Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Possibly. But regardless, the U.S. decided ratifying these agreements was the right thing to do. So what's going on with Israel?
Possibly.
You were worried that without this treaty, the US would build a stockpile of chemical weapons?
You've seen both Syria and Iran cheated on their treaty obligations.
What was the benefit again?
You have not proven they've cheated on anything. You're just spewing Warmongering hype.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
The U.S. has ratified these agreements as well. So why not Israel?
Were you worried about the US building a stockpile of chemical weapons?
Possibly. But regardless, the U.S. decided ratifying these agreements was the right thing to do. So what's going on with Israel?
Possibly.
You were worried that without this treaty, the US would build a stockpile of chemical weapons?
You've seen both Syria and Iran cheated on their treaty obligations.
What was the benefit again?
You have not proven they've cheated on anything. You're just spewing Warmongering hype.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
Possibly.
You were worried that without this treaty, the US would build a stockpile of chemical weapons?
You've seen both Syria and Iran cheated on their treaty obligations.
What was the benefit again?
You have not proven they've cheated on anything. You're just spewing Warmongering hype.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
You have not proven they've cheated on anything. You're just spewing Warmongering hype.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything.
Syria had chemical weapons. Even if you believe the regime didn't use them, that is a violation.
Did you miss when Putin prevented war with Syria by getting Assad to destroy his chemical weapons?
It was in all the papers.
Do you need more links? Or will nothing get you to admit Syria violated the treaty?
You have not proven they've cheated on anything. You're just spewing Warmongering hype.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything.
Syria had chemical weapons. Even if you believe the regime didn't use them, that is a violation.
Did you miss when Putin prevented war with Syria by getting Assad to destroy his chemical weapons?
It was in all the papers.
Do you need more links? Or will nothing get you to admit Syria violated the treaty?
Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything.
Syria had chemical weapons. Even if you believe the regime didn't use them, that is a violation.
Did you miss when Putin prevented war with Syria by getting Assad to destroy his chemical weapons?
It was in all the papers.
Do you need more links? Or will nothing get you to admit Syria violated the treaty?
The Neoconservatives Are Brewing A Wider War In Syria
With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the US warning, had crossed the “red line.”
Syria, with Russia's help, destroyed their chemical weapons, to stop Obama from attacking.
Did you forget that already?
Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How could Syria have chemical weapons stockpiles when they signed a treaty saying they wouldn't?
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything.
Syria had chemical weapons. Even if you believe the regime didn't use them, that is a violation.
Did you miss when Putin prevented war with Syria by getting Assad to destroy his chemical weapons?
It was in all the papers.
Do you need more links? Or will nothing get you to admit Syria violated the treaty?
The Neoconservatives Are Brewing A Wider War In Syria
With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the US warning, had crossed the “red line.”
Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
if you were a 98 lb. weakling, would you attempt to harass a 255 lb. pro wrestler??
kinda like the Reagan philosophy, "we have them so we do not have to use them"
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have. Yet you have a bigger problem with them, than you do with Israel, who refuses to ratify it. Not gettin where you're coming from.
They ratified the Treaty, as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, Syria ratified the treaty. Then they violated it by manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons.
What was the benefit to getting Syria to sign the treaty?
as most other nations in the world have.
Yes, as the US did. Do you really think we'd have chemical weapons if we hadn't signed the treaty? Why?
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything. You're making it up as you go along. You're deflecting and avoiding contemplating why Israel has refused to ratify various weapons treaties.
Again, you have not proven Syria, Iran, or others have violated anything.
Syria had chemical weapons. Even if you believe the regime didn't use them, that is a violation.
Did you miss when Putin prevented war with Syria by getting Assad to destroy his chemical weapons?
It was in all the papers.
Do you need more links? Or will nothing get you to admit Syria violated the treaty?
The Neoconservatives Are Brewing A Wider War In Syria
With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the US warning, had crossed the “red line.”
'Regime Change.' It's time for our Government to end that illegal policy.
So looking for incontrovertible facts are screwed up beliefs...... sure thing there Sparky......Can't help yourself can ya Sparky......Uummmm, you seem to have a one track mind, kinda fixated in liking dicks...... I bet your favorite seating arrangement is a bar stool with no seat......... Hey, whatever floats your boat.Your beliefs hold no water, dicklicker.
And once again your beliefs lead you astray, dicklicker.
I'm fine, dicklicker. You're the one with screwed up beliefs.
Now before some of you brand me an 'Evil Antisemite', just hear me out. This is an issue hardly discussed in the U.S. We all know about the lengths the U.S. and West are going to keep Nukes out of the hands of nations in the Middle East. And that the U.S. was all set to go to war with Syria for possessing chemical weapons.
However, Syria has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty. While Israel is actually one of the few nations on earth that hasn't ratified the Treaty. It also hasn't signed on to other Treaties pertaining to arms. So why the double standard U.S. policy in regards to Israel? Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Israel is a responsible nation....the muslim nations are run by dictators who sponsor terrorism around the world..........
Bullshit
Israel was created by the US
Now the US must engage in terrorism in order to protect and defend the Zionist state.
.
Apparently determined that it wasn't in their best interests to ratify the treaties.Now before some of you brand me an 'Evil Antisemite', just hear me out. This is an issue hardly discussed in the U.S. We all know about the lengths the U.S. and West are going to keep Nukes out of the hands of nations in the Middle East. And that the U.S. was all set to go to war with Syria for possessing chemical weapons.
However, Syria has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty. While Israel is actually one of the few nations on earth that hasn't ratified the Treaty. It also hasn't signed on to other Treaties pertaining to arms. So why the double standard U.S. policy in regards to Israel? Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Which claims in the Wiki article are you contesting?Can you convince me the Wikipedia article is true?
Apparently determined that it wasn't in their best interests to ratify the treaties.Now before some of you brand me an 'Evil Antisemite', just hear me out. This is an issue hardly discussed in the U.S. We all know about the lengths the U.S. and West are going to keep Nukes out of the hands of nations in the Middle East. And that the U.S. was all set to go to war with Syria for possessing chemical weapons.
However, Syria has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty. While Israel is actually one of the few nations on earth that hasn't ratified the Treaty. It also hasn't signed on to other Treaties pertaining to arms. So why the double standard U.S. policy in regards to Israel? Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Plain and simple.
Quoting a Wiki article is supposed to convince me........ You're joking...... right?Which claims in the Wiki article are you contesting?Can you convince me the Wikipedia article is true?
"Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons[7][8] and to be the sixth country in the world to have developed them, allegedly having built its first nuclear weapon in December 1966..."
Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So looking for incontrovertible facts are screwed up beliefs...... sure thing there Sparky......Can't help yourself can ya Sparky......Uummmm, you seem to have a one track mind, kinda fixated in liking dicks...... I bet your favorite seating arrangement is a bar stool with no seat......... Hey, whatever floats your boat.
And once again your beliefs lead you astray, dicklicker.
I'm fine, dicklicker. You're the one with screwed up beliefs.
A search for the truth is admirable. You just make shit up. And that my friend, is you in a nutshell.
Boy do you have projection down to a science!!!!
Is there any good reason for the US to do that?Apparently determined that it wasn't in their best interests to ratify the treaties.Now before some of you brand me an 'Evil Antisemite', just hear me out. This is an issue hardly discussed in the U.S. We all know about the lengths the U.S. and West are going to keep Nukes out of the hands of nations in the Middle East. And that the U.S. was all set to go to war with Syria for possessing chemical weapons.
However, Syria has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty. While Israel is actually one of the few nations on earth that hasn't ratified the Treaty. It also hasn't signed on to other Treaties pertaining to arms. So why the double standard U.S. policy in regards to Israel? Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Plain and simple.
Fair enough, but it doesn't look like the U.S. is applying much pressure to do so. It certainly isn't threatening sanctions or war.
Are you capable of reading the article and then telling me which claim Wiki is making that you find questionable? For example: "Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons." Do you find that proposition dubious? If not, pick one you feel isn't accurate.Quoting a Wiki article is supposed to convince me........ You're joking...... right?Which claims in the Wiki article are you contesting?Can you convince me the Wikipedia article is true?
"Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons[7][8] and to be the sixth country in the world to have developed them, allegedly having built its first nuclear weapon in December 1966..."
Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is there any good reason for the US to do that?Apparently determined that it wasn't in their best interests to ratify the treaties.Now before some of you brand me an 'Evil Antisemite', just hear me out. This is an issue hardly discussed in the U.S. We all know about the lengths the U.S. and West are going to keep Nukes out of the hands of nations in the Middle East. And that the U.S. was all set to go to war with Syria for possessing chemical weapons.
However, Syria has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty. While Israel is actually one of the few nations on earth that hasn't ratified the Treaty. It also hasn't signed on to other Treaties pertaining to arms. So why the double standard U.S. policy in regards to Israel? Just interested in hearing what you all think. Thanks.
Plain and simple.
Fair enough, but it doesn't look like the U.S. is applying much pressure to do so. It certainly isn't threatening sanctions or war.
