SNAP (food stamps) should be restricted to rice, flour, rolled oats, and sugar

[danielpalos]

Afraid to investigate the numbers.....How much per person

doesn't it matter; if you did not pay for all of it, you are merely mooching off the rest.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Their cash? What about MY cash?

REAL conservatives are those that want to help the people who truly need help by weeding out those that can take care of themselves and are just using our tax dollars so that they can free up more of their own cash to use on non-necessities.

Your cash is going to pay for our wars on crime, drugs, and terror, not our war on poverty, so you can "look tough".

Yes it does because the money I spend to fight drugs, terror and crime protects me and our country. We all benefit from that. Nobody benefits by supporting children that are not their own. The only one that benefits are the mothers and in some rare cases, the father as well.

you can't care under our form of capitalism. the poor should not how much the rich make or how they make it, and the rich should not care how much the poor make or how they make it.

The poor don't make anything, that's the point. You need to learn the difference between making money and getting money.

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

 

[Flash]

[QU

just the right wing showcasing their moral of " badwill toward men".

why not end the drug war, first.

You are confused about the concept of charity. The Bible says that charity should come from the family, church and heart. Says nothing about the friggin government.

I am quite callable of determining who I think needs a little help. I don't need the fucking oppressive government, led by corrupt politicians elected by special interest groups, taking my money by force and doling it out to the shitheads that elected the politicians.

How come you don't believe in freedom? Are you so incapable of making your own decisions that you are are willing to let the fucking government make those decisions for you by taking your money and giving it away to somebody else? Do you think it is your right just because you are alive to make somebody else be forced by the government to pay your bills? What is your problem? Are you are greedy little welfare queen?

By the way Moon Bat. On Christmas day my wife and I spent most of the day helping to feed the poor in the county I live in. We did the same on Thanksgiving. What did you do? Who did you help? I suspect you are like most Libtards and want other people to pay but your not willing to do so yourself.

 

[danielpalos]

Your cash is going to pay for our wars on crime, drugs, and terror, not our war on poverty, so you can "look tough".

Yes it does because the money I spend to fight drugs, terror and crime protects me and our country. We all benefit from that. Nobody benefits by supporting children that are not their own. The only one that benefits are the mothers and in some rare cases, the father as well.

you can't care under our form of capitalism. the poor should not how much the rich make or how they make it, and the rich should not care how much the poor make or how they make it.

The poor don't make anything, that's the point. You need to learn the difference between making money and getting money.

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

 

[danielpalos]

[QU

just the right wing showcasing their moral of " badwill toward men".

why not end the drug war, first.

You are confused about the concept of charity. The Bible says that charity should come from the family, church and heart. Says nothing about the friggin government.

I am quite callable of determining who I think needs a little help. I don't need the fucking oppressive government, led by corrupt politicians elected by special interest groups, taking my money by force and doling it out to the shitheads that elected the politicians.

How come you don't believe in freedom? Are you so incapable of making your own decisions that you are are willing to let the fucking government make those decisions for you by taking your money and giving it away to somebody else? Do you think it is your right just because you are alive to make somebody else be forced by the government to pay your bills? What is your problem? Are you are greedy little welfare queen?

By the way Moon Bat. On Christmas day my wife and I spent most of the day helping to feed the poor in the county I live in. We did the same on Thanksgiving. What did you do? Who did you help? I suspect you are like most Libtards and want other people to pay but your not willing to do so yourself.

Our drug war is not charity; i did not want it, or want to pay taxes for it; i object to being made a drug war, "welfare recipient" merely for the sake of right wing fantasy.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes it does because the money I spend to fight drugs, terror and crime protects me and our country. We all benefit from that. Nobody benefits by supporting children that are not their own. The only one that benefits are the mothers and in some rare cases, the father as well.

you can't care under our form of capitalism. the poor should not how much the rich make or how they make it, and the rich should not care how much the poor make or how they make it.

The poor don't make anything, that's the point. You need to learn the difference between making money and getting money.

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work? It's bad enough that industry can't find workers as it is now because they are all sitting home getting fat on food stamps and talking on their Obama phones. The ones that may work can't get good jobs because smoking pot is more important than earning a living.

Too many loafers in this country. It's like the cart theory we Republicans talk about: If the people of the town pull an empty cart, the cart flies down the road effortlessly. As some of the town people grow tired of pulling the cart, and jump in the cart instead, the cart greatly slows down. When over half of the towns people are in the cart instead of pulling it, the cart stops.

The cart has nearly stopped. Over one-third of our working age population are not working nor looking for a job. That is on top of the 4.7% unemployed that are not working either. It's time to pull the plug. We need more of a work-or-starve society for those who are able to work. If you are physically and mentally capable of pulling the cart and don't, then die in the street. You are worthless to our society anyhow.

 

[Flash]

[Q

Our drug war is not charity; i did not want it, or want to pay taxes for it; i object to being made a drug war, "welfare recipient" merely for the sake of right wing fantasy.

You are really confused about things like this aren't you?

The drug war has nothing to do with a bunch of welfare queen shitheads getting food stamps.

I am against both the drug war and the welfare state. I believe in liberty. want the government to stay out of my life. However, you are pretty damn selective with government oppression that you are willing to live with, aren't you? If you get Crack and a monthly welfare check then you are pretty damn happy, aren't you?

 

[danielpalos]

you can't care under our form of capitalism. the poor should not how much the rich make or how they make it, and the rich should not care how much the poor make or how they make it.

The poor don't make anything, that's the point. You need to learn the difference between making money and getting money.

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

 

[danielpalos]

[Q

Our drug war is not charity; i did not want it, or want to pay taxes for it; i object to being made a drug war, "welfare recipient" merely for the sake of right wing fantasy.

You are really confused about things like this aren't you?

The drug war has nothing to do with a bunch of welfare queen shitheads getting food stamps.

I am against both the drug war and the welfare state. I believe in liberty. want the government to stay out of my life. However, you are pretty damn selective with government oppression that you are willing to live with, aren't you? If you get Crack and a monthly welfare check then you are pretty damn happy, aren't you?

Yes, it does; you are the one confused. capital must circulate under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The poor don't make anything, that's the point. You need to learn the difference between making money and getting money.

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

What does that have to do with your comment about optional unemployment checks? Ask me if I want an unemployment check and just sit home, guess what, I'm taking it. I'll stay on unemployment for the rest of my life. A lot of people would.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, they do; like the rich actually make anything. getting tax breaks is not, "making money".

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

What does that have to do with your comment about optional unemployment checks? Ask me if I want an unemployment check and just sit home, guess what, I'm taking it. I'll stay on unemployment for the rest of my life. A lot of people would.

if you want to "earn" your multimillion dollar bonus, you may need to hire labor.

 

[Flash]

[Q

Yes, it does; you are the one confused. capital must circulate under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

I am sorry Moon Bat but that is a garbled mess that you just posted that doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

You said you are for the government staying out of the business of telling you what drugs you can have but you see nothing wrong with the fucking government taking your money by force and giving it away to the welfare queens that elected the government leaders. You have no understanding of the concept of liberty, do you?

It is not good to go through life dumb, stupid and clueless. You really need to do better.

 

[danielpalos]

[Q

Yes, it does; you are the one confused. capital must circulate under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

I am sorry Moon Bat but that is a garbled mess that you just posted that doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

You said you are for the government staying out of the business of telling you what drugs you can have but you see nothing wrong with the fucking government taking your money by force and giving it away to the welfare queens that elected the government leaders. You have no understanding of the concept of liberty, do you?

It is not good to go through life dumb, stupid and clueless. You really need to do better.

That is why, no one, takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Capital has to circulate under any form of Capitalism; unemployment compensation merely ensures that happens. that is all. it is more cost effective than what we have now.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Correct, getting tax breaks is not making money, it's the ability to keep YOUR OWN money that you made.

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

What does that have to do with your comment about optional unemployment checks? Ask me if I want an unemployment check and just sit home, guess what, I'm taking it. I'll stay on unemployment for the rest of my life. A lot of people would.

if you want to "earn" your multimillion dollar bonus, you may need to hire labor.

I'm not an employer. What does sitting home on unemployment for life have to do with me hiring somebody?

 

[danielpalos]

going along with capitalism instead of simply advocating more socialism, is worth, fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

don't like it, offer a bonus.

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

What does that have to do with your comment about optional unemployment checks? Ask me if I want an unemployment check and just sit home, guess what, I'm taking it. I'll stay on unemployment for the rest of my life. A lot of people would.

if you want to "earn" your multimillion dollar bonus, you may need to hire labor.

I'm not an employer. What does sitting home on unemployment for life have to do with me hiring somebody?

it has to do with supply and demand in our first world economy. we don't have a third world economy, for a reason.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So if half of the country goes on unemployment, who is going to do all the work?

the laws of demand and supply don't stop due to right wing fantasy; capitalism always works if there is enough capital involved.

What does that have to do with your comment about optional unemployment checks? Ask me if I want an unemployment check and just sit home, guess what, I'm taking it. I'll stay on unemployment for the rest of my life. A lot of people would.

if you want to "earn" your multimillion dollar bonus, you may need to hire labor.

I'm not an employer. What does sitting home on unemployment for life have to do with me hiring somebody?

it has to do with supply and demand in our first world economy. we don't have a third world economy, for a reason.

Thanks for your answer that made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Capital has to circulate under any form of Capitalism; unemployment compensation merely ensures that happens. that is all. it is more cost effective than what we have now.

You're as crazy as obozo when he said welfare makes a country wealthy.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

I've corrected you SEVERAL times. It is a 1996 FEDERAL law signed by Bill Clinton.

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act - Wikipedia

Another law that obozo spent 8 years NOT enforcing.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

We should give food stamps to all people making less then 30k per year. Fuck punishing the poor!

How much? You can feed yourself on a dollar a day so $365 a year? That's ok with me but the line should be drawn at say income of $12,000 a year and you should not get more money for having kids. Poor people shouldn't have kids.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

First of all, do you know how much this program costs per year in total? Also, most SNAP recipients are kids. Obviously it's important they get a balanced diet for normal development.

Junk food is NOT a balanced diet. That's why we need to restrict food stamp purchases to staples. THINK