Still to date no US gov't agency has been allowed to examine the hacked servers.

[tinydancer]

This begs the question why not? The libs are still running around saying that the Russians hacked the election and yet there's no proof.

Who can take CrowdStrike's word for it? They are the company hired by the Clinton campaign who passed on their findings to the FBI. And yet that's where we are.

What's wrong with this picture? A serious international incident and the intelligence community just took a third party's word for it that it was Russians.

 

[The Original Tree]

Absolutely True. The FBI asked to look at it and The DNC refuses to let them see the server.

Why didn't Obama Subpoena it?

Because the servers weren't hacked.

If this was so important to preserving National Security why did not one Government Agency Force the DNC to let someone look at it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

td, links please

 

[tinydancer]

td, links please

Here you go. Good write up at the Hill. This was revealed in January and the intelligence community never bothered after they issued their report based on CrowdStrikes report.

That's just insane that the US government considering all the internation implications did not examine those servers.

FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report
By Katie Bo Williams - 01/04/17 07:29 PM EST

FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

 

[usmbguest5318]

The libs are still running around saying that the Russians hacked the election

That is not at all the claim.

 

[miketx]

Too many secrets.

 

[Coyote]

What's wrong with CrowdStrike?

 

[tinydancer]

What's wrong with CrowdStrike?

Considering this was considered an "act of war against America" don't you think just for one moment that an American Intelligence agency should be involved first hand?

Rather than an IT firm hired by the Democrats? You know just to remove any question of bias? All of this has resulted in committees and inquiries banning Russians in the country and not one freaking agency could do their jobs?

 

[whitehall]

Wikileaks indicates that the CIA has hacked various foreign (and domestic?) entities and left fake evidence indicating that the hacks come from some other country. Is it possible that the CIA is responsible for the alleged Russian hacking? I'm still waiting for someone in the U.S. government "intelligence" network to take the alleged pedophile angle in Podesta's emails seriously.

 

[tinydancer]

Wikileaks indicates that the CIA has hacked various foreign (and domestic?) entities and left fake evidence indicating that the hacks come from some other country. Is it possible that the CIA is responsible for the alleged Russian hacking? I'm still waiting for someone in the U.S. government "intelligence" network to take the alleged pedophile angle in Podesta's emails seriously.

What's killing me is that you are about to have all these hearings with testimony, but no one in the government has examined the servers. Not one intelligence agency. So how can you have testimony with no first hand evidence.

Does the intelligence community now just go on a third party's say so? Or how they you know feel in their gut?

This is crazy.