🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Six studies that show that everything the GOP believe are wrong...

As for the economic stimulus, there are several solid studies which show the stimulus mitigated the bleeding. It did not turn the economy around. It did not save every job lost by the Bush crash. But it did mitigate the damage.

However, it did so by adding a tremendous amount to the federal debt. And in the long term, a huge public and private debt slows economic growth. Without balancing the budget and paying down the debt, the gains of the stimulus will be reversed.
 
Each response will one of these:

Studies arent true

Liberals did the Studies

OP is an asshole

Obama something.


Not once will true or false enter the equation because to republicans here. Whether something is true or false doesnt matter

You forgot; "Everything he said is Bullshit!"

And "Liberals are stupid!"
Both true.

Let me ask the major question here: How would you evaluate whether what the OP claimed was true or not? What steps would you use?
 
The post indicates six "studies" but when you check the link the "studies" turn out to be "simple facts" and when you check a little further the "facts" turn out to be nothing but opinion by a left wing writer who contributes to Salon and Rolling Stone.
 
2. The Stimulus Created Millions of Jobs.

In the aftermath of the 2007 recession, President Obama invested in a massive stimulus. The Republican belief that markets are always good and government is always bad led them to argue that diverting resources to the public sector this way would have disastrous results. They were wrong: The stimulus worked, with the most reliable studies finding that it created millions of jobs. The fact that government stimulus works – long denied by Republicans (at least, when Democrats are in office) – is a consensus among economists, with only 4 percent arguing that unemployment would have been lower without the stimulus and only 12 percent arguing that the costs outweigh the benefits.

3. Taxing The Rich Doesn't Hurt Economic Growth.

Republicans believe that the wealthy are the vehicles of economic growth. Starting with Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, they tried cutting taxes on the rich in order to unleash latent economic potential. But even the relatively conservative Martin Feldstein has acknowledged that investment is driven by demand, not supply; if there are viable investments to be made, they will be made regardless of tax rates, and if there are no investments to be made, cutting taxes is merely pushing on a string. Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, two of the eminent economists of inequality, find no correlation between marginal tax rates and economic growth.



Read more: Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Say About the Economy is Wrong | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

Greedy idiot Pubs and their silly dupes...

The Left is Giddy Over New Marxist Book

April 24, 2014

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: There's something that I want to spend some time on -- if it takes the next two days discussing with you, and it may. There's a new book out. I became aware of this while I was out, post-op. Some French socialist, Marxist, communist economist has published a book, and the left in this country is having orgasms over it. It's the number one book on Amazon.

The guy's name is Thomas Piketty. It is timed coincidentally -- maybe not coincidentally -- you know, the Obama Regime and the Democrats are all on this big kick of income inequality and what to do about it. And this guy's book gives them ammo.

It's the most outrageous set of assumptions that I have ever read. In fact, it's nothing new. It's just repackaged, but I'm telling you the people on the left can barely contain themselves with their giddiness over this, and it portends grave danger for this country if any of this guy's suggestions were to ever become adopted.

And Obama is on his way to trying to adopt some of them, all on the basis of getting rid of income inequality. Can somebody tell me, when has there ever been income equality, and if you can tell me when there has been income equality, can you tell me what kind of lives those people had, and what kind of country they lived in, and what kind of liberty and freedom they had.

This guy is suggesting an 80% tax rate on incomes over $500,000 a year. Not to raise revenue for the government, but to eliminate those incomes. This guy's objective is to simply wipe out the wealthy.

And supposedly everybody is gonna be deliriously happy after this.

It is absurd. It's stupid. It's dumb. It's ignorant.

It's been tried, and it is being tried in every place in the world you wouldn't want to live.

And yet the left in this country and the Democrat Party and the media, they're just chomping at the bit, excited as they can be. And I want to go through some actual factual analysis of incomes in this country and wealth and census data evidence that proves that this is the land of opportunity.

The Left is Giddy Over New Marxist Book - The Rush Limbaugh Show
 
"Rock Journalism is People Who Can’t Write Interviewing People Who Can’t Talk for People Who Can’t Read" -- Frank Zappa

“My best advice to anyone who wants to raise a happy, mentally healthy child is: Keep him or her as far away from a church as you can.”

“There's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.”

“Communism doesn't work because people like to own stuff.”

“Take the Kama Sutra. How many people died from the Kama Sutra as opposed to the Bible? Who wins?”

“The United States is a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced.”

Frank Zappa Quotes (Author of The Real Frank Zappa Book)
 
The post indicates six "studies" but when you check the link the "studies" turn out to be "simple facts" and when you check a little further the "facts" turn out to be nothing but opinion by a left wing writer who contributes to Salon and Rolling Stone.

Actually, the Rolling Stones article links to this page which contains links to the actual studies done which prove the stimulus worked.

Here are the studies linked on that page:

http://www.nber.org/papers/w16759.pdf

http://www.stanford.edu/~waw/papers...ow_Woolston_state_fiscal_relief__aug_2011.pdf

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2010/wp10-17bk.pdf

http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12185

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/cea_5th_arra_report.pdf

http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/End-of-Great-Recession.pdf

http://www.nber.org/papers/w16775.pdf

http://web.econ.ohio-state.edu/dupor/arra10_may11.pdf

http://www.stanford.edu/~johntayl/JEL_taylor revised.pdf
 
Last edited:
good grief!!! good example of how not to be,a broken freaking record, 3rd grade mentality narrow minded boob.

The all inclusive left,willing to embrace nothing .

here's one of those lazy worthless repub-lie-tards
republicans say raising the min. wage will cost jobs .... repub-lie-tards show us once where raising the min. wage has cost jobs they can't

they say passing a budget for roads has to paid for ... and will cost us in debt if we don't... every time we Dems have raised the budget for roads and services we have come out of a job recession ... we have had money to pay down on the national debt ... every time the republicans cut cut cut we went into a further national debt and in both cases where they cut so much we went in to a great depression .... like the guy said stop being so lazy and look up the real facts ...

Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage? Because its almost a direct correlation.
We have not paid down the national debt in 40 years. Not even under Clinton.

It isnt that libs dont know anything. ITs that whatever they know is a lie.
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage under Clinton??? under clinton we raised the mim wage ... under bill clinton we had a surplus of 500 billion dollars ... under bill clinton the black citizen had jobs ...under bush 1, under reagan, under bush 2, the black voter lost their jobs in huge numbers and you wonder why they won't vote republican ... they lost their job because of cutting taxes ... do you want to try and compare DEM leader ship verses republican leader ship ??? you will lose that debate, Graphs and all ... under Bush he took the 500 billion dollars that could have been used to pay down on the national debt ... he didn't do that... if bush had kept Clintons policies in tact he would have come out looking like a hero .... bush didn't do that ... he cut taxes ... he gave the rich 1% huge taxes cuts and ran the country in to the toilet ... almost another great depression toilet ... we didn't have any money for hispanic to work ... we didn't have any money for your Orientals to work ... we didn't have any money for young whites to work ... we didn't have any money for Blacks to work ... you republicans and this desire to cut taxes just because they are a taxes and you don't care what it does .... you have your heads so far up your asses with this we must cut taxes that you don't see what happens by cutting taxes ... ask Oklahoma what happen their ... they are in deep shit ... whjy ????because of their republicans in office ... they have cut taxes so bad they can't even pay their police... their fire department ... or any of the state services way to go repub-lie-tards ... the word on the street is republicans are in deep shit in that state ...
 
good grief!!! good example of how not to be,a broken freaking record, 3rd grade mentality narrow minded boob.

The all inclusive left,willing to embrace nothing .

put the fool on ignore, he is not worth your time.
 
here's one of those lazy worthless repub-lie-tards
republicans say raising the min. wage will cost jobs .... repub-lie-tards show us once where raising the min. wage has cost jobs they can't

they say passing a budget for roads has to paid for ... and will cost us in debt if we don't... every time we Dems have raised the budget for roads and services we have come out of a job recession ... we have had money to pay down on the national debt ... every time the republicans cut cut cut we went into a further national debt and in both cases where they cut so much we went in to a great depression .... like the guy said stop being so lazy and look up the real facts ...

Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage? Because its almost a direct correlation.
We have not paid down the national debt in 40 years. Not even under Clinton.

It isnt that libs dont know anything. ITs that whatever they know is a lie.
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage under Clinton??? under clinton we raised the mim wage ... under bill clinton we had a surplus of 500 billion dollars ... under bill clinton the black citizen had jobs ...under bush 1, under reagan, under bush 2, the black voter lost their jobs in huge numbers and you wonder why they won't vote republican ... they lost their job because of cutting taxes ... do you want to try and compare DEM leader ship verses republican leader ship ??? you will lose that debate, Graphs and all ... under Bush he took the 500 billion dollars that could have been used to pay down on the national debt ... he didn't do that... if bush had kept Clintons policies in tact he would have come out looking like a hero .... bush didn't do that ... he cut taxes ... he gave the rich 1% huge taxes cuts and ran the country in to the toilet ... almost another great depression toilet ... we didn't have any money for hispanic to work ... we didn't have any money for your Orientals to work ... we didn't have any money for young whites to work ... we didn't have any money for Blacks to work ... you republicans and this desire to cut taxes just because they are a taxes and you don't care what it does .... you have your heads so far up your asses with this we must cut taxes that you don't see what happens by cutting taxes ... ask Oklahoma what happen their ... they are in deep shit ... whjy ????because of their republicans in office ... they have cut taxes so bad they can't even pay their police... their fire department ... or any of the state services way to go repub-lie-tards ... the word on the street is republicans are in deep shit in that state ...

WTF are you babbling about? It isnt a contest to see who can post the most irrelevant shit. Black teen unemployment went up with every min wage increase. Even under Clinton.
 
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage? Because its almost a direct correlation.
We have not paid down the national debt in 40 years. Not even under Clinton.

It isnt that libs dont know anything. ITs that whatever they know is a lie.
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage under Clinton??? under clinton we raised the mim wage ... under bill clinton we had a surplus of 500 billion dollars ... under bill clinton the black citizen had jobs ...under bush 1, under reagan, under bush 2, the black voter lost their jobs in huge numbers and you wonder why they won't vote republican ... they lost their job because of cutting taxes ... do you want to try and compare DEM leader ship verses republican leader ship ??? you will lose that debate, Graphs and all ... under Bush he took the 500 billion dollars that could have been used to pay down on the national debt ... he didn't do that... if bush had kept Clintons policies in tact he would have come out looking like a hero .... bush didn't do that ... he cut taxes ... he gave the rich 1% huge taxes cuts and ran the country in to the toilet ... almost another great depression toilet ... we didn't have any money for hispanic to work ... we didn't have any money for your Orientals to work ... we didn't have any money for young whites to work ... we didn't have any money for Blacks to work ... you republicans and this desire to cut taxes just because they are a taxes and you don't care what it does .... you have your heads so far up your asses with this we must cut taxes that you don't see what happens by cutting taxes ... ask Oklahoma what happen their ... they are in deep shit ... whjy ????because of their republicans in office ... they have cut taxes so bad they can't even pay their police... their fire department ... or any of the state services way to go repub-lie-tards ... the word on the street is republicans ano it didre in deep shit in that state ...

WTF are you babbling about? It isnt a contest to see who can post the most irrelevant shit. Black teen unemployment went up with every min wage increase. Even under Clinton.

no it didn't ... looks like you lost the debate again


THE LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATE SINCE 1969 AND MORE THAN 20 MILLION NEW JOBS. In 1992, when Bill Clinton was elected President, the American economy was barely creating jobs, wages were stagnant, and the unemployment rate was 7.5 percent. His bold, three-part economic strategy focused on three objectives: fiscal discipline, investing in education, health care, science and technology, and opening foreign markets. Today’s jobs release provides more evidence that this strategy is working:

The Unemployment Rate Was 4.2 Percent in 1999 -- the Lowest Since 1969. The unemployment rate was 4.1 percent in December bringing the average unemployment rate for 1999 to 4.2 percent -- the lowest since 1969. The unemployment rate has fallen for seven years in a row. It has remained below 5 percent for 30 months in a row. For women the unemployment rate was 4.1 percent -- the lowest since 1953.

African American and Hispanic Unemployment Rates Were the Lowest on Record in 1999. The unemployment rate for African Americans has fallen from 14.2 percent in 1992 to 8.0 percent in 1999 – the lowest rate on record. The unemployment rate for Hispanics has fallen from 11.6 percent in 1992 to 6.4 percent in 1999 -- the lowest rate on record.

20.4 Million New Jobs Created Under the Clinton-Gore Administration. Since 1993, the economy has added 20.4 million new jobs. That’s the most jobs ever created under a single Administration – and more new jobs than Presidents Reagan and Bush created during their three terms. Under President Clinton, the economy has added an average of 245,000 jobs per month, the highest of any President on record. This compares to 52,000 per month under President Bush and 167,000 per month under President Reagan.

92 Percent -- 18.8 Million -- of the New Jobs Have Been Created in the Private Sector. Since President Clinton and Vice President Gore took office, the private sector of the economy has added 18.5 million new jobs. That is 92 percent of the 20.4 million new jobs – the highest percentage since Harry S. Truman was President and presiding over the post-World War II demobilization.

Most Rapid Growth in Construction Jobs In 50 Years. After losing 662,000 jobs in construction during the previous four years, 1.9 million new construction jobs have been added during the Clinton-Gore years -- that’s a faster annual rate (5.1 percent) than any other Administration since Harry S. Truman was President.

Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Two Decades. In the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased 3.7 percent -- faster than the rate of inflation. This marks the fourth consecutive year of real wage growth -- the longest consecutive increase since the early 1970s. Under President Clinton, real wages are up 6.5 percent, after declining 4.3 percent during the Reagan and Bush years. Real wage growth in 1998 reached 2.6 percent -- the largest increase since 1972.

Inflation-- Lowest Since the 1960s. Inflation remains virtually non-existent, with the underlying core rate of inflation at 2.0 percent this year -- the lowest rate since 1965. In the last four quarters the GDP price index has risen 1.3 percent -- the lowest rate of increase since 1963.

why did this all happen ???? Clinton raised the tax rate on the rich ... it was that plain, it was that simple ... the repub-lie-tard went crazy over it ...
 
Last edited:
Hater dupes, everything you know is wrong. You're the chumps of greedy idiot megarich Pubs and their bs propaganda machine.
5. The Affordable Care Act is Working

President Obama's centrist healthcare bill was informed by federalism (delegating power to the states) and proven technocratic reforms (like a board to help doctors discern which treatments would be most cost-effective). Republicans, undeterred, decried it as Soviet-style communism based on "death panels" – never mind the fact that the old system, which rationed care based on income, is the one that left tens of thousands of uninsured people to die.

From the beginning, Republicans have predicted disastrous consequences or Obamacare, none of which came true. They predicted that the ACA would add to the deficit; in fact, it will reduce the deficit. They claimed the exchanges would fail to attract the uninsured; they met their targets. They said only old people would sign up; the young came out in the same rates as in Massachusetts. They predicted the ACA would drive up healthcare costs; in fact it is likely holding cost inflation down, although it's still hard to discern how much of the slowdown was due to the recession. In total, the ACA will ensure that 26 million people have insurance in 2024 who would have been uninsured otherwise.

It's worth noting that every time the CBO estimates how much Obamacare will cost, the number gets lower. Odd how we've never heard Republicans say that.

6. Rich people are no better than the rest of us.

Politicians on the right like to pretend that having money is a sign of hard work and morality – and that not having money is a sign of laziness. This story is contradicted by human experience and many religious traditions (Jesus tells a graphic story about a rich man who refused to help the poor burning in hell). But it's also contradicted by the facts – more and more rich people are getting their money through inheritances, and science shows that they are no more benevolent than others.

More and more, the wealthy in America are second or third generation. For instance, the Walton family, heirs to the Walmart fortune, own more wealth than the poorest 40 million Americans. Thomas Philippon and Ariell Reshef have found that 30 to 50 percent of the wage difference between the financial sector and the rest of the private sector was due to unearned "rent," or money they gained through manipulating markets. Josh Bivens and Larry Mishel found the same thing for CEOs – their increased pay hasn't been correlated to performance.

If rich people haven't really earned their money, are they at least doing any good with it? Studies find that the wealthy actually give less to charity as a proportion of their income than middle-class Americans, even though they can afford more. Worse, they use their supposed philanthropy to avoid taxes and finance pet projects. Research by Paul Piff finds that the wealthy are far more likely to exhibit narcissistic tendencies. "The rich are way more likely to prioritize their own self-interests above the interests of other people," Piff recently told New York magazine. "It makes them more likely to exhibit characteristics that we would stereotypically associate with, say, assholes."





Read more: Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Say About the Economy is Wrong | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
 
like i said ... these repub-lie-tards are to lazy to do any actual real research ... they have their handlers do it for them ... forget all of those pesky facts ... rush will tell them what to think .... fox noise and their handlers will tell them what to think ... breitbart will tell them what to think ... Whirleynutdaily will tell them what to think ... its their way.... the repub-lie-tarded way...
 
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage under Clinton??? under clinton we raised the mim wage ... under bill clinton we had a surplus of 500 billion dollars ... under bill clinton the black citizen had jobs ...under bush 1, under reagan, under bush 2, the black voter lost their jobs in huge numbers and you wonder why they won't vote republican ... they lost their job because of cutting taxes ... do you want to try and compare DEM leader ship verses republican leader ship ??? you will lose that debate, Graphs and all ... under Bush he took the 500 billion dollars that could have been used to pay down on the national debt ... he didn't do that... if bush had kept Clintons policies in tact he would have come out looking like a hero .... bush didn't do that ... he cut taxes ... he gave the rich 1% huge taxes cuts and ran the country in to the toilet ... almost another great depression toilet ... we didn't have any money for hispanic to work ... we didn't have any money for your Orientals to work ... we didn't have any money for young whites to work ... we didn't have any money for Blacks to work ... you republicans and this desire to cut taxes just because they are a taxes and you don't care what it does .... you have your heads so far up your asses with this we must cut taxes that you don't see what happens by cutting taxes ... ask Oklahoma what happen their ... they are in deep shit ... whjy ????because of their republicans in office ... they have cut taxes so bad they can't even pay their police... their fire department ... or any of the state services way to go repub-lie-tards ... the word on the street is republicans ano it didre in deep shit in that state ...

WTF are you babbling about? It isnt a contest to see who can post the most irrelevant shit. Black teen unemployment went up with every min wage increase. Even under Clinton.

no it didn't ... looks like you lost the debate again


THE LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATE SINCE 1969 AND MORE THAN 20 MILLION NEW JOBS. In 1992, when Bill Clinton was elected President, the American economy was barely creating jobs, wages were stagnant, and the unemployment rate was 7.5 percent. His bold, three-part economic strategy focused on three objectives: fiscal discipline, investing in education, health care, science and technology, and opening foreign markets. Today’s jobs release provides more evidence that this strategy is working:

The Unemployment Rate Was 4.2 Percent in 1999 -- the Lowest Since 1969. The unemployment rate was 4.1 percent in December bringing the average unemployment rate for 1999 to 4.2 percent -- the lowest since 1969. The unemployment rate has fallen for seven years in a row. It has remained below 5 percent for 30 months in a row. For women the unemployment rate was 4.1 percent -- the lowest since 1953.

African American and Hispanic Unemployment Rates Were the Lowest on Record in 1999. The unemployment rate for African Americans has fallen from 14.2 percent in 1992 to 8.0 percent in 1999 – the lowest rate on record. The unemployment rate for Hispanics has fallen from 11.6 percent in 1992 to 6.4 percent in 1999 -- the lowest rate on record.

20.4 Million New Jobs Created Under the Clinton-Gore Administration. Since 1993, the economy has added 20.4 million new jobs. That’s the most jobs ever created under a single Administration – and more new jobs than Presidents Reagan and Bush created during their three terms. Under President Clinton, the economy has added an average of 245,000 jobs per month, the highest of any President on record. This compares to 52,000 per month under President Bush and 167,000 per month under President Reagan.

92 Percent -- 18.8 Million -- of the New Jobs Have Been Created in the Private Sector. Since President Clinton and Vice President Gore took office, the private sector of the economy has added 18.5 million new jobs. That is 92 percent of the 20.4 million new jobs – the highest percentage since Harry S. Truman was President and presiding over the post-World War II demobilization.

Most Rapid Growth in Construction Jobs In 50 Years. After losing 662,000 jobs in construction during the previous four years, 1.9 million new construction jobs have been added during the Clinton-Gore years -- that’s a faster annual rate (5.1 percent) than any other Administration since Harry S. Truman was President.

Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Two Decades. In the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased 3.7 percent -- faster than the rate of inflation. This marks the fourth consecutive year of real wage growth -- the longest consecutive increase since the early 1970s. Under President Clinton, real wages are up 6.5 percent, after declining 4.3 percent during the Reagan and Bush years. Real wage growth in 1998 reached 2.6 percent -- the largest increase since 1972.

Inflation-- Lowest Since the 1960s. Inflation remains virtually non-existent, with the underlying core rate of inflation at 2.0 percent this year -- the lowest rate since 1965. In the last four quarters the GDP price index has risen 1.3 percent -- the lowest rate of increase since 1963.

why did this all happen ???? Clinton raised the tax rate on the rich ... it was that plain, it was that simple ... the repub-lie-tard went crazy over it ...

If that had been responsive to anything I wrote you might have a point. But it wasn't. You understand what you wrote was irrelevant to what I wrote, right?
 
like i said ... these repub-lie-tards are to lazy to do any actual real research ... they have their handlers do it for them ... forget all of those pesky facts ... rush will tell them what to think .... fox noise and their handlers will tell them what to think ... breitbart will tell them what to think ... Whirleynutdaily will tell them what to think ... its their way.... the repub-lie-tarded way...

"57 states"
"fundamentally change this country"
"..redistribute the wealth"
"corpseman"
"I will put the healthcare debate on c-span"
"red line on syria"
"raising the national debt is a failure of leadership"

Your hero said it, you own it.
 
^^Total chump of the greedy idiot rich...Those are stupid, or blocked by your a-hole heroes...
 
here's one of those lazy worthless repub-lie-tards
republicans say raising the min. wage will cost jobs .... repub-lie-tards show us once where raising the min. wage has cost jobs they can't

they say passing a budget for roads has to paid for ... and will cost us in debt if we don't... every time we Dems have raised the budget for roads and services we have come out of a job recession ... we have had money to pay down on the national debt ... every time the republicans cut cut cut we went into a further national debt and in both cases where they cut so much we went in to a great depression .... like the guy said stop being so lazy and look up the real facts ...

Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage? Because its almost a direct correlation.
We have not paid down the national debt in 40 years. Not even under Clinton.

It isnt that libs dont know anything. ITs that whatever they know is a lie.
Do you really need me to repost the graph showing black teen unmployment against min wage under Clinton??? under clinton we raised the mim wage ... under bill clinton we had a surplus of 500 billion dollars ... under bill clinton the black citizen had jobs ...under bush 1, under reagan, under bush 2, the black voter lost their jobs in huge numbers and you wonder why they won't vote republican ... they lost their job because of cutting taxes ... do you want to try and compare DEM leader ship verses republican leader ship ??? you will lose that debate, Graphs and all ... under Bush he took the 500 billion dollars that could have been used to pay down on the national debt ... he didn't do that... if bush had kept Clintons policies in tact he would have come out looking like a hero .... bush didn't do that ... he cut taxes ... he gave the rich 1% huge taxes cuts and ran the country in to the toilet ... almost another great depression toilet ... we didn't have any money for hispanic to work ... we didn't have any money for your Orientals to work ... we didn't have any money for young whites to work ... we didn't have any money for Blacks to work ... you republicans and this desire to cut taxes just because they are a taxes and you don't care what it does .... you have your heads so far up your asses with this we must cut taxes that you don't see what happens by cutting taxes ... ask Oklahoma what happen their ... they are in deep shit ... whjy ????because of their republicans in office ... they have cut taxes so bad they can't even pay their police... their fire department ... or any of the state services way to go repub-lie-tards ... the word on the street is republicans are in deep shit in that state ...

Oklahoma Unemployment 4.5
Oklahoma 2013 Budget 6.8 Billion, 2014 Budget 7.1 Billion

Billeye you are quite the dumfuck.
 
like i said ... these repub-lie-tards are to lazy to do any actual real research ... they have their handlers do it for them ... forget all of those pesky facts ... rush will tell them what to think .... fox noise and their handlers will tell them what to think ... breitbart will tell them what to think ... Whirleynutdaily will tell them what to think ... its their way.... the repub-lie-tarded way...

"57 states"
"fundamentally change this country"
"..redistribute the wealth"
"corpseman"
"I will put the healthcare debate on c-span"
"red line on syria"
"raising the national debt is a failure of leadership"

Your hero said it, you own it.

Simple mispeak.
Needs it, Pubs have been screwing the nonrich for 30 years. See sig.
Ditto.
Simple mispeak. Irrelevant talking point again, zombie dupe.
Congress wouldn't allow it. All Pubs against EVERYTHING.
Syria forced to give up all chem/bio weapons by diplomacy only. What a concept, war- mongering chickenhawk 100% brainwashed negative dingdongs- with no alternative plan of their own...lol
Booosh raised the debt in "good times"- actually a huge corrupt bubble. Now the deficit is basically ZERO without UE and welfare for victims of the Boooosh World BUST.
:cuckoo::eusa_liar::cuckoo::eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top