muslim, alike.

Now we're equal, eh?

It quite apparent that you did not UNERSTAND A FUCKING THING that I said. You are a hopeless fucking troll.

 

[Tilly]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

Absolutely!
Just look how much freer Iranian women are compared to a generation ago.
Look how much freer Turkish women are compared to two generations ago.

Wait....what? LOL!

And Egypt.
What a tard Tammy is.

 

[fncceo]

You speak American don't you.

I speak English.

 

[Tilly]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

The underclass are the women who aren’t allowed to choose their husbands, aren’t allowed to keep their clitoris intact, and and aren’t allowed to disobey the husbands who force them into these oppressive black sacks so they are not only subjugated, but also find it much more difficult to integrate.

And you are aiding and abetting this disgusting misogyny. No surprise there though, you can’t wven bring yourself to unequivocally condemn the muslim paedo rape gangs, so why would the oppression and subjugation of women worry you?

 

[skye]

I voted yes!

Bravo Denmark

 

[Tilly]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

 

[whitehall]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

View attachment 209260

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

Is there a hole in the mask to slurp slushies in the hot sun? At least they get to wear comfortable Nikies in the 6th century. The question is why aren't modern American women outraged at the sight of adult women being forced (by liberal religious men) to wear such garb. It's a tribute to the American media.

 

[Tilly]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

View attachment 209260

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

Is there a hole in the mask to slurp slushies in the hot sun? At least they get to wear comfortable Nikies in the 6th century. The question is why aren't modern American women outraged at the sight of adult women being forced (by liberal religious men) to wear such garb. It's a tribute to the American media.

Quite. It’s a mystery to me why feminists and women in general think this is OK. Invariably they pretend to believe that the majority of these muslim women want to dress like this in the West.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

View attachment 209260

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

Is there a hole in the mask to slurp slushies in the hot sun? At least they get to wear comfortable Nikies in the 6th century. The question is why aren't modern American women outraged at the sight of adult women being forced (by liberal religious men) to wear such garb. It's a tribute to the American media.

Quite. It’s a mystery to me why feminists and women in general think this is OK. Invariably they pretend to believe that the majority of these muslim women want to dress like this in the West.

I'll ask the same think of you that I asked the OP and did not get any response to. The concern for women I suspect, is just a ruse -a thinly veiled attempt to take the edge off of your bigotry

This is what I asked:

So, your concern is the oppression of women? Very commendable but oppression and discrimination takes many form and , while not always so visible, it can be just as insidious right here in the USA. Take for example

10 Surprising Statistics on Women in the Workplace

Tell us which of these practices you are concerned about and are working to remedy.

Then, we can talk about access to reproductive health care which is a problem for many women

We can also talk about the Equal Rights (for women) Amendment that has been hanging out there for a few decades..

Tell us about all of your concerns about how women are treated. Not just Muslim women

 

[Tilly]

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

View attachment 209260

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

Is there a hole in the mask to slurp slushies in the hot sun? At least they get to wear comfortable Nikies in the 6th century. The question is why aren't modern American women outraged at the sight of adult women being forced (by liberal religious men) to wear such garb. It's a tribute to the American media.

Quite. It’s a mystery to me why feminists and women in general think this is OK. Invariably they pretend to believe that the majority of these muslim women want to dress like this in the West.

I'll ask the same think of you that I asked the OP and did not get any response to. The concern for women I suspect, is just a ruse -a thinly veiled attempt to take the edge off of your bigotry

This is what I asked:

So, your concern is the oppression of women? Very commendable but oppression and discrimination takes many form and , while not always so visible, it can be just as insidious right here in the USA. Take for example

10 Surprising Statistics on Women in the Workplace

Tell us which of these practices you are concerned about and are working to remedy.

Then, we can talk about access to reproductive health care which is a problem for many women

We can also talk about the Equal Rights (for women) Amendment that has been hanging out there for a few decades..

Tell us about all of your concerns about how women are treated. Not just Muslim women

He didn’t answer you because you are going totally off topic.
Why are you soooooo desperate to derail and change the subject??

Here’s the title of this thread:

Should Burka be banned?


If you don’t want to discuss the topic of the OP gtfo and start your own thread! Will you be able to manage that since it’s not about gays??? Lol.

 

[danielpalos]

Denmark has banned the outfit of woman hate:



Leftists and feminists, should we also ban this tool of oppression?

On a related note, congratulations to Denmark on finally growing some balls and standing up against the invasion!

it should be reserved for the truly religious!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It's their right. What's funny is a leftist mecca, Denmark, banned them.

 

[Tilly]

It's their right. What's funny is a leftist mecca, Denmark, banned them.

Muslim majority countries ban them too, usually after they’ve experienced terror attacks from burqa clad murderous pigs.

 

[danielpalos]

This is just the whining of a hate filled underclass.

By underclass you're referring to the unfortunate women who are forced to wear those ridiculous black beekeeper suits 24/7 for whatever stupid religiously motivated reason?

It would be pretty appalling if you had to wear it. But I think many wear it out of choice. I also think that in a generation or so it will be obsolete.

You’re kidding, right?
Used to be the UKs Pakistani and Bangladeshi women wore colourful saris.
Now it is not uncommon to see them in burqas and niqabs. The number wearing these oppressive garments is an upward trend, as I’m sure you know.

View attachment 209260

Many people find the sight of oppression and misogyny in liberal western societies offensive and don’t want to feel as if they are living in a backwards shitehole like Saudi Arabia. It is also NOT a religious requirement, which is why they weren’t worn in the past.
That you support the oppression and subjugation of women is not exactly a surprise though.

Is there a hole in the mask to slurp slushies in the hot sun? At least they get to wear comfortable Nikies in the 6th century. The question is why aren't modern American women outraged at the sight of adult women being forced (by liberal religious men) to wear such garb. It's a tribute to the American media.

Quite. It’s a mystery to me why feminists and women in general think this is OK. Invariably they pretend to believe that the majority of these muslim women want to dress like this in the West.

In modern times, it is OK to be pornographic enough to "bare your ankles", on public beaches!

 

[Coyote]

Yes. Ban all headscarves. Including the Christian and Jewish ones. That will free all women from bondage right?

 

[danielpalos]

Yes. Ban all headscarves. Including the Christian and Jewish ones. That will free all women from bondage right?

Women could insist on having a superior understanding of supply side economics; and simply ensure guys have no urge to be Bad around women anymore.

 

[Thinker101]

It's their right. What's funny is a leftist mecca, Denmark, banned them.

Muslim majority countries ban them too, usually after they’ve experienced terror attacks from burqa clad murderous pigs.

Yup, that happens here too, they're just called Antifa over here.