Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,398
- 2,180
its not one plant think there is two and it's a start idiot to fight back after a 30 year hiatusKnow it'll suck for the miner community, their families, and their communities, but the sooner we make coal unprofitable and more trouble than its worth, the better off everyone else will be.
Because .
You have nothing. You cant simply get rid of coal you need to replace it. As nuclear is not an option and green energy simply cannot do it you essentially have no plan at all. We ban coal and we end up going back to the Stone Age. It is a fucking terrible idea.
ONE PLANT! Really! I guess nuclear energy is rapidly growing then to replace coal .Nuclear is off limits. The environmentalists closed that industry down in the Carter administration. It is a good idea, though.
Guess again a new nuke plant is being built in south Carolina
About time
Wait.
No, of course not. It IS untouchable because the environmentalists have gone completely nuts. Rather than looking for reasonable and practical solutions, they support nothing but green energies which CANNOT take the place of coal considering they are not consistent forms of energy. They are supplementary. Good to have yes but you cant build an entire system on them.
Nuclear is the best we have and we should be utilizing it FAR more. Unfortunately, the rules are written by people that dont bother to understand what they are regulating or what would be the best course of action.
.