Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
Are you playing games with me?I don't buy your premise of what constitutes the social contract. We are either a nation of laws or a nation of men. Or are we a nation of social contracts?
What part of the explanation in the OP do you not understand?
Definition: Social Contract:your definition of a social contract: 1) This is generally accepted 2) This is your own personal contract you wish to discuss or the US Constitution? The US Constitution is not a social contract, it is a
1. The process or system by which society organizes itself for the mutual benefit of all. This can be binding on all or informally understood.
2. An agreement between the people and government assigning specific responsibilities and limitations on power to each.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE TOPIC TO BE DISCUSSED:
a) Is Social Contract as defined above a valid concept?
b) If so, is the U.S. Constitution social contract? State and local governments?
c) If so, has the spirit and intent of social contract been preserved in current times?
d) Do you agree with Locke that laws and policies that violate social contract invalidates the law and the government that imposes them? That social contract should be the single most guiding principle in what government and laws should be?
And who should get to decide that?
a) any contract agreed to by all parties is valid.
b) by your own definition (2) or the accepted definition (1)?
this makes no sense
a primer on what a constitution is is needed
Constitution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
I don't know what to make of your post. To me the OP is quite clear and quite specific including Rule #3 in which I give myself the authority to specify what definition(s) we will use.
your definitions: Definition: Social Contract:
1. The process or system by which society organizes itself for the mutual benefit of all. This can be binding on all or informally understood.
2. An agreement between the people and government assigning specific responsibilities and limitations on power to each.
number 2 is not a definition of a social contract as much as it is a view of the US Constitution. Why did you not say this is about the US Constitution?
The OP does discuss the Constitution but the Constitution is not the only social contract that would be defined in that way. A Homeowner's Association agreement, for instance, is the same sort of social contract.
They are legal contracts. That is the point. You appear to be conflating things