Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Huh?Strozk was the one that originally started the phone investigation that eventually became the Mewler witch hunt. Her Mewler had to get rid of him because he was such an obvious partisan who tainted all the evidence.Not after the IG report....he would be crazy to sit with that snake Mueller and his den of vipers...
Exactly what did the IG report have to do with Mueller?
Which phone investigation did Strzok start that started the Mueller investigation?
Should he?
I say yes, as the investigation is meant to get to the truth. Trump's interview will advance that goal.
Of course he did. Video of him doing precisely that was all over the news. But I am not going to argue with you whether or not the Earth is flat.That's a lie. He didn't refer to any white supremecists as "fine people."
Nope. The fake news deliberately mischaracterized what he said, and just like a total sucker you fell for it.Of course he did. Video of him doing precisely that was all over the news. But I am not going to argue with you whether or not the Earth is flat.That's a lie. He didn't refer to any white supremecists as "fine people."
And yes, a grand jury can subpoena him. Whether or not a court can then compel him to honor the subpoena under threat of arrest is up for debate.
I wish President Trump would stop stalling....he is making the investigation go longer, it was JANUARY when he was first suppose to be interviewed for goodness sake.... and he has dragged this out in his Reality TV production of will he or will he not.... and purposely stalling for his own evil genius reasons, like needing the 6 months to convince his supporters that this is all a witch hunt campaign that he has promoted since then.........so they won't think anything is wrong about him refusing to testify.
I agree with Old School, I would through my body in front of him to prevent him from testifying because he doesn't have any kind of relationship with telling truth over fiction....if I were his lawyer....
but if he were to refuse the interview, depending on what Mueller needed to ask him questions about and the necessity to speak with Trump.... the grand jury could subpoena him, and then Trump might refuse, and then this becomes a battle that goes to the supreme court to decide, whether a President of the US, is ABOVE the Law and can rule with lawlessness.... and Trump loves the fight, he lives for it, so you know this will be years in court.... regardless of it tearing our Nation apart!
It sucks to be you, doesn't it?I wish President Trump would stop stalling....he is making the investigation go longer, it was JANUARY when he was first suppose to be interviewed for goodness sake.... and he has dragged this out in his Reality TV production of will he or will he not.... and purposely stalling for his own evil genius reasons, like needing the 6 months to convince his supporters that this is all a witch hunt campaign that he has promoted since then.........so they won't think anything is wrong about him refusing to testify.
I agree with Old School, I would through my body in front of him to prevent him from testifying because he doesn't have any kind of relationship with telling truth over fiction....if I were his lawyer....
but if he were to refuse the interview, depending on what Mueller needed to ask him questions about and the necessity to speak with Trump.... the grand jury could subpoena him, and then Trump might refuse, and then this becomes a battle that goes to the supreme court to decide, whether a President of the US, is ABOVE the Law and can rule with lawlessness.... and Trump loves the fight, he lives for it, so you know this will be years in court.... regardless of it tearing our Nation apart!
He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
It depends I suppose, on what it is that Mueller is trying to get to the bottom of and whether Trump's testimony is needed to clear something up..... shoot, I suppose if it is not important, then Mueller could shut down THAT PART of the investigation and just issue the report without his clarification? Not being Mueller, I have no idea what he needs....I wish President Trump would stop stalling....he is making the investigation go longer, it was JANUARY when he was first suppose to be interviewed for goodness sake.... and he has dragged this out in his Reality TV production of will he or will he not.... and purposely stalling for his own evil genius reasons, like needing the 6 months to convince his supporters that this is all a witch hunt campaign that he has promoted since then.........so they won't think anything is wrong about him refusing to testify.
I agree with Old School, I would through my body in front of him to prevent him from testifying because he doesn't have any kind of relationship with telling truth over fiction....if I were his lawyer....
but if he were to refuse the interview, depending on what Mueller needed to ask him questions about and the necessity to speak with Trump.... the grand jury could subpoena him, and then Trump might refuse, and then this becomes a battle that goes to the supreme court to decide, whether a President of the US, is ABOVE the Law and can rule with lawlessness.... and Trump loves the fight, he lives for it, so you know this will be years in court.... regardless of it tearing our Nation apart!
Doesn't have to be. Meuller can simply finish the report without the interview and recommend whatever action he sees fit.
whether under oath in a court room, or being officially interviewed by officers of an investigation by the FBI....He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
You mean interview Mueller in Levenworth? NoShould he?
I say yes, as the investigation is meant to get to the truth. Trump's interview will advance that goal.
Hmmm . . . . .wrong. You are not under oath when you are interviewed by the FBI. There is just a law that says you can't lie to them. I think the law is unconstitutional. However, it doesn't compel you to answer their questions as you are compelled to answer when you are under oath. For what crime would Trump be required to testify before a Grand Jury?whether under oath in a court room, or being officially interviewed by officers of an investigation by the FBI....He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
it is criminal to lie..... the penalty is the same... you can't lie before the FBI, it's a felony, just like in court.....
but was not really talking about being interviewed by the FBI, I was thinking ahead, on the Grand Jury for this investigation, being the ones asking questions, ...he can plead the 5th.
It depends I suppose, on what it is that Mueller is trying to get to the bottom of and whether Trump's testimony is needed to clear something up..... shoot, I suppose if it is not important, then Mueller could shut down THAT PART of the investigation and just issue the report without his clarification? Not being Mueller, I have no idea what he needs....I wish President Trump would stop stalling....he is making the investigation go longer, it was JANUARY when he was first suppose to be interviewed for goodness sake.... and he has dragged this out in his Reality TV production of will he or will he not.... and purposely stalling for his own evil genius reasons, like needing the 6 months to convince his supporters that this is all a witch hunt campaign that he has promoted since then.........so they won't think anything is wrong about him refusing to testify.
I agree with Old School, I would through my body in front of him to prevent him from testifying because he doesn't have any kind of relationship with telling truth over fiction....if I were his lawyer....
but if he were to refuse the interview, depending on what Mueller needed to ask him questions about and the necessity to speak with Trump.... the grand jury could subpoena him, and then Trump might refuse, and then this becomes a battle that goes to the supreme court to decide, whether a President of the US, is ABOVE the Law and can rule with lawlessness.... and Trump loves the fight, he lives for it, so you know this will be years in court.... regardless of it tearing our Nation apart!
Doesn't have to be. Meuller can simply finish the report without the interview and recommend whatever action he sees fit.
I said, THAT PART of the investigation because it is my understanding that it is the obstruction of justice part, that Mueller will end soon and give a report, but not necessarily the Russia investigation of their interference.....
He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
If you had taken care of that R&C deficit you would know I said 'collusion' itself is no crime. Trump and his handmaidens will be probably charged with collusion to commit _______ (fill in the blank)So called "collusion" isn't a crime, moron. Plenty of you fucking snowflake douchebags have claimed Trump or his minions will be indicted for "collusion." That's how fucking stupid you are. The longer Herr Muwler's witch hunt conitnues, the more obvious it becomes that the Clinton campiagn is the one that was making dirty deals with the Russians.
Sure, pal.Nope. The fake news deliberately mischaracterized what he said, and just like a total sucker you fell for it.Of course he did. Video of him doing precisely that was all over the news. But I am not going to argue with you whether or not the Earth is flat.That's a lie. He didn't refer to any white supremecists as "fine people."
And yes, a grand jury can subpoena him. Whether or not a court can then compel him to honor the subpoena under threat of arrest is up for debate.
What the hell is an "R&C deficit?"If you had taken care of that R&C deficit you would know I said 'collusion' itself is no crime. Trump and his handmaidens will be probably charged with collusion to commit _______ (fill in the blank)So called "collusion" isn't a crime, moron. Plenty of you fucking snowflake douchebags have claimed Trump or his minions will be indicted for "collusion." That's how fucking stupid you are. The longer Herr Muwler's witch hunt conitnues, the more obvious it becomes that the Clinton campiagn is the one that was making dirty deals with the Russians.
Hillary Clinton knew enough not to interview with the FBI under oath. S
None of that makes any sense. For one, Bill Clinton was not interviewed by the FBI when he committed perjury. Second, Hillary absolutely did get interviewed under oath, several times.She learned from Bill's experience, and Trump should have as well.
