Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So now you deny questioning the FACT that ALL semiautomatics fire only one round per trigger pull?Your posts tell me all I need to know.Are you really trying to say that shooting an Ar 15 at 46 rounds per minute will cause the barrel to melt down?
Now I know you are either trying to be stupid or are just plain stupid
I'm leaning towards the latter.
In 30 + years of shooting rifles I have never seen any rifle melt a barrel because of firing too fast.
As I have said many times, It is more capable of combat type firing than most. You can nibble around the edges and say "but what if" all you want, but you can't change that fact.
It's a distinction without a difference. And since you have no experience with these type of rifles you can't understand that
Not real sure how you would have any idea of what experience I might have in anything.
You didn't know that the single most important defining attribute of a semiautomatic firearm is that it only fires one round per trigger pull
Link?
So now you deny questioning the FACT that ALL semiautomatics fire only one round per trigger pull?Your posts tell me all I need to know.As I have said many times, It is more capable of combat type firing than most. You can nibble around the edges and say "but what if" all you want, but you can't change that fact.
It's a distinction without a difference. And since you have no experience with these type of rifles you can't understand that
Not real sure how you would have any idea of what experience I might have in anything.
You didn't know that the single most important defining attribute of a semiautomatic firearm is that it only fires one round per trigger pull
Link?
You said that semiautos advertise different rates of fire but you haven't posted any of those advertisements have you?
Not a matter of the guns capibility at all. A dude shot a president with a bolt gun, pretty crappy one to. A slew of gun regulations came after that, why was it a President was shot again? Then you had Bobby Kennedy. He also got shot after all the new gun laws, then Regan. Columbine happened and it happened like 7 years after Clinton made it law. All the rules and regulations you want had been inplace yet the shooting happened. Not a guns capability at all.
That's one of the goofiest things I ever heard. We wear seat belts, but people still die in car wrecks. Does that mean seat belts aren't a good idea?
people still die in car wrecks yet no call to ban them
A car is not designed and built for only one purpose. To kill.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
That's one of the goofiest things I ever heard. We wear seat belts, but people still die in car wrecks. Does that mean seat belts aren't a good idea?
people still die in car wrecks yet no call to ban them
A car is not designed and built for only one purpose. To kill.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
So I was wrong to say that a semiautoSo now you deny questioning the FACT that ALL semiautomatics fire only one round per trigger pull?Your posts tell me all I need to know.It's a distinction without a difference. And since you have no experience with these type of rifles you can't understand that
Not real sure how you would have any idea of what experience I might have in anything.
You didn't know that the single most important defining attribute of a semiautomatic firearm is that it only fires one round per trigger pull
Link?
You said that semiautos advertise different rates of fire but you haven't posted any of those advertisements have you?
Only in your mind dumb ass. You spouted that several times as if you thought it could prove your point. Now go away. ou were wrong. All guns are not exactly the same.
So now you deny questioning the FACT that ALL semiautomatics fire only one round per trigger pull?Your posts tell me all I need to know.It's a distinction without a difference. And since you have no experience with these type of rifles you can't understand that
Not real sure how you would have any idea of what experience I might have in anything.
You didn't know that the single most important defining attribute of a semiautomatic firearm is that it only fires one round per trigger pull
Link?
You said that semiautos advertise different rates of fire but you haven't posted any of those advertisements have you?
Only in your mind dumb ass. You spouted that several times as if you thought it could prove your point. Now go away. ou were wrong. All guns are not exactly the same.
people still die in car wrecks yet no call to ban them
A car is not designed and built for only one purpose. To kill.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
A car is not designed and built for only one purpose. To kill.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
people still die in car wrecks yet no call to ban them
A car is not designed and built for only one purpose. To kill.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Nothing gives me a bigger smile than when you PUTIN enablers call those on the left commies and then Stalinists in the space of two short sentences.
Not all guns are designed to kill, either. Shooting competition guns are designed solely to be as accurate as possible, not to kill.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Tiny niche market.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
That was kinda my point.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.
The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.
You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.
The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.
The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.
There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.
Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.
EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.
Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.
Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....
The same is not true of these weapons...
The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.
Lever action rifle....war weapon.
Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.
Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.
AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.
Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.
Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.
The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.
There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.
