Flash
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2014
- 71,172
- 62,057
Worry my little Moon Bat head? Does questioning whether the NRA would be able to provide trainers for gun classes in every school in the country make me a liberal/progressive/whatever Moon Bat means to you?
Only a Moon Bat would question that. The question you should be asking is why in the hell would somebody be so stupid as to suggest that the filthy ass government require qualifications like training before a citizen could enjoy a right that clearly says shall not be infringed?
Do we need training before we are allowed free speech? Do we need training before we are allowed by the filthy government to go to church?
When does the filthy government get a say so in the rights that are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights? If we have to get permission from the government then they aren't really rights, are they?
I can see your partisan filter is working well.
Perhaps you can't ask questions about more than one subject, but I don't need to limit my responses that way. I'm perfectly capable of asking about whether the NRA can supply gun training teachers (for free) to every school in the country, without it having any effect whatsoever on my thoughts about whether such training (if mandatory) would be productive or pass Constitutional scrutiny.
We don't need training to practice free speech or to worship, but there ARE restrictions on those rights. I don't think the Supreme Court would accept mandatory training before someone exercised their second amendment right, but I'm not completely confident about that.
You are probably more likely to have a civil discussion if you don't make unwarranted assumptions or place silly labels on people.
What I can see is that you asked a really dumb Moon Bat question.
You have trouble determining the real issue. It must be typical Moon Bat confusion.
The issue is allowing the government to infringe upon a right that specifically say it can't be infringed.
A "right" that you have to go through background checks, training, and is subject to bans and other onerous requirements really isn't a right is it?
When is specifically says that a right shall not be infringed and the government infringes upon it then the Bill of Rights isn't worth the paper it is written on, is it?
If you look, you might notice that I've already said that requiring training to buy a gun seems like an infringement to me, and that I don't believe the USSC would accept it.
Why is asking whether or not the NRA has enough people available to provide free training in schools (a point I was responding to, not one I brought up) a "Moon Bat question"?
I have no trouble determining the issues. You seem to be having issues with treating me as anything but a stereotype you've created in your mind, however.
I think the NRA would be happy to provide instructors, and in fact, they already have the program up and running...it is just that anti gunners fight to keep them out of the schools.
Any school district that is run by filthy ass Democrats would oppose the NRA teaching the kids.
I would gladly go and teach kids about firearms safety. I know other NRA members who would do the same.
If the filthy government is hell bent on gun safety then they would hire the NRA to do the training since the NRA is the largest gun safety organization in the world.