So because Bernie is the only campaign in this race with actual grassroots support, are the rest...

[Billy000]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Let's also not forget that Bernie is beating any republican in a hypothetical match up.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Howard Dean had similar grassroots support and look what happened....he ended up back where he started.

So, the lesson here is, that you shouldn't count the hens before the eggs have opened for the chicks.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Trump's support is grassroots, as well.

Popular does not mean "authentic".

 

[blackhawk]

People on both sides are making such a big deal of Bernies poll numbers in Iowa and New Hampshire but beyond these he does not seem to be close to Hillary anywhere. He's not even a threat to Hillary much less Republicans.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Trump's support is grassroots, as well.

Popular does not mean "authentic".

Do you think Bernie Sanders can win the election, this of course if he first gets the nomination?

 

[Billy000]

Trump's support is grassroots, as well.

Popular does not mean "authentic".

No, what makes the others not authentic is the aid of super PACs.

Trump is grassroots but he is largely funded by himself.

 

[Billy000]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Howard Dean had similar grassroots support and look what happened....he ended up back where he started.

So, the lesson here is, that you shouldn't count the hens before the eggs have opened for the chicks.

Howard Dean went down with no clear explicable reason. That makes it unlikely this phenomenon would happen again.

 

[Two Thumbs]

bern tells people he will give them free shit for donations to his cause, stoopid people buy into this non-sense, most are young, and, here's some news; young people rarely vote.

so the 'free college' lie won't come to fruition, b/c the people that want it either are in college, away from where they can vote, are 18 and have no idea how to vote, or just got out and are hoping their debt will be erased since they can't get a job with a masters in ancient greek music weaving.


you need real adult support

and you need to not be a dick and hire people to makes calls in support of the $15 min while only paying them $12

 

[RandallFlagg]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Do you REALLY believe that?

Well, I guess there IS one born every minute.

 

[Billy000]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Do you REALLY believe that?

Well, I guess there IS one born every minute.

You know I'm right. That's why you haven't attempted to explain why I am wrong.

 

[RandallFlagg]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Do you REALLY believe that?

Well, I guess there IS one born every minute.

You know I'm right. That's why you haven't attempted to explain why I am wrong.

Well sonny - you go right ahead and support that communist. See how far that gets you. If you truly believe that that bitch murderer Clinton will allow that other old windbag to gain the nomination, you are too precious to be voting. Or, as the old saying goes, "Money talks and bullshit walks". Jesus, just think about your choices as a "progressive" - a murderer or a communist. What a deal, right??

 

[Billy000]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Do you REALLY believe that?

Well, I guess there IS one born every minute.

You know I'm right. That's why you haven't attempted to explain why I am wrong.

Well sonny - you go right ahead and support that communist. See how far that gets you. If you truly believe that that bitch murderer Clinton will allow that other old windbag to gain the nomination, you are too precious to be voting. Or, as the old saying goes, "Money talks and bullshit walks". Jesus, just think about your choices as a "progressive" - a murderer or a communist. What a deal, right??

Well like any far right nutter, you have no idea what a communist is. Tell me how does it feel that this "communist" is beating any repub in a hypothetical match up?

 

[Missourian]

People on both sides are making such a big deal of Bernies poll numbers in Iowa and New Hampshire but beyond these he does not seem to be close to Hillary anywhere. He's not even a threat to Hillary much less Republicans.

I don't think Barack was either...until he won some early primaries.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Trump's support is grassroots, as well.

Popular does not mean "authentic".

Do you think Bernie Sanders can win the election, this of course if he first gets the nomination?

I doubt he'll win the primary. I have no idea what would happen should he make the general.

 

[Missourian]

Hell, I'd like to see the two underdogs make it to the general election. It sends a powerful message to the Washington elites. You don't control the process anymore.

 

[Rozman]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Let's also not forget that Bernie is beating any republican in a hypothetical match up.

Over 100 million people voted in the last general election.
Why is Bernie getting 2 million individual contributions such a threat to the GOP....

 

[Katzndogz]

Trump's support is grassroots, as well.

Popular does not mean "authentic".

Do you think Bernie Sanders can win the election, this of course if he first gets the nomination?

No. There aren't that many socialists in the country.

 

[percysunshine]

.
"Socialist is, as Socialist does"

-Forrest Gump

 

[RandallFlagg]

... Lacking authenticity?

Yes.

Bernie's campaign has had unprecedented grassroots support. It's reached 2 million individual contributions faster than any US presidential candidate in history. Both Hillary and Bernie have raised more in donations than any other candidate with Bernie having raised a few million short of Hillary. However, he has accepted no Super PAC support to achieve this.

This is what makes Sander's a real threat to republicans.

Do you REALLY believe that?

Well, I guess there IS one born every minute.

You know I'm right. That's why you haven't attempted to explain why I am wrong.

Well sonny - you go right ahead and support that communist. See how far that gets you. If you truly believe that that bitch murderer Clinton will allow that other old windbag to gain the nomination, you are too precious to be voting. Or, as the old saying goes, "Money talks and bullshit walks". Jesus, just think about your choices as a "progressive" - a murderer or a communist. What a deal, right??

Well like any far right nutter, you have no idea what a communist is. Tell me how does it feel that this "communist" is beating any repub in a hypothetical match up?

Well again sonny, you don't have a clue. You would do well to check the polls.......Bernie Sanders......absolutely precious!

 

[Katzndogz]

Bernie Sanders reminds me of Ron Paul. They have similar constituents.

I saw a Bernie bumper sticker today. So far, no hillary's.