simple question for the WTC collapse

[Gamolon]

Explain why, using the laws stated above, you think the lower structure should have halted or stopped the upper section.

This should be interesting.

IThat wasn't the issue at hand, though another point that needs to be addressed. The issue at hand is that you're saying the upper section of the building sheered off into debris on its way down. Kinetic energy can't be used for two separate works. So it either expelled that energy as it sheered off (meaning that the total mass of the upper section became smaller, along with its potential/kinetic energy along the way), or it used it to pulverize the section below it. One or the other, not both. You would need an energy input for that to occur and we dont have one. Unless you know something we dont.

Interesting.

Please explain how the building at 3:22 of this video completely collapsed.

Days? eots? TakeASteBack? Explain how your "violated" laws of physics apply to the building at 3:22 in the video above.

No explanation?

 

[SFC Ollie]

In 2008 they found the explosive; nano thermitic devices, brand new technology in 1999, the only people who had it in 2001 was US military Labs (probably still the case).

You make false statements. You obviously have an agenda.

7 years after the fact some conspiracy people supposedly tested some dust from supposedly 4 different places and found particles of elements that make up thermite.

There is no way this so called evidence can be admitted into court because there is no train of custody on the dust. And the amount of so called thermite found in the dust would mean there would have had to have been hundreds of tons to leave behind that much thermite.

Please play again......

 

[legaleagle_45]

it was blown to bits.

"I can't see any top portion of tower doing this herculean crushing of the entire structure below it. That's because the demolition wave began at points of impact and went in both directions; down and up, and since the towers were struck in the upper portions, the tops were blown to pieces by the time the bottoms were still only half blown to pieces. So, there was no upper tower portion left bearing down upon the lower portions of the tower."

Sigh... There was a mythbusters episode about whether a trailer truck filled with birds was lighter if the birds were flying inside the trailer. Think about it.

MYTH BUSTERS ..LOL AND THERE CREDIBILITY IS WHAT EXACTLY ???

So you must believe that a truck trailer filled with birds actually weighs less when the birds are flying, right?

 

[legaleagle_45]

the myth buster claim was it took a truck load and still could not melt steel...clearly this is false...and these devices are what a handy man with no budget could do in his back yard...myth buster myths...busted

Err, the Mythbusters never did a show on 9/11. That is another myth.

 

[Graphix]

Aliens

Sure, why not?

 

[eots]

IThat wasn't the issue at hand, though another point that needs to be addressed. The issue at hand is that you're saying the upper section of the building sheered off into debris on its way down. Kinetic energy can't be used for two separate works. So it either expelled that energy as it sheered off (meaning that the total mass of the upper section became smaller, along with its potential/kinetic energy along the way), or it used it to pulverize the section below it. One or the other, not both. You would need an energy input for that to occur and we dont have one. Unless you know something we dont.

Interesting.

Please explain how the building at 3:22 of this video completely collapsed.

Days? eots? TakeASteBack? Explain how your "violated" laws of physics apply to the building at 3:22 in the video above.

No explanation?

lol...its a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION...people made calculations and precise cuts to structural support removing these supports rapidly and in sequence then it appears as if the top HALF of the building crushes the bottom after it has been weakened and prepared...it sure did not happen from small office fires or random damage that much is for sure

 

[eots]

the myth buster claim was it took a truck load and still could not melt steel...clearly this is false...and these devices are what a handy man with no budget could do in his back yard...myth buster myths...busted

Err, the Mythbusters never did a show on 9/11. That is another myth.

No one said they did...they did one on can thermite cut steel...

 

[eots]

Sigh... There was a mythbusters episode about whether a trailer truck filled with birds was lighter if the birds were flying inside the trailer. Think about it.

MYTH BUSTERS ..LOL AND THERE CREDIBILITY IS WHAT EXACTLY ???

So you must believe that a truck trailer filled with birds actually weighs less when the birds are flying, right?

lol it looks like your the majority of your birds have flown well away from the truck horizontally and appear to be heading south for the winter

 

[eots]

In 2008 they found the explosive; nano thermitic devices, brand new technology in 1999, the only people who had it in 2001 was US military Labs (probably still the case).

You make false statements. You obviously have an agenda.

7 years after the fact some conspiracy people supposedly tested some dust from supposedly 4 different places and found particles of elements that make up thermite.

There is no way this so called evidence can be admitted into court because there is no train of custody on the dust. And the amount of so called thermite found in the dust would mean there would have had to have been hundreds of tons to leave behind that much thermite.

Please play again......

they did not find the elements...they found unignited nano-thermite

 

[legaleagle_45]

the myth buster claim was it took a truck load and still could not melt steel...clearly this is false...and these devices are what a handy man with no budget could do in his back yard...myth buster myths...busted

Err, the Mythbusters never did a show on 9/11. That is another myth.

No one said they did...they did one on can thermite cut steel...

You mean the one where they showed thermite does cut steel?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ]Mythbusters Toast 1/2 Ton of Thermite - YouTube[/ame]

The episode showed that it melted steel even though it did not cleanly cut the SUV in half... which is what Jamie wanted to do.

Obviously you rely upon what other people say rather than looking at the evidence directly because if you watch the episode in question you will see the steel melting and hearing Jamie say "you can see it dripping off the front".

You like to make claims which are exactly opposite of the truth, huh?

 

[legaleagle_45]

lol it looks like your the majority of your birds have flown well away from the truck horizontally and appear to be heading south for the winter

Seems like you are a bird brain.

 

[Derideo_Te]

In 2008 they found the explosive; nano thermitic devices, brand new technology in 1999, the only people who had it in 2001 was US military Labs (probably still the case).

You make false statements. You obviously have an agenda.

7 years after the fact some conspiracy people supposedly tested some dust from supposedly 4 different places and found particles of elements that make up thermite.

There is no way this so called evidence can be admitted into court because there is no train of custody on the dust. And the amount of so called thermite found in the dust would mean there would have had to have been hundreds of tons to leave behind that much thermite.

Please play again......

they did not find the elements...they found unignited nano-thermite

Thermite was used to cut up the steel debris afterwards. If there hadn't been any in the dust around the site that would have been remarkable.

Thermite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Thermite reactions have many uses. Thermite is not an explosive; instead it operates by exposing a very small area of metal to extremely high temperatures. Intense heat focused on a small spot can be used to cut through metal or weld metal components together both by melting metal from the components, and by injecting molten metal from the thermite reaction itself.

 

[numan]

where did it go? It is right in front of you, it is part of that huge debris being blown out in every direction.

It does appear that a considerable portion of the mass of the buildings was ejected beyond the perimeter of the buildings, and so would not participate in the collapse of the lower floors.

.

 

[eots]

7 years after the fact some conspiracy people supposedly tested some dust from supposedly 4 different places and found particles of elements that make up thermite.

There is no way this so called evidence can be admitted into court because there is no train of custody on the dust. And the amount of so called thermite found in the dust would mean there would have had to have been hundreds of tons to leave behind that much thermite.

Please play again......

they did not find the elements...they found unignited nano-thermite

Thermite was used to cut up the steel debris afterwards. If there hadn't been any in the dust around the site that would have been remarkable.

Thermite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Thermite reactions have many uses. Thermite is not an explosive; instead it operates by exposing a very small area of metal to extremely high temperatures. Intense heat focused on a small spot can be used to cut through metal or weld metal components together both by melting metal from the components, and by injecting molten metal from the thermite reaction itself.

thermite was not used to cut the debris..

 

[candycorn]

Here we go again. Bush knocked down the towers, right?

Bush or the Jews...or both

Which Jews are you talking about, and what is your evidence? I'm sure you don't mind sharing it with us.

I was kidding man...

Whenever a conspiracy about 9/11 is hatched, almost always the person in charge was either Bush or the Jews or both. Eventually, Days will appoint an accusing finger at one of the aforementioned parties. Just wait.

 

[eots]

Err, the Mythbusters never did a show on 9/11. That is another myth.

No one said they did...they did one on can thermite cut steel...

You mean the one where they showed thermite does cut steel?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ]Mythbusters Toast 1/2 Ton of Thermite - YouTube[/ame]

The episode showed that it melted steel even though it did not cleanly cut the SUV in half... which is what Jamie wanted to do.

Obviously you rely upon what other people say rather than looking at the evidence directly because if you watch the episode in question you will see the steel melting and hearing Jamie say "you can see it dripping off the front".

You like to make claims which are exactly opposite of the truth, huh?

I did not say melt...I said cut..he says the thermite could not 'cleave' through the sheet metal. and failed to cleanly cut implying it could not cut through heavy steel

.Verb
Split or sever (something), esp. along a natural line or grain.

Synonyms
split - slit - splinter - crack

but the fact is it could easily cut through sheet metal and even thick steel in applied properly and the reason they failed was how they chose to utilize the thermite

 

[Montrovant]

where did it go? It is right in front of you, it is part of that huge debris being blown out in every direction.

It does appear that a considerable portion of the mass of the buildings was ejected beyond the perimeter of the buildings, and so would not participate in the collapse of the lower floors.

.

It seems very difficult to tell to me. There is so much smoke, how can you determine the amount of debris falling away from the structure?

 

[SFC Ollie]

I wonder just how much thermite it took to cause molten steel to run.... And in what concentration, and if it was used to cut the columns how did it all get together in one spot to run?

BTW if you look at more than one video of the collapse, (like not the one the truthers always try to show) you can see the roof line all the way into the smoke and dust...it was intact for quite some distance.

 

[SFC Ollie]

And Days nor anyone else has been able to account for the bowing in of the building before the collapse...I suppose some magical thermite caused that too........

 

[eots]

where did it go? It is right in front of you, it is part of that huge debris being blown out in every direction.

It does appear that a considerable portion of the mass of the buildings was ejected beyond the perimeter of the buildings, and so would not participate in the collapse of the lower floors.

.

It seems very difficult to tell to me. There is so much smoke, how can you determine the amount of debris falling away from the structure?

that is not smoke that is the debris made into a cloud of pulverized concrete