Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are a moron.
www.usmessageboard.com
Did you hear? The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report, states the TCR is likely between 1C to 2.5C.
What were the facts?You just posted an article which uses both to try to deny scientific facts.
Why is that bob.
And what would you do with facts?What were the facts?
You should start with the fact that simple physics shows the instantaneous radiative forcing to be 1C per doubling of CO2. Because that's the most important fact to start with.And what would you do with facts?
You can't discuss anything, just post Curry... and try to BS/Lie/Obfuscate/insult in the other 95% of your posts.
`
Are you aware that during WW2 the Germans manufactured what you call fossil fuels?
Surely Americans can also manufactured more.
Not if you use thermal depolymerization. Of course that process isn't for commercially producing oil and gas.Wrong.
What the Germans did in WWII was to make gasoline from coal.
That is not manufacturing fossil fuel, but just converting one fossil fuel into another fossil fuel.
Fossil fuel is ancient solar energy captured by photosynthesis and concentrated by anerobic bacteria into black gold.
It is buried treasure that is not replaceable in real time.
It takes over 100 million years to make fossil fuel.
And you think that evidence proves what?If by politics you mean greed, sure. Because I can't see any other reason for dismissing the empirical evidence from the paleo-climate record.
That they are dismissing key data for political purposes. Because they sure as hell aren't acting like scientists.And you think that evidence proves what?
Again, what does your evidence prove against todays climate.That they are dismissing key data for political purposes. Because they sure as hell aren't acting like scientists.
Don't you know that the IPCC agrees that the simple physics shows that the radiative forcing effect of CO2 is 1C per doubling of CO2? That's the basis for their low end estimate of TCR of 1C.And you think that evidence proves what?
www.carbonbrief.org
TCR tends to be notably lower than ECS. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report, completed in 2014, gave a likely ECS range of 1.5C to 4.5C of warming for a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, but a likely TCR of only 1C to 2.5C.
Again, what does your paleo climate obsession affect todays climate change.Don't you know that the IPCC agrees that the simple physics shows that the radiative forcing effect of CO2 is 1C per doubling of CO2? That's the basis for their low end estimate of TCR of 1C.
Explainer: How scientists estimate climate sensitivity
The sensitivity of the Earth’s climate to increases in atmospheric CO2 concentration is a question that sits at the heart of climate science. Essentially, it dictates how much global temperatures will rise in response to human-caused CO2 emissions, but it is a question that does not yet have a...
For starters it shows the current warming trend began 400 years ago which was 150 years before CO2 could have caused it.Again, what does your paleo climate obsession affect todays climate change.
No, no it does not.For starters it shows the current warming trend began 400 years ago which was 150 years before CO2 could have caused it.
Yes, it did. It began when the little ice age reached it's glacial maximum and then began warming. It's been warming ever since.No, no it does not.
Secondly, this interglacial period is 2C cooler than the previous interglacial periods so it hasn't reached it's peak temperature yet that it naturally warms to every interglacial period before temperature effects on ocean water density and salinity coupled with changing wind patterns from solar radiation variability causes the AMOC to switch off and disrupt heat transfer from the Atlantic to the Arctic thus causing temperatures to plunge. Like it has been doing for the past 3 million years.Again, what does your paleo climate obsession affect todays climate change.
Thirdly, the empirical climate data shows the planet cooling for millions of years with 50% more CO2 than today which means the planet is not sensitive to CO2.Again, what does your paleo climate obsession affect todays climate change.
Yes, it did. It began when the little ice age reached its glacial maximum and then began warming. It's been warming ever since.
Fourthly, the empirical climate data shows the planet is uniquely configured for colder temperatures, not warmer temperatures.Again, what does your paleo climate obsession affect todays climate change.
