- Mar 23, 2010
- 43,678
- 14,555
But not Breitbart? Trying to hamstring the competition?White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon reportedly is calling for regulation on tech giants such as Google and Facebook.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
But not Breitbart? Trying to hamstring the competition?White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon reportedly is calling for regulation on tech giants such as Google and Facebook.
Do people view Breitbart as a competitor to Google or Facebook? Does Breitbart have a social component I don't know about? Are Google and Facebook doing original reporting?But not Breitbart? Trying to hamstring the competition?White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon reportedly is calling for regulation on tech giants such as Google and Facebook.
He wants to regulate them because of their influence, but isn't that what Breitbart peddles, too?Do people view Breitbart as a competitor to Google or Facebook? Does Breitbart have a social component I don't know about? Are Google and Facebook doing original reporting?But not Breitbart? Trying to hamstring the competition?White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon reportedly is calling for regulation on tech giants such as Google and Facebook.
Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
That Bannon is a hypocrite. I thought that would be obvious.So does NBC, CBS, and ABC, and they're all regulated by the FCC. What's your point?Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
That Bannon is a hypocrite. I thought that would be obvious.So does NBC, CBS, and ABC, and they're all regulated by the FCC. What's your point?Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
You're deflecting from your own topic, because you realize I'm right. You can't defend Bannon, so you have to bring up Obama. Lame!!!You don't understand the true meaning of the word "hypocrite" until you take a closer look at the slimebags who inhabited Obama's administration.That Bannon is a hypocrite. I thought that would be obvious.So does NBC, CBS, and ABC, and they're all regulated by the FCC. What's your point?Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
You're probably right about his motivations, but it doesn't change the fact that Breitbart and Facebook are not competitors. Facebook and Google facilitate the spread of information, whereas Breitbart creates content out of information. I suppose I see what you're trying to say, but I just don't think it works. Facebook and Google are ubiquitous in basically all aspects of online life, whereas Breitbart is very narrow.He wants to regulate them because of their influence, but isn't that what Breitbart peddles, too?Do people view Breitbart as a competitor to Google or Facebook? Does Breitbart have a social component I don't know about? Are Google and Facebook doing original reporting?But not Breitbart? Trying to hamstring the competition?White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon reportedly is calling for regulation on tech giants such as Google and Facebook.
Now here I think you undermine your own argument and make Bannon's alleged argument. If Breitbart is forced to sit at the Google and/or Facebook table with everyone else I don't think you can compare it as a competitor to them. If Breitbart were a competitor to Facebook it wouldn't need a Facebook page to increase traffic and engagement with its content. That would all be done in-house.Oh no? It has a Facebook page and allows for comments to their articles. That's being involved in the social media game, IMO.Breitbart doesn't run a social media site.
It basically has. The market has responded with things like Netflix, Hulu and Youtube in lashing back at the veritable monopoly that the cable companies have had.Particularly cable companies. Their monopolies need to end.Utilities?
Stupid idea. Break them up into little pieces so they cannot monopolize a market. It has been done before...from rail roads to oil companies to telecomunications companies to airlines...this is not new stuff.
Many people are still dependent upon them for internet connections. They carve out little niches in markets and then allow tiny little DSL companies to run internet on existing phone lines, but if you want to purchase a broadband connection, you're stuck with the cable company monopoly.It basically has. The market has responded with things like Netflix, Hulu and Youtube in lashing back at the veritable monopoly that the cable companies have had.Particularly cable companies. Their monopolies need to end.Utilities?
Stupid idea. Break them up into little pieces so they cannot monopolize a market. It has been done before...from rail roads to oil companies to telecomunications companies to airlines...this is not new stuff.
There is a huge shift away from them in general because you can get your content on these alternative sources.
By regulate does he mean tax?
Since it has been brought up by Stevearino, along with his 44% tax on rich folks...
But they are not monopolies and he therefore couldn't...With Microsoft they would have a better chance...By regulate does he mean tax?
No, he means regulate as in break them up.
Since it has been brought up by Stevearino, along with his 44% tax on rich folks...
Yep.
Steve Bannon Pushing for 44 Percent Marginal Tax Rate on the Very Rich