Sondland revises Quid Pro Quo testimony

[sealybobo]

Be

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

Lying about a bj....

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses.

cause it was over a bj. This is not about a bj

So sick of you guys thinking trump can break the law because a former president did it.

Trumps crimes are more than just lying about a bj

 

[sealybobo]

Sondland is a disloyal SOB.

This kind of loyalty is unpatriotic. The Justice Department is working for Trump. No independence. And anyone who speaks out against this most corrupt administration is thrown under the bus.

He's not going to go to jail for Trump like so many others have. Michael Cohen. Flynn. Papadapolis. Who else has gone to jail that has worked with Trump?

Or been fired or quit or forced to leave.

Inside Hope Hicks' Troubled Romances with Ousted Top Trump Aides Rob Porter and Corey Lewandowski

President Trump's communications director Hope Hicks has been romantically linked to two ousted Trump aides, Corey Lewandowski and Rob Porter

Didn't Lewandowski hit her?

And you guys want to make Lewindowski a Senator?

Lewandowski 'very, very close' to announcing Senate decision

 

[M14 Shooter]

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

You’re comparing lying about sex to what trump did?

It does not matter how you try to diminish the fact the senate failed to convict Clinton of the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction -- because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses
According to YOU, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998.

There was oversight. Clinton even testified under oath dummy

Nothing here changes the fact that, according to the standard YOU supplied, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998, by failing to convict and remove Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Be

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

Lying about a bj....

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses.

cause it was over a bj.

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses

 

[sealybobo]

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

You’re comparing lying about sex to what trump did?

It does not matter how you try to diminish the fact the senate failed to convict Clinton of the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction -- because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses
According to YOU, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998.

There was oversight. Clinton even testified under oath dummy

Nothing here changes the fact that, according to the standard YOU supplied, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998, by failing to convict and remove Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction.

Not true at all. You completely misunderstand. Not surprising.

Just because they didn't remove Bill doesn't mean there wasn't oversight.

Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

And if the Republicans allow Trump to obstruct the investigation and not answer sopeonas, that's when the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die. In the future the president will be able to do what Trump is doing.

 

[M14 Shooter]

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

You’re comparing lying about sex to what trump did?

It does not matter how you try to diminish the fact the senate failed to convict Clinton of the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction -- because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses
According to YOU, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998.

There was oversight. Clinton even testified under oath dummy

Nothing here changes the fact that, according to the standard YOU supplied, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998, by failing to convict and remove Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction.

Not true at all. You completely misunderstand. Not surprising.
Just because they didn't remove Bill doesn't mean there wasn't oversight.

Ah. So not removing Trump doesn't mean there wasn't oversight, and said oversight is not dead.
Good to see you know when you're wrong.

 

[sealybobo]

Be

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

Lying about a bj....

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses.

cause it was over a bj.

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses

Depends on the circumstances don't you think? Lying over a bj? Not impeachable.

Don't forget the American people didn't want Clinton impeached.

Most Americans wants Trump impeached and removed. Even his own cabinet is considering the 25th Amendment at this point.

 

[sealybobo]

You’re comparing lying about sex to what trump did?

It does not matter how you try to diminish the fact the senate failed to convict Clinton of the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction -- because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses
According to YOU, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998.

There was oversight. Clinton even testified under oath dummy

Nothing here changes the fact that, according to the standard YOU supplied, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998, by failing to convict and remove Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction.

Not true at all. You completely misunderstand. Not surprising.
Just because they didn't remove Bill doesn't mean there wasn't oversight.

Ah. So not removing Trump doesn't mean there wasn't oversight, and said oversight is not dead.
Good to see you know when you're wrong.

If Trump doesn't do what he is required to do by law and the GOP Senate lets him get away with it, that'll set presidence.

Anyways, Trump's going to serve out his term and be a 1 termer. Bet on it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Be

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

Lying about a bj....

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses.

cause it was over a bj.

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses

Depends on the circumstances don't you think?

Federal felonies are federal felonies regardless of cause or issue; perjury and obstruction - both federal felonies - are impeachable, or they aren't.
You don't get to have it both ways - at least not without ceding an credibility you might still have.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It does not matter how you try to diminish the fact the senate failed to convict Clinton of the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction -- because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses
According to YOU, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998.

There was oversight. Clinton even testified under oath dummy

Nothing here changes the fact that, according to the standard YOU supplied, the Democrats killed the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive, back in 1998, by failing to convict and remove Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction.

Not true at all. You completely misunderstand. Not surprising.
Just because they didn't remove Bill doesn't mean there wasn't oversight.

Ah. So not removing Trump doesn't mean there wasn't oversight, and said oversight is not dead.
Good to see you know when you're wrong.

If Trump doesn't do what he is required to do by law and the GOP Senate lets him get away with it, that'll set presidence.

Unsupportable nonsense.

Anyways, Trump's going to serve out his term and be a 1 termer. Bet on it.

Do tell!

 

[iceberg]

Be

In the weeks to come, the House will almost certainly vote to impeach Trump, and among the articles of impeachment it will send to the Senate for trial will be an article explaining that Trump’s king-like refusal to allow any testimony before Congress or release any requested documents amounts to obstruction of justice.

There's no doubt the house will impeach Trump,. for any end every little bit of nonsense it can dream up.

If the Republican-led Senate rejects that particular article, if it decides that this extraordinary refusal to produce legally sought evidence is acceptable, then at that moment the very concept of congressional oversight as a check on the executive will die.

Like in 1998, where it failed to convict Clinton for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction, because Democrats decided said federal felonies did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses?

Lying about a bj....

Perjury. A federal felony.
Obstruction. A federal felony.
Democrats: The federal felonies of perjury and obstruction are not impeachable offenses.

cause it was over a bj. This is not about a bj

So sick of you guys thinking trump can break the law because a former president did it.

Trumps crimes are more than just lying about a bj

so sick the you and the left thinking trump is fair game cause clinton got impeached.

wheee. we can do this all day long.

 

[lennypartiv]

Sondland is a disloyal SOB.

This kind of loyalty is unpatriotic. The Justice Department is working for Trump. No independence. And anyone who speaks out against this most corrupt administration is thrown under the bus.
He's not going to go to jail for Trump like so many others have. Michael Cohen. Flynn. Papadapolis. Who else has gone to jail that has worked with Trump?
Or been fired or quit or forced to leave.
Inside Hope Hicks' Troubled Romances with Ousted Top Trump Aides Rob Porter and Corey Lewandowski
President Trump's communications director Hope Hicks has been romantically linked to two ousted Trump aides, Corey Lewandowski and Rob Porter
Didn't Lewandowski hit her?
And you guys want to make Lewindowski a Senator?
Lewandowski 'very, very close' to announcing Senate decision

Too bad Hope Hicks isn't the one coming back. I don't mind eye candy like that. Trump should have picked Hicks to replace Sanders.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Sondland is a disloyal SOB.

This kind of loyalty is unpatriotic. The Justice Department is working for Trump. No independence. And anyone who speaks out against this most corrupt administration is thrown under the bus.
He's not going to go to jail for Trump like so many others have. Michael Cohen. Flynn. Papadapolis. Who else has gone to jail that has worked with Trump?
Or been fired or quit or forced to leave.
Inside Hope Hicks' Troubled Romances with Ousted Top Trump Aides Rob Porter and Corey Lewandowski
President Trump's communications director Hope Hicks has been romantically linked to two ousted Trump aides, Corey Lewandowski and Rob Porter
Didn't Lewandowski hit her?
And you guys want to make Lewindowski a Senator?
Lewandowski 'very, very close' to announcing Senate decision

Too bad Hope Hicks isn't the one coming back. I don't mind eye candy like that. Trump should have picked Hicks to replace Sanders.

Hicks won't come back because she isn't interested in being a toady or yes person.