pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 71,476
- 27,657
- 2,210
Doesn't matter to me. Help them out because the pay isn't high enough or pay them to stay home. Not my call.Try to remember that without those low-skill Walmart jobs the employees would have no jobs. Do you actually believe that to be the better outcome?Yes, gov't action is - under extreme circumstances - necessary to save jobs and accumulated wealth from being lost. That isn't socialism, Comrade, nor is it a rational response to capitalism's failures. The Great Depression was caused in part by President Coolidge's failure to act.Everyone supports Socialism when they are the ones benefiting. When we do things that are not Capitalistic it's not because it's not 100% perfect it's because it's not what we are doing. You condemn a program that helps people when they get sick as Socialism. You say bailing out a business is simply things not being perfect.And you do not support capitalism but rather have a childish view that it must be 100% perfect, 100% of the time. Life is messy and people are imperfect and capitalism sucks except when compared to any other economic system. Grow up.
And I don't condemn any program that "helps people when they get sick" but I adamantly reject socialism as the answer to the imperfections of capitalism.
BTW, that Walmart Myth you promote is just a myth.
Myth Busted: Taxpayers Are Not Subsidizing Wal-Mart's Low Wages | Investor's Business Daily
Report: Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 Billion In Public Assistance