Stephen Crowder, Top 5 AR-15 myths...banning them is a Trojan Horse...

[BULLDOG]

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....

The same is not true of these weapons...

The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.

Lever action rifle....war weapon.

Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.

Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.

AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.

Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

 

[BULLDOG]

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....

The same is not true of these weapons...

The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.

Lever action rifle....war weapon.

Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.

Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.

AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.

Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

And no Stoner designed rifle that is not capable of full auto has ever been used by our military in a war. None.

Again, Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode?

 

[Crixus]

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....

The same is not true of these weapons...

The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.

Lever action rifle....war weapon.

Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.

Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.

AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.

Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

And no Stoner designed rifle that is not capable of full auto has ever been used by our military in a war. None.

Mmm, Don’t know about that. Maybe not as a typical issue type weapon, but even now, sniper platforms are not suited to full auto and many sniper rifles are built semi auto. Maybe not back in the day but to be honest, an AR15 is not but an M16, just without a giggle switch. All the same parts just one more click foward. Hair splitting aside, It don’t matter. Hell, had Cruze had full auto he would probably have killed less people

 

[hadit]

The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.

That was kinda my point.

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Yet you don't ever define what it is about that format that the military favors.

 

[BULLDOG]

That was kinda my point.

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Yet you don't ever define what it is about that format that the military favors.

Why don't you ask them? They chose it as the goto military weapon. I trust their judgement.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The largest market for guns is either self defense or hunting. In both cases, being designed to kill is desirable.

That was kinda my point.

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

No they decided that in the trade off of combat where weight, durability, and many other variables come into play that a the M 16 was the best compromise for the rifle soldiers would carry into battle

No one and I mean no one thinks that an M 16 is a better killing weapon than the M2.

 

[WinterBorn]

Lie....the AR-15 is not a military weapon.....keep lying, we will keep correcting you....the AR-15 is a semi automatic, civilian and police rifle.....it was not a military weapon and has not been used in a war.....

The same is not true of these weapons...

The 6 shot revolver.....war weapon.

Lever action rifle....war weapon.

Bolt action rifle, current weapon of war.

Pump action shotgun....current weapon of war.

AR-15.....civiliain and police rifle, not a weapon of war.

Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

 

[BULLDOG]

That was kinda my point.

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

No they decided that in the trade off of combat where weight, durability, and many other variables come into play that a the M 16 was the best compromise for the rifle soldiers would carry into battle

No one and I mean no one thinks that an M 16 is a better killing weapon than the M2.

If you don't think a mass shooting is combat, you're nuts.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

No they decided that in the trade off of combat where weight, durability, and many other variables come into play that a the M 16 was the best compromise for the rifle soldiers would carry into battle

No one and I mean no one thinks that an M 16 is a better killing weapon than the M2.

If you don't think a mass shooting is combat, you're nuts.

It's not combat when no one is firing back at you

 

[Crixus]

That was kinda my point.

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

No they decided that in the trade off of combat where weight, durability, and many other variables come into play that a the M 16 was the best compromise for the rifle soldiers would carry into battle

No one and I mean no one thinks that an M 16 is a better killing weapon than the M2.

Yeah, it’s just the Illuminati who forces the US military to use the substandard puny mouse gun. But you are right. No one THINKS it is, they KNOW it will kill as fast as whatever an “M2” is, just not at two miles away . Apples and pumpkin comparison. But you do bring up a good point. .50 BMG is a good killing round and many civilians own and shoot them. Wonder why no one has shot up a school with one yet?

 

[BULLDOG]

Th AR15 was designed for the military, and slightly modified for civilian sales. As a gun nut, you should know that.

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

No they decided that in the trade off of combat where weight, durability, and many other variables come into play that a the M 16 was the best compromise for the rifle soldiers would carry into battle

No one and I mean no one thinks that an M 16 is a better killing weapon than the M2.

Yeah, it’s just the Illuminati who forces the US military to use the substandard puny mouse gun. But you are right. No one THINKS it is, they KNOW it will kill as fast as whatever an “M2” is, just not at two miles away . Apples and pumpkin comparison. But you do bring up a good point. .50 BMG is a good killing round and many civilians own and shoot them. Wonder why no one has shot up a school with one yet?

The M 16 will kill as fast as the M2

Dismissed

 

[WinterBorn]

Armalite designated their new version of the Stoner design as the AR-15. It was a selective fire rifle, as the military specifications required. Armalite then sold the design to Colt, who produced the semi-auto version and designated it the AR-15. The two rifles are different enough to not be the same gun. The simple difference of one being capable of full auto fire, and the other is not, is difference enough.

The AR-15 being discussed is NOT capable of full-auto. That was a basic requirement of the military. So the AR-15, in this context, has never been used in a war.

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

I don't think full auto is good for much of anything except cover fire. But that is not the point. If I buy an old GTO with a big V8, I can drive it slowly and get decent gas mileage. That does not make it a Prius.

 

[BULLDOG]

There is more that makes that platform better suited for combat than auto fire. An M16 used in semi mode still a military assault weapon, and essentially identical to an AR15.

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

I don't think full auto is good for much of anything except cover fire. But that is not the point. If I buy an old GTO with a big V8, I can drive it slowly and get decent gas mileage. That does not make it a Prius.

True. Has nothing to do with this, but I like those old cars too.

M16 in semi mode = military grade combat weapon
AR15 = M16in semi mode
therefore
AR15 = military grade combat weapon.

The bigger question is whether all rifles are the same. They are not.

 

[WinterBorn]

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

I don't think full auto is good for much of anything except cover fire. But that is not the point. If I buy an old GTO with a big V8, I can drive it slowly and get decent gas mileage. That does not make it a Prius.

True. Has nothing to do with this, but I like those old cars too.

M16 in semi mode = military grade combat weapon
AR15 = M16in semi mode
therefore
AR15 = military grade combat weapon.

The bigger question is whether all rifles are the same. They are not.

An M16 is capable of full auto fire. That is a fundamental part of its design. Anything that cannot fire full auto is not an M16, no matter how similar they are. The US Military has never carried an AR into war.

 

[WinterBorn]

But the fact that the M16 CAN fire full auto makes it a different rifle. Period. When Eugene Stoner designed the rifle for military use, it was designed as a selective fire rifle. Producing one, even if identical in every other way, that is only capable of semi-auto fire makes it a different rifle.

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

I don't think full auto is good for much of anything except cover fire. But that is not the point. If I buy an old GTO with a big V8, I can drive it slowly and get decent gas mileage. That does not make it a Prius.

True. Has nothing to do with this, but I like those old cars too.

M16 in semi mode = military grade combat weapon
AR15 = M16in semi mode
therefore
AR15 = military grade combat weapon.

The bigger question is whether all rifles are the same. They are not.

Your comparison of the M16 and the AR15 is not the point? Cool.

No, all rifles are not the same. I don't think anyone has said that they are. In fact, you are the one trying to argue that an M16 and an AR are the same.

 

[BULLDOG]

Is a M16 less of a weapon in semi mode? Only an idiot would only use auto mode and run out of ammo that quickly.

An M16 is specifically a selective fire rifle. The US military has never used a semi-auto version in war.

Come on. You really think the M16 is ONLY used in full auto mode? That would be just nuts. The military emphasizes good management of ammo. Wouldn't do much good to run out of ammo in the first minute or two.

I don't think full auto is good for much of anything except cover fire. But that is not the point. If I buy an old GTO with a big V8, I can drive it slowly and get decent gas mileage. That does not make it a Prius.

True. Has nothing to do with this, but I like those old cars too.

M16 in semi mode = military grade combat weapon
AR15 = M16in semi mode
therefore
AR15 = military grade combat weapon.

The bigger question is whether all rifles are the same. They are not.

An M16 is capable of full auto fire. That is a fundamental part of its design. Anything that cannot fire full auto is not an M16, no matter how similar they are. The US Military has never carried an AR into war.

You are certainly allowed to have your opinion, but

Is the AR-15 a ‘Weapon of War’?
Is the AR-15 a ‘Weapon of War’?
Most of the time, the distinction is of little practical importance: these semiautomatic rifles are ubiquitous, widely available for sale in gun shops across much of America. But on Tuesday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, came down squarely one side of this debate, with big implications for how states regulate assault weapons. In a 10-4 decision, the federal court upheld Maryland’s 2013 assault weapons ban, finding that guns like the AR-15 are weapons of war, and thus American civilians don’t have an unfettered right to buy and own them under the Second Amendment.

 

[hadit]

Not really. Go back and read. You said the only thing an AR 15 can do is kill people. Fine, they was the idea when Eugene Stoner designed it. What you Fail to recognize is that ever since the us has been a country civilians typically used the exact same gun. For excample, the tommy gun not to mention the old bolt action Springfield’s, the M1 Garand the M1A (M15) the Krag Jurgenson the trap door Springfield conversion, not to mention a shit ton of hand guns and so on. You kind of changed what your implication was it seems which is that the AR15 is only a people killer.

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Yet you don't ever define what it is about that format that the military favors.

Why don't you ask them? They chose it as the goto military weapon. I trust their judgement.

You've been saying they chose it because it was the best at killing the most people, but you really don't know why they chose it, do you?

 

[BULLDOG]

You're adding words to my remarks. I said killing is the reason that gun was designed. Misrepresenting my words is the same as lying. Quit it.

Wasn’t trying to put words In your mouth. My bad, that shit is worse then lying.Point is, guns are obviously used solely for killing. And from the fist gun ever made to what we have now, every single gun ever made was designed to kill other people.


EVEN the AR15. But it is no more deadly then a Remington 700 in any caliber. It just ain’t.

Any gun will kill. Some are just more suited to killing as many as possible in as short a time as possible than others. Our military decided that the AR15/M16 format was the most effective for that. I trust their judgement.

Yet you don't ever define what it is about that format that the military favors.

Why don't you ask them? They chose it as the goto military weapon. I trust their judgement.

You've been saying they chose it because it was the best at killing the most people, but you really don't know why they chose it, do you?

I know lots of reasons why they did. The fact that they did is all that matters. If you disagree with their choice, I suggest you contact them.

 

[DrLove]

Nothing gives me a bigger smile than when you PUTIN enablers call those on the left commies and then Stalinists in the space of two short sentences.

Good point. It was really shameful the way we colluded with the Kremlin in cooking up that Dossier in an attempt to rig the election, the way we rigged our primary. Then the way we used the DOJ and the FBI to commit treason by spying on the opposition campaign. Then the way we were so arrogant that we didn't even cover our tracks, so certain were we that the fix was in and it was "in the bag."

You Stalinists sure are smart....

Uncensored and 2aguy dine in a Parallel Universe