Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Broke down loser knows these kids are the future voters and they sure as hell won't be voting republican.Interstate Gun Sales
Federal law for interstate gun sales and other transfers – those occurring between two people who are not Federal Firearm Licensees (FFLs) who live in different states — is pretty straightforward. A person who is not an FFL cannot acquire a handgun from anyone – an FFL or any other person – who lives in another state. A person (the “transferee”) acquiring a long gun must do so through a licensed dealer (FFL). It can be an FFL in any state, the transfer must comply with the laws of the FFL’s and the transferee’s states.
Buying and Selling a Firearm: Online and Interstate Gun Sales | OutdoorHub
Your ignorance is so profound you are a waste of my time.
Up your game Gomer
Private Gun Sale Laws by State - FindLaw
Internet Gun Sales and Background Checks, Explained
Universal Background Checks | Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
None of your links disprove what I said about interstate sales, all MUST go through FFL dealers who conduct background checks.
Like Emma, I call BS! ^ ^ ^
So who’s the new “face” of the DNC...the chick with the dick in VA or little wack-job Emma with a gender that is to be determined?
OOOF barrel strokers - THIS is gonna hurt!
What about freedom of life liberty and not getting your ass blown off by a psycho?
That's easy....get rid of democrat gun free zones and the mass shooters won't attack schools.....we know this because the mass shooters we have captured state they attack gun free zones......
Florida school had an armed police man . Not gun free.
Defiant1, post: 19565821I have the right to bear whatever arms I want.
No you don't. Your right to own fully automatic asault rifles has been infringed everyday of your life. You do nothing about it. Why not?
BrokeLoser, post: 19565238,They will BEG Father Government to strip them of constitutional rights granted by our founders..
There is no constitutional right to play with semi-automatic assault rifles. It just does not exist. You accept there is no constitutional right to play with fully automatic assault rifles.
You don't get to decide where the line is drawn.
Seventy eight percent of American adults don't own firearms and are not and never will be obsessed with guns.
A larger majority for sure do not feel the need to play with assaukt rifles.
Only three percent of American adults own half the firearms. That three percent has to be the most obsessed.
Constitutional rights established by the founders will not be stripped due to raving maniacal paranoia by those who feel the need play with assault rifles.
Lots of mumbo-jumbo andjibber-jabber in your post...how many different ways can this be interpreted?
Are you in a well regulated militia. I see no interpretation of the SA that could progress 200 years into the future that says you have the right outside of participating in a well regulated militia to piay with an AR15 for pleasure.
How does a small fraction of the unregulated population being allowed to play with AR15s preserve the security of our free state?
I think you are nuts. Shouldn't own any guns.
Preserve the free state? Are you nuts?
Most of us don't want you playing with your silly guns under the delusion that you are preserving the free state.
Your right to bear arms, to defend your life and your property will not be infringed in the least if you have to undergo a thorough and universal background check.sure you are if you are willing to sacrifice one then the others are as meaningless to youNone. How did you conclude that by citing the constitution I was erasing rights?The right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
what other rights are you willing to give up
Your right to bear arms is not an absolute. If it were, there would be no restriction on the type of arms you could bear. If the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American street. If that firing system requires special restrictions to obtain, how can we see firing systems as dangerous to shoot up school kids?
^^^^^^Perhaps someone will shoot at your kids, or at you, with an AR, and then we will make fun of you, me boy.These kids are a joke. Even more, these funded trips are like a field trip to them. They could care less about the reason. Just a social event for them. Nothing more
-Geaux
^^^^^^^^^Your right to bear arms, to defend your life and your property will not be infringed in the least if you have to undergo a thorough and universal background check.sure you are if you are willing to sacrifice one then the others are as meaningless to youNone. How did you conclude that by citing the constitution I was erasing rights?The right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
what other rights are you willing to give up
Your right to bear arms is not an absolute. If it were, there would be no restriction no on the type of arms you could bear. If the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American streets, if that firing system requires special restrictions to obtain, how can we see firing systems as dangerous to shoot up school kids?
Yo Nosmo, you stupid miserable dingle berry
Our right to bear arms is an UNALIENABLE ABSOLUTE - an extra-constitutional natural right.
How many Jews would have passed Hitler's background check?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
.
Your right to bear arms, to defend your life and your property will not be infringed in the least if you have to undergo a thorough and universal background check.sure you are if you are willing to sacrifice one then the others are as meaningless to youNone. How did you conclude that by citing the constitution I was erasing rights?The right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
what other rights are you willing to give up
Your right to bear arms is not an absolute. If it were, there would be no restriction on the type of arms you could bear. If the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American street. If that firing system requires special restrictions to obtain, how can we see firing systems as dangerous to shoot up school kids?
Exactly how do plan to enforce your universal background checks, there about 400 million guns in circulation?
.
View attachment 184509 This 6-year-old is marching in London today carrying a sign with the names of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre. "I am 6. So were they," the sign reads. cnn.it/2Gn3KZK
Bless the "ghetto kids"...
Fuck those assholes and their lies.
And they refused to interview a kid that actually lost a family member, unlike any of the Douglas five. All this is pure commie propaganda..
In your signature statement:They will BEG Father Government to strip them of constitutional rights granted by our founders...they will beg to be protected from themselves and the very same lowlifes they stand shoulder to shoulder with....haha
Think about that...you can’t make this shit up. Do we really need to wonder why nobody sane can take these Loons serious?
Every politically controlled educational system will inculcate the doctrine of state supremacy sooner or later. . . . Once that doctrine has been accepted, it becomes an almost superhuman task to break the stranglehold of the political power over the life of the citizen. It has had his body, property and mind in its clutches from infancy. An octopus would sooner release its prey.
A tax-supported, compulsory educational system is the complete model of the totalitarian state.
–Isabel Paterson, The God of the Machine (1943)
.
And they were so behaved.D.C. crowd much bigger than Trump inauguration. Estimated at 800,000.
And they were so behaved.D.C. crowd much bigger than Trump inauguration. Estimated at 800,000.
Your right to bear arms, to defend your life and your property will not be infringed in the least if you have to undergo a thorough and universal background check.sure you are if you are willing to sacrifice one then the others are as meaningless to youNone. How did you conclude that by citing the constitution I was erasing rights?what other rights are you willing to give up
Your right to bear arms is not an absolute. If it were, there would be no restriction on the type of arms you could bear. If the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American street. If that firing system requires special restrictions to obtain, how can we see firing systems as dangerous to shoot up school kids?
Exactly how do plan to enforce your universal background checks, there about 400 million guns in circulation?
.
f the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American street.
well actually that is not the standard the supreme court uses
it uses if it useful to the military or not
Fuck those assholes and their lies.
What's the problem - So you don't believe they're serving or vets, but they came out of crisis actor school?
The only difference between a military weapon and what these a-holes are using to shoot up schools and concerts is auto vs semi-auto.
A minor inconvenience overcome with any of several adaptations including a bump stock.
