Shut It Down!

[The T]

Under FDR the nation had one-man government, euphemistically called the 'Imperial Presidency.'

We lost the Constitution.

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

"...Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch..."


Look carefully at the OP.

In it, you will see that there is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat-lite Republicans and the Republicans.


And that is the essence of the post.

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Can't read can you? Take off the hyper-partisan blinders.

 

[Redfish]

No. I didn't say that. However, where the sequester did hurt the citizenry directly, you saw both parties get together and fund those specific services.

I don't want that to happen again, total destruction at the behest of the GOP...thats the ticket.

the public was only hurt because obama planned it that way.

Unlikely

the sequester was tiny compared to the annual budget. obozo took the cuts where the public would feel them. he did that because his view of government is more and more spending, paid for by more and more taxes.

332-206
Apparently We the People agree with him, and we'll return 80%+ of the Senators and 90%+ of the House members to their jobs in 2014.

Yet you'll only blame one guy as long as he's Obama....right?

52/48 if you look at how the citizens voted. If a large number of conservatives had not stayed home, obama would have been a one term failure instead of a two term failure.

When does obama become responsible for anything that happens on his watch? Never?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You prove your "worth" with every post.

As usual, you bring nothing to the table, but the 'I don't like you' posts.

This, of course, is because you are a dunce.

A "dunce"?

Ouch!

You must be inured....called that so many times.
Shall I wait while you get a dictionary?


And, you wear the appellation proudly.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

"...Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch..."


Look carefully at the OP.

In it, you will see that there is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat-lite Republicans and the Republicans.


And that is the essence of the post.

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Can't read can you? Take off the hyper-partisan blinders.

Still got a crush on me, I see. How's about a reach around, sister?

 

[The T]

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Can't read can you? Take off the hyper-partisan blinders.

Still got a crush on me, I see. How's about a reach around, sister?

Translation: "No I can't read."

 

[Katzndogz]

If the government shuts down it will be because obama vetoed a budget that defunded obamacare. It won't be the GOPs fault but obama's fault.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

 

[Edgetho]

Under FDR the nation had one-man government, euphemistically called the 'Imperial Presidency.'

We lost the Constitution.

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.



1."Rubio: ‘I don’t think you can say you are against Obamacare if you vote for a budget that funds it’

2. WASHINGTON — Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and other conservative lawmakers sent a clear message to their fellow Republicans on Thursday: get on board with their strategy for defunding Obamacare or lose your conservative credibility.

3. ....I think it’s outrageous that the president and his allies are threatening to shutdown the American government if it doesn’t fund the Obamacare law.”

4. Rubio made the comments alongside other senators — including Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah — who have pledged not to support any resolution that continues funding the federal government if President Obama’s health-care law remains funded.

5. ....if this thing goes into effect beginning Oct. 1, with the exchanges and all the mandates that start kicking in, it will be do irreparable damage to our economy and to our country.”

6. ....Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn said last week. “It’s a terribly dangerous and not successful strategy.”
Rubio tells Republicans to get on board defunding Obamacare strategy | The Daily Caller





Is this a 'terribly dangerous' and failing strategy???


7. "...what happened in November of 1995 is very misleading.
Republicans certainly did not suffer at the polls. They lost only nine House seats, a relatively trivial number after a net gain of 54 in 1994. They actually added to their majority in the Senate, picking up two seats in the 1996 cycle.

8. More important, they succeeded in dramatically reducing the growth of federal spending. They did not get everything they wanted, to be sure, but government spending grew by just 2.9 percent during the first four years of GOP control, helping to turn a $164 billion deficit in 1995 into a $126 billion surplus in 1999. And they enacted a big tax cut in 1997.

9. If that’s what happens when Republicans are defeated, I hope the GOP loses again this year.

10. So what actually happened in 1995, and why do Republicans have such unpleasant memories?"
Winning the Government-Shutdown Fight | National Review Online





We are about to find out if there is any hope of a two-party system in the United States.

Conditions as they exist today are FAR different than they were in 1995, almost 20 years ago.

Most importantly, dimocraps had just come off of one of the worst ass-whuppins in American electoral history.

And not in just ONE House... We crushed them in the House of Representatives (+54 Seats) and took 8 of 22 democrat Senate election races.

And to further rub their faces in it, democrat Richard Shelby changed parties to make it a 9 Member pick up in the Senate and give us the Majority.

In 1995, we had a majority in both Houses, Bill the rapist Clinton was scared to death and dimocraps everywhere were on the run.

And we STILL lost the Prom Queen vote!!!

And that was back when the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM still pretended to be fair.

They don't even bother with that anymore.

It would be stupidity beyond anything I've ever seen Republicans do to shut the government down under present day circumstances.

Just dissolve the fucking party if you're going to do that.

Here's what we need to tell people, "You stupid motherfuckers. You voted for these asswipes. You knew how bad these people were in getting us out of the economic down turn and you voted for them anyway. We told you, we warned you about everything that's going on and we're not going to commit political suicide just to assuage your feelings of impotence. Like John Roberts said, 'You want better laws, elect better Law Makers'. Fuck off and have fun at your parents/child's/brother's/in-law's until they get sick of you and put you on the curb.

Eat shit."

THAT is what we need to tell the American Electorate and Republicans, too.

"This is on you. You voted for them. Suck on it."

And watch the inevitable outcome of marxist philosophy.....

 

[The T]

Under FDR the nation had one-man government, euphemistically called the 'Imperial Presidency.'

We lost the Constitution.

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.



1."Rubio: ‘I don’t think you can say you are against Obamacare if you vote for a budget that funds it’

2. WASHINGTON — Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and other conservative lawmakers sent a clear message to their fellow Republicans on Thursday: get on board with their strategy for defunding Obamacare or lose your conservative credibility.

3. ....I think it’s outrageous that the president and his allies are threatening to shutdown the American government if it doesn’t fund the Obamacare law.”

4. Rubio made the comments alongside other senators — including Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah — who have pledged not to support any resolution that continues funding the federal government if President Obama’s health-care law remains funded.

5. ....if this thing goes into effect beginning Oct. 1, with the exchanges and all the mandates that start kicking in, it will be do irreparable damage to our economy and to our country.”

6. ....Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn said last week. “It’s a terribly dangerous and not successful strategy.”
Rubio tells Republicans to get on board defunding Obamacare strategy | The Daily Caller





Is this a 'terribly dangerous' and failing strategy???


7. "...what happened in November of 1995 is very misleading.
Republicans certainly did not suffer at the polls. They lost only nine House seats, a relatively trivial number after a net gain of 54 in 1994. They actually added to their majority in the Senate, picking up two seats in the 1996 cycle.

8. More important, they succeeded in dramatically reducing the growth of federal spending. They did not get everything they wanted, to be sure, but government spending grew by just 2.9 percent during the first four years of GOP control, helping to turn a $164 billion deficit in 1995 into a $126 billion surplus in 1999. And they enacted a big tax cut in 1997.

9. If that’s what happens when Republicans are defeated, I hope the GOP loses again this year.

10. So what actually happened in 1995, and why do Republicans have such unpleasant memories?"
Winning the Government-Shutdown Fight | National Review Online





We are about to find out if there is any hope of a two-party system in the United States.

Conditions as they exist today are FAR different than they were in 1995, almost 20 years ago.

Most importantly, dimocraps had just come off of one of the worst ass-whuppins in American electoral history.

And not in just ONE House... We crushed them in the House of Representatives (+54 Seats) and took 8 of 22 democrat Senate election races.

And to further rub their faces in it, democrat Richard Shelby changed parties to make it a 9 Member pick up in the Senate and give us the Majority.

In 1995, we had a majority in both Houses, Bill the rapist Clinton was scared to death and dimocraps everywhere were on the run.

And we STILL lost the Prom Queen vote!!!

And that was back when the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM still pretended to be fair.

They don't even bother with that anymore.

It would be stupidity beyond anything I've ever seen Republicans do to shut the government down under present day circumstances.

Just dissolve the fucking party if you're going to do that.

Here's what we need to tell people, "You stupid motherfuckers. You voted for these asswipes. You knew how bad these people were in getting us out of the economic down turn and you voted for them anyway. We told you, we warned you about everything that's going on and we're not going to commit political suicide just to assuage your feelings of impotence. Like John Roberts said, 'You want better laws, elect better Law Makers'. Fuck off and have fun at your parents/child's/brother's/in-law's until they get sick of you and put you on the curb.

Eat shit."

THAT is what we need to tell the American Electorate and Republicans, too.

"This is on you. You voted for them. Suck on it."

And watch the inevitable outcome of marxist philosophy.....

Indeed. Ultimately the responsibility rests with the people.

Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

Under FDR the nation had one-man government, euphemistically called the 'Imperial Presidency.'

We lost the Constitution.

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

"...Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch..."


Look carefully at the OP.

In it, you will see that there is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat-lite Republicans and the Republicans.


And that is the essence of the post.

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Turn it down a notch: it is hardly necessary to prove, once again, that you are an incompetent.


I'm precise, clear, and mean what I say: don't blame your inadequacies on me.


OK....here is your tutorial:

Item #4 names Republicans
Item #6, Democrat-lite Republican

Items #7-#10 illustrates which I find to be the truth.


Read their statements and see if you can discern the difference.
Better yet, find someone with a more extensive education, a junior high school grad, to explain it to you.




In the future, to avoid this sort of embarrassment, stick to posting about subjects with which you have expertise: favorite Crayola, best reality TV show, why you enjoy the 24-hour Cartoon Network.

 

[Geaux4it]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

 

[NightFox]

Under FDR the nation had one-man government, euphemistically called the 'Imperial Presidency.'

We lost the Constitution.

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

"...Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch..."


Look carefully at the OP.

In it, you will see that there is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat-lite Republicans and the Republicans.


And that is the essence of the post.

I apologize if it was unclear that my response was to what appeared to me to be the premise of your post, specifically:

We are about to see whether or not this nation becomes a one-party government....essentially a totalitarian monarchy.

 

[The Rabbi]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

There is no such poll. You simply lie.
The generic ballot shows even split GOP/Dem. Approval ratings for Congress as a whole are poor. Recall that the Senate is controlled by Harry Reid (D-Corruption) and the Democrats.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It could be argued that we're already there, Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch with a royal court complete with giant corporations, special interest groups, political class sycophants and legions of faceless bureaucrats. The only difference between what we have now and the European Monarchies is that we get the illusion of choice when it comes to which hand gets to slap us around and we get to desperately cling to whatever liberty hasn't yet become too inconvenient for our betters to suppress.

The government worshipers of course will strenuously object, since they've been so imbued with the doctrine of statist apologists that any deviation from the mode of ever growing and centralized power seems "radical" to them. They seem to be either unwilling or incapable of thinking this progression through to it's logical conclusion, even though history is replete with examples of what the end game looks like.

Just look at what's going on today, the citizenry is at war with itself over which hand of the monarch gives the less painful beatings and all the while the increasingly enriched ruling class is laughing their heads off at how effective their game plan is working out. We are very well advanced on our journey down the road to serfdom, welcome aboard and enjoy the view.

"Many now believe that with the rise of the totalitarian State the world has entered upon a new era of barbarism. It has not. The totalitarian State is only the State; the kind of thing it does is only what the State has always done with unfailing regularity, if it had the power to do it, wherever and whenever its own aggrandizement made that kind of thing expedient. Give any State like power hereafter, and put it in like circumstances, and it will do precisely the same kind of thing. The State will unfailingly aggrandize itself, if only it has the power, first at the expense of its own citizens, and then at the expense of anyone else in sight. It has always done so, and always will." -- Albert Jay Nock, The Criminality of the State

"...Republicans and Democrats two hands of the same monarch..."


Look carefully at the OP.

In it, you will see that there is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat-lite Republicans and the Republicans.


And that is the essence of the post.

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Turn it down a notch: it is hardly necessary to prove, once again, that you are an incompetent.


I'm precise, clear, and mean what I say: don't blame your inadequacies on me.


OK....here is your tutorial:

Item #4 names Republicans
Item #6, Democrat-lite Republican

Items #7-#10 illustrates which I find to be the truth.


Read their statements and see if you can discern the difference.
Better yet, find someone with a more extensive education, a junior high school grad, to explain it to you.




In the future, to avoid this sort of embarrassment, stick to posting about subjects with which you have expertise: favorite Crayola, best reality TV show, why you enjoy the 24-hour Cartoon Network.

Mentioning republicans is not the same as banging on them. Maybe if you didn't think others are stupid, you would not think you could lie and not get called on it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bullshit. The essence of your post is that the GOP was right in 1995 and they would be right to force a shutdown now. Nowhere in your OP did you bang on the GOP.

Give it up.

Turn it down a notch: it is hardly necessary to prove, once again, that you are an incompetent.


I'm precise, clear, and mean what I say: don't blame your inadequacies on me.


OK....here is your tutorial:

Item #4 names Republicans
Item #6, Democrat-lite Republican

Items #7-#10 illustrates which I find to be the truth.


Read their statements and see if you can discern the difference.
Better yet, find someone with a more extensive education, a junior high school grad, to explain it to you.




In the future, to avoid this sort of embarrassment, stick to posting about subjects with which you have expertise: favorite Crayola, best reality TV show, why you enjoy the 24-hour Cartoon Network.

Mentioning republicans is not the same as banging on them. Maybe if you didn't think others are stupid, you would not think you could lie and not get called on it.

In all honesty, I believe you're stupid.


That, largely, is the explanation for you seeing others in that light.





"Mentioning republicans is not the same as...."

My mistake was in assuming that all readers would be able to follow the OP.
Your mistake was in assuming that you are of the caliber that the OP was designed for.


Please re-consider my suggestions for your future participation.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

So you're willing to get rid of the Republicans in Congress based on their disapproval rating?

 

[Geaux4it]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

So you're willing to get rid of the Republicans in Congress based on their disapproval rating?

Including Obama with his?- YES

Oh, and don't forget, Obama loves to use the term "And most Americans agree' when, actually, they don't

-Geaux

 

[The T]

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

So you're willing to get rid of the Republicans in Congress based on their disapproval rating?

Including Obama with his?- YES

Oh, and don't forget, Obama loves to use the term "And most Americans agree' when, actually, they don't

-Geaux

Only the blind/extremely gullible belive his crap. NY Carbonated sadly is one of them.

 

[Redfish]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

So you're willing to get rid of the Republicans in Congress based on their disapproval rating?

please stop lying. the poll you are attempting to quote addresses congress as a whole, not either party. Congress has a 19% approval rating. obama is at 44%. 63% want obamacare repealed. Even the leader of the teamsters has come out against obamacare--because he finally woke up and realized it will hurt his members---how will they pay their union dues if they only get 30 hours work and have to pay a high premium or a tax penalty for crappy insurance coverage

 

[Geaux4it]

The Republicans in Congress in the latest poll have a 19% approval 73% disapproval rating.

That's what their scorched earth obstruction-at-all-costs policy has gotten them.

Escalating the policy that got them down to 19% approval would seem to the rational mind to be insanity.

Yet over 50% of Americans want ACA repealed, yet that don't matter?

LMAO

-Geaux

So you're willing to get rid of the Republicans in Congress based on their disapproval rating?

How about them Democrats too?

-Geaux

Congress: Democrats


7/28-31/13

Approve- 31%
Disapprove- 61%
Unsure- 7%