States have obligation to ignore SCOTUS ruling on SSM

[NYcarbineer]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

Try committing this to memory:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

...and while you're at it have someone explain to you what it means.

 

[paddymurphy]

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

 

[SillyWabbit]

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Jack Booted Black Armor Clad Storm Troopers from Homeland Security tasering some elderly white Christian court clerk, and as she falls to the ground, they pillory her with nightsticks, before cuffing her hands behind her back, and drag her by her ankles towards their armored assault vehicle, her bloody head bouncing along the ground.

I'm telling you: there's an HBO miniseries here, I know it. This stuff writes itself.

 

[SillyWabbit]

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

 

[bendog]

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

Sofía Vergara as Satan the Temptress who misleads female court clerks into sexual relationships dooming their souls to perpetual torment

 

[JakeStarkey]

oh my

 

[paddymurphy]

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

Ok Church Lady.

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

There will be no troops. State Police and federal marshals will turn out any county officials who defy the law. Still good TV.

Well, maybe. It's not quite as dramatic as the Army waging war on states for defying Federal edict, but it would be a worthy diversion from Chopped--at least for a night or two.

Since they will be personally liable, in no time at all they will be back to issuing licenses, to gay and straight couples.

Now, don't be so negative. The potential for Great TV is staring right at us: imagine hundreds of good Christian souls across the nation standing up to the Tyranny of the Federal Government. Middle-aged white folk being hauled off to jail, unwilling to perform the Devil's work. That's some great TV--not as good as bullets flying and APC's rolling down Main Street--but a close second.

Standing up for what? Their demand that the secular law reflect their particular religious faith?

No, they'll be defying Tyranny and refusing to dance with Satan.

Google Image Result for http tntalk.files.wordpress.com 2008 08 church lady 1.jpg

 

[SillyWabbit]

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
Try committing this to memory:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

..

The key phrase in the Supremacy Clause is "made in pursuance there of". Only constitutional federal laws are supreme. And who decides that? The constitution doesn't say and that means, by the tenth amendment" the authority to rule whether a law is constitutional or not rests with the states. THINK

 

[Skylar]

[
Try committing this to memory:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

..

The key phrase in the Supremacy Clause is "made in pursuance there of". Only constitutional federal laws are supreme. And who decides that? The constitution doesn't say and that means, by the tenth amendment" the authority to rule whether a law is constitutional or not rests with the states. THINK

Ah, but you forget the 14th amendment. Which extends the Bill of Rights to the states and arms congress with the authority to compel obedience from the States and punish state officials who violate the Bill of Rights or their oath under the Federal Constitution.

That's a whole new batch of powers there. And its in the constitution.

 

[hazlnut]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

It's called Judicial Review, junior.

You failed civics again....

 

[Skylar]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

It's called Judicial Review, junior.

You failed civics again....

This is definitely one of those situations where it doesn't matter. Shooter can imagine whatever he wants. Same sex marriage is still legal. And none of his pseudo-legal babble has the slightest relevance to the law, the constitution, or anyone else's marriage.

The irrelevance of conservatives to this situation has yet to fully sink in with them.

It will.

 

[paddymurphy]

[
Try committing this to memory:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

..

The key phrase in the Supremacy Clause is "made in pursuance there of". Only constitutional federal laws are supreme. And who decides that? The constitution doesn't say and that means, by the tenth amendment" the authority to rule whether a law is constitutional or not rests with the states. THINK

The irony of you following each of your thoughtless, idiotic claims with the word "think" is so rich.

 

[candycorn]

Bring it on.

 

[007]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

SCOTUS has demonstrated that BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, they are JUST AS CORRUPT as the other two branches of government. So there is NO REASON that any state should take anything they decide as the LAST WORD.

The kenyan decides which laws he wants to follow, so states can decide which scotus rulings they want to follow. It appears that laws in this day and age are nothing more than SUGGESTIONS.

 

[paddymurphy]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

SCOTUS has demonstrated that BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, they are JUST AS CORRUPT as the other two branches of government. So there is NO REASON that any state should take anything they decide as the LAST WORD.

To dumber than dirt shits like you they are corrupt because they rule in a way your tiny little brain tells you is wrong.

 

[007]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

SCOTUS has demonstrated that BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, they are JUST AS CORRUPT as the other two branches of government. So there is NO REASON that any state should take anything they decide as the LAST WORD.

To dumber than dirt shits like you they are corrupt because they rule in a way your tiny little brain tells you is wrong.

LMFAO... find yourself a towel, pajama boy, your gash is dripping...

Man, you leftards are going to have a shitty day when Trump is elected president... HA HA HA HAAAAA.

 

[paddymurphy]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

SCOTUS has demonstrated that BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, they are JUST AS CORRUPT as the other two branches of government. So there is NO REASON that any state should take anything they decide as the LAST WORD.

To dumber than dirt shits like you they are corrupt because they rule in a way your tiny little brain tells you is wrong.

LMFAO... find yourself a towel, pajama boy, your gash is dripping...

Man, you leftards are going to have a shitty day when Trump is elected president... HA HA HA HAAAAA.

You have that wonderful combination of being a fucking moron but being too stupid to realize it.

 

[007]

Once again judges are repealing laws and they can't do that. The very first words of the federal constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

Federal judges are not allowed to write, rewrite, or repeal laws. Those are legislative powers.

SCOTUS has demonstrated that BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, they are JUST AS CORRUPT as the other two branches of government. So there is NO REASON that any state should take anything they decide as the LAST WORD.

To dumber than dirt shits like you they are corrupt because they rule in a way your tiny little brain tells you is wrong.

LMFAO... find yourself a towel, pajama boy, your gash is dripping...

Man, you leftards are going to have a shitty day when Trump is elected president... HA HA HA HAAAAA.

You have that wonderful combination of being a fucking moron but being too stupid to realize it.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAA.... POOR LITTLE... WHOEVER THE FUCK YOU ARE.... LMFAO!

What a pathetic little jackoff... lol:

 

[Politico]

Ignorant nonsense.

Supreme Court rulings are the law of the land, law the states are subject to.

No they are legislations from the bench.