Alpha1
NAVY
- Jun 3, 2007
- 1,719
- 193
- 48
here is your words:
If you do those two things I will agree that I was wrong. Will... at some time in the future, conditional upon my doing something. I did it. Your turn.
say it.
say, "I was LYING when I said you had been attacking Bush's military record since before the 2000 election. I had no basis to say that and it was WRONG of me to do so."
say it.
Maybe MM's memory isn't as good as it used to be....
I would agree, that MM has usually always defended those that have openly attacked Bush's NG service was far back as I can remember....
MM has not ever suggested that those attackers show any reasonable proof about their accusations...he defends their assertions without question...just as he has recently stated he believes the Texas Lt. Gov.'s accusations (without proof)seems he considers the accusation itself proof....
Just as he has defended Durbin comparing our troops to Nazies and Kerry calling our troops too stupid to get out of military service, (or whatever it was..)and he continues to insist Bush lied about Iraq even though hes been shown over and over that those "lies" were essentially,(sometimes exactly) what those in his own party were saying for years previous to Bush.....
What Dims said in January suddenly become lies in February because Bush says them....MM reasoning sees nothing ironic about a scenario like that...