Should Pelosi be removed from office? After violating 18 U.S. Code 2071

[Syriusly]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

LOL sure- thats what it was.

And her simple gesture deflated Trump's entire speech.

It was masterful.

 

[San Souci]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

are you saying the national archives are not digital and are on paper only?

No. He was saying that she destroyed a Document.

Speaking of destroying a document. I don't remember any of you Trumpskyites stomping your feet about your Dear Leader destroying official documents

Richard Nixon Is the Reason President Trump's Aides Have to Repair Documents He Rips Up
President Trump reportedly has a habit of ripping up documents after he’s done with them, a tendency that has sent aides scrambling to quite literally pick up the pieces.

“I had a letter from [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer — he tore it up,” Solomon Lartey, one of the officials in record management who restored the documents but was terminated this past spring, told Politico. “It was the craziest thing ever. He ripped papers into tiny pieces.”

Trump is required by law to preserve all documents he handles during his presidency. The Presidential Records Act mandates that presidents retain all “documentary material,” which includes documents, papers, books, pamphlets, audiotapes and videos, so that

Or Trump's head of EPA destroying documents
EPA chief of staff under investigation in document destruction

CNN Source? Or is it MSDNC?

 

[San Souci]

when destroying Federal documents, last night, while having a temper tantrum/standing behind the President at the SOTU

LOL. Have YOU every had an original thought in your life? Do you always echo opinions, without thought, just to get attention? Are you happy now, you got some attention. Maybe now you will have some self confidence and believe you will finally fit in.

No crime ,no evidence ,and to cowardly to NAME Eric Ciaramella the Traitor.

Absolutely there was no crime by Pelosi or Biden and there is no evidence of any such crime.

Don't know who this Eric Ciaramella is but tell us more about how you think that he " levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort"

It is almost like you Trumpskyites think that any criticism of your Dear Leader is treason.

Wait- not almost like- that is what you Trumpskyites think.

Eric Ciaramella is the fake WB. Actually a Dem Plant ,he took info from that traitor Vindman as an excuse to impeach after Mueller FAILED. Anything else?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

LOL sure- thats what it was.

And her simple gesture deflated Trump's entire speech.

It was masterful.

The President's speech was masterful, and it left Nancy nothing to do but mumble to herself and take out her shame and frustration on some papers. It was a powerful gesture of defeat.

 

[WEATHER53]

Mitt should replace her.
He’s a tantrumless disgrace

 

[Rye Catcher]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echo by stupid people who can't think for themselves. Attacking the character of those who stood up to the President, whose character flaws are well known and easily observed, takes courage. The Bully has already attacked Speaker Pelosi as he is want to do to everyone who has the guts and facts to put him down.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Most all polls are in the range of 3-1 to 6-1 for some formal action against Nutsy

I thought polls were all fake?

Only polls which do not support their narrative are fake, as is all news items from the MSM, and all comments by those of us who see reality and report it here.

 

[San Souci]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

LOL sure- thats what it was.

And her simple gesture deflated Trump's entire speech.

It was masterful.

The President's speech was masterful, and it left Nancy nothing to do but mumble to herself and take out her shame and frustration on some papers. It was a powerful gesture of defeat.

Ya think Trump will play THAT in his campaign adds? (hehe)

 

[toomuchtime_]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echo by stupid people who can't think for themselves. Attacking the character of those who stood up to the President, whose character flaws are well known and easily observed, takes courage. The Bully has already attacked Speaker Pelosi as he is want to do to everyone who has the guts and facts to put him down.

Clearly it was an act of surrender by Pelosi. If she had felt like a winner, she wouldn't have had the need for such adolescent gestures.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echo by stupid people who can't think for themselves. Attacking the character of those who stood up to the President, whose character flaws are well known and easily observed, takes courage. The Bully has already attacked Speaker Pelosi as he is want to do to everyone who has the guts and facts to put him down.

Clearly it was an act of surrender by Pelosi. If she had felt like a winner, she wouldn't have had the need for such adolescent gestures.

As I just stated, "It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echoed by stupid people who can't think for themselves." Trump is a damn liar, and he lied throughout the speech. How can anyone be so gullible as to support this man-child?!

 

[toomuchtime_]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echo by stupid people who can't think for themselves. Attacking the character of those who stood up to the President, whose character flaws are well known and easily observed, takes courage. The Bully has already attacked Speaker Pelosi as he is want to do to everyone who has the guts and facts to put him down.

Clearly it was an act of surrender by Pelosi. If she had felt like a winner, she wouldn't have had the need for such adolescent gestures.

As I just stated, "It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echoed by stupid people who can't think for themselves." Trump is a damn liar, and he lied throughout the speech. How can anyone be so gullible as to support this man-child?!

You're just being silly now, but who can blame you when you see the Speaker reduced to adolescent gestures of powerlessness by the President's speech?

 

[Roudy]

Her blithering excuse and justification was as repugnant as the act
Keep digging Nancy I think she’s trying to get kicked out

She has a new moniker now; Nancy the Ripper, lol.

So to conclude, we have a Grim Reaper running the Senate and Crazy Ripper running the House!

 

[Roudy]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echo by stupid people who can't think for themselves. Attacking the character of those who stood up to the President, whose character flaws are well known and easily observed, takes courage. The Bully has already attacked Speaker Pelosi as he is want to do to everyone who has the guts and facts to put him down.

Clearly it was an act of surrender by Pelosi. If she had felt like a winner, she wouldn't have had the need for such adolescent gestures.

As I just stated, "It was not an act of surrender by Pelosi, saying so is one more BIG LIE echoed by stupid people who can't think for themselves." Trump is a damn liar, and he lied throughout the speech. How can anyone be so gullible as to support this man-child?!

What flavor of Leftie Coolaid have you been drinking?!

 

[Roudy]

when destroying Federal documents, last night, while having a temper tantrum/standing behind the President at the SOTU

Trump has destroyed the Constitution

Suddenly, the anti gun, anti free speech, anti privacy rights, anti constitution Left have become Constitutionalists. Ya gotta love it!

 

[Roudy]

AP FACT CHECK: Ripping up copy of Trump's speech not illegal

But it hurt Trumps feelings
There has to be some law against that

He didn't even notice it. What she did was disgraceful and beyond the office of the Speaker. Why don't you guys admit it. Never before has a speaker sat there and made faces while the president was giving his address to the nation, and then got up and ripped the speech. Every president gives their (and their party's) point of view and perspective during the state of union. The opposing party then responds either in the Response or by other methods. Perhaps she lost it completely because Trump was telling the truth about his achievements and the economy.

 

[Syriusly]

when destroying Federal documents, last night, while having a temper tantrum/standing behind the President at the SOTU

LOL. Have YOU every had an original thought in your life? Do you always echo opinions, without thought, just to get attention? Are you happy now, you got some attention. Maybe now you will have some self confidence and believe you will finally fit in.

No crime ,no evidence ,and to cowardly to NAME Eric Ciaramella the Traitor.

Absolutely there was no crime by Pelosi or Biden and there is no evidence of any such crime.

Don't know who this Eric Ciaramella is but tell us more about how you think that he " levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort"

It is almost like you Trumpskyites think that any criticism of your Dear Leader is treason.

Wait- not almost like- that is what you Trumpskyites think.

Eric Ciaramella is the fake WB. Actually a Dem Plant ,he took info from that traitor Vindman as an excuse to impeach after Mueller FAILED. Anything else?

Ah so you were just spouting more Trump propaganda, nothing factual.

Just the same old bullshit.

 

[Syriusly]

AP FACT CHECK: Ripping up copy of Trump's speech not illegal

But it hurt Trumps feelings
There has to be some law against that

He didn't even notice it. What she did was disgraceful and beyond the office of the Speaker. Why don't you guys admit it..

Disgraceful?

Like bragging about grabbing women by their pussies?
Like attacking a decorated dead veteran?
Like asking a foreign government to investigate a political rival?
Like spewing profanities at an official function?
Like taking credit publicly for a law passed by the dead veteran that was attacked?
Like using a charity for a personal piggy bank?
Like lying about committing adultery with a porn star, and paying her off?

Or for using the office to publicly attack and demean everyone who is seen as a potential threat?

After three years of the disgraceful behavior by our current President of the United States, I fail to see how the Speaker of the House tearing up a piece of paper is an action that needs to be criticized.

4 years ago- maybe. But the last 3 years of disgraceful behavior by Trump

 

[Syriusly]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

LOL sure- thats what it was.

And her simple gesture deflated Trump's entire speech.

It was masterful.

The President's speech was masterful, and it left Nancy nothing to do but mumble to herself and take out her shame and frustration on some papers. It was a powerful gesture of defeat.

The President's speech was his usual collection of boasts, lies and taking credit for what other people have done.

Really just the usual stuff.

But here we are days later- and no one is talking about his speech- we are all talking about Pelosi.

She is brilliant.

 

[Syriusly]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

are you saying the national archives are not digital and are on paper only?

No. He was saying that she destroyed a Document.

Speaking of destroying a document. I don't remember any of you Trumpskyites stomping your feet about your Dear Leader destroying official documents

Richard Nixon Is the Reason President Trump's Aides Have to Repair Documents He Rips Up
President Trump reportedly has a habit of ripping up documents after he’s done with them, a tendency that has sent aides scrambling to quite literally pick up the pieces.

“I had a letter from [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer — he tore it up,” Solomon Lartey, one of the officials in record management who restored the documents but was terminated this past spring, told Politico. “It was the craziest thing ever. He ripped papers into tiny pieces.”

Trump is required by law to preserve all documents he handles during his presidency. The Presidential Records Act mandates that presidents retain all “documentary material,” which includes documents, papers, books, pamphlets, audiotapes and videos, so that

Or Trump's head of EPA destroying documents
EPA chief of staff under investigation in document destruction

CNN Source? Or is it MSDNC?

Really- you are too lazy to even click on the links?

LOL

 

[rightwinger]

Yes. She destroyed a historical document that was supposed to be archived in The House records as all SOTU speeches are.

Except of course- there is no actual requirement to do any such thing.

But I do find it fascinating how Nancy Pelosi has managed to completely obscure Trump's speech by the simple act of tearing a piece of paper up.

What is everyone talking about? Not your Dear Leader's speech- but your whining about how mean Pelosi was to your Dear Leader.

It was an act of surrender by Pelosi. After disgracing herself and her Party with the faux impeachment, she tore up the speech to acknowledge she has no answer to President Trump's success and his increasing popularity.

LOL sure- thats what it was.

And her simple gesture deflated Trump's entire speech.

It was masterful.

The President's speech was masterful, and it left Nancy nothing to do but mumble to herself and take out her shame and frustration on some papers. It was a powerful gesture of defeat.

It was a gesture of disdain
Well deserved