Stormy Daniels Is Another Mueller Folly

[Ricky LIbtardo]

Can you believe the fake moral outrage over the Stormy Daniels "matter"?

Rudy made it perfectly clear. It was a private "matter". But, like all of Mueller's other escapades, it's just a way to trap Cohen and get Trump on a perjury charge.

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Obama campaign to pay $375,000 fine for omitting some donor’s names in 2008

 

[JoeB131]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

 

[JoeMoma]

Stormy Daniel’s fake boobs are too big.

 

[JoeB131]

Stormy Daniel’s fake boobs are too big.

That and she looks like Ivanka.... Trump even said so.

 

[BULLDOG]

Stormy Daniel’s fake boobs are too big.

And shaped more like a plastic milk jug than a boob.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

You mean like that $850,000 "expense" Bill Clintoon paid Paula Jones?

 

[JoeMoma]

potato

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Stormy Daniel’s fake boobs are too big.

Feel free to burn your man card!

 

[Care4all]

Can you believe the fake moral outrage over the Stormy Daniels "matter"?

Rudy made it perfectly clear. It was a private "matter". But, like all of Mueller's other escapades, it's just a way to trap Cohen and get Trump on a perjury charge.

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Obama campaign to pay $375,000 fine for omitting some donor’s names in 2008

if that's all it is, then I agree, pay the fine....

But I doubt that's all there is... a search warrant would not have been granted for Cohen and his businesses simply for a single campaign finance infraction.... imo.... so, we will see...

 

[eagle1462010]

On the one hand.............Mueller turns over the Stormy case to the 10th because it's out of his scope of investigation.

On the other hand.......Sends questions to Trump that ask questions about Stormy............

 

[BULLDOG]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

You mean like that $850,000 "expense" Bill Clintoon paid Paula Jones?

That didn't come from campaign money, but it was reported.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Stormy Daniel’s fake boobs are too big.

That and she looks like Ivanka.... Trump even said so.

They are just about the same age

 

[BULLDOG]

On the one hand.............Mueller turns over the Stormy case to the 10th because it's out of his scope of investigation.

On the other hand.......Sends questions to Trump that ask questions about Stormy............

You understand that the Stormy Daniels case is in state court, and Mueller has nothing to do with it, don't you?

 

[eagle1462010]

On the one hand.............Mueller turns over the Stormy case to the 10th because it's out of his scope of investigation.

On the other hand.......Sends questions to Trump that ask questions about Stormy............

You understand that the Stormy Daniels case is in state court, and Mueller has nothing to do with it, don't you?

You understand that the questions leaked asked Stormy questions to Trump don't you.....................

 

[Care4all]

On the one hand.............Mueller turns over the Stormy case to the 10th because it's out of his scope of investigation.

On the other hand.......Sends questions to Trump that ask questions about Stormy............

The only thing I can see as a possible connection is....
His affinity and love for prostitutes, porn stars, and playmates, could be the Kompromat that the Russians have on him....Trump willing to pay to play, so to hide his indiscretions....could be connected to Russia and Trump's bold and un-bashful, love for Putin...?

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

You mean like that $850,000 "expense" Bill Clintoon paid Paula Jones?

That didn't come from campaign money, but it was reported.

Ya, we know. $400,000 of it just magically appeared from a fund Hillarious reported had $100,000 in it.

 

[BULLDOG]

On the one hand.............Mueller turns over the Stormy case to the 10th because it's out of his scope of investigation.

On the other hand.......Sends questions to Trump that ask questions about Stormy............

You understand that the Stormy Daniels case is in state court, and Mueller has nothing to do with it, don't you?

You understand that the questions leaked asked Stormy questions to Trump don't you.....................

I didn't read the questions, but you understand those questions were written by Seculow to help Trump prepare for what they might ask him, don't you? Those were never questions proposed by Mueller.

 

[rightwinger]

Can you believe the fake moral outrage over the Stormy Daniels "matter"?

Rudy made it perfectly clear. It was a private "matter". But, like all of Mueller's other escapades, it's just a way to trap Cohen and get Trump on a perjury charge.

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Obama campaign to pay $375,000 fine for omitting some donor’s names in 2008

Stormy happened....just ask Melania

It is not fake news but news that Trump paid to keep from being released

An act that may be illegal

 

[Care4all]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

You mean like that $850,000 "expense" Bill Clintoon paid Paula Jones?

That didn't come from campaign money, but it was reported.

Ya, we know. $400,000 of it just magically appeared from a fund Hillarious reported had $100,000 in it.

It didn't come from Hillary?

It came from a Bill Clinton 'legal defense' fund....

 

[BULLDOG]

Now, to all the fuming libtardos. Even if the FEC determined Trump's payment to Stormy to be a campaign contribution, Trump can contribute as much of his own money as he wants to his campaign. So that fake outrage is a big fat nothing burger. If the FEC determines it was a violation for not reporting the payment, it would just be a fine.

What, you say. That's a crime.

Well, I'm glad you brought that up.

Obama was fined $375,000 for not reporting campaign contributions. Didn't bother the libtardos then, so what seems to be the problem now?

Not really the same thing. this was an expense that wasn't reported, not a donation.

You mean like that $850,000 "expense" Bill Clintoon paid Paula Jones?

That didn't come from campaign money, but it was reported.

Ya, we know. $400,000 of it just magically appeared from a fund Hillarious reported had $100,000 in it.

But Hilary is not an answer to every question, even if you want it to be.