Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The intent always was to have the allegation as vague and unspecific as possible. By doing so and then screaming as loud as possible they avoided the pitfall of anything specific which he could easily prove is a lie.
If they named a specific address, there was always the possibility that it could be proven that the house was vacant at that time or owned by an elderly couple with no kids.
If a specific date was used, they didn't know what Kavanaugh's real schedule was and what if he had been in another state, country or whatever?
If she named who had brought her to the party or how she had gotten home with and with whom, what if they popped up and said, hey, I never hung out with those kids, or I hadn't moved to that area until a year later.
MUCH better to keep all the allegations as vague as possible and let the Progressive lemmings do their thing.
It's the way Dims do things. Scream and rant but never, ever, be specific.
2 keys to the end of this fiasco that are pertinent----------->
Notice that Grassley has stated publicly that...………...anyone coming forward now and proven lying WILL be prosecuted!
And 2----------> The FBI is going to also investigate the leak.
What that means in essence is-----------> The Far Left better have all their eggs in a row, because if not, they are going to end up par boiled!
I URGE all of you to understand----------> The FBI is going to investigate LYING in allegations; not of Ford so much, but the other 2. Do we understand what this means? If EITHER of the other 2 can be proven to be LYING, the Me Too movement is toast, and they can thank the Democrats. AND, if either of the other 2 are proven as liars, the association of all allegations together will become not only inconsequential, but an impetus to bury the far Left.
You Leftists insist this is all true? You better hope so, because if ANY of them end up being proven liars, you are all hosed!
Who are we talking about, these "other 2"? Can you be ---- what is the word --- specific?
The reprehensible right ever reprehensible: blame the victim.What is a 15 year old doing at and adult party.
I merely asked a question. I think the answer would go to HER legitimacy. What was she doing at a drinking party at that age? Why did she go upstairs with boys into a private room? If, that is, we are to believe what she says which, I don't because she can't even remember where or when and nobody supports her story. No, sorry I don't believe she was a victim of Kavanaugh.
Any of you cultists care to explain why even your Lord and Savior say Ford's testimony was credible?
The timing is terrible, the optics are terrible. I'm just making a wild-ass-guess.NOt bad, but that does not explain the highly suspicious timing.
.
The timing is terrible, the optics are terrible. I'm just making a wild-ass-guess.NOt bad, but that does not explain the highly suspicious timing.
.
That is what I mean. It looks suspiciously like this "scandal" was manufactured based on the goal of the timing and the optics.
"Timing" is subjective. Neither what happened to the 15-year-old girl, nor her recounting of the incident, are recent. The fact that most of us just now heard about it doesn't make it something that "just popped up" except in our own experience. That's the fatal flaw with all these wags who sit on the internet and crow (about this or any other issue) that somebody "waited until now" and "did nothing", seemingly oblivious to the fact that just because Numero Uno didn't hear about something--- doesn't mean it never happened.
Why did it take 30 years to put Cosby behind bars. It has already been established by the accuser that she did not want to come forward until recently. I guess you want to disregard what the victim has to say. Do you think she would say the dems have mistreated her or the republicans? Seems to me she was right in her reluctance considering what the piece of shit republicans are saying about her. Please understand my last sentence I did not say republicans because not all of them have attacked her in the manor that Bripat and others have. Only the shit republicans did in this manor.I have not said that her story is correct nor have I said that Kavenough is guilty. Bripat has had his mind made up since day one. You have no proof she is lying. When you put your self in the public eye you are open to scrutiny . Candidates for high court are put under a great deal of scrutiny it has always been this way. Vetting is not a coup. Bripat and his piece of shit ilk have called it a coup. Called her a lying whore from the get go. They posted pictures of her with lying whore bitch carved into her face. They have said she should be killed. They have advocated death for Jeff Flake. There was a time when it was standard procedure to investigate all allegations for such a candidate and both sides of the isle supported the vetting of such candidates as it should be. The complaints must be heard and investigated for this type of position, you do not want pieces of shit on the supreme court......You have no reason to assume her story is correct.
THe timing is highly suggestive.
If they wanted it investigated, why wait to the last minute?
That's not what you do, when you want to find the truth. That's what you do, when you want to smear someone.
It is very convenient for the dems that the timing of the woman coming to terms with coming forward, just happened to coincide with the ending of hearings.
Lucky for them she did not need another week or two, out of 36 years, or it would have been too late.
So, very, very lucky.
YOu know what I mean?
I mean, really, REALLY, REALLY, lucky.
----- and if you want to you can peruse old Beatles albums and find all kinds of "clues" that Paul McCartney died in 1966. Same thing.
What exactly would have been the point for Dr. Ford to wait until AFTER he got on the SCOTUS, considering her motivation was to reveal something about his character? What possible purpose would that serve?
Gotta think these things through before you hit the Post button.
I wil not say all conservatives are shit but you are!Nothing happened. He's totally innocent. She's a crazy lying psycho bitch.Having spent four fairly boozy years in college, having been to my share of college parties, and just having a fundamental understanding of that environment, here's what I think happened.
I think he was drunk and he dry humped her for "fun". Stupid, sophomoric, thoughtless, "fun". The mix of booze, testosterone and adrenaline can make a young guy do some pretty stupid shit, and you can DOUBLE that when a buddy is there. He and his buddy laughed about it, and maybe she hid her horror by not acting like she had been attacked. Ask them about it a week later, and they may or may not have remembered it.
Different people (men and women) are sensitive to entirely different things. Clearly this really, profoundly hurt Ford, even though he was clowning around. It wasn't a rape, it wasn't an attempted rape, it was a short, stupid, ignorant act by a drunk kid who was showing off and should have fucking known better. Some women would have laughed it off, some would not, and there is no right or wrong response to it.
Should that disqualify any candidate, three decades later, nominated by a President from either party, for the Supreme Court? Not in my book, but it certainly provides a pretty good excuse for partisans of the opposite party nowadays.
My two cents. Yours?
.
You have no reason to assume her story is correct.
Correct. And Finger Boy has even less reason to ass-sume "She's a crazy lying psycho bitch".
Concede THAT and we've turned a corner.
I doubt you have the stones to do it though.
First you gotta apologize for advancing lies then we can discuss culture....Then why do women wear the Burka in all those countries? Whether it's legally required isn't up for discussion here. The question is whether the culture imposes it on women, which it obviously does.Wrong....Only Iran and Pakistan that require the Hijab and not even the burka....which is a huge difference. Certainly not the other countries that you mentioned.....educate yourself please....bigotry and racism stems from ignorance and you are clearly have a FOX news opinion without facts.Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Sudan, Libya, Egypt, Syria, YemenHuh? Name me countries that women get beat up foe not wearing burka out of the 56 Muslim majority countries ?Women wore the burka as a choice? What was the alternative choice, a severe beating? No one would wear those horrors if they had a real choice.Wrong again. Most musk countries domt force women to wear anything.....every woman I knew of that wore, she did by Choice....stop the fucking lies....or just bothers you because u want them naked and you can choose which u wanna grab her pussy.
Now tell me how many women get sexually harassed and raped in the US? U even elected a pussy grabber.
Oh Puh-leeze yourself, the poster is correct. Kavanaugh continuously dissembled, evaded questions, deflected onto "I got into Yale" and "I like beer" and clearly tried to eat up so much time on bullshit deflections having no relationship to the question posed that the questioner would run out of time. He also deliberately misstated the same thing I just busted (again) Fingerboy on --- the idea that "all these people say it never happened". They cannot say it never happened, nor did they.
I'd like to see you put on trial before the world accused of some heinous things with vague details and that you did not do and being told you have to prove your innocence.
I bet you'd handle it far worse than Kavanaugh did.
Oh, and today's reading assignment:
The Degeneration of Belief: Compiled By Laird Wilcox
Hate to tell you this but nobody's reading your "assignments". They may be relevant or useful somewhere but they're not applicable to anything here. Again if you have a point, make that point and use your reference to support it. Nobody's going to read through an entire treatise or video to find out what the point is when you could have just posted it and doesn't appear to be relevant anyway.
I linked to a very good short article on Ritual Defamation. The tactics should be quite familiar to you as you are engaged in the with Kavanaugh.
And as you are a trusted, credible and honorable source, I will read it.
I just don't expect it will be relevant to anything here.
No need to seize the last word, friendo.
I'll imagine you tried to say something clever.
I'd like to see you put on trial before the world accused of some heinous things with vague details and that you did not do and being told you have to prove your innocence.
I bet you'd handle it far worse than Kavanaugh did.
Oh, and today's reading assignment:
The Degeneration of Belief: Compiled By Laird Wilcox
Hate to tell you this but nobody's reading your "assignments". They may be relevant or useful somewhere but they're not applicable to anything here. Again if you have a point, make that point and use your reference to support it. Nobody's going to read through an entire treatise or video to find out what the point is when you could have just posted it and doesn't appear to be relevant anyway.
I linked to a very good short article on Ritual Defamation. The tactics should be quite familiar to you as you are engaged in the with Kavanaugh.
And as you are a trusted, credible and honorable source, I will read it.
I just don't expect it will be relevant to anything here.
No need to seize the last word, friendo.
I'll imagine you tried to say something clever.
Sorry to disappoint; I opted to say something sincere.
The coward wouldn't even address post 530. Me thinks that yellow streak is showing.
I tend not to waste my time on posts that contain no intelligent content. 530 is such a post. Have a good cry and then come back with something that actually has meaning.
I enjoy watch a coward hauling ass. You enjoy believing lies and false memories that aren't even allowed in court.
Hey, you're the klown trying to bring up "Becky" in a desperate attempt to get the spotlight off a different date. That's a coward hauling ass if ever I saw one.
No, oh ignorant one, it's a simple example of him listing the names of girls on his calendar when they were present. BTW did you hear the committee has issued a criminal referral on the dude that lied about the boat thing and later admitted it didn't happen. Several folks are going to jail over this commie freak show and I'll bet none will be Kavanaugh.
I have no inkling of an idea what you're babbling about here with "boats" and shit. Perhaps Harvey Weinstein finally explains how he got into this thread --- I don't know and I don't care, I stay on the topic.
Again --- if you list in your calendar that you're going with "A, B, C, and D" to location Q, NOTHING IN YOUR PLANS PRECLUDES X, Y and Z from showing up at the same location. This is not fucking rocket surgery. Your puerile attempt at feeblemindedness is just not working.
I tend not to waste my time on posts that contain no intelligent content. 530 is such a post. Have a good cry and then come back with something that actually has meaning.
I enjoy watch a coward hauling ass. You enjoy believing lies and false memories that aren't even allowed in court.
Hey, you're the klown trying to bring up "Becky" in a desperate attempt to get the spotlight off a different date. That's a coward hauling ass if ever I saw one.
No, oh ignorant one, it's a simple example of him listing the names of girls on his calendar when they were present. BTW did you hear the committee has issued a criminal referral on the dude that lied about the boat thing and later admitted it didn't happen. Several folks are going to jail over this commie freak show and I'll bet none will be Kavanaugh.
I have no inkling of an idea what you're babbling about here with "boats" and shit. Perhaps Harvey Weinstein finally explains how he got into this thread --- I don't know and I don't care, I stay on the topic.
Again --- if you list in your calendar that you're going with "A, B, C, and D" to location Q, NOTHING IN YOUR PLANS PRECLUDES X, Y and Z from showing up at the same location. This is not fucking rocket surgery. Your puerile attempt at feeblemindedness is just not working.
Why don't you write the committee under penalty of felony with your suppositions and maybe you can go to jail with the guy that made the false allegations of misconduct on the boat. I guess you're not keeping up as well as you think. LMAO
she drew a picture of the inside layout of the house, with description... small living room, stairway to go up to 2nd floor, bathroom at top of stairs and bedroom near it that she was thrown in to and locked in...Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.
said meet at timmy's?
There ya go.
Now Ford has a place and time.
Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.
I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.
I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.
the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant
I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.
You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.
I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
Because it IS funny.
You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.
I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.
Because Graham had had enough.
That seems pretty obvious.
Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st
(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)
if the FBI gets in Timmy's old house and it has not been remodeled, or gets old pictures of it, and the layout matches her drawing, that is corroboration, the 3 men that she mentioned at the party, on the K calendar that summer day, is also corroboration, now that they have a date, they can try to get the member log ins for those who were at the country club pool that day, july 1st, 1982 and if she was there that would corroborate her story as well.....
they can check his calendar to see if he never put girls on his calendar, and only mentions of ''the guys''....
they can confirm whether he was a heavy drinker... what he was like when he drank?
there are many things that can end up corroborating her story...
she drew a picture of the inside layout of the house, with description... small living room, stairway to go up to 2nd floor, bathroom at top of stairs and bedroom near it that she was thrown in to and locked in...
Exactly how did she get out if she was LOCKED IN? Every bedroom I've seen with locks, is locked from the inside.
Correct. Everyone was inside and while in there one of them locked it. Then when she got free from under Kavanaugh on the bed, she ----- STILL BEING ON THE INSIDE ---- would have had equal ability to UNlock it, and so escape.
This isn't complex. Really it isn't. When you lock a door from the inside, you also UNlock it from the inside. It's the same knob on the same side of the same door.
Would you like an illustration to understand how this works?
Holey SHIT.....
Really dood? Political partisan hackery has now devolved into pretending not to understand how a freaking DOORKNOB works?
On his own calendar he does. But he does not predict, nor can he, nor could anybody, WHO ELSE might show up as the eveningthey can check his calendar to see if he never put girls on his calendar, and only mentions of ''the guys''....
The Aug 7 entry proves he includes girls.
goes on.
Again ---- NOT FUCKING ROCKET SURGERY.
You can put 30 friends together and rent a bus to go to Fenway Park. You can even get there with a "three hour drive" if your bus can go 140 miles an hour. And you can enter all that in your calendar. But you ***CANNOT*** list the names of thirty thousand other people who may be at Fenway Park the same day. Because that CANNOT BE PREDICTED.
---- what is it........ something in the water between Oklahoma and Texas? Or what? Is your water imported from Flint?
Go look at the successful case % for Senator Whitehouse as a prosecutor.
You people are so full of shit you don't even know when the prison door has been slammed & locked on your poor asses.
Nuthouse's prosecution record is irrelevant, by the end of next week we're going to be at the same place we were yesterday. And Nuthouse will hold his usual 1% of the senate vote. He will still be crying in his beer when Kavanaugh is confirmed.
Actually we haven't even established whether Sheldon Whitehouse likes beer.
Brett Kavanaugh actually asked him that question.
Let's reiterate that in a separate line. In a judiciary hearing for a SCOTUS position, the candidate asked a Senator on the committee what kind of beer he likes. The Senator did not answer.
It didn't matter and if the FBI comes back and says Kavanaugh is Jesus incarnate with the wisdom of God himself, Nuthouse still wouldn't vote for him.
.
The 'process' is NOT ALL about a vote; idiot
Of course it is, he will get a confirmation vote or he won't. 45-46 of the 49 commies won't vote for him no matter what, the was put out day one. Everything is just a side show.
.
Hate to tell you this but nobody's reading your "assignments". They may be relevant or useful somewhere but they're not applicable to anything here. Again if you have a point, make that point and use your reference to support it. Nobody's going to read through an entire treatise or video to find out what the point is when you could have just posted it and doesn't appear to be relevant anyway.
I linked to a very good short article on Ritual Defamation. The tactics should be quite familiar to you as you are engaged in the with Kavanaugh.
And as you are a trusted, credible and honorable source, I will read it.
I just don't expect it will be relevant to anything here.
No need to seize the last word, friendo.
I'll imagine you tried to say something clever.
Sorry to disappoint; I opted to say something sincere.
OK, hun. Peace Out.
Having spent four fairly boozy years in college, having been to my share of college parties, and just having a fundamental understanding of that environment, here's what I think happened.
I think he was drunk and he dry humped her for "fun". Stupid, sophomoric, thoughtless, "fun". The mix of booze, testosterone and adrenaline can make a young guy do some pretty stupid shit, and you can DOUBLE that when a buddy is there. He and his buddy laughed about it, and maybe she hid her horror by not acting like she had been attacked. Ask them about it a week later, and they may or may not have remembered it.
Different people (men and women) are sensitive to entirely different things. Clearly this really, profoundly hurt Ford, even though he was clowning around. It wasn't a rape, it wasn't an attempted rape, it was a short, stupid, ignorant act by a drunk kid who was showing off and should have fucking known better. Some women would have laughed it off, some would not, and there is no right or wrong response to it.
Should that disqualify any candidate, three decades later, nominated by a President from either party, for the Supreme Court? Not in my book, but it certainly provides a pretty good excuse for partisans of the opposite party nowadays.
My two cents. Yours?
.
I enjoy watch a coward hauling ass. You enjoy believing lies and false memories that aren't even allowed in court.
Hey, you're the klown trying to bring up "Becky" in a desperate attempt to get the spotlight off a different date. That's a coward hauling ass if ever I saw one.
No, oh ignorant one, it's a simple example of him listing the names of girls on his calendar when they were present. BTW did you hear the committee has issued a criminal referral on the dude that lied about the boat thing and later admitted it didn't happen. Several folks are going to jail over this commie freak show and I'll bet none will be Kavanaugh.
I have no inkling of an idea what you're babbling about here with "boats" and shit. Perhaps Harvey Weinstein finally explains how he got into this thread --- I don't know and I don't care, I stay on the topic.
Again --- if you list in your calendar that you're going with "A, B, C, and D" to location Q, NOTHING IN YOUR PLANS PRECLUDES X, Y and Z from showing up at the same location. This is not fucking rocket surgery. Your puerile attempt at feeblemindedness is just not working.
Why don't you write the committee under penalty of felony with your suppositions and maybe you can go to jail with the guy that made the false allegations of misconduct on the boat. I guess you're not keeping up as well as you think. LMAO
Why don't you write to this thread explaining where anybody anywhere all day in the hearing mentioned anything about a fucking "boat".
Hey maybe Admiral Fucking Harvey Weinstein has a clue. Oh wait, we can't ask him --- he's not mentioned in the Kavanaugh calendar. Clearly then he does not exist.
The Senate this week investigated a 5th sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh.
This time, a male wrote a letter to Democrat Senator Whitehouse claiming that a female friend was assaulted on a boat in Rhode Island in 1985 by “two heavily inebriated men she referred to at the time as Brett and Mark.”
Kavanaugh denied the latest allegation against him.
The man who wrote the letter to Senator Whitehouse said he and another individual hunted down Brett and Mark at the harbor and “physically confronted the two men, leaving them with significant injuries.”
Shortly after NBC ran with the story, the man recanted his story–IT WAS A HOAX!
The Senate Judiciary Committee is now asking for a criminal investigation into this hoax.
Grassley Refers Hoax Accuser Claiming Kavanaugh Raped Woman on Boat in Rhode Island For Criminal Investigation
Well, I'm either trying real hard, or I just naturally don't think like a partisan. You can run with whichever you'd like.Having spent four fairly boozy years in college, having been to my share of college parties, and just having a fundamental understanding of that environment, here's what I think happened.
I think he was drunk and he dry humped her for "fun". Stupid, sophomoric, thoughtless, "fun". The mix of booze, testosterone and adrenaline can make a young guy do some pretty stupid shit, and you can DOUBLE that when a buddy is there. He and his buddy laughed about it, and maybe she hid her horror by not acting like she had been attacked. Ask them about it a week later, and they may or may not have remembered it.
Different people (men and women) are sensitive to entirely different things. Clearly this really, profoundly hurt Ford, even though he was clowning around. It wasn't a rape, it wasn't an attempted rape, it was a short, stupid, ignorant act by a drunk kid who was showing off and should have fucking known better. Some women would have laughed it off, some would not, and there is no right or wrong response to it.
Should that disqualify any candidate, three decades later, nominated by a President from either party, for the Supreme Court? Not in my book, but it certainly provides a pretty good excuse for partisans of the opposite party nowadays.
My two cents. Yours?
.
My two cents is that you are so busy trying to be seen as an independent and an independent thinker that you are willing to suspend logic, reason, and common sense.
Nuthouse's prosecution record is irrelevant, by the end of next week we're going to be at the same place we were yesterday. And Nuthouse will hold his usual 1% of the senate vote. He will still be crying in his beer when Kavanaugh is confirmed.
Actually we haven't even established whether Sheldon Whitehouse likes beer.
Brett Kavanaugh actually asked him that question.
Let's reiterate that in a separate line. In a judiciary hearing for a SCOTUS position, the candidate asked a Senator on the committee what kind of beer he likes. The Senator did not answer.
It didn't matter and if the FBI comes back and says Kavanaugh is Jesus incarnate with the wisdom of God himself, Nuthouse still wouldn't vote for him.
.
The 'process' is NOT ALL about a vote; idiot
Of course it is, he will get a confirmation vote or he won't. 45-46 of the 49 commies won't vote for him no matter what, the was put out day one. Everything is just a side show.
.
but the question is; How many TrumPutins from the GOP will vote for that Russian piece of shit? Jus' sayin'
Bla bla bla. Keep supporting draft dodgers and people that cry on national TV and call your self a conservative. You like little bitches and birds of a feather flock together!
Sorry to disappoint; I opted to say something sincere.
but the question is; How many TrumPutins from the GOP will vote for that Russian piece of shit? Jus' sayin'
