- Thread starter
- #161
Yea, we heard a lot about "your body" during the protests, while other bodies have no problem infecting other bodies.Roe vs. Wade was never about a woman deciding life, because no one can. The woman was given the choice because it was her body, no one else's. Has nothing to do with determining life. That's totally ridiculous. When are you people going to get it? We are not God. What ails you folks? Seriously?You have not given rational scientific facts against the no brainer scientific facts I gave you. Do we have to school you all over again?He’s a leftwing zealot, abortion is a sacred pillar of his beliefs. Rational scientific facts won’t sway him. Calling out his bullshit only enrages him even more and make him more irrational.Got a link to support that bullshit? Of course you don't. Because no scientist worth his lab coat will claim a newborn is a “fully developed” human. You’re easily one of the dumbest mother fuckers to ever “chime in” on this topic.More inventions! Boss, you can 't help yourself can you? Let's make up another scenario, of which I never made claim to. Why do you do this? Simple, you have lost the argument, and you are not smart enough to walk away from it.In other words you can’t defend your idiotic position about “fully developed” humans not being real people. You were too dumb to realize the words you were using also described an infant.I never explained killing a newborn was illegal. I never offered that information, because the newborn is out of the womb. Something you don't get, or can argue about. Why do you make up shit that I never argued about? Answer, because your own argument is a failure.Really? Yet you can’t explain why killing a newborn is illegal when it isn’t a “fully developed” human being.Again, you keep circle jerking over your same failed argument. You still fail to prove anyone is killing a fully developed human being. Why? Because there is no known science out there that identifies a fully developed human being with a functioning brain that uses reason in the womb. Keep circle jerking and you will always go back to where you started.Again, no one is forcing a woman to have an abortion, although far leftwing states like China do. Interesting how you people defend China with their forced abortions yet claim you are against government dictating to women if they can have children. Which means you are all full of shit.Ignorant nonsense.A right to privacy doesn’t give someone the right to kill an unborn child.The pro-life argument was BS from the beginning?Documentary reveals 'Jane Roe' of Roe V. Wade was paid to reverse abortion stance
Norma McCorvey, known for years as Jane Roe the plaintiff from one of the most famous Supreme Court cases in history: Roe v. Wade, reveals that she was paid to reverse her stance from pro-choice to anti-abortion by Operation Rescue, now known as Operation Save America, according to a new...www.msnbc.com
Well now, that changes everything. So no one on the pro-life side ever had anyone to really represent them during Roe vs. Wade. That explains everything. That just means the pro-life argument has been bs from the beginning. And it still is. They knew way back then they would never be able to prove the pro-life argument from a scientific point of view, so they up and paid someone to lie about it, with their instructions. These are such disgusting people. And look at the people these pro-life nuts murdered because of lies and payoffs.
The entire premise of the decision on Roe v Wade was this purely invented “right to privacy”.
Rehnquist said it best:
To reach its result, the Court necessarily has had to find within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently completely unknown to the drafters of the Amendment. As early as 1821, the first state law dealing directly with abortion was enacted by the Connecticut Legislature. By the time of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, there were at least 36 laws enacted by state or territorial legislatures limiting abortion. While many States have amended or updated their laws, 21 of the laws on the books in 1868 remain in effect today.
Obviously you've never read the 4th amendment.
It very clearly says we have the right to our person or body. Which is what Roe V Wade was decided on. The right to privacy with our body.
The part of the 4th amendment that it was decided on:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated
So what you're saying is that the 4th Amendment doesn't apply to women.
Men do get the right to privacy with their body. I have never seen anyone try to pass legislation that prohibits any man from having any medical procedure they want. Nor do they have to go through a waiting period or have to sit through propaganda they don't believe that it's only purpose is to convince them to not have the procedure. Nor do they have to have a totally medically unnecessary probe test which neither he or the doctor wants which he has to pay 100%. I don't see clinics for men being bombed or harassed or people screaming for the man to not go in. I don't see legislatures writing regulations specifically designed to close medical facilities for men.
I have never seen anyone protest to protect a man's right to privacy with their body. Or any thing else for that matter.
Who do you think you are? What makes you think you have any right to say you can take someone's rights from them and violate the constitution?
You don't. Plus, no one gives a rat's ass what you think and want.
If you work and pay taxes, work hard. Pay those taxes. Women need that money to pay for their contraception and for abortions. If you pay federal or state taxes, you're paying for abortions and contraception for women. I hope I that totally pisses you off.
Yup. Nobody ever attempted to violate a male's right to sovereignty over his body. But the anti-choice folks seem to think that women are public property, not people with rights under the Constitution. They also never protest the funding of "ED" medications for men who are not attempting to conceive a child and maybe are having sex with women who are too old to conceive. The sex that they want to have is purely recreational. Where is the scrutiny of this?
If men were “controlling” women’s bodies then they could force her to have an abortion when she doesn’t want one. When has that been put into law? Oh it hasn’t, so all this talk about “controlling women’s bodies” is BS.
Murder concerns criminal law; the right to privacy civil law – one having nothing to do with the other.
It is neither the role nor responsibility of government to dictate to a woman whether she may have a child or not; the right to privacy safeguards citizens from government excess and overreach with regard to such personal decisions.
Outlawing the killing of human life isn’t anymore of an “overreach” of government anymore than government outlawing rape.
Dude, get a hold of yourself. No one said anything about a fully devoloped person not being a human being. Science identifies a fully developed human being at birth. You continue to invent nonsense and lies.
You can give them scientific facts all day long. You can fill message boxes with facts all day long.
The person you're replying to and those like him will never accept any honest scientific facts.
You are wasting your time.
Both of you.
Roe V. Wade gave that choice to women. Not men. Women. Women decide when it's life. No one else. Not a man. Not a book. No one.
Only the woman carrying that pregnancy is the person who decides. If she decides it's not life, it's not and she has an abortion. There is absolutely nothing anyone can do to stop it. There never will be.
That is fact and reality in this world. Whether anti choice people like it or not.
"Roe V. Wade gave that choice to women. Not men. Women. Women decide when it's life. No one else. Not a man. Not a book. No one.
Only the woman carrying that pregnancy is the person who decides. If she decides it's not life, it's not and she has an abortion. There is absolutely nothing anyone can do to stop it. There never will be."
Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the "party of science".
View attachment 341025
What ails us?
Pray tell, what ails YOU? What kind of sick, twisted fucks attempt to justify killing babies?
By the way, is the body in that womb experiencing life through your scientific knowledge, or because of your religious and philosophical fantasies?
Ha, if it's killing babies, when did you find out it was experiencing life? Are you God? Lol! It takes a sick fuck to act like your God you know?
Last edited: