Since the republicans will use the Harry Reid option , will we ever have a left wing Supreme court?

Actually, the Republicans employing the nuclear option makes it considerably more likely we will see more far left SCOTUSs in the future.

Republicans never see the long game.



Republicans never see the long game?

Who the fuck used it in the first place tard?



Who thought by using all those E..O. s instead of going through congress they were safe...?



The democrats never ever think ahead.

It's really just a matter of demographics.

The changing demographics of this country heavily favor Democratic presidential candidates.

The Senate most likely will continue to change hands, but when the Dems have a majority they will be able to place truly left-wing justices on the bench.
The changing demographics will destroy whatever is left of Democrat cohesion and create an entire generation of apolitical patriots.


Your being facetious ya?
Nope.


Then you are delusional.
 
Republicans never see the long game?

Who the fuck used it in the first place tard?



Who thought by using all those E..O. s instead of going through congress they were safe...?



The democrats never ever think ahead.

It's really just a matter of demographics.

The changing demographics of this country heavily favor Democratic presidential candidates.

The Senate most likely will continue to change hands, but when the Dems have a majority they will be able to place truly left-wing justices on the bench.


BTW most people switch to Republican as they get older, and Latinos are traditionally conservative, if the immigration problem is solved they will vote for Republicans more in the future



.
Millennials will switch over as well.

Immigration is all they have left.


Well that and racism /segregation in the blue states... If blacks and whites ever get together there the democrat party is finished.
Technically white people and black people are together in blue states because of their common disdain for whiteness.

The problem for Democrats is that white masochists worship blacks, not Hispanics or Arabs etc, so the switch to being a Hispanic party will hurt Democrats even with the most crazy leftists.

USMB's weekly Klan meeting?

:wtf:
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
 
It's really just a matter of demographics.

The changing demographics of this country heavily favor Democratic presidential candidates.

The Senate most likely will continue to change hands, but when the Dems have a majority they will be able to place truly left-wing justices on the bench.


BTW most people switch to Republican as they get older, and Latinos are traditionally conservative, if the immigration problem is solved they will vote for Republicans more in the future



.
Millennials will switch over as well.

Immigration is all they have left.


Well that and racism /segregation in the blue states... If blacks and whites ever get together there the democrat party is finished.
Technically white people and black people are together in blue states because of their common disdain for whiteness.

The problem for Democrats is that white masochists worship blacks, not Hispanics or Arabs etc, so the switch to being a Hispanic party will hurt Democrats even with the most crazy leftists.

USMB's weekly Klan meeting?

:wtf:
LOL

I love how stupid you Democrats are.

You don't even possess the brain cells to comprehend that you called me a klan member for simply reversing the standard Democrat racial narrative.

Racist white Republicans with black Republican lackeys = brilliant "progressive" observation

Racist black Democrats with white Democrat lackeys = "klan meeting".


If only you had a brain and could actually appreciate the irony.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.
 
IMO the only way to get the congress critters back in line is to introduce another party into both the house and senate in enough numbers that neither the dipshitcraps nor the repubic-hairs will ever have a majority on their own
 
BTW most people switch to Republican as they get older, and Latinos are traditionally conservative, if the immigration problem is solved they will vote for Republicans more in the future



.
Millennials will switch over as well.

Immigration is all they have left.


Well that and racism /segregation in the blue states... If blacks and whites ever get together there the democrat party is finished.
Technically white people and black people are together in blue states because of their common disdain for whiteness.

The problem for Democrats is that white masochists worship blacks, not Hispanics or Arabs etc, so the switch to being a Hispanic party will hurt Democrats even with the most crazy leftists.

USMB's weekly Klan meeting?

:wtf:
LOL

I love how stupid you Democrats are.

You don't even possess the brain cells to comprehend that you called me a klan member for simply reversing the standard Democrat racial narrative.

Racist white Republicans with black Republican lackeys = brilliant "progressive" observation

Racist black Democrats with white Democrat lackeys = "klan meeting".


If only you had a brain and could actually appreciate the irony.

A fallacy of a false equivalency to which you no doubt remain oblivious.

In each post, you ignore 400 years of history, It's truly astonishing.
 
Millennials will switch over as well.

Immigration is all they have left.


Well that and racism /segregation in the blue states... If blacks and whites ever get together there the democrat party is finished.
Technically white people and black people are together in blue states because of their common disdain for whiteness.

The problem for Democrats is that white masochists worship blacks, not Hispanics or Arabs etc, so the switch to being a Hispanic party will hurt Democrats even with the most crazy leftists.

USMB's weekly Klan meeting?

:wtf:
LOL

I love how stupid you Democrats are.

You don't even possess the brain cells to comprehend that you called me a klan member for simply reversing the standard Democrat racial narrative.

Racist white Republicans with black Republican lackeys = brilliant "progressive" observation

Racist black Democrats with white Democrat lackeys = "klan meeting".


If only you had a brain and could actually appreciate the irony.

A fallacy of a false equivalency to which you no doubt remain oblivious.

In each post, you ignore 400 years of history, It's truly astonishing.
In each post, you ignore 400 years of history,
1776-2016=400
It's truly astonishing.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.



Thank god I will never see it in my lifetime

.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.

Without the peculiarity of the EC there'd be no reason for most Americans to vote. The POTUS would be elected by the residents of LA, Chicago, NYC & DC.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.

The Democrats got 11 million more votes than the GOP in the Senate elections in 2016.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.

The Democrats got 11 million more votes than the GOP in the Senate elections in 2016.
:confused-84::confused-84::confused-84:
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.

Without the peculiarity of the EC there'd be no reason for most Americans to vote. The POTUS would be elected by the residents of LA, Chicago, NYC & DC.

That is nonsensical.

With the electoral college there's no reason for California Republicans to vote at all.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.

The Democrats got 11 million more votes than the GOP in the Senate elections in 2016.
:confused-84::confused-84::confused-84:

Are you having a stroke?
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.

The Democrats got 11 million more votes than the GOP in the Senate elections in 2016.


That's a stupid retort even for you.


Remind us again how we can vote for the dog catcher in Little Rock Arkansas when you live in Muncy Indiana


.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.

Without the peculiarity of the EC there'd be no reason for most Americans to vote. The POTUS would be elected by the residents of LA, Chicago, NYC & DC.

That is nonsensical.

With the electoral college there's no reason for California Republicans to vote at all.
With the electoral college there's no reason for California Republicans to vote at all.

Think they will ever win the popular vote?
 
I feel sorry for the LGBT crowd, the tree huggers and the little snow flakes now.
It will be century or more before we would see a left wing Supreme court..
That's sad...
.

Actually, the Republicans employing the nuclear option makes it considerably more likely we will see more far left SCOTUSs in the future.

Republicans never see the long game.

If they can prop ginsberg up like bernie in bernie's vacation and just wait. Yep the dems what them to exercise the nuclear option and repubs are too stupid to realize this.
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.
That would be true if the Democrats were an actual political party with a legitimate political message...but they no longer are.

The Democrats got 11 million more votes than the GOP in the Senate elections in 2016.
:confused-84::confused-84::confused-84:

Are you having a stroke?


No

I'm trying to figure out what the number of votes nationwide for the Senate has to do with anything?
 
The Democrats have won the presidential popular vote in the last 6 out of 8 elections. The GOP is now almost wholly dependent on the peculiarity of the electoral college to have any good chance of winning the presidency.

That is a dependence that will not serve them well in the long term.

Therefore, the end of the filibuster will favor Democrats over time.

Without the peculiarity of the EC there'd be no reason for most Americans to vote. The POTUS would be elected by the residents of LA, Chicago, NYC & DC.

That is nonsensical.

With the electoral college there's no reason for California Republicans to vote at all.

Heck they couldn't even vote for republican senators both candidates were democrats in one district
 

Forum List

Back
Top