Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[ if the US Supreme Court decided that transient lifestyles control local laws and the 1st Amendment right to exercise of religion..
So your basically saying that transient lifestyles would then trump local laws (i.e. Federal Judges over ruling the states as it were), and therefore cancelling out the1st Amendment right to have without interference from government the freedom in the exorcize of one's religion within the nation and within the states as it were ? People were allowed to exorcize their freedom of their religion for ever it seems, but now that all these things have come up, such a thing is now under assault anymore. Look at how many cases have come up in the past 30 to 35 years now.
Well, what I'm saying is that it won't happen. And if it does happen, pack your bags to move to Russia or maybe North Korea where there would be more freedom at that point.n.
[ if the US Supreme Court decided that transient lifestyles control local laws and the 1st Amendment right to exercise of religion..
We do not know for sure whether or not homosexuality is imprinted or not- but we do know that religious choice is transient.
If the criteria is that 'transient life styles' don't have legal protections then there would be no protections for Christians and Jews and Muslims based upon their religion.
Does it matter to you if Christians have religious freedom, and the ability to practice said religion in peace? Does your thinking trump the constitution of this united states ?Not real sure about sharia laws or that religion, but is there some reason you don't approve of that religion or it's laws if they are peaceful and excepted by it's believers ?No. it's just that I'm not schooled on those religions in which you speak of, so how can I touch on them as you say ?Can I call it, or can I call it. He won't touch Muslims or Sharia with a 10 foot pole.
Why? Because he doesn't want supremecy of religion over civil law. He was suprememcy of CHristianity over civil law. Thus, he won't extend his reasoning to sharia, insisting sharia should trump civil law. This is the naked hypocrisy of the religiously based 'sovereign citizen' argument.
You wouldn't have to be 'schooled' in any other religion to believe in religious freedom, as you claim you do.
If Christianity trumps civil law, why wouldn't Sharia trump civil law? It uses the same basis as your arguments: religious beliefs. It uses the same protections as your arguments: the 1st amendment.
Why then wouldn't the latter work just as well as the former?
If religious conviction is your standard for trumping a civil law, would it matter?
[ if the US Supreme Court decided that transient lifestyles control local laws and the 1st Amendment right to exercise of religion..
We do not know for sure whether or not homosexuality is imprinted or not- but we do know that religious choice is transient.
If the criteria is that 'transient life styles' don't have legal protections then there would be no protections for Christians and Jews and Muslims based upon their religion.
Lifestyle choices are transient too.
LoL... Thanks for the spell check sil...That was a good one with the exorcism needed before long. I thank the nation will need it for sure. Note - The new testament is full of speak about the sin of today, so I don't know why so many are in denial about it.So your basically saying that transient lifestyles would then trump local laws (i.e. Federal Judges over ruling the states as it were), and therefore cancelling out the1st Amendment right to have without interference from government the freedom in the exorcize of one's religion within the nation and within the states as it were ? People were allowed to exorcize their freedom of their religion for ever it seems, but now that all these things have come up, such a thing is now under assault anymore. Look at how many cases have come up in the past 30 to 35 years now.
Well, what I'm saying is that it won't happen. And if it does happen, pack your bags to move to Russia or maybe North Korea where there would be more freedom at that point.
BTW, it's "exercise". But yeah, maybe we need an exorcism right about now...lol. Not judging. I'm a terrible speller myself. I'm thinking of having a spellcheck microchip installed in my brain.
LoL... Thanks for the spell check sil...That was a good one with the exorcism needed before long. I thank the nation will need it for sure. Note - The new testament is full of speak about the sin of today, so I don't know why so many are in denial about it.
Jude 1 is an interesting passage.
It really emphasizes the Old Testament tales of Sodom and reminds newer jews (christians) of how entire regions were scrubbed by God for refusing to push back on advances of homosexuals who were organizing to replace common moral values with their own set of depraved dogma.
So your basically saying that transient lifestyles would then trump local laws (i.e. Federal Judges over ruling the states as it were), and therefore cancelling out the1st Amendment right to have without interference from government the freedom in the exorcize of one's religion within the nation and within the states as it were ? People were allowed to exorcize their freedom of their religion for ever it seems, but now that all these things have come up, such a thing is now under assault anymore. Look at how many cases have come up in the past 30 to 35 years now.
Well, what I'm saying is that it won't happen. And if it does happen, pack your bags to move to Russia or maybe North Korea where there would be more freedom at that point.n.
You would be happier in Russia- where gay marriage is illegal, and discrimination against homosexuals is encouraged- it is your kind of place.
LoL... Thanks for the spell check sil...That was a good one with the exorcism needed before long. I thank the nation will need it for sure. Note - The new testament is full of speak about the sin of today, so I don't know why so many are in denial about it.
Jude 1 is an interesting passage. It really doesn't mince words. It really emphasizes the Old Testament tales of Sodom and reminds newer jews (christians) of how entire regions were scrubbed by God for refusing to push back on advances of homosexuals who were organizing to replace common moral values with their own set of depraved dogma. The warning is simple, concise and to the point: passive assent to this or active assitance gets you eternity in the Big Slammer down under, roasting in the fires of hell forever.
Yes, it does. It also mentions people who manipulate speech/language in order to forward the homosexual agenda....
Yes, it does. It also mentions people who manipulate speech/language in order to forward the homosexual agenda...
...oddly enough...
...you know, like denying what is being said, isolating words apart from one another and pretending context doesn't matter...that type of thing....all of it gets you sentenced to forever in the Pit if you are conniving against the Word of God on this matter..
Yes, it does. It also mentions people who manipulate speech/language in order to forward the homosexual agenda...
...oddly enough...
...you know, like denying what is being said, isolating words apart from one another and pretending context doesn't matter...that type of thing....all of it gets you sentenced to forever in the Pit if you are conniving against the Word of God on this matter..
You mean, show you again? Put "Jude 1" into the search bar and click the button. You'll find my posts with the full text of that passage in it...numbers of them..Show us the passage you're referring to. Every time we ask, you get really, really vague.
Yes, it does. It also mentions people who manipulate speech/language in order to forward the homosexual agenda...
...oddly enough...
...you know, like denying what is being said, isolating words apart from one another and pretending context doesn't matter...that type of thing....all of it gets you sentenced to forever in the Pit if you are conniving against the Word of God on this matter..
You mean, show you again? Put "Jude 1" into the search bar and click the button. You'll find my posts with the full text of that passage in it...numbers of them..Show us the passage you're referring to. Every time we ask, you get really, really vague.
Yes, it does. It also mentions people who manipulate speech/language in order to forward the homosexual agenda...
...oddly enough...
...you know, like denying what is being said, isolating words apart from one another and pretending context doesn't matter...that type of thing....all of it gets you sentenced to forever in the Pit if you are conniving against the Word of God on this matter..
Well said Silouette.
Read an article yesterday that said one of the Bakers who refused to be involved with the celebration of depravity, is likely to be fined 150K.
So.... looks like the US is heading for a divine beat down. And all because we can't find the sand to call a perv, a demented pervert.
But hey... ya get what ya pay for.
Well said Silouette.
Read an article yesterday that said one of the Bakers who refused to be involved with the celebration of depravity, is likely to be fined 150K.
So.... looks like the US is heading for a divine beat down. And all because we can't find the sand to call a perv, a demented pervert.
But hey... ya get what ya pay for.
Odd, our economy has improved sharply since 2011 when support for gay marriage has surged...
Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
- Most new HIV infections among youth occur among gay and bisexual males; there was a 22% increase in estimated new infections in this group from 2008 to 2010. CDC - HIV Among Youth - Age - Risk - HIV AIDS
