State-Sponsored Censorship

[Nostra]

So what am I supposed to be outraged about now?

You? Nothing. Cuz you support Dimwingers blindly, even when they become totalitarian fucksticks.

 

[jc456]

So what am I supposed to be outraged about now?

I know you think I'm your gawd, but certainly you know that better than anyone.

 

[colfax_m]

I know you think I'm your gawd, but certainly you know that better than anyone.

You guys are addicted to outrage.

Psaki said they identify misinformation and send that info to Facebook. Big whoop.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

OHMYGODOHMYGOD DO YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT PSEUDO SCIENCE WILL HAVE TO BACK UP WITH FACTS

What pseudo-science? Masks don’t work or masks are necessary? We must all hunker down or we must selectively hunker down? Children are safe or children must wear masks? Those are all democrat/Fauci positions. Which are pseudo-science?
Meanwhile, censorship is censorship, selective or otherwise. All censorship is un-American.

 

[bendog]

What pseudo-science? Masks don’t work or masks are necessary? We must all hunker down or we must selectively hunker down? Children are safe or children must wear masks? Those are all democrat/Fauci positions. Which are pseudo-science?
Meanwhile, censorship is censorship, selective or otherwise. All censorship is un-American.

Thanks for proving the point.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Thanks for proving the point.

You didn’t respond to my post.

 

[EvMetro]

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”
‐--------
At a recent press conference, Jen Psaki said, “We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation. She went on to say that purveyors of “disinformation” must be suppressed and banned, not merely on Facebook but on all platforms.

 

[EvMetro]

Psaki said they identify misinformation and send that info to Facebook. Big whoop.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

 

[EvMetro]

Here is another article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

First, keep in mind the landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, where the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

Now see this article:

Biden Surgeon General Suggests Joe Rogan Podcast Should Be Censored: Big Tech ‘Has Important Role To Play’​

Biden Surgeon General Suggests Joe Rogan Podcast Should Be Censored: Big Tech ‘Has Important Role To Play’ | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

 

[EvMetro]

Another example of state sponsored censorship:

Jen Psaki

"Our hope is that all major tech platforms and all major news sources for that matter be responsible and be vigilant...we want every platform to continue doing more..."

White House Advocates for Big Tech to Censor Health Experts They Disagree With

townhall.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Here is a great article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

State-Sponsored Censorship

www.theepochtimes.com

For this reason, there should be thousands of lawsuits against FedGov including the Biden administration.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Here is a great article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

State-Sponsored Censorship

www.theepochtimes.com

By the way....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another example of state sponsored censorship:

Jen Psaki

"Our hope is that all major tech platforms and all major news sources for that matter be responsible and be vigilant...we want every platform to continue doing more..."

White House Advocates for Big Tech to Censor Health Experts They Disagree With

townhall.com

Will those who cooperate recieve a medal showing what they have done in the great fight for the motherland???

 

[EvMetro]

Since lefties will browse this thread looking for ways to support and defend government sponsored censorship, I'll leave this again:

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

It's funny to me that both dems and gopers use social media about equally. Differently to be sure

An oasis of bipartisanship: Republicans and Democrats distrust social media sites for political and election news

Both Democrats and Republicans express far more distrust than trust of social media sites as sources for political and election news.

www.journalism.org

Differences in How Democrats and Republicans Behave on Twitter

Entering the peak of the the 2020 election season, social media platforms are firmly entrenched as a venue for Americans to process campaign news and engage in various types of social activism. But not all Americans use these platforms in similar ways.

www.pewresearch.org

What's disturbing to me about the first link is that people who use social media as their primary/soul(_: newsource are the most misled.

You are not wrong, but you have to selected and dismissed is a very disturbing trend of government using the private sector as it bitch to do it spitting in violating individual rights.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”
‐--------
At a recent press conference, Jen Psaki said, “We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation. She went on to say that purveyors of “disinformation” must be suppressed and banned, not merely on Facebook but on all platforms.

How is that not government censorship of free speech?

Holy fuck. The people on here defending this shit do not deserve to live in the United States of America.

 

[EvMetro]

We should keep in mind what Biden has to say too:

“I make a special appeal to social media companies and media outlets — please deal with the misinformation and disinformation that’s on your shows. It has to stop,” the president told the nation.

JUST IN: Biden Tells Social Media Platforms to Crack Down on Free Speech - Todd Starnes

President Biden called on social media companies to crack down on what he called China Virus misinformation. “I make a […]

www.toddstarnes.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We should keep in mind what Biden has to say too:

“I make a special appeal to social media companies and media outlets — please deal with the misinformation and disinformation that’s on your shows. It has to stop,” the president told the nation.

JUST IN: Biden Tells Social Media Platforms to Crack Down on Free Speech - Todd Starnes

President Biden called on social media companies to crack down on what he called China Virus misinformation. “I make a […]

www.toddstarnes.com

Yes that 1973 SCOTUS case is getting more and more relevant and on point.

He's asking the private sector to do his bedding.

 

[EvMetro]

How is that not government censorship of free speech?

Holy fuck. The people on here defending this shit do not deserve to live in the United States of America.

Lefties like to claim that they are against government censorship, but where are they now?

 

[dblack]

Here is a great article about the state sponsored censorship problem that is defining our current political landscape.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

State-Sponsored Censorship

www.theepochtimes.com

This is a well written article that makes a sound argument with real evidence. Clearly EvMetro's account has been hacked.