Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,837
- 16,986
- 2,190
I am so positive about how wrong you are. You are so far from right you are left. I'm just not sure there is any convincing you of thatThe parents do pay more for school... Books backpacks, fund raisers erc etc etc. don't be and idiot you know these thingsIt amazes me that you can't foresee the effects that your ideas would have on communities... mainly the poor/welfare community. You have obvious contempt for them, but they aren't all lazy free-loaders, and the fact that you want to punish children whom don't have a choice in the matter is really sad. And for what? To keep a few more bucks in your pocket?Take college away, haven't you stated that you dont support funding grade school with tax money?
No, what I said is that people with kids in the school should pay substantially more than those with no kids in school. Sure, I'm for paying nothing, but that will never happen.
So you object with people who have kids in school paying more than people without? As it stands now, I'm paying more for the schools than many of the people that have kids in them. You call that fair?
Over here, schools are paid by property tax. If you have kids in school, you should just have to pay much higher taxes than those of us with no kids in school. If you can't afford that tax, then you simply must move to someplace you can afford.
You promote people having kids they can't support, and if I say I don't want to support other people's kids, I'm the bad guy--not the parents.
Oh, big deal. They pay for books. And what public school has fund raisers anyway? I've never seen that here.
Quit making excuses. You know I am right. It's amazing we've let liberalism pollute our country to such a point where we don't expect parents to take care of their own kids anymore--taxpayers now have to.
"When you go out of your way to create more irresponsible people--don't be surprised when you end up with more irresponsible people.
Rush Limbaugh